Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
17 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-06-08
Heh. Some of you Deuxcels are alright. Don't come to DeuxCHAT tomorrow.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
53 boyoyoyoyong 2020-06-08
Not praying to the patron saint of fentanyl,meth, and armed robbery
43 wizdumb337 2020-06-08
It's ok reddit has told me that George would have been ok with this since they seem to understand how he thought and felt.
31 ToQuoteGuyFieri 2020-06-08
Oh shit Trump is gonna win in a landslide
18 Evening_Dingo 2020-06-08
I think so. 10-15% "no good" people in this nation could help.
9 TrentonJay 2020-06-08
Never go...
16 yocrappacrappa 2020-06-08
I doubt it.
He will lose or reelected with razor thin margin.
I don't think the nooz media can take another 4 years of orange pounding.
18 theworstever 2020-06-08
They would love it. People can pretend they matter and they don't even have to do their jobs properly for another 4 years.
5 Qwagsoir 2020-06-08
It's literally free clicks for them, they support it lmao
3 modsarefatpussies 2020-06-08
nah hes gonna win
hes just really good at campaigning
16 AttitudeVast1245 2020-06-08
i got jewtrithis bro
13 KingCheetah2001 2020-06-08
this is one of the most embarrassing photos I've ever seen
6 SnapshillBot 2020-06-08
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
3 fishstickpicker 2020-06-08
Based... Jew?
1 knuckledowntown 2020-06-08
Jew on deez nuts
3 MiniatureEvil 2020-06-08
Oh, say can you seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
by the dawn's early liiiiiiiiight
1 FroppyHoppyMyFloppy 2020-06-08
THE FUCKING JOG SCARFS