Most Based Comments

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘

You seem like you're proud of yourself for driving in the passing lane when you passed few cars. Pass a car and get back in the right lane. WTF (125)

Washington state law says that I can stay in the left-hand lane as long as I am overcoming cars. I was consistently faster than the traffic in the right hand lane. I was going well over the speed limit. Also, it's not actually illegal to pass on the right hand side. It's just poor taste. But you can see from the video very clearly that him passing on the right hand side only allowed him to get one car ahead, and perhaps the blame should be placed on the silver car in front of me for not moving over so that I could pass them myself. (-31)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘

Goddarn this video was so pointlessly long. Slower traffic keep right dude. Overreaction from the jeep but don't just sit in the left lane. (92)

I was passing everyone. You're just wrong. If they stayed behind me, we would have gone faster once we got over the hill and the car in front of us moved over. This man is insane, and if you feel any sympathy for him, you're insane too. ❤️ (-34)

Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔘

He is an unhinged peepee, but you belonged a lane over based on how many people you didn't pass.Stay right unless passing. (89)

I was going faster than the right lane, and the silver car shown on the front-facing camera was in front of me the whole time. I refuse to tailgate just to get them to move over. The silver car was also going faster than the right lane. It was also an incline. You're just wrong, oregontittysucker (-38)

Angriest Comments

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

Still passing? Move over! If i was driving 90 I would let that guy pass. Then you say he is driving slow when there is a car in front of him. The other guy is the really idiot though. You don't know who's the other driver. Dont play yourself, you would have probably went to jail for assault if you ran him over (not really sure though).No one is perfect we all do stupid shit driving. Accept your "stupid" and don't let someone else's "stupid" get you killed. Stay safe out there. (8)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

The guy is an obvious douche, and should not have reacted this way. But you were definitely left lane camping. I really wish people would realize how dangerous and rude this is. The left lane is a passing lane, and if you aren't passing you should move over. Left lane camping is proven to be more dangerous than speeding, and it causes traffic jams. It is mind blowing to me to see a long line of cars in the left lane following one slow car that won't move over, then in the right lane there is no one. I lived in Germany for a few years and people take this seriously due to the fast speeds on the Autobahn. Again, this guy is an absolute idiot, but you were in the wrong too. (47)

Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡

OP is the one in the wrong here about 70 times. He slows down when passing then speeds up when clear, literally the worst kind of driver on the road. (45)

Drivers who lose emotional regulation to the point where they stop and get out of their vehicle on active highways are worse. This is how multi car accidents happen. This is how people get killed.Drivers who act on their aggression, the ones who act on their road rage... They are much worse drivers than folks using the passing lane improperly.I don't understand how you came to your conclusion. (22)

Biggest Lolcow: /u/PaPilot98

Score: 🐮🐮🔘🔘🔘

Number of comments: 18

Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

Maximum angriness: 😡😡🔘🔘🔘

Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘

NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!

autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramautists. Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion

!bardfinn

https://bsky.app/profile/pennyoaken.bsky.social/post/3kukxrmwh752a

Now she's on MSNBC blaming Cheeto Hitler

Got one perm and temp today and a lot of warnings.

I'm going to be sending out messages to these naughty redditors to let them know their behavior will not be tolerated ;)

Perm Bans:

Temp Bans:

Warnings:

‘only white girls..I love girls your type..your color’ pic.twitter.com/vt5nYLK0M9

— The Daily Sneed™ (@Tr00peRR) June 9, 2024

>their own c*ntries

this was in Toronto btw lmao

also lol@him being called joo when his profile is like this

joo paranoia is one of my favourite part of terminally online schizos

anyway

meanwhile foid in question:

oh those silly wignats

There's no context to this contest beyond "post whatever" but I did only pick the things that personally amused me, so if your "submission" isn't here it's because it failed to meet the extremely low bar of making me exhale a larger-than-normal amount of air out of my face when I saw it. Sucks to suck straggot. There's also a super secret easter egg hidden within the contest. See if you can spot it!

As if we ladies with small breasts didn't have it hard enough.

We persevered through adolescences marred by a devastating lack of top-growth, endured comings-of-age minimized by the jabs of our bustier peers and, as adults, find ourselves woefully relegated to Victoria's Secret's young teen “Pink” section, from where we covetously eye the perfectly impractical lacy/strappy/barely-there/disgustingly-provocative underthings so accessibly sized for plumper patrons. Since childhood, men, magazines and our mothers have ridiculed our relative lack of endowment, so maybe it was only a matter of time before whole governments made our bitty busts their business.

The first to do so: Australia, whose government censors are banning adult publications and films that feature women with small breasts in an effort to—get this—curb pedophilia. Now I'm no porn apologist, but I rather dislike having my body categorically likened to a child's. (As I always say: It ain't much, but it sure ain't nothin'!) And it seems obvious to me that an industry founded on fake tits, fake orgasms and the general fictionalizing of women's sexuality is only made worse by censors that further restrict it from realistically depicting women's bodies, however flat-chested those bodies may be.

Maureen O'Connor of Gawker sums up the ban's implicit sexism pretty succinctly:

Obviously, the proposed ban would not reduce smut so much as codify an arbitrary set of female sexual ideals, which is a terrible idea for many reasons.

Moreover (and at the risk of re-hashing that age-old Asian fetish debate), I have to wonder how a country surrounded by Asia and with an Asian population larger than that in the U.S. gets off discriminating against the oh-so-petite. Perhaps a better way to discourage pedophilia would be to check IDs—or, I don't know, find some way to prevent dirty old Aussie men from traveling to the Phils and Thailand to be p-dophiles over there. (For the record: I used to live in Angeles City, the s*x tour capital of the Philippines, so I know who you are!)

In closing, thank you, Australia, for letting me know that I'm not woman enough for you. Lest I become confused at a later date, perhaps you should also consider banning women under 5'3″ or with a shoe size below size 6 1/2.

In the meantime, I'll be doing my part to curb American pedophilia by lobbying to have men with small peepeees banned from bars.