He's kinda right tho. For the first time in history the hardest part about warfare is using restraint rather than strength. The fact that the US military could hiroshima any country that looks at it weirdly is pretty damning evidence that war isn't really win/lose anymore.
America's role has been more about global politics than total war for a long time now.
Yeh but there's nothing more dramatically satisfying than making boomer rightoids feel inadequate about the military. Maybe making leftards agree with Islamic teachings comes close.
I was going to say no major power has won a 4th generation war but apparently Wikipedia decided a few Russian shitposters in 2016 constitutes 4th generation warfare
What can you say, boomers love being gay op'd by the media, our government, and jews to kill poor brown people. At this point it's part of their culture along with demanding they get their gibs and do everything in our power to keep them alive at the expense of everyone else. They really all the niggers of generations
That βlost to countries without civilizationβ line had him smashing his life alert. Burger gets btfo on the homefront after barely surviving the sheep herder onslaught π
Al-Jazeera aired portions of the videotape Friday but released the full transcript of the entire tape on its Web site Monday.
"We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah," bin Laden said in the transcript.
He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, "using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers."
"We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat," bin Laden said.
He also said al Qaeda has found it "easy for us to provoke and bait this administration."
"All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note other than some benefits for their private corporations," bin Laden said."
What do you mean? They bombed Cambodia to try to get a better deal and break supply lines. They failed to break the commies will to fight. The north Vietnamese wouldn't surrender. As soon as the US left the North invades the South and won. How is that a win? Is the south getting captured by the north your idea of a win? Sacrficing 60 000 lives just to run away and lose the south is a win? Lmao come on bro.
The whole point was to contain communism. That's a huge L.
reread what you said and what i said retard. you said the US military loses to 3rd world countries, meaning vietnam. i said that they didn't using casualty numbers. never did i claim the US reached its political goals
Lmao wtf is casuality numbers? It wouldn't matter if America lost 5 or 5 million. The Vietnamese never surrended and sent America running. They couldn't take Vietnam or defend it from the North so the US ran and accepted defeat. What you're talking about is battles. Not war. Even then I don't think you have a good point lol. That's still a huge loss lmaoooooo. Wtf is this selective criteria ππ
More burgers died during the revolutionary war so Britain won
That's what you sound like lmaooo
It's ok to accept you lost burger. Just say it once and move on. πAmericaπlosesπtoπ3rdπworldπcountriesπ
Holy shit of course casualties matter in the Vietnam war you absolute fish brain. The entire US strategy was to wear out North Vietnam by killing as many Charlies as possible to and to not push North for fear of Chinese intervention like in the Korean War. This would force a stalemate and either keep the two divided or (however unlikely) reunited as a non-communist state through peace talks.
And what is your argument? That because America withdrew and ultimately failed at it's political goals of keeping Vietnam free of communism that the nations military was utterly defeated by the North Vietnamese? Fucking lol you're retarded. America only lost a handful of battles and of them there were no crushing defeats.
Since you don't understand literally anything about America's involvement in the war and unironically use clapping emojis like a Twitter gussy you can add this to your list of internet arguments won because I'm not responding further, faggot.
And what is your argument? That because America withdrew and ultimately failed at it's political goals of keeping Vietnam free of communism that the nations military was utterly defeated by the North Vietnamese?
Yes
You finally got it
πππ
Don't be mean to my militarino. I won't reply anymore because you're being mean π€π€ lmaooooo
Holy shit of course casualties matter in the Vietnam war you absolute fish brain. The entire US strategy was to wear out North Vietnam by killing as many Charlies as possible to and to not push North for fear of Chinese intervention like in the Korean War. This would force a stalemate and either keep the two divided or (however unlikely) reunited as a non-communist state through peace talks.
This is K/D ratio gamer tier logic lmao. We fucking lost the war in the most cucked way imaginable airlifting the last of our personnel from the roof of our Embassy in Saigon. Smh at the absolute state of burger education.
Lmao look at the glorious burger rightoid seething. They get so mad when you make fun of the militarino. That specific user is still seething so hard. It's been over 2 hours πππ
Well no shit sherlock. getting a high K/D was literally the idea, as I just said. thanks for restating my point. And wtf? do you have any idea what youre talking about? that airlift happened 2 years after the US had already left the war
Since you don't understand literally anything about America's involvement in the war and unironically use clapping emojis like a Twitter gussy you can add this to your list of internet arguments won because I'm not responding further, faggot.
REEEEE I'm not seething I just need to prove you wrong because my militarino deffers didn't lose. You're just looking at it wrong. I'm not emotional. You are! Quick I better use those unironic emojis to show how I'm not seething.
Except that you are. The seethe is too much for you to handle lmaoooo.
You seem mad. I get that you need to try to take control of this situation by using ad hominems but it's ok. You lost Vietnam and then went online and coped hard about not losing lmaoooooo ππ
Lmao the absolute state of cope. Why do you keep trying to throw things back at me? You coped. You seethed. You resorted to ad hominems. You projected. Now you're trying to deflect. What an emotional rollercoaster this has been for you lmaoooo π€π€
Imagine seething about something that doesn't even affect you lmao ππ
am i forbidden from using any arguing tactic, now? and lol at saying i use ad hominem (thats a big word for you). literally every reply of yours has been attacking me and not the argument. thats projection. thats deflection. thats cope. thats seethe.
I'm just trying to argue I have that right π€π€
You're actually just seething and being very emotional.
Lmaoooooo look at that beautiful deflection and cope. You should go back at see how many times I attacked you as a person and how many you times you used an ad hominem π€π€π€
youre the one grasping at straws. no other way would you manage to blabber on this long. no, im not going to ever reread this 10+ comment chain of someone seething over my historical analysis and attacking my person
81 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-14
Do not comment or vote in linked threads.
Users who cause problems will be banned.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
15 agent_cody_banks420 2020-04-14
He's kinda right tho. For the first time in history the hardest part about warfare is using restraint rather than strength. The fact that the US military could hiroshima any country that looks at it weirdly is pretty damning evidence that war isn't really win/lose anymore.
America's role has been more about global politics than total war for a long time now.
14 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Yeh but there's nothing more dramatically satisfying than making boomer rightoids feel inadequate about the military. Maybe making leftards agree with Islamic teachings comes close.
6 agent_cody_banks420 2020-04-14
fuck lol, perfect crime
13 boyoyoyoyong 2020-04-14
I was going to say no major power has won a 4th generation war but apparently Wikipedia decided a few Russian shitposters in 2016 constitutes 4th generation warfare
5 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lol yeh but look at the rightoids seethe in this post.
4 boyoyoyoyong 2020-04-14
What can you say, boomers love being gay op'd by the media, our government, and jews to kill poor brown people. At this point it's part of their culture along with demanding they get their gibs and do everything in our power to keep them alive at the expense of everyone else. They really all the niggers of generations
3 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao boomers are the niggas of generations. Absolutely classic. Mod this guy ππ
10 Things_Remote 2020-04-14
That βlost to countries without civilizationβ line had him smashing his life alert. Burger gets btfo on the homefront after barely surviving the sheep herder onslaught π
6 xanderfill 2020-04-14
No quicker way to get a boomer mad than making fun of the military. The absolute seething π
5 EveryDelay 2020-04-14
Zoomer DESTROYS rightoid boomertard
5 Chapose 2020-04-14
And several more in this thread π€π€π€
7 xanderfill 2020-04-14
They get so mad if you say mean things about their militarino π€π€π€
4 habeshamuscle 2020-04-14
Who won the Iraq war? Saddam?
9 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Al-Jazeera aired portions of the videotape Friday but released the full transcript of the entire tape on its Web site Monday.
"We are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah," bin Laden said in the transcript. He said the mujahedeen fighters did the same thing to the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s, "using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers."
"We, alongside the mujahedeen, bled Russia for 10 years until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat," bin Laden said. He also said al Qaeda has found it "easy for us to provoke and bait this administration."
"All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note other than some benefits for their private corporations," bin Laden said."
https://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/11/01/binladen.tape/
Inshallah. What an absolute master baiter. ππ
1 RedditAdminsHateCons 2020-04-14
Imagine supporting Ossama Bin Laden to own the burgers...smdh
6 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao answering a question and correctly identifying his master baiting skills is supporting him? π€
Is that more or less offensive than burgers supporting Saudi Arabia lmaoo π€π€
2 LegitimateMail0 2020-04-14
Imagine not supporting our muslim KANG. How many sons did you lose in iraq?
4 Swagbag6969 2020-04-14
No one, we weren't there to murder them. The middle east isn't really comparable. There was no set goal.
1 MikeStoklasa-cel 2020-04-14
Ba'athism
2 SnapshillBot 2020-04-14
ahhh yes, I didn't make any death threats. I've just called you fat and gay
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
2 TotesMessenger 2020-04-14
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
60,000 US deaths compared to 1 million+ charlies. america definitely lost to them on the battlefield
11 xanderfill 2020-04-14
US bombed Vietnam and Cambodia then pulled out. That's an L bro.
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
so they won and then they left, but lost? nigga read what you type
14 xanderfill 2020-04-14
What do you mean? They bombed Cambodia to try to get a better deal and break supply lines. They failed to break the commies will to fight. The north Vietnamese wouldn't surrender. As soon as the US left the North invades the South and won. How is that a win? Is the south getting captured by the north your idea of a win? Sacrficing 60 000 lives just to run away and lose the south is a win? Lmao come on bro.
The whole point was to contain communism. That's a huge L.
2 thowaway_throwaway 2020-04-14
If I argue with you, and I'm smarter and make better points, but eventually give up because you're just too dense does that mean you won and I lost?
9 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Yes you surrendered and ran away loser.
2 thowaway_throwaway 2020-04-14
So you think the winner is the dumber one?
9 xanderfill 2020-04-14
The winner is the one that doesnt lose lmao.
3 thowaway_throwaway 2020-04-14
What if my stated objective is to convince you you're wrong, but I really just want to show everyone that you're kinda a dope?
9 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Imagine caring so much about an opinion on the internet that you need to prove something lmao. Do you really just want to show everyone lmaoo.
If America had cared to win as much as you care then maybe you burgers wouldn't be losing to 3rd world countries lmaooooo.
Nice seething rightoid ππ
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
reread what you said and what i said retard. you said the US military loses to 3rd world countries, meaning vietnam. i said that they didn't using casualty numbers. never did i claim the US reached its political goals
11 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao wtf is casuality numbers? It wouldn't matter if America lost 5 or 5 million. The Vietnamese never surrended and sent America running. They couldn't take Vietnam or defend it from the North so the US ran and accepted defeat. What you're talking about is battles. Not war. Even then I don't think you have a good point lol. That's still a huge loss lmaoooooo. Wtf is this selective criteria ππ
That's what you sound like lmaooo
It's ok to accept you lost burger. Just say it once and move on. πAmericaπlosesπtoπ3rdπworldπcountriesπ
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
Holy shit of course casualties matter in the Vietnam war you absolute fish brain. The entire US strategy was to wear out North Vietnam by killing as many Charlies as possible to and to not push North for fear of Chinese intervention like in the Korean War. This would force a stalemate and either keep the two divided or (however unlikely) reunited as a non-communist state through peace talks.
And what is your argument? That because America withdrew and ultimately failed at it's political goals of keeping Vietnam free of communism that the nations military was utterly defeated by the North Vietnamese? Fucking lol you're retarded. America only lost a handful of battles and of them there were no crushing defeats.
Since you don't understand literally anything about America's involvement in the war and unironically use clapping emojis like a Twitter gussy you can add this to your list of internet arguments won because I'm not responding further, faggot.
8 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaoooooo cope harder burger
Yes
You finally got it
πππ
Don't be mean to my militarino. I won't reply anymore because you're being mean π€π€ lmaooooo
3 Strictlybutters 2020-04-14
This is K/D ratio gamer tier logic lmao. We fucking lost the war in the most cucked way imaginable airlifting the last of our personnel from the roof of our Embassy in Saigon. Smh at the absolute state of burger education.
3 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao look at the glorious burger rightoid seething. They get so mad when you make fun of the militarino. That specific user is still seething so hard. It's been over 2 hours πππ
3 Strictlybutters 2020-04-14
I forgot how much seethe you can extract from a rightoid when you insult their GI Joe toys. Itβs like an inexhaustible supply of cope. ππ
2 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaooooo he deleted his account π€π€π€
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
Well no shit sherlock. getting a high K/D was literally the idea, as I just said. thanks for restating my point. And wtf? do you have any idea what youre talking about? that airlift happened 2 years after the US had already left the war
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-14
Pings by unapproved deuxcels are automatically removed. If this is a good ping, it may get manually approved.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
u/agent_cody_banks420
Make fun of the military and the rightoid will seethe hard lmao
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-14
Pings by unapproved deuxcels are automatically removed. If this is a good ping, it may get manually approved.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
5 xanderfill 2020-04-14
REEEEE I'm not seething I just need to prove you wrong because my militarino deffers didn't lose. You're just looking at it wrong. I'm not emotional. You are! Quick I better use those unironic emojis to show how I'm not seething.
https://images.app.goo.gl/Yz2CbWCH9nv68TFZA
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
Wow I'm really reeeing and just need to prove someone wrong with my very large amount of three replies.
Autist, those weren't unironic emojis. I was mocking you and that other idiots replies. Can you make yourself look any more of a retarded faggot?
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Except that you are. The seethe is too much for you to handle lmaoooo.
You seem mad. I get that you need to try to take control of this situation by using ad hominems but it's ok. You lost Vietnam and then went online and coped hard about not losing lmaoooooo ππ
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
I was speaking to him, not you. Yet again you prove your mighty autistic might. And yes, America lost. Again, I never denied that...
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaooo yet you replied to me. You just had to come back and try to deny the seethe π€π€π€
You didn't win at all lmaooo ππ
1 [deleted] 2020-04-14
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Yes that is an accurate description of what you look like right now lmaoooo πππ
2 [deleted] 2020-04-14
seethe harder under your lmaooo and πππ
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaooo now you're just projecting. You need to cope harder it'll help your seething π€π€π€
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
already cope with history. thats why im not a retarded faggot
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaooo so you are trying to cope already? You must be so mad to go on the internet and say
Reminder. America lost Vietnam and you lost your battle with your own seethe lmaoooπππ
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
not even american or a rightoid. are you projecting?
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao the absolute state of cope. Why do you keep trying to throw things back at me? You coped. You seethed. You resorted to ad hominems. You projected. Now you're trying to deflect. What an emotional rollercoaster this has been for you lmaoooo π€π€
Imagine seething about something that doesn't even affect you lmao ππ
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
am i forbidden from using any arguing tactic, now? and lol at saying i use ad hominem (thats a big word for you). literally every reply of yours has been attacking me and not the argument. thats projection. thats deflection. thats cope. thats seethe.
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao look at you grasping at straws.
You're actually just seething and being very emotional.
Lmaoooooo look at that beautiful deflection and cope. You should go back at see how many times I attacked you as a person and how many you times you used an ad hominem π€π€π€
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
youre the one grasping at straws. no other way would you manage to blabber on this long. no, im not going to ever reread this 10+ comment chain of someone seething over my historical analysis and attacking my person
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaoooo
He said as he grasped at straws.
Is that because if you reread it you'll realise how sad you look for seething this hard over something you're wrong about lmaoo π€π€π€
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
Then maybe explain how I'm wrong instead grasping at straws and attacking me
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaoo yes sweetie you're the victim here after using so many ad hominems. Classic rightoid move π
It's over. This became corpse fucking for me because you've already seethed and coped so hard lmaooo π€π€π€
Reminder. America loses to 3rd world countries and you lost to your own emotions and seethe lmaooππ
2 AutoModerator 2020-04-14
r/wholesome
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao what did I say that's a personal attack? Everything I said was true. Now you're seething over truth lmaoooooo π€π€π€
Facts are hurting your feelings πππ
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
Classic rightoid move π
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmaoooo and another example of projection and deflection π€π€π€ this is truly glorious coping lmaoo
0 [deleted] 2020-04-14
idk how you can describe yourself in better terms. this entire thread and you still havent even put forth an argument π€π€π€
1 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao let me describe you
Argue what? That America lost in Vietnam and you lost to your own seething emotions? Lmaooo π€π€π€
1 agrees2retards 2020-04-14
I wish your dad pulled out π
5 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Are you saying you want one less troid in this world? Why are you invalidating my existence π€π€
2 agrees2retards 2020-04-14
Oh you're a troid?
I guess that problem has 41% chance of sorting itself out.
4 xanderfill 2020-04-14
We're all troids here you nazi. This is a joint Islamic/troid support group. Take your heterosexuality and go back to r/all lmao π€’π€’
2 agrees2retards 2020-04-14
I love what HRT can do for men these days.
3 xanderfill 2020-04-14
If you love it so much then why aren't you on it? π€
2 agrees2retards 2020-04-14
"Love the bussy. Don't become the bussy."
-Ghandi
6 xanderfill 2020-04-14
Lmao imagine quoting streetshittingcels smh π. That kind of thinking is exactly why Ghandi never won any wars.
3 agrees2retards 2020-04-14
He was skinny cause he was on a strict diet of only eating bussy.