That same mod has done the same BS in the past (warned me for "insulting a poor innocent person who was just trying to be sweet and engage in polite conversation!")
r/seattlewa and OP here are the twats. A bunch of "well, acktually" types.
I'm shocked charlesgrodinfan hasn't chimed in to tell us the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia and how it's totally acceptable in other societies.
I'm shocked charlesgrodinfan hasn't chimed in to tell us the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia and how it's totally acceptable in other societies.
AmericanDerp magically missed every other awesome contribution in the thread (and has in the past as well) yet jumps on me stating the fact that libertarians diddle kids.
reddit is full of tryhards with too much free time.
This is, to put it mildly, very wrong. Self-identified US libertarians are far-right and switch seamlessly to republicanism. This is a very easy out for you from which to attack their views.
But you follow the United States school of debates, don't you? Following your presidential candidates.
Funny considering I'm not far right... I don't switch seemingly to republicans whatsoever, considering they trample the constitution at every opportunity.
The US constitution explicitly allows slavery in the prison-industrial complex, a thing libertarians are explicitly in favor of. Libertarians also happily side with republicans whenever they want to perpetuate existing systems of oppression. I'm talking things like, "well do businesses have to be forced to serve niggers? do we need to suffer under such a fascist society?"
One of the most interesting things about libertarians is the ability to talk completely theoretically about things that actually happened and come to completely opposite conclusions.
You realize it was laws that kept segregation from ending yes?
False.
You also realize that the free market wanted to integrate yes?
Turbo false: HD remix.
The "white" and "colored" fountains are a step up from what was before: "white only" fountains because the owner just flat out didn't want to accomodate the niggers.
Because we rightly understand that a racist business owner, will not be a business owner for long.
False. The reduced social acceptance of overt racism is a result of laws forcing the free market(tm) to desegregate.
One of the most interesting things about libertarians is the ability to talk completely theoretically about things that actually happened and come to completely opposite conclusions.
You realize it was laws that kept segregation from ending yes?
In case you needed a refresher that segregation was enforced by laws...
Turbo false: HD remix.
The "white" and "colored" fountains are a step up from what was before: "white only" fountains because the owner just flat out didn't want to accomodate the niggers.
Another History brush up for you... "Within a year, a group of New Orleans activists led by Louis A. Martinet, the
editor of an African American newspaper, organized the “Citizens’ Committee” to challenge the law. The East Louisiana Railroad Company, which also sought to terminate the Act largely for monetary reasons, worked with them. "
In case you needed a refresher that segregation was enforced by laws...
Wow, you linked to Jim Crow, which I brought up in the first place as evidence of the absolute fact that the free market was forced to accomodate blacks. Separate but equal is a step up from the option far preferred by the free market, "separate and strictly inferior".
which also sought to terminate the Act largely for monetary reasons,
On the grounds that it would require the purchase of more railcars.
Such very civil rights.
You think the free market made laws in government?
Are you not familiar with the concept of buying politicians? Other interesting things include the Green book of the Negro motorist, which listed, amongst other things, businesses that would actually accomodate blacks. Businesses were pissed off at the very thought of being forced to accomodate blacks.
But I digress. The laws forced the free market, which had nothing against segregation, to desegregate. Libertarians were against desegregation as it would be simply Communist Fascism to force them to accomodate niggers, and they. still. are.
Wow, you linked to Jim Crow, which I brought up in the first place as evidence of the absolute fact that the free market was forced to accomodate blacks.
Dude... Jim Crow laws forced segregation...
On the grounds that it would require the purchase of more railcars.
Yes exactly. It's not a solid free market ideal to spend more money you don't have to. Thats kinda my whole point.
Are you not familiar with the concept of buying politicians?
Yes, and in a truly free market, the government isn't as big or strong, so this point becomes mute.
But I digress. The laws forced the free market, which had nothing against segregation, to desegregate.
No, you simply don't understand history correctly. Government forced segregation through laws.
"Jim Crow laws, in U.S. history, statutes enacted by Southern states and municipalities, beginning in the 1880s, that legalized segregation between blacks and whites. The name is believed to be derived from a character in a popular minstrel song."
Rothbard was talking about selling children as property.
The kind of people who would buy a child aren't looking to raise it as their own.
But Chickens and Gardens was literally arguing that HE doesn't like Kshama Sawant therefore he's going to shit all over my post... yet the mods warned ME for triggering him and his pedophilia political party.
I see that you spent your days posting memes about how wonderful gulags are if all your opponents go there instead of volunteering at an orphanage.
There are many families who are too poor to raise their children. There are many families who can afford to raise children but cannot have them. Your assumption immediately jumps to rape why? Rothbard is clearly discussing the concept of removing government hurdles that prevent easy adoption.
This sounds like either paranoid schizophrenia or some kind of adverse reaction to medication to me. I know there are a lot of people who really hate libertarians for whatever reason, but to say they all rape children and the party was founded to enable child rape requires some sort of cerebral short-circuit.
The fact that he made 52 posts in the past two hours arguing with people provides further evidence.
I know there are a lot of people who really hate libertarians for whatever reason, but to say they all rape children and the party was founded to enable child rape requires some sort of cerebral short-circuit.
til libertarians think stating facts is a "cerebral short-circuit"
I think it's pretty stupid to sit around and try to diagnose people over the internet. There are certainly a lot of unsavory and pedophilic elements in the libertarian right movement and having these arguments with people can get grating so one might just start at the end in a matter of speech. People have their own tics and triggers in any environment and understanding these without pathologizing them is really a good first step and honestly what Seattle was based on.
What I'm trying to say is that he was recently attacked by libertarians in a shot for shot remake of the nihlist scene in Big Lebowski
Do you remember that thread in /r/legaladvice where the dude wondered if he would get in trouble if he slept with a heavily mentally challenged girl? His excuse was that she seemed "excited" and didn't seem to think that just because she was too special to go out alone in the world, it didn't mean she was too special for sexy-times with him.
Oh wow, that Rothbard quote. I always thought the libertarianism=paedophilia meme was just something to balance out the commie-hate. Didn't know it was an actual thing.
tbf libertarian started meaning something 80 years before Rothbard was even born. The US libertarian party might have a bunch of pedos in it, but at least they don't promote theirs to US presidential candidates.
Gary Johnson could have won, but we were too pathetic as people. Gary did nothing but forget the name of a city and faking a heart attack, nothing your goofy uncle hasn't done but instead he was worse somehow than a person who flew on Jeffrey Epstein's pedo jet.
Now we're going to get stuck in Syria, aka Iraq war 3.0, to defeat ISIS, a group we helped arm years ago.
No, he could not have. There's a bipartisan effort in the U.S. to bar any third party from having any power. Ross Perot got far closer to presidency than ever, and what did they do? They quickly changed the rules around so he couldn't.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Pedophilia, is in fact, Ephebophilia, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Heterosexuality plus Ephebosexuality. Ephebosexuality is not a sexual fetish unto itself, but rather another component of the fully functioning heterosexuality system made useful by the genitals, tongue and finger components comprising a full SEX as defined by Congress.
Many sex users run a modified version of the heterosexual system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of heterosexuality which is widely used today is often called “Pedophilia”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the ephebosexuality system, developed by the Muhammed Prophet.
There really is an Ephebosexuality, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Ephebosexuality is the preference: the program in the system that allocates the human's genitalia to the other young girls that you secretly desire. The pedosexual/ephebosexual is an essential part of the pedosexuality/ephebosexuality movement, but useless by themselves; it can only attempt to legislate for the legalization and the recognition of consensual sex with girls aged 16 and under and abide by the law in the context of the complete society. Heterosexuality is normally used in combination with women aged 18 and over: the whole heterosexual system is basically 10 to 17 year old girls with women added, or Loli/Shota. All the so-called “Heterosexuality” distributions are really distributions of teaching people how to fuck, so I was wondering if you guys could tell me how to fuck young girls (preferably aged 10 to 12).
You joke but Stallman actually got a lot of flak for his views on libertarianism:
[P]rostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia … should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.
-Richard Stallman, link, 28 June, 2003.
I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.
-Richard Stallman, 'Dutch paedophiles form political party', 5 June, 2006.
There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.
-Richard Stallman, on Pedophilia, 4 January, 2013.
what's these assholes' problem? Just let other people do what they want, it's their bodies after all. If I'm a child lover I should be allowed to do what i want. Look, I understand if they don't want to PERSONALLY have sex with children under 18, but that's just their decision; there's a difference between being anti child-loving and anti-choice. They aren't allowed to impede on MY choices with MY sexuality. Hopefully they'll educate themselves before I report them to the junta.
No, libertarianism isn't code for pedophile, and most if not all libertarians would say that because children are not able to consent, they are not able to make a voluntary transaction in this way. Sure they could make an agreement to mow lawns, but not for anything sexual.
Why are all Trump supporters pedophiles and pedophile apologists? /u/The_Reason_Trump_Won is because republicans and libertarians are baby rapers. FACT.
102 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-02-28
Now with added Cancer!
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-02-28
I mean, it is.
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
LIKE I SAID
TIL
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-02-28
Yeah I just read the title and went "mmhmm"
n/a uhuhuhu 2017-02-28
akshually its hebebibobumphilia
n/a OiBoiFloyd 2017-02-28
scoobydoobydowhereareyouweneedsomehelpfromyounowphilia
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you screaming kids
n/a ProgressiveFragility 2017-02-28
Zionism is code for Heebophilia.
n/a theherps 2017-02-28
Nah, I just want recreational nukes.
n/a Tar-mairon 2017-02-28
Is it still pedophilia if libertarians themselves are children?
n/a Sober_Sloth 2017-02-28
Libertarian is code for being 14.
n/a davvii 2017-02-28
Noam Chomsky is going to be really pissed when he finds out he's a pedophile.
n/a OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-02-28
The drama disappeared really quickly. It's very sad, that was a drama vein that could have been mined for years.
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-02-28
You know what else disappeared really quickly? Children around a libertarian.
n/a OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-02-28
Usually I'd be lining up to protect the children, but since it's you I'll just take a break.
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-02-28
Almost as fast as food in a communist country!
n/a headasplodes 2017-02-28
Lmao how far up your own ass do you have to be to get a warning from a mod and continue being a smug facetious twat
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
That same mod has done the same BS in the past (warned me for "insulting a poor innocent person who was just trying to be sweet and engage in polite conversation!")
r/seattlewa and OP here are the twats. A bunch of "well, acktually" types.
I'm shocked charlesgrodinfan hasn't chimed in to tell us the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia and how it's totally acceptable in other societies.
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
bc i'm smarter than that
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
but it is hilarious that they canceled his book anyway
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
As an ACLU/Milo/Nazi free speech supporter I'll buy an extra copy for you
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
I'm sure he'll sell dozens! 0.001 copy for every shitpost
n/a JustAThrowaway4563 2017-02-28
That's millions of copies
n/a UncleSamuel 2017-02-28
Not up my own ass, others asses. You should appreciate that you giant fruitcake.
-UncleSamuel
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
:'(
n/a shadowbanned2 2017-02-28
Why are you into fucking kiddies so much pedo?
n/a nmx179 2017-02-28
but acktually,
It's entirely possible to discuss topics without leaping to calling people pedophiles because you're butthurt about the things they actually believe.
Far-out stuff, I know.
u/AmericanDerp is an amazing moderator with the patience of a saint when it comes to dealing with obtuse, self-rightous retards like you.
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
AmericanDerp magically missed every other awesome contribution in the thread (and has in the past as well) yet jumps on me stating the fact that libertarians diddle kids.
reddit is full of tryhards with too much free time.
n/a Bowl_of_troll 2017-02-28
Someone should stick their foot up your ass and wear you like the autistic flipflop that you are.
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
ayyy
n/a Fartkin 2017-02-28
you're really giving it your all to give trump all 8 years. I salute you centipede.
n/a kippot 2017-02-28
its centiPEDOS
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
Here's the thing.
This is the point where /u/Chickens_and_Gardens is still the idiot in the discussion.
This is, to put it mildly, very wrong. Self-identified US libertarians are far-right and switch seamlessly to republicanism. This is a very easy out for you from which to attack their views.
But you follow the United States school of debates, don't you? Following your presidential candidates.
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
Funny considering I'm not far right... I don't switch seemingly to republicans whatsoever, considering they trample the constitution at every opportunity.
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
The US constitution explicitly allows slavery in the prison-industrial complex, a thing libertarians are explicitly in favor of. Libertarians also happily side with republicans whenever they want to perpetuate existing systems of oppression. I'm talking things like, "well do businesses have to be forced to serve niggers? do we need to suffer under such a fascist society?"
Sources say yes.
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
You realize it was laws that kept segregation from ending yes? You also realize that the free market wanted to integrate yes?
Yes we believe in freedom of association. Because we rightly understand that a racist business owner, will not be a business owner for long.
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
One of the most interesting things about libertarians is the ability to talk completely theoretically about things that actually happened and come to completely opposite conclusions.
False.
Turbo false: HD remix.
The "white" and "colored" fountains are a step up from what was before: "white only" fountains because the owner just flat out didn't want to accomodate the niggers.
False. The reduced social acceptance of overt racism is a result of laws forcing the free market(tm) to desegregate.
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws
In case you needed a refresher that segregation was enforced by laws...
Another History brush up for you... "Within a year, a group of New Orleans activists led by Louis A. Martinet, the editor of an African American newspaper, organized the “Citizens’ Committee” to challenge the law. The East Louisiana Railroad Company, which also sought to terminate the Act largely for monetary reasons, worked with them. "
http://database.civics.unc.edu/files/2012/05/PlessyvFergusonPPT.pdf
Are you even listening to yourself? You think the free market made laws in government?
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
You are a very interesting liar.
Wow, you linked to Jim Crow, which I brought up in the first place as evidence of the absolute fact that the free market was forced to accomodate blacks. Separate but equal is a step up from the option far preferred by the free market, "separate and strictly inferior".
On the grounds that it would require the purchase of more railcars.
Such very civil rights.
Are you not familiar with the concept of buying politicians? Other interesting things include the Green book of the Negro motorist, which listed, amongst other things, businesses that would actually accomodate blacks. Businesses were pissed off at the very thought of being forced to accomodate blacks.
But I digress. The laws forced the free market, which had nothing against segregation, to desegregate. Libertarians were against desegregation as it would be simply Communist Fascism to force them to accomodate niggers, and they. still. are.
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
I provide context and sources, so I'm a liar?
Dude... Jim Crow laws forced segregation...
Yes exactly. It's not a solid free market ideal to spend more money you don't have to. Thats kinda my whole point.
Yes, and in a truly free market, the government isn't as big or strong, so this point becomes mute.
No, you simply don't understand history correctly. Government forced segregation through laws.
"Jim Crow laws, in U.S. history, statutes enacted by Southern states and municipalities, beginning in the 1880s, that legalized segregation between blacks and whites. The name is believed to be derived from a character in a popular minstrel song."
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
Rothbard was talking about selling children as property.
The kind of people who would buy a child aren't looking to raise it as their own.
But Chickens and Gardens was literally arguing that HE doesn't like Kshama Sawant therefore he's going to shit all over my post... yet the mods warned ME for triggering him and his pedophilia political party.
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
I see that you spent your days posting memes about how wonderful gulags are if all your opponents go there instead of volunteering at an orphanage.
There are many families who are too poor to raise their children. There are many families who can afford to raise children but cannot have them. Your assumption immediately jumps to rape why? Rothbard is clearly discussing the concept of removing government hurdles that prevent easy adoption.
n/a tasdna 2017-02-28
yes "free market in children and no age of consent" immediately makes me think "quality childcare" not "creepy old men who want to rape kids"
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
so is your interpretation that Rothbard wants to allow parents to sell their children into rape slavery? is this your interpretation? y/n
n/a Choozadoodle 2017-02-28
Lol 'cause you called them pedos and we don't like competition in the field of "really dumb, really inaccurate insults"
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-02-28
This sounds like either paranoid schizophrenia or some kind of adverse reaction to medication to me. I know there are a lot of people who really hate libertarians for whatever reason, but to say they all rape children and the party was founded to enable child rape requires some sort of cerebral short-circuit.
The fact that he made 52 posts in the past two hours arguing with people provides further evidence.
n/a glmox 2017-02-28
til libertarians think stating facts is a "cerebral short-circuit"
n/a MayorEmanuel 2017-02-28
I think it's pretty stupid to sit around and try to diagnose people over the internet. There are certainly a lot of unsavory and pedophilic elements in the libertarian right movement and having these arguments with people can get grating so one might just start at the end in a matter of speech. People have their own tics and triggers in any environment and understanding these without pathologizing them is really a good first step and honestly what Seattle was based on.
What I'm trying to say is that he was recently attacked by libertarians in a shot for shot remake of the nihlist scene in Big Lebowski
n/a Time_to_Drink 2017-02-28
The first thing we do when we don't like someone is diagnose them. It's this millenias curse.
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
First read that as "it's the millennial curse" which ain't far off
n/a ExtreemWeenie 2017-02-28
mfw my cyber-citizens break RP by not respecting my moderator powers
n/a theherps 2017-02-28
Eh, depends on the sub. Here when I get warned I act like a total cunt, get b&, and then spam the modmail until they mute me.
Anything else goes against the core principles of this fucking dumpster fire
n/a Akilroth234 2017-02-28
people get banned here?
how the fuck is /u/riemann1413 still around then?
n/a theherps 2017-02-28
Dunno. Last time I got b& I was telling one of the mods to kill himself over bitstrips or some other autism
n/a riemann1413 2017-02-28
no, that ban was becuz u refused to post ur bitmoji
n/a theherps 2017-02-28
Ah yes, that was the autism
n/a zahlman 2017-02-28
Yet the mod isn't doing anything about it, and didn't even remove the comment that earned the initial warning.
n/a Arathian 2017-02-28
It happens way too often.
Like, about a tenth of warnings I make in /r/europe escalate into bans as someone turns and does what I just warned him about "to show me".
n/a [deleted] 2017-02-28
[deleted]
n/a riemann1413 2017-02-28
yeah pretty much
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
ayy lmao
n/a going_for_a_wank 2017-02-28
This one too
n/a cptAustria 2017-02-28
i LIKE THIS ONE
n/a BasicallyADoctor 2017-02-28
But what if the child consents tho
n/a charlesgrodinfan 2017-02-28
here we goooooo
n/a dj_ilo 2017-02-28
in libertardian utopia every exchange is voluntary and happens between two consenting individuals
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
No unethical consumption under capitalism
n/a eebu 2017-02-28
kys
n/a drunkengael 2017-02-28
Ancapistan™ is leaking
n/a khanfusion 2017-02-28
Brain say "upvote due to good sarcasm", heart say "downvote cause ancaps want to rape kids", liver say "hay brain and heart. I'm love you and sorry."
n/a MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-02-28
Do you remember that thread in /r/legaladvice where the dude wondered if he would get in trouble if he slept with a heavily mentally challenged girl? His excuse was that she seemed "excited" and didn't seem to think that just because she was too special to go out alone in the world, it didn't mean she was too special for sexy-times with him.
"But she consents" was brought up a couple times.
n/a a_normal_human 2017-02-28
It is known.
n/a bleasehalb 2017-02-28
Tbh I usually see that kind of logic from people out to prove librul hypocrisy.
n/a pepperouchau 2017-02-28
Which spectrum are we talking about about?
n/a blackbluegrey 2017-02-28
Oh wow, that Rothbard quote. I always thought the libertarianism=paedophilia meme was just something to balance out the commie-hate. Didn't know it was an actual thing.
n/a fourcrew 2017-02-28
Comet Ping Pong Pizza: Libertarian Paradise
n/a telandrias 2017-02-28
tbf libertarian started meaning something 80 years before Rothbard was even born. The US libertarian party might have a bunch of pedos in it, but at least they don't promote theirs to US presidential candidates.
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
That's because libertarians don't promote anyone to presidential candidates.
n/a telandrias 2017-02-28
Gary Johnson could have won, but we were too pathetic as people. Gary did nothing but forget the name of a city and faking a heart attack, nothing your goofy uncle hasn't done but instead he was worse somehow than a person who flew on Jeffrey Epstein's pedo jet.
Now we're going to get stuck in Syria, aka Iraq war 3.0, to defeat ISIS, a group we helped arm years ago.
n/a thefran 2017-02-28
No, he could not have. There's a bipartisan effort in the U.S. to bar any third party from having any power. Ross Perot got far closer to presidency than ever, and what did they do? They quickly changed the rules around so he couldn't.
n/a ColorfulGhost 2017-02-28
I have you tagged sucks garys johnsons dick little too much
n/a Stuntman119 2017-02-28
Tag me too
n/a 18aidanme 2017-02-28
>"invented"
n/a Teresa_May 2017-02-28
Gary Johnson was the Pizzagate mastermind all along.
n/a ExtreemWeenie 2017-02-28
denying my sexual freedom in the name of reactionary age standards is just toxic
n/a OnSnowWhiteWings 2017-02-28
/r/drama regular is code for pedophile
n/a glmox 2017-02-28
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Pedophilia, is in fact, Ephebophilia, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Heterosexuality plus Ephebosexuality. Ephebosexuality is not a sexual fetish unto itself, but rather another component of the fully functioning heterosexuality system made useful by the genitals, tongue and finger components comprising a full SEX as defined by Congress.
Many sex users run a modified version of the heterosexual system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of heterosexuality which is widely used today is often called “Pedophilia”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the ephebosexuality system, developed by the Muhammed Prophet.
There really is an Ephebosexuality, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Ephebosexuality is the preference: the program in the system that allocates the human's genitalia to the other young girls that you secretly desire. The pedosexual/ephebosexual is an essential part of the pedosexuality/ephebosexuality movement, but useless by themselves; it can only attempt to legislate for the legalization and the recognition of consensual sex with girls aged 16 and under and abide by the law in the context of the complete society. Heterosexuality is normally used in combination with women aged 18 and over: the whole heterosexual system is basically 10 to 17 year old girls with women added, or Loli/Shota. All the so-called “Heterosexuality” distributions are really distributions of teaching people how to fuck, so I was wondering if you guys could tell me how to fuck young girls (preferably aged 10 to 12).
n/a subpoutine 2017-02-28
You joke but Stallman actually got a lot of flak for his views on libertarianism:
n/a Akilroth234 2017-02-28
that dude definitely diddles kids
n/a subpoutine 2017-02-28
But at least he doesn't use proprietary software.
n/a bleepis 2017-02-28
im going to come to where you live and spray you with a spray bottle full of bleach
n/a drvgyn2 2017-02-28
what's these assholes' problem? Just let other people do what they want, it's their bodies after all. If I'm a child lover I should be allowed to do what i want. Look, I understand if they don't want to PERSONALLY have sex with children under 18, but that's just their decision; there's a difference between being anti child-loving and anti-choice. They aren't allowed to impede on MY choices with MY sexuality. Hopefully they'll educate themselves before I report them to the junta.
n/a jubbergun 2017-02-28
...what does any of this have to do with pizza?
n/a DoomlordKravoka 2017-02-28
Pizzagate.
n/a Mexagon 2017-02-28
Nah, salon and their ilk seem to have a monopoly on all of that.
n/a Insulasol2 2017-02-28
http://imgur.com/a/dKNG8
n/a Akilroth234 2017-02-28
i hate being a libertarian, everyone thinks you're a faggy ancap
n/a YourGayOpinion 2017-02-28
Maybe stop then
n/a [deleted] 2017-02-28
[removed]
n/a HINDBRAIN 2017-02-28
/u/AmericanDerp why don't you just ban the guy? He'll obviously never get what you mean.
n/a CH0AM_N0MSKY 2017-02-28
He ain't wrong.
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
Hey I made the Drama page!
No, libertarianism isn't code for pedophile, and most if not all libertarians would say that because children are not able to consent, they are not able to make a voluntary transaction in this way. Sure they could make an agreement to mow lawns, but not for anything sexual.
n/a Pornthrow1697 2017-02-28
Dude weed lmao
n/a Chickens_and_Gardens 2017-02-28
lol, and the repeal of the entire drug war. reformation of the criminal justice system etc.
I don't even smoke weed.
n/a drvoke 2017-02-28
Why are all Trump supporters pedophiles and pedophile apologists? /u/The_Reason_Trump_Won is because republicans and libertarians are baby rapers. FACT.
n/a _LordSheogorath_ 2017-02-28
Funnily enough 'priest' is also code for pedophile