Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao !codecels

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17272006149242635.webp

Remove the code pls saar :marseyphonecall:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17272006260069757.webp

REMOVE IT NOW

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17272006475198474.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

DO NOT REDEEM THE CODE

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the dude doesn't know how git works, eh? lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's most engineers these days. The number of times idiotic motherlovers push secrets but it's ok because they are going to delete them later so they disappear is absurd.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What tards. I just revoke them (when I remember)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

well u can force push it gone... maybe at least. idk if github keeps track of the last HEADs, or if so, makes them accessable externally. if both of those were true then u couldn't force push them gone.

and jeeez i learned that the 1st yr of using git back as a junior engineer.

this industry is like 95% redundant fluff. basically a total economic tragedy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The best part is it is almost completely impossible to actually remove code from Github

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is force push not a thing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It remains on the PR history. You have to delete the entire repo and then republish to get rid of them.

Also obviously doesn't impact forks. GitHub support can force kill commits but you have to either pay them their Jew gold or pay your Jew lawyer to threaten them for that to happen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Winamp!

Winamp!

Winamp!

It really whips the llamas butt

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Baaaah :marseyllama:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So basically they want the codecel community to maintain and improve it for free, but without actually giving any rights away. Good luck with that.

:#marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Still using winamp3, classic skin :marseyboomer:

The same installer .exe I downloaded back in high school or whenever


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kino

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao. I was excited months ago (especially considering the line of shady owners and the very specific wording they used for the upcoming release:marseychuddance: :marseyexcited:) but completely forgot it was coming out. It's even funnier than I thought :killherkillher:

It's like what the Aseprite guy did. :marseytiny1:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Again, foobarchads win by having r-slurred competition :gigachad2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like foobar too :marseyjamming:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LGTM

Snapshots:

https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp:

Releasing source code which is meant to be proprietary:

2:

releasing source code meant for a subscription:

Releasing it under a license that may violate GitHub TOS (Potential Reportmaxxing opportunity :marseyreportmaxxer2: ?):

lel:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41636804:

https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/102535233:

https://old.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fogjjg/winamp_releases_source_code_with_nonfloss_license/:

https://old.reddit.com/r/madlads/comments/1fog97h/madlads_are_forking_new_winamp_source_code_even/:

#Winamp:

https://t.co/TX3sOaSbS5:

pic.twitter.com/ZvDeKiJ1uO:

September 24, 2024:

https://lemmy.world/post/20137876?scrollToComments=true:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.