Nazi killing drama in /r/Anarchism

19  2017-02-08 by LSDawson

47 comments

Here's the thing. You said a "trilby is a fedora."

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, ceddit.com, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

When you can't even beat Franco, you're in no position to take on the nazis.

Reminder that by Nazis they mean "unarmed college students going to see a talk by a conservative political pundit"

You mean "unarmed college students going to see a talk by a gay jewish dragqueen that dates black guys"

/u/pol__invictus__risen is upset about that part, pls no bully nazis, /r/drama is supposed to be a safe space from SRD nonsense.

Most of whom still cheerlead for horrific state violence in the form of police, jails/prisons, deportations, etc. And obviously at least one of Milo's supporters was armed at UW.

Milo himself was armed as well

Hey /u/nointerlockingparts what is it like to be an ineffectual retard in real life? Does your mom bitch at you about how much time you spend in your room?

/u/nointerlockingparts is an honest to gOD black separatists, I used him as an example to win a stupid internet slapfight with /u/mrsamsa, so I'm very grateful for his continued online presence.

honest to gOD black separatist

You can just say unemployed.

No, there are many white unemployed people, many black unemployed people, being unemployed in and by itself doesn't come close to getting downvoted (but not banned, get this) in /r/SRSDiscussion for arguing for segregation.

That pretty much proves he's white.

A white guy would've gotten himself banned in any Fempire subreddit in a blink of an eye if he said one tenth of that shit. No, /u/nointerlockingparts must be black and probably sent dickpix to their mods as confirmation.

You clearly underestimate the power of white privilege.

I was banned from SRSD so whatever

edit: get this, for telling a mod i'm still not voting for hillary

I'm not surprised tbh, it might seem counterintuitive at first, but apparently people tend to form stronger feelings of political allegiance/approval based on closeness in terms of abstract ideology than actual real world alignment or conflict of interests. That's why, for example, a lot of mainland Chinese support (or at least supported during the elections) Trump, because they like his nationalism and anti-SJWism a lot, while not paying any particular attention to the part where American nationalism sort of goes against Chinese self-interest.

Imo this is a white bourgie site and even the left subs reflect white bourgie interests, like order and stability over justice. Liberals make for the crudest Marxists.

You mean where I said that I'm against violence, and you said "What about black separatists who advocate violence?!" and I said: "Well I'm against violence so yeah, them too"?

No, where you said that it's completely different and an understandable (if not exactly praiseworthy) reaction to oppression, unlike the wholly evil racism of privileged whites like mr. Spencer.

A natural mistake, it's hard to keep your story straight when on any topic you have at least two diametrically opposed opinions that you hold simultaneously and can use either appropriately to the situation.

You're talking about the discussion where I explained that I think there's a difference between someone arguing for genocide and someone wanting to be separate? To which you couldn't come up with a good response as to how they're the same?

How exactly did you think you won that?

where I explained that I think there's a difference between someone arguing for genocide and someone wanting to be separate?

No, they were both for peaceful separation, but while Spencer reluctantly acknowledged that there might be violence involved in implementing it, the other guy was positively relishing the idea of black militia curbstomping any whitey they think is being racist on their territory.

No, they were both for peaceful separation, but while Spencer reluctantly acknowledged that there might be violence involved in implementing it, the other guy was positively drooling at the idea of black militia curbstomping any whitey they think is being racist on their territory.

I didn't see anything about curb stomping, fuck that guy then.

You should have mentioned that when I said the difference was that Spencer's approach was violent.

And no, I remember that the core of your reasoning was that one is understandable given oppression, the other is unforgivable given actual white supremacy.

My understanding of the argument was that he was sick of being oppressed and wanted to live away from people who oppress him, which to me is significantly different from someone viewing a group as sub human and wanting to kill them all.

My understanding of the argument was that he was sick of being oppressed and wanted to live away from people who oppress him, which to me is significantly different from someone viewing a group as sub human and wanting to kill them all.

Yeah, but the problem is that you do this thing where the Spencer guy says that he wants for whites to live alone, and from that you pivot a couple of times and arrive to a conclusion that he must consider everyone else to be subhuman. Like, idk, "that would be violent => he's OK with violence against minorities => must consider them subhuman", something like that.

You mean I describe the fundamentals of the Nazi ideology to you?

"that would be violent => he's OK with violence against minorities => must consider them subhuman"

You mean I describe the fundamentals of the Nazi ideology to you?

Yeah, sure, now do the same re: ending apartheid and kys.

No, seeing as I have my own place and she's been dead for years.

You psycho, you murdered your own mother?!

Lupus

Why can't they just play RPGs like the rest of us?

Some antifascists do play RPGs.

If you have the integrity to limit your killing to fascists, more power to you. If I made a party out of slaughtering people, I wouldn't be able to stop. Revolutionary violence ain't for everybody.

/u/summerspeaker is a fucking psychopath. reported

Thanks. Note that I don't encourage harming any feeling beings, in part because I recognize how people can get carried away with exterminating the supposedly evil enemy.

Start by exterminating yourself.

That's an option under consideration. I don't plan to physical exterminate anybody at present. Instead, I'm trying to exterminate fascism, authoritarianism, militarism, etc. as ideologies. They should become regarded as curious and perhaps informative errors of the last, about how scientists regard phlogiston theory.

Story status: Cool, bro.

Mass murdering people for having different opinions seems quite authoritarian tbqh, you really should start with yourself.

Mass murdering people for having different opinions seems quite authoritarian tbqh

Yeah, that's why I don't do it.

No the key reason is you're an ineffectual pussy who doesn't have the courage of their convictions to actually do anything to change the world. You talk about exterminating ideas, but don't have the brains to look back at our history and realize what has killed bad ideas in the past.

Yeah I don't think most people are at risk of becoming serial killers. That's just you dude.

Uh, look at what happens in wars and other violent conflicts across the ages. It ain't just me.

In any case, I'm a good psychopath because I recognize my limitations and know better to engage in revolutionary violence. (Note that by "violence" here I'm talking about physically harming feeling beings, particularly vertebrates.)

yeah like even people who did kill Nazis (GIs etc) didn't come home and start axe murdering because they had the lust for more blood. In fact most people who come back from wars hate conflict and killing.

Don't mind him. He's just terrified of your barely-constrained raw power. The rest of the world has nothing but respect for the self control you excercise daily by not murdering people who's politics you disagree with. It's like watching Batman not kill the Joker, except you're totes more badass.

I never said I'd stop with political disagreements. If I starting killing fascists and somehow got away with it, such as in a revolutionary situation, there's a nonzero chance I'd extend the category "fascist" to anybody I had a problem with.

If you think I'm the only person in danger of falling down this slippery slope, I question your understanding of both history of psychology.

I don't question the slope. I question your ability to physically (and mentally, though I didn't really imply it in the earlier comment - sorry!) take even one step down the slope and possibly outside.

Well sure, I have no unusual ability to hurt other humans. I'm not a cop, soldier, or street fighter.

It appears we've been had by an ebin trole

> sees pepe on Reddit

> "literally at war with muh fash"

Fucking retards.