While human prostitutes are mired in legal red tape, doll brothels don’t have to worry about complying with any restrictive legislation. It’s as if sex dolls and sex robots have more rights and freedom than actual human sex workers
It’s as if sex dolls and sex robots have more rights and freedom
She's so wrong, she's completely making a false equivalence. She's talking like the rubber molds in the shop are humans with benefits. They aren't paid humans, they have no benefits. The fuckbot shop employees are the poor bastards douching them out and sterilizing them for the next guy.
I can't think of any laws regarding how or where you run an innie-dildo rental shop.
Someone in Vegas told the truth, and got downvoted for it.
Cut the prices honey, if you want to compete with superior product
Hoes literally mad at techno pussy (X24).
Years from now when immersive VR and lifelike AI are mainstream, you'll see thots moaning en masse about the degeneracy of a society that doesn't let them get their fuck on with men that have money to give them.
It's not even that. Her whole premise is retarded. Using that standard, any guy who nuts to any amount of porn, is "alienated".
Actually by her reasoning, any guy who nuts at all, without having a woman supervising the process is "alienated from healthy sexual experiences with real women".
Men fucking other men...sorry, no supervising pussy involved, so they're alienated from healthy sexual experiences with women. Time to fire up the Pence clamps and get those fuckers healthy again.
Wonder if she'd consider some fat wine aunt pushing a vibe into her clam, while fantasizing about a guy who'd never ever touch her, to be healthy.
Bet she'd call it something like "women taking control of their own sexuality", and a good thing that guys aren't in the picture.
And that doesn't even touch the special kind of bean-tingling porn that's overwhelmingly loved by women: the romance novel, which is definitely a realistic look at relationships and is in no way designed to only present men made to fufill women's fantasies rather than be realistic.
Not to mention the laughable idea that every women is universally capable of delivering "healthy sexual experiences" to men they're fucking in the first place.
Or even that all women in the world are capable of delivering healthy human interaction to men in general.
14 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-02-01
Horny? Chat live with hot autists in your area today with DeuxCHAT
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4 Maintainyoursafety 2020-02-01
I for one fully support her in having women legally classified as objects
1 SnapshillBot 2020-02-01
This wouldn't have happened if Comrade Stalin was running things.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 CroatianSAMCrew 2020-02-01
idiot
1 AnotherClosetAtheist 2020-02-01
topkek
1 SlowFatHusky 2020-02-01
She's not wrong. Different businesses have different legal requirements. Doll brothels are more like video rental places than service providers.
1 AnotherClosetAtheist 2020-02-01
She's so wrong, she's completely making a false equivalence. She's talking like the rubber molds in the shop are humans with benefits. They aren't paid humans, they have no benefits. The fuckbot shop employees are the poor bastards douching them out and sterilizing them for the next guy.
I can't think of any laws regarding how or where you run an innie-dildo rental shop.
1 VanillaReign 2020-02-01
If she wasn't, she probably wouldn't still be hooking.
1 Tardigrade_Sex_Party 2020-02-01
Someone in Vegas told the truth, and got downvoted for it.
Hoes literally mad at techno pussy (X24).
Years from now when immersive VR and lifelike AI are mainstream, you'll see thots moaning en masse about the degeneracy of a society that doesn't let them get their fuck on with men that have money to give them.
1 AnotherClosetAtheist 2020-02-01
From the newspaper link
"Sex worker Allissa said sex-bots alienate men "from healthy sexual experiences with real women"
Because transactional sex with no intention of forming a bond is a totally healthy way to experience "real women."
1 Tardigrade_Sex_Party 2020-02-01
It's not even that. Her whole premise is retarded. Using that standard, any guy who nuts to any amount of porn, is "alienated".
Actually by her reasoning, any guy who nuts at all, without having a woman supervising the process is "alienated from healthy sexual experiences with real women".
Men fucking other men...sorry, no supervising pussy involved, so they're alienated from healthy sexual experiences with women. Time to fire up the Pence clamps and get those fuckers healthy again.
Wonder if she'd consider some fat wine aunt pushing a vibe into her clam, while fantasizing about a guy who'd never ever touch her, to be healthy.
Bet she'd call it something like "women taking control of their own sexuality", and a good thing that guys aren't in the picture.
And that doesn't even touch the special kind of bean-tingling porn that's overwhelmingly loved by women: the romance novel, which is definitely a realistic look at relationships and is in no way designed to only present men made to fufill women's fantasies rather than be realistic.
Not to mention the laughable idea that every women is universally capable of delivering "healthy sexual experiences" to men they're fucking in the first place.
Or even that all women in the world are capable of delivering healthy human interaction to men in general.
1 AnotherClosetAtheist 2020-02-01
pussy gatekeeping
gusskeeping
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2020-02-01
This is why we need yang
1 PlumCorruptor 2020-02-01
Hoes mad