The new year inspires drama in, wait for it, /r/math, as debate erupts as to the nature of math.

32  2017-01-01 by zahlman

10 comments

You're oversimplifying a complex situation to the point of adding nothing to the discussion.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, ceddit.com, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

complex

ohyou.png

ohyou.png


Feedback welcome at /r/image_linker_bot | Disable with "ignore me" via reply or PM

Snapshillbot is my spirit animal

Lol!!! Great find!!!

/u/redrumsir's mistake was a simple one -- transferring the property of arbitrariness from the choice of 10 as a base because humans have 10 fingers to the set of completely and entirely mathematical statements about numbers in base n where n happens to equal 10, about which there's nothing arbitrary whatsoever.

You can't do that, kiddo, maybe learn yourself some philosophy before trying a more object level science.

(note: the point that it's mathematical but not mathematically interesting, which she didn't even make I think, was nevertheless also soundly rebuked in the thread, by pointing out that for some weird reason we have a spigot algorithm for fast computation of digits of Pi in base 16 but not in base 10, which is interesting).

nice use of xkcd from when it was still funny

Which is just a poor take on this.

/r/math: posts fun little 2017 facts

/u/redrumsir: knock it off, plebs.

what a guy

Guess it was just 2spooky4him.