Would you tolerate a DM who places Strength caps on female characters?
9 2019-10-31 by Danny__Treadname
Get the hell out. Seriously, the only reason anybody would do this is blatant sexism. Any appeals to realism are plainly ludicrous given how poor D&D realism is, even before getting into the deliberately fantastic stuff. Not that appeals to realism for enforced gender modifiers is ever appropriate, it's just extra ludicrous in a game where you can stabilize dying people by drowning them or move an item at relativistic speeds simply by passing it along to others.
Also, why would you even ask about the scenario? It's just such an obvious no-no that it shouldn't need asking.
8 comments
1 AutoModerator 2019-10-31
Horny? Chat live with hot autists in your area today with DeuxCHAT
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-10-31
find the gay person:
👩🏻👩🏼👩🏽👩🏾👩🏿👩🏻👩🏼👩🏽👩🏾👩🏿 👨🏻👨🏼👨🏽👨🏾👨🏿👨🏻👨🏼👨🏽👨🏾👨🏿 👦🏽👦🏾👦🏿👦🏻👦🏼👦🏽👦🏾👦🏿
can’t find them?
that’s because they live among us, looking like normal people. the only real difference is they’re going to hell
Snapshots:
Would you tolerate a DM who places ... - archive.org, archive.today
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/show... - archive.org, archive.today
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Danny__Treadname 2019-10-31
https://1d4chan.org/wiki/File:Interspecies_crossbreeding.jpg
1 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2019-10-31
Dungeons and dragons is dumb.
1 JimmyNuttrin 2019-10-31
Community was the only acceptable form of Dungeons and Dragons
1 NeverAskAnyQuestions 2019-10-31
I don't know what's gayer - using muh realism in a children's fantasy game to justify being a prick to your female players, or getting so mad about that you post about it on reddit
1 YoshFromYsraelDntBan 2019-10-31
2
1 SchnupfStaffel 2019-10-31
No.