My thought is that it is mainly a left-egalitarian thing; incels are incredibly low-status because they are (considered as incels) generally undesirable and pathetic and since left egalitarianism is all about undermining social distinctions/hierarchies it canβt mock incels for those reasons. Just as a thoroughly general and principled left egalitarianism canβt really look upon the disabled, weak, or dumb as possessing intrinsically undesirable features, it canβt really dislike incels for the reason most do, but instead must force incels into the only position which left egalitarianism can outright oppose: the right-wing. Which isnβt generally untrue for politicized incels, but makes it clear that the left-wing position is just changing the subject. Soyboy incels would still be pathetic and could complain in left-wing terms just as easily as right-wing incels, but such a topic is never broached in popular left-wing spaces (and mens-lib is a cuck-shed, not a popular left-wing space) because it would make it clear that the principles at work in the left-wing position are either incoherent, under-thought, or insincere. Note that she somehow thinks that pointing to the fact that incels donβt really want sex, but rather the dignity of a relationship, should somehow undermine the relevance of their claims, whereas it plausibly seems to suggest that left-wing social views have little to offer incels of any stripe. βWe canβt just redistribute social relationships because they arenβt fungible in that wayβ is just the first step into admission of social distinction and intrinsic purposiveness which isnβt popular to the more radically egalitarian strains of left-wing social politics (though I guess polyamory is a kind of redistributive relationship that could find left-wing support by evacuating romantic relationships of much of their worthwhile content).
You can see this in how Jordan Peterson was attacked far more for his fairly tolerant pro-tradition and βfix yourselfβ stances than for his hacky Jungian metaphysics (which much of the left couldnβt consistently attack because of its own interest in complicated, vaguely-mystical social structures of a similar kind). Fascism is being dissatisfied with yourself and wanting better instead of riding the rollercoaster of social decay all the way to the bottom. Itβs anathema to think that leveling social differences could empty life of some of its moral structure and content (unless that social distinction is, funnily enough, tied up with being an academic or other credentialed professional).
since left egalitarianism is all about undermining social distinctions/hierarchies it canβt mock incels for those reasons.
lmao this is true. they trip up on their own retarded ideology when they try to ream out these losers for clicks and retweets. I'm curious why she deleted the tweet.
next time make an edit-pass before you take your adderall k?
sheβs absolutely not my type but whatever this bitch has to say about incels is probably more correct than whatever comes off their greasy fingers π
26 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-03-13
Heh. Some of you Deuxcels are alright. Don't come to DeuxCHAT tomorrow.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 WreckingYourHome 2020-03-13
Is this supposed to be some deep take?
1 Mick_mangina 2020-03-13
This bitch is literally a professional philosopher ππ
1 morethanjustasloth 2020-03-13
Philosophy is dead. Diogenes is still dead when we need him most.
1 Moist__nuggets 2020-03-13
RIP to a real niπ ±οΈπ ±οΈa
1 Frog_Refugee_2019 2020-03-13
I just can't stop noticing them once i started bros
1 CornReaper 2020-03-13
you gotta respect the hustle. ur just jealous you donβt get paid to sit around and complain about the moid menace
1 Mick_mangina 2020-03-13
Last name is an obvious double entendre
1 AugustinesBitchBoy 2020-03-13
Continental philosophy (read French and German) and itβs consequences...
2 AngryFurfag 2020-03-13
British analytic autists won in Evropa, Burgeroids still unironically read Michel "AIDS is a social construct" Foucault.
1 Verdreht 2020-03-13
Why do most outspoken Incel critics have such smoothbrain takes? It's not that hard to make fun of literal virgins
1 JokerCarSalesman 2020-03-13
My thought is that it is mainly a left-egalitarian thing; incels are incredibly low-status because they are (considered as incels) generally undesirable and pathetic and since left egalitarianism is all about undermining social distinctions/hierarchies it canβt mock incels for those reasons. Just as a thoroughly general and principled left egalitarianism canβt really look upon the disabled, weak, or dumb as possessing intrinsically undesirable features, it canβt really dislike incels for the reason most do, but instead must force incels into the only position which left egalitarianism can outright oppose: the right-wing. Which isnβt generally untrue for politicized incels, but makes it clear that the left-wing position is just changing the subject. Soyboy incels would still be pathetic and could complain in left-wing terms just as easily as right-wing incels, but such a topic is never broached in popular left-wing spaces (and mens-lib is a cuck-shed, not a popular left-wing space) because it would make it clear that the principles at work in the left-wing position are either incoherent, under-thought, or insincere. Note that she somehow thinks that pointing to the fact that incels donβt really want sex, but rather the dignity of a relationship, should somehow undermine the relevance of their claims, whereas it plausibly seems to suggest that left-wing social views have little to offer incels of any stripe. βWe canβt just redistribute social relationships because they arenβt fungible in that wayβ is just the first step into admission of social distinction and intrinsic purposiveness which isnβt popular to the more radically egalitarian strains of left-wing social politics (though I guess polyamory is a kind of redistributive relationship that could find left-wing support by evacuating romantic relationships of much of their worthwhile content).
You can see this in how Jordan Peterson was attacked far more for his fairly tolerant pro-tradition and βfix yourselfβ stances than for his hacky Jungian metaphysics (which much of the left couldnβt consistently attack because of its own interest in complicated, vaguely-mystical social structures of a similar kind). Fascism is being dissatisfied with yourself and wanting better instead of riding the rollercoaster of social decay all the way to the bottom. Itβs anathema to think that leveling social differences could empty life of some of its moral structure and content (unless that social distinction is, funnily enough, tied up with being an academic or other credentialed professional).
2 RabbitRobert 2020-03-13
Seriousposting in an autistic online gossip community LMAO
1 JokerCarSalesman 2020-03-13
More importantly Iβm autistposting in a serious online gossip community ππ
1 LongPostBot 2020-03-13
Sorry ma'am, looks like his delusions have gotten worse. We'll have to admit him,
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 nyacointelpro 2020-03-13
lmao this is true. they trip up on their own retarded ideology when they try to ream out these losers for clicks and retweets. I'm curious why she deleted the tweet.
next time make an edit-pass before you take your adderall k?
1 _-ctrl-_ 2020-03-13
Not the worst take ever, but youβre also a massive fag for writing all of that.
1 JokerCarSalesman 2020-03-13
If Socrates had been a little more faggy with Alcibiades maybe he wouldnβt have suffered the Day of the Owed Cock so soon.
1 ForlornGrace 2020-03-13
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πD
8====π=D
8===π==D
8==π===D
8=π====D
8π=====D
8=π====D
8==π===D
8===π==D
8====π=D
8=====πDπ¦π¦π¦π¦
1 LongPostBot 2020-03-13
That's great and all, but I asked for my burger without cheese.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 ForlornGrace 2020-03-13
What about dick cheese?
1 liberules 2020-03-13
that's a really interesting game of pong you've got there
1 MySQ_uirre_L 2020-03-13
sheβs absolutely not my type but whatever this bitch has to say about incels is probably more correct than whatever comes off their greasy fingers π
1 ThouShaltHearLight 2020-03-13
There is nothing more correct than shid and cum. Be correcter, sweaty.
1 jewdanksdad 2020-03-13
No exist