A) Majority of people support increased taxes on the demographics being targeted, even Republicans.
B) Most people don't give a shit about guns.
C) Nobody is running on open borders and democrats secure a larger percentage of the vote than Republicans do like every cycle.
Just because Republicans can take 60% of a state government with 40% of the vote doesn't mean they're a majority or have a mandate. They're just clowns that rigged the electoral system in their own favor.
A) I don't give a fuck about rich people one way or the other but if taxing them affects my bottom line I have a problem. But I don't know shit about economics so I usually don't care to postulate.
B) Firearms ownerships is higher than it has ever been and continues to rise while violent crimes fall. Classic professorshitheadphd.
C) Bernie sanders and biden are literally advocating for decriminalizing border crossings. If you don't see the correlation between that and open borders might I suggest removing your head from your rectum and then going for a shower you dirty retard?
Go back to r/drama and arguing with the other spergs in whatever shithole you normally inhabit.
C) Bernie sanders and biden are literally advocating for decriminalizing border crossings. If you don't see the correlation between that and open borders might I suggest removing your head from your rectum and then going for a shower you dirty retard?
This is called you being very stupid. They aren't going to make it legal to cross the border, they're trying to make it a lower level offense.
You're not understanding what they're saying. Likely because your brain is rotted with Trumpian propaganda.
Although the discussion about repeal of Section 1325 was seen as a pivotal moment in the debates, the truth is that repealing it would do very little. Taking Section 1325 off the books would not open American borders to uncontrolled immigration or grant the right to enter the country to anyone who wants it. It would simply mean those entering without authorization would be deported using the civil immigration process, rather than using the criminal system to first convict them for a low-level misdemeanor offense and then deport them.
Moreover, repealing this section would leave on the books the other crimes mentioned above. Castro’s proposal would still allow prosecution for re-entering the U.S. without authorization, as well as a myriad other offenses.10
All it would be mean is they're deported via the civil system.
Aight, i'll bite. The ownership has seen a decrease since last year. I'll accept that. But if you think you can win with 20% of the vote not being interested in your position on firearms, you can think again.
If you think even dropping border crossing to a lower level offense is a winning position, you can think again.
I'm not sure dropping it to deportation via the civil system would be any better. They'd still be free to go about their business in the country before having to meet specific dates, and with no concrete information on the person, it'd be hard to find them again.
I'm just going to put this here for the record: Biden or Bernie, provided Trump doesn't fuck up the Coronavirus, Trump wins. It's extremely fucking clear at this stage. Polling data showed Hillary had a HUGE favorability coming into the 2016 election. How did that work out for her? Trump had a huge surge in support for his primary. He's the fucking incumbent, nobody needs to vote for him. Voter turnout for the state caucuses has been as anemic as they were in 2016.
Just seems to me like everything's coming up Trump. I like him for his meme factor but not much else, to be honest. I'm sick of defending him. I'd rather somebody like Jill Stein get in and see more libertarian policies introduced to defend freedoms and liberties and limit the powers of the government, but I don't get what I want.
Aight, i'll bite. The ownership has seen a decrease since last year. I'll accept that. But if you think you can win with 20% of the vote not being interested in your position on firearms, you can think again.
So you were wrong, then? Furthermore, yes, you literally can win without those voters. There are more democrats in America than Republicans and indies agree more with dems on gun control than Republicans. The DNC needs not a single guntard vote.
If you think even dropping border crossing to a lower level offense is a winning position, you can think again.
Cite your sources. Show me your empirical data showing the majority of the country is against lowering the offense level. You already tried to lie and claim they wanted open borders, which took me 10 seconds to prove wrong.
This might blow your mind given you likely spend most of your time in right-wing circlejerks, but the vast majority of Americans are not cruel pieces of shit. Repealing the law simply takes it back to what it used to be, it's not some big adjustment.
I'm not sure dropping it to deportation via the civil system would be any better. They'd still be free to go about their business in the country before having to meet specific dates, and with no concrete information on the person, it'd be hard to find them again.
The vast majority of people show up to their court hearings. Well over 75%.
I'm just going to put this here for the record: Biden or Bernie, provided Trump doesn't fuck up the Coronavirus, Trump wins. It's extremely fucking clear at this stage. Polling data showed Hillary had a HUGE favorability coming into the 2016 election.
Where is your data supporting the claim Trump wins? Biden is out running Clinton with rural whites by double digit margins. Trump won 3 states by razor thin margins. If Biden does even 1% better with rural whites in those states - which is already the case, he will easily beat Donald Trump.
Trump had a huge surge in support for his primary. He's the fucking incumbent, nobody needs to vote for him. Voter turnout for the state caucuses has been as anemic as they were in 2016.
Retards showing up to vote in an uncontested primary has no relevance to overall electoral support. And turnout is up in pretty much every state, actually. over 40% in some cases.
You are all a bunch of faggot pussies. Finally a politician just tells some try hard dipshit to fuck off, and all you purse holders can do is bitch and moan about how your fee fees hurt. What a pack of loser cunts you are.
41 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-03-10
Heh. Some of you Deuxcels are alright. Don't come to DeuxCHAT tomorrow.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
5 tallcelvolcel 2020-03-10
Ah he's in the angry demented phase
4 SamManilla 2020-03-10
Michigan tends to not vote how the dnc wants despite being overwhelmingly blue.
3 hyledog 2020-03-10
he’ll never take my AR-14
2 Msmit71 2020-03-10
Because it doesn't exist?
1 UnalignedRando 2020-03-10
It probably exists as some kind of prototype or failed product, and didn't reach commercial success.
AR means "ArmaLite" and they named all their guns AR-something.
And they're not all "assault rifles" (they also produce high caliber bolt actions, and some very smart small caliber survival rifles).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ArmaLite_rifles
2 Yardbinn 2020-03-10
I see this all the time, and love the way people capitalize the L in armalite so that you can see it represents the R in AR.
1 UnalignedRando 2020-03-10
The L is capitalized because that's how they write their own company's name.
The names for the rifles start with AR because that's also a choice from the company for their naming scheme.
2 Yardbinn 2020-03-10
Of course, just tickled that nobody says armalite rifle when they know they’re explaining it to someone who thinks it’s called “assault rifle 15”
1 UnalignedRando 2020-03-10
Only the IRA called their rifles an "armalite", and then it wasn't even AR15s.
2 Yardbinn 2020-03-10
I reckon IRA members had tons of fun
2 UnalignedRando 2020-03-10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8wgrZ6t5BA
1 _adderall-admiral_ 2020-03-10
ok so it doesn’t exist tweaker
1 UnalignedRando 2020-03-10
I mean they probably used that number, but it might have not have reached market (their numbers seem sequential, with one or two exceptions).
3 inceltiers2 2020-03-10
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-eeaef34c72e2d5ddf0c778d9898cdddf based fudd biden he chills with his homies with his glock and goes out hunting with his boomer friends
1 myNAMEjef420 2020-03-10
I mean technically he could have said "AR (anything from 1 to 22)" and still name a gun that exists.
1 inceltiers2 2020-03-10
1 myNAMEjef420 2020-03-10
18 180
same thing
1 inceltiers2 2020-03-10
Tbh i shud 180 and shoot ur self lmao
2 theworstever 2020-03-10
If the Democucks stop being retarded about guns and troons then they can start winning.
Oh well.
2 AutoModerator 2020-03-10
seethe
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
2 theworstever 2020-03-10
cope.
2 myNAMEjef420 2020-03-10
"Were gonna tax you to hell,take your guns and thrust your borders open."
"Oh we didn't win running on these premises. Could we be wrong? No, everyone in this country is just a racist right wing redneck"
0 professorshillphd 2020-03-10
A) Majority of people support increased taxes on the demographics being targeted, even Republicans.
B) Most people don't give a shit about guns.
C) Nobody is running on open borders and democrats secure a larger percentage of the vote than Republicans do like every cycle.
Just because Republicans can take 60% of a state government with 40% of the vote doesn't mean they're a majority or have a mandate. They're just clowns that rigged the electoral system in their own favor.
4 Mayor_of_tittycity 2020-03-10
Seeeethe.
0 professorshillphd 2020-03-10
Yeah we'll see who is seething when the coronavirus reduces the boomer supply bud.
1 Mayor_of_tittycity 2020-03-10
I'm so excited. I'm hoping I can catch it and transmit it to all the people I hate at work.
1 [deleted] 2020-03-10
[deleted]
3 noogai131 2020-03-10
A) I don't give a fuck about rich people one way or the other but if taxing them affects my bottom line I have a problem. But I don't know shit about economics so I usually don't care to postulate.
B) Firearms ownerships is higher than it has ever been and continues to rise while violent crimes fall. Classic professorshitheadphd.
C) Bernie sanders and biden are literally advocating for decriminalizing border crossings. If you don't see the correlation between that and open borders might I suggest removing your head from your rectum and then going for a shower you dirty retard?
Go back to r/drama and arguing with the other spergs in whatever shithole you normally inhabit.
1 professorshillphd 2020-03-10
I don't know what this would have to do with anything? I said most people don't give a shit about guns, and the data says as much:
1
This is called you being very stupid. They aren't going to make it legal to cross the border, they're trying to make it a lower level offense.
https://www.thirdway.org/memo/whats-the-impact-of-decriminalizing-border-crossings
You're not understanding what they're saying. Likely because your brain is rotted with Trumpian propaganda.
All it would be mean is they're deported via the civil system.
1 LongPostBot 2020-03-10
That was a mistake. You're about to find out the hard way why.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 noogai131 2020-03-10
Aight, i'll bite. The ownership has seen a decrease since last year. I'll accept that. But if you think you can win with 20% of the vote not being interested in your position on firearms, you can think again.
If you think even dropping border crossing to a lower level offense is a winning position, you can think again.
I'm not sure dropping it to deportation via the civil system would be any better. They'd still be free to go about their business in the country before having to meet specific dates, and with no concrete information on the person, it'd be hard to find them again.
I'm just going to put this here for the record: Biden or Bernie, provided Trump doesn't fuck up the Coronavirus, Trump wins. It's extremely fucking clear at this stage. Polling data showed Hillary had a HUGE favorability coming into the 2016 election. How did that work out for her? Trump had a huge surge in support for his primary. He's the fucking incumbent, nobody needs to vote for him. Voter turnout for the state caucuses has been as anemic as they were in 2016.
Just seems to me like everything's coming up Trump. I like him for his meme factor but not much else, to be honest. I'm sick of defending him. I'd rather somebody like Jill Stein get in and see more libertarian policies introduced to defend freedoms and liberties and limit the powers of the government, but I don't get what I want.
1 professorshillphd 2020-03-10
So you were wrong, then? Furthermore, yes, you literally can win without those voters. There are more democrats in America than Republicans and indies agree more with dems on gun control than Republicans. The DNC needs not a single guntard vote.
Cite your sources. Show me your empirical data showing the majority of the country is against lowering the offense level. You already tried to lie and claim they wanted open borders, which took me 10 seconds to prove wrong.
This might blow your mind given you likely spend most of your time in right-wing circlejerks, but the vast majority of Americans are not cruel pieces of shit. Repealing the law simply takes it back to what it used to be, it's not some big adjustment.
The vast majority of people show up to their court hearings. Well over 75%.
Where is your data supporting the claim Trump wins? Biden is out running Clinton with rural whites by double digit margins. Trump won 3 states by razor thin margins. If Biden does even 1% better with rural whites in those states - which is already the case, he will easily beat Donald Trump.
Retards showing up to vote in an uncontested primary has no relevance to overall electoral support. And turnout is up in pretty much every state, actually. over 40% in some cases.
1 LongPostBot 2020-03-10
still unemployed then?
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 [deleted] 2020-03-10
[deleted]
1 ZronaldoFwupNotGood 2020-03-10
Cope
1 endians 2020-03-10
Thanks for contributing to the discussion, your arguements on this subreddit will help push the dems to victory
1 MySQ_uirre_L 2020-03-10
that won’t fix their problem. those are just redditor pet issues.
2 Mypussylipsneedchad 2020-03-10
You are all a bunch of faggot pussies. Finally a politician just tells some try hard dipshit to fuck off, and all you purse holders can do is bitch and moan about how your fee fees hurt. What a pack of loser cunts you are.
Suck it.
1 [deleted] 2020-03-10
[deleted]