You simp. Okay Homer SIMPson. You absolute simpanzee. OOO OOO OO OO EE EE OO 🐒 <- that is you. You are nothing but sludge . You are putrid muck given form, weakness personified. I am not sympathetic. You are simp pathetic.
wah wah, retarded male mayo can't contain female mayo's appetite for whoring, let's argue for days!
Maybe we should show mayos what slavery felt like for our ancestors once in a while so they'd finally do something with their lives, instead of bitching about retarded shit nobody cares about.
A cuckold is the husband of an adulterous wife. In evolutionary biology, the term is also applied to males who are unwittingly investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own.
In Western traditions, cuckolds have sometimes been described as "wearing the horns of a cuckold" or just "wearing the horns". This is an allusion to the mating habits of stags, who forfeit their mates when they are defeated by another male. In Italy (especially in Southern Italy, where it is a major personal offence), the insult is often accompanied by the sign of the horns. In French, the term is "porter des cornes", which is used by Molière to describe someone whose consort has been unfaithful. In German, the term is "jemandem Hörner aufsetzen", or "Hörner tragen", the husband is "der gehörnte Ehemann". Rabelais wrote the Tiers Livers of Gargantua and Pantagruel in 1546, by which time the symbol of the horns was "so well-known and over-used that the author could barely avoid making reference to it".[9]Molière's L'École des femmes (1662) is the story of a man who mocks cuckolds and becomes one at the end. In Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (c. 1372–77), "The Miller's Tale" is a story that humorously examines the life of a cuckold. In Chinese usage, an altogether different allusion is used, when the cuckold (or wittol) is said to be "戴綠帽子" (wearing the green hat), which derives from the sumptuary laws used in China from the 13th to the 18th centuries that required the males in households with prostitutes to wrap their heads in a green scarf (or later a hat).
An abbreviation of cuckold, the term cuck has been used by the alt-right to attack the masculinity of an opponent. It was originally aimed at other conservatives, whom the alt-right saw as ineffective.
Unlike the traditional definition of the term, in fetish usage a cuckold or wife watching is complicit in their partner's sexual "infidelity"; the wife who enjoys cuckolding her husband is called a cuckoldress if the man is more submissive.[12][page needed][13][14] If a couple can keep the fantasy in the bedroom, or come to an agreement where being cuckolded in reality does not damage the relationship, they may try it out in reality. However, the primary proponent of the fantasy is almost always the one being humiliated, or the "cuckold": the cuckold convinces his lover to participate in the fantasy for them, though other "cuckolds" may prefer their lover to initiate the situation instead. The fetish fantasy does not work at all if the cuckold is being humiliated against their will.
Psychology regards cuckold fetishism as a variant of masochism, the cuckold deriving pleasure from being humiliated. In Freudian analysis, cuckold fetishism is the eroticization of the fears of infidelity and of failure in the man's competition for procreation and the affection of females. In his book Masochism and the Self, psychologist Roy Baumeister advanced a Self Theory analysis that cuckolding (or specifically, all masochism) was a form of escaping from self-awareness, at times when self-awareness becomes burdensome, such as with perceived inadequacy. According to this theory, the physical or mental pain from masochism brings attention away from the self, which would be desirable in times of "guilt, anxiety, or insecurity", or at other times when self-awareness is unpleasant.
I mean it is capitalism. Capitalism doesn't care about shame or morality or any of that shit. There is only one question you have to answer. To succeed in a capitalist system all you have to do is to provide a service other people will pay for. He made a youtube channel and made millions of money, and her girlfriend is gonna make bank, the drama around it was such a big advertisment for her onlyfans account, so you can cry and call him a simp or a cuck and call her a whore or whatever, the invisible hand of the market favors them and made them succesful. The hand simply doesn't give a fuck how modest your girlfriend is or how moral you are, the hand is gonna punch you with debt and even homelessness, if you can't give it what it wants. If you don't like it maybe seize the means of production and try to start a communist revolution.
One got famous from streaming with her tits out, the other from eating pickles out of a sewer
The criticism people direct at them isn't entirely that it's amoral/pathetic/necessary, but mostly that he as a man is accepting of his partner whoring herself out online - something that outside western Europe and coastal areas of North America would bring shame and mockery
What does shame and mockery matter if they have money? And there is a large part of society that already accepts that lifestyle so they can just ignore those that don't.
What does shame and mockery matter if they have money?
The fact that you feel something justified by whether or not it brings money is as sad as it is materialistic; I hope you one day see that there is more to life than money
If you want to have a house, provide for your family and put food on the table, then you need money to do it. Morality, love and good wishes are not accepted as payment in the shop. Yeah it sucks and I don't like it, but that's how capitalism and our current world we live in works.
I don't get whether your take is "Money is necessary, therefore it is necessary for her to whore herself out" or "The money she gets out-weights the social stigma"
If it's the former, then it doesn't apply as they already had more than enough income prior to this to live on. If it's the latter, then saying "you need money for things to live well" does nothing to address the aforementioned social stigma
For a part of society whoring is already not social stigmatized. I guess if someone's morality is based on something like "you are free to do anything until you hurt someone" then posting nude pictures on the internet doesn't count as immoral, because it hurts noone. The social stigma is only there in more conservative communities nowadays, and not in the whole society.
For a part of society, whoring is already not socially stigmatised
Yes for Western Europe and the coastal areas of North America and practically nowhere else, I mentioned that before. You have to remember that neither his audience (the ones doing the criticising), nor Ian, live in the areas where it is free of stigma
Your point boils down to "It's not stigmatised in my community, how come so many people are attacking him for it?"
It's more like a cultural war between what is stigmatised and what isn't, a war between the left and right, and historically the left won several times, like being gay is already not stigmatised in the mainstream, it is still stigmatized in certain communities, mainly religious ones for example. And yes whoring is still heavily stigmatized, but if someone believes it's not wrong, then power to them if they don't just conform, but take a stand, and are willing to go against the grain.
What is your scope on "mainstream" dude? There are almost 200 countries in the world, only 28 have gay marriage so much as legalised. There are more countries that would have you killed for being gay than there are that would allow you to marry
What you have is called a "western supremacy" complex, which is largely a result of the leftover bigotry from Western colonialism. Be better, do better
I mean it is capitalism. Capitalism doesn't care about shame or morality or any of that shit. There is only one question you have to answer. To succeed in a capitalist system all you have to do is to provide a service other people will pay for.
You managed to unironically be right in your """"ironic"""" tism fits for once
34 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-03-30
Do not comment or vote in linked threads.
Users who cause problems will be banned.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2020-03-30
You simp. Okay Homer SIMPson. You absolute simpanzee. OOO OOO OO OO EE EE OO 🐒 <- that is you. You are nothing but sludge . You are putrid muck given form, weakness personified. I am not sympathetic. You are simp pathetic.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 LetsGetSQ_uirre_Ly 2020-03-30
TELL ME WE HAVENT SEEN THIS ONE BEFORE FOLX
1 kenspacito_kotsumi 2020-03-30
wah wah, retarded male mayo can't contain female mayo's appetite for whoring, let's argue for days!
Maybe we should show mayos what slavery felt like for our ancestors once in a while so they'd finally do something with their lives, instead of bitching about retarded shit nobody cares about.
1 Soylent_Official 2020-03-30
Here's why...
A cuckold is the husband of an adulterous wife. In evolutionary biology, the term is also applied to males who are unwittingly investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own.
In Western traditions, cuckolds have sometimes been described as "wearing the horns of a cuckold" or just "wearing the horns". This is an allusion to the mating habits of stags, who forfeit their mates when they are defeated by another male. In Italy (especially in Southern Italy, where it is a major personal offence), the insult is often accompanied by the sign of the horns. In French, the term is "porter des cornes", which is used by Molière to describe someone whose consort has been unfaithful. In German, the term is "jemandem Hörner aufsetzen", or "Hörner tragen", the husband is "der gehörnte Ehemann". Rabelais wrote the Tiers Livers of Gargantua and Pantagruel in 1546, by which time the symbol of the horns was "so well-known and over-used that the author could barely avoid making reference to it".[9] Molière's L'École des femmes (1662) is the story of a man who mocks cuckolds and becomes one at the end. In Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (c. 1372–77), "The Miller's Tale" is a story that humorously examines the life of a cuckold. In Chinese usage, an altogether different allusion is used, when the cuckold (or wittol) is said to be "戴綠帽子" (wearing the green hat), which derives from the sumptuary laws used in China from the 13th to the 18th centuries that required the males in households with prostitutes to wrap their heads in a green scarf (or later a hat).
An abbreviation of cuckold, the term cuck has been used by the alt-right to attack the masculinity of an opponent. It was originally aimed at other conservatives, whom the alt-right saw as ineffective.
Unlike the traditional definition of the term, in fetish usage a cuckold or wife watching is complicit in their partner's sexual "infidelity"; the wife who enjoys cuckolding her husband is called a cuckoldress if the man is more submissive.[12][page needed][13][14] If a couple can keep the fantasy in the bedroom, or come to an agreement where being cuckolded in reality does not damage the relationship, they may try it out in reality. However, the primary proponent of the fantasy is almost always the one being humiliated, or the "cuckold": the cuckold convinces his lover to participate in the fantasy for them, though other "cuckolds" may prefer their lover to initiate the situation instead. The fetish fantasy does not work at all if the cuckold is being humiliated against their will.
Psychology regards cuckold fetishism as a variant of masochism, the cuckold deriving pleasure from being humiliated. In Freudian analysis, cuckold fetishism is the eroticization of the fears of infidelity and of failure in the man's competition for procreation and the affection of females. In his book Masochism and the Self, psychologist Roy Baumeister advanced a Self Theory analysis that cuckolding (or specifically, all masochism) was a form of escaping from self-awareness, at times when self-awareness becomes burdensome, such as with perceived inadequacy. According to this theory, the physical or mental pain from masochism brings attention away from the self, which would be desirable in times of "guilt, anxiety, or insecurity", or at other times when self-awareness is unpleasant.
​
As I have proven, idubbbz is NOT a cuck.
1 InterestedVoter2k16 2020-03-30
retards: words words words
normal people: give bitches the pimphand, or else you a bitch too
1 LetsGetSQ_uirre_Ly 2020-03-30
you don’t though
1 InterestedVoter2k16 2020-03-30
flair up faggot
1 LetsGetSQ_uirre_Ly 2020-03-30
re read this comment out loud and ask yourself if you sound normal
1 InterestedVoter2k16 2020-03-30
flair up faggot
1 lawlzposting 2020-03-30
Based
1 knuckledowntown 2020-03-30
Didn't read lol
1 foureyednickfury 2020-03-30
Nice pasta
1 NumerousEvent 2020-03-30
It is though.
1 knuckledowntown 2020-03-30
If it wasn't, sex hoes wouldnt be fighting tooth and nail to be respected. It is rightly shamed.
1 agrees2retards 2020-03-30
Being a shameful whore is sex work. They get paid to let men shame them and degrade them.
And anyone that tries to shame us for shaming whores is not respecting our fetish.
1 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
I mean it is capitalism. Capitalism doesn't care about shame or morality or any of that shit. There is only one question you have to answer. To succeed in a capitalist system all you have to do is to provide a service other people will pay for. He made a youtube channel and made millions of money, and her girlfriend is gonna make bank, the drama around it was such a big advertisment for her onlyfans account, so you can cry and call him a simp or a cuck and call her a whore or whatever, the invisible hand of the market favors them and made them succesful. The hand simply doesn't give a fuck how modest your girlfriend is or how moral you are, the hand is gonna punch you with debt and even homelessness, if you can't give it what it wants. If you don't like it maybe seize the means of production and try to start a communist revolution.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2020-03-30
One got famous from streaming with her tits out, the other from eating pickles out of a sewer
The criticism people direct at them isn't entirely that it's amoral/pathetic/necessary, but mostly that he as a man is accepting of his partner whoring herself out online - something that outside western Europe and coastal areas of North America would bring shame and mockery
2 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
What does shame and mockery matter if they have money? And there is a large part of society that already accepts that lifestyle so they can just ignore those that don't.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2020-03-30
The fact that you feel something justified by whether or not it brings money is as sad as it is materialistic; I hope you one day see that there is more to life than money
1 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
If you want to have a house, provide for your family and put food on the table, then you need money to do it. Morality, love and good wishes are not accepted as payment in the shop. Yeah it sucks and I don't like it, but that's how capitalism and our current world we live in works.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2020-03-30
I don't get whether your take is "Money is necessary, therefore it is necessary for her to whore herself out" or "The money she gets out-weights the social stigma"
If it's the former, then it doesn't apply as they already had more than enough income prior to this to live on. If it's the latter, then saying "you need money for things to live well" does nothing to address the aforementioned social stigma
1 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
For a part of society whoring is already not social stigmatized. I guess if someone's morality is based on something like "you are free to do anything until you hurt someone" then posting nude pictures on the internet doesn't count as immoral, because it hurts noone. The social stigma is only there in more conservative communities nowadays, and not in the whole society.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2020-03-30
Yes for Western Europe and the coastal areas of North America and practically nowhere else, I mentioned that before. You have to remember that neither his audience (the ones doing the criticising), nor Ian, live in the areas where it is free of stigma
Your point boils down to "It's not stigmatised in my community, how come so many people are attacking him for it?"
1 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
It's more like a cultural war between what is stigmatised and what isn't, a war between the left and right, and historically the left won several times, like being gay is already not stigmatised in the mainstream, it is still stigmatized in certain communities, mainly religious ones for example. And yes whoring is still heavily stigmatized, but if someone believes it's not wrong, then power to them if they don't just conform, but take a stand, and are willing to go against the grain.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2020-03-30
What is your scope on "mainstream" dude? There are almost 200 countries in the world, only 28 have gay marriage so much as legalised. There are more countries that would have you killed for being gay than there are that would allow you to marry
What you have is called a "western supremacy" complex, which is largely a result of the leftover bigotry from Western colonialism. Be better, do better
1 JanniesGuzzleCum 2020-03-30
You managed to unironically be right in your """"ironic"""" tism fits for once
Didn't read past this tho
1 QuadNarca 2020-03-30
what do you mean, that I try to act ironic but I'm serious? 🤔
1 Prabdr40 2020-03-30
iDubz drama, ahhhhhhh I’m gonna snoooooooze I’m snoooooooozing
1 JanniesGuzzleCum 2020-03-30
It's always amusing to see redditors argue for shit completely detached from reality
Amazing how degenerate incels manage to convince themselves their positions are sane, god bless this shithole of a site
1 MissionMushroom 2020-03-30
incelphobic
1 JanniesGuzzleCum 2020-03-30
And proud
1 LetsGetSQ_uirre_Ly 2020-03-30
good comment