Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. I wager you couldn't empty a boot of excrement were the instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have to us who think and reason? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed , drooling meatslapper. You...
People who complain about dog whistling are so gay, every example of it is either something so obscure the person obviously had no clue what it was or it was obviously a joke
I called someone an idiot and he accused me of an "ad hominem". So I explained him that if I make fun of him because his mama is fat, that is an "ad hominem". If I call him an idiot for being wrong, this is only an insult.
I was always winning the debate, but in the end he told me I am gaslighting him. Damn, at this moment I was won.
You want me to explain this in detail and at length then? sure.
Before that though, you will admit that you are completely ignorant about everything happening in europe. This admission of utter ignorance must be at length, specific and detailed. You will also admit that you were too stupid to explain the context I provided for my metrics, directly stating that it went way over your head and the reasons why that is.
If you are truly ignorant about it , this is a pretty small ask. If you are being disingenous however, it will seem wildly unreasonable.... honestly, I despise this a lot, but you are dishonest and have presented nothing of substance meaning I offer you zero respect.
This started as a conversation with someone else but I am starting to notice a pattern here. Even people that are generally opposed to SJW nonsense will default back to it when it comes to certain topics.
I'm responding to the above quoted, one more after that and then dismissing you on the grounds that you're either a legitimate troll or you are being wildly disingenous.
I am always open to being proven wrong and in fact, I enjoy being proven wrong because it means I have learned something and thus improved.
That has yet to happen though, instead you are wasting my time with subjective nonsense, with innuendo... or the other guy with strawman arguments and dishonest tactics.
You have nothing of value to present, gg... you can have the last word unless you meet the criteria established.
35 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-26
I have information that will lead to DeuxCHAT's arrest.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4 4thebadbone 2020-04-26
What the fuck is sealioning
5 AutoModerator 2020-04-26
yikes
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4 Timomemo 2020-04-26
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
2 4thebadbone 2020-04-26
Is this what autism looks like?
1 Furweeb 2020-04-26
no, autists are not capable of typing this much
2 4thebadbone 2020-04-26
You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. I wager you couldn't empty a boot of excrement were the instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you. Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have to us who think and reason? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed , drooling meatslapper. You...
Read More
1 [deleted] 2020-04-26
[deleted]
1 UhohYikesAlert 2020-04-26
Its when i roll my semi chub in a ball like a sealion tail and just roll around the clitoral hood haha.
1 cnac1 2020-04-26
http://wondermark.com/1k62/
Leftist defense against having to admit they're bigots.
3 calvinthecalvin 2020-04-26
b-b-bad faith argument detected!
2 Timomemo 2020-04-26
Whataboutism, zero-sum game, dog whistling, gatekeeping
3 calvinthecalvin 2020-04-26
(((dog whistling)))
3 AutoModerator 2020-04-26
gay
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 [deleted] 2020-04-26
[deleted]
1 [deleted] 2020-04-26
[deleted]
1 ConfrontationalKosm 2020-04-26
People who complain about dog whistling are so gay, every example of it is either something so obscure the person obviously had no clue what it was or it was obviously a joke
1 Veilofmomo 2020-04-26
Fuck you Brainlet, my superpower is reading minds!!!
3 agrees2retardsFan 2020-04-26
Using any of these words instantly indicates that you’ve never had a debate outside of the internet.
3 GameUpBoyHustleHardr 2020-04-26
Leg me tell you about aristotelian ethics...
1 SnapshillBot 2020-04-26
I was gonna start playing league again til I saw they auto filter the N slur now. Noped right out.
Gaming is basically dead.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 massive_fckwit 2020-04-26
you're a bad faith actor op
1 char_67 2020-04-26
Whenever I hear those words it means I'm doing something right
1 TimGuoRen 2020-04-26
I called someone an idiot and he accused me of an "ad hominem". So I explained him that if I make fun of him because his mama is fat, that is an "ad hominem". If I call him an idiot for being wrong, this is only an insult.
I was always winning the debate, but in the end he told me I am gaslighting him. Damn, at this moment I was won.
1 AutoModerator 2020-04-26
💩
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ManOfBored 2020-04-26
You want me to explain this in detail and at length then? sure.
Before that though, you will admit that you are completely ignorant about everything happening in europe. This admission of utter ignorance must be at length, specific and detailed. You will also admit that you were too stupid to explain the context I provided for my metrics, directly stating that it went way over your head and the reasons why that is.
If you are truly ignorant about it , this is a pretty small ask. If you are being disingenous however, it will seem wildly unreasonable.... honestly, I despise this a lot, but you are dishonest and have presented nothing of substance meaning I offer you zero respect.
This started as a conversation with someone else but I am starting to notice a pattern here. Even people that are generally opposed to SJW nonsense will default back to it when it comes to certain topics.
I'm responding to the above quoted, one more after that and then dismissing you on the grounds that you're either a legitimate troll or you are being wildly disingenous.
I am always open to being proven wrong and in fact, I enjoy being proven wrong because it means I have learned something and thus improved.
That has yet to happen though, instead you are wasting my time with subjective nonsense, with innuendo... or the other guy with strawman arguments and dishonest tactics.
You have nothing of value to present, gg... you can have the last word unless you meet the criteria established.
1 debildawg 2020-04-26
I'm not gaslighting you. Thats not even an actual word, you made it up because you're facing delusional.
-1 ponybopper 2020-04-26
cringe fucking frogposters
2 HaltOverDow 2020-04-26
👆 faggot.
-2 ponybopper 2020-04-26
i may be a faggot but at least im not a frogposter
1 TheInternetSucksNow 2020-04-26
Based
1 Gaymaster_Nacelle 2020-04-26
What's wrong with posting frogs?
1 ALT_SHIFT_DOWN 2020-04-26
They make the chemicals gay
1 ConfrontationalKosm 2020-04-26
Cringe, the chemicals (that are in your tap water) were actually making the frogs gay