I think the only movie I have ever seen that was that bad was the Zack Snyder suicide squad movie. It was a total waste of 2 hours

!Meowr !fakecels

I am sorry I let you all down.

Text is taken from list 11 on this page.

https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/audio/harvard.html

Ye has now made an “HH” swastika shirt, likely standing for “Hail Hitler.”

Yeezy sales have nearly doubled since Ye returned to X.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/48AK8zEnRz

— AF Post (@AFpost) February 8, 2025

who wants to see

Beaver W pic.twitter.com/qO8kvgQujW

— Dudes Posting Their W’s (@DudespostingWs) February 6, 2025

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/c4g3ve3ll21o

!hibernians

I hate it I hate it I hate it. 90% of our student body relies on it to complete their work. There is near to no originality in their writing and work. We are nearing complete dependence on it from some students. AI checkers work sometimes but students just use AI then switch the words around to avoid this.

I know the upside that it has for us as a society, but we are losing creativity and gumption with every improvement. I hurt for them. I used to read beautiful student writing and didn't have to question if it was written by a program. Now I am forced into skepticism. How can we lose so much with advancement?

/u/Academic_Let_1043

What are you actually losing? Oh no kids are cheating? Kids always cheated! This is the calculator argument all over again

just click the lil 3 dots by a comment or thread and then click votes

find out who has the right takes and fall in love with them

find out who doesnt and is too afraid to say so outright and call that snake OUT

https://old.reddit.com/r/redscarepod/comments/124b7yc/i_hate_phoebe_bridgers/

I feel like #CaptainAmericaBraveNewWorld is a film people are going to watch themselves today, and realize that it’s not nearly as bad as the RT score suggests or the narrative around it has been

It’s an Iron Man 2 level film, an enjoyable cohesive film, that’s also a bit messy pic.twitter.com/tlTaEGjyio

— Rayyan*🇵🇸 (@RayyanTCG) February 13, 2025

Clearly my kind is not welcome here. You will all regret this.

OpenAI says it has found evidence that Chinese artificial intelligence start-up DeepSeek used the US company's proprietary models to train its own open-source competitor, as concerns grow over a potential breach of intellectual property.

The San-Francisco-based ChatGPT maker told the Financial Times it had seen some evidence of 'distillation', a technique used by developers to obtain better performance on smaller models by using outputs from larger, more capable models. This allows them to achieve similar results on specific tasks at a much lower cost.

OpenAI declined to comment further on details of its evidence. Its terms of service state users cannot "copy" any of its services or "use output to develop models that compete with OpenAI".