A leader willing to step down when 75% of your MPs vote no confidence is more important. Contrary to what you might think they aren't all blairite scum and actually do give a shit about Labour having a future as a party that can form a government rather than being a twitter protest party. If you want the latter go join the Greens.
I live in the US, so that's gonna be my fate for at least 4 years. And the reason we have that is because our "Left" party nominated Conservative-Lite.
And he's gonna get buttfucked in the next general election.
He won amongst the party membership, which consists of ~500,000 people. 9 million voted for Labour in the 2015 GE, and everyday sees more and more of those moving away from the party.
Maybe it's time for the MPs to catch up to what their constituents want.
What does this even mean? If you mean the party membership, then yes you're right. But they're very different things and the electorate at large is much more important.
The Clinton-Sanders model doesn't really apply to the UK. Sanders had a shot at winning the presidency; Corbyn has no chance. He's so much more useless than Sanders in just about every respect.
Why the fuck is Sargon acting pro-Corbyn anyway? Is this like one of those things where the anime Nazis pretend they were totally sincere Sanders supporters to try and appeal to lefties?
Ghazi actually believes this
They actually think Sargon wants to gas Muslims or whatever
25 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-03-02
Providing a Community Safe from TITrCJ's Sexual Advances Since October 2015.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-03-02
Shit actual Blairites like /u/Stenanosaurus stay
n/a Stenanosaurus 2017-03-02
A leader willing to step down when 75% of your MPs vote no confidence is more important. Contrary to what you might think they aren't all blairite scum and actually do give a shit about Labour having a future as a party that can form a government rather than being a twitter protest party. If you want the latter go join the Greens.
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-03-02
Corbyn won twice retard. Maybe it's time for the MPs to catch up to what their constituents want.
n/a Stenanosaurus 2017-03-02
Well he is doing a great job losing byelections in safe seats at a time when the opposition should be winning seats as they are the opposition.
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-03-02
What's the point of Labour winning elections if they have to become Tories or LibDems to do so? May as well just have the latter two.
n/a Stenanosaurus 2017-03-02
If you think New Labour was just the same as the Tories then I hope you enjoy a very long time under the Tories.
n/a OiBoiFloyd 2017-03-02
Why do you like dead Iraqi children so much?
n/a Stenanosaurus 2017-03-02
You can do better than...but Iraq. Enjoy a Conservative government without a huge majority for another decade.
n/a OiBoiFloyd 2017-03-02
I'm not British. I'm a KKKanadian trapped under Trudeaus iron heel.
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-03-02
You know whose enjoying this conservative government instead of New Labour?
Iraqi Kids.
n/a Teresa_May 2017-03-02
I don't think Iraqi children give a shite about who is living in Number 10.
n/a ExterminateTrots 2017-03-02
The Eternal Anglo strikes again.
Why do the Britishers lust for blood and misery?
n/a PoorLilMarco 2017-03-02
Why do you not?
n/a PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-03-02
I live in the US, so that's gonna be my fate for at least 4 years. And the reason we have that is because our "Left" party nominated Conservative-Lite.
n/a blackbluegrey 2017-03-02
And he's gonna get buttfucked in the next general election.
He won amongst the party membership, which consists of ~500,000 people. 9 million voted for Labour in the 2015 GE, and everyday sees more and more of those moving away from the party.
What does this even mean? If you mean the party membership, then yes you're right. But they're very different things and the electorate at large is much more important.
The Clinton-Sanders model doesn't really apply to the UK. Sanders had a shot at winning the presidency; Corbyn has no chance. He's so much more useless than Sanders in just about every respect.
n/a Equus_Bonus 2017-03-02
Stay mad that Corbyn is making Labour red again, blairite.
n/a Stenanosaurus 2017-03-02
Keeping Labour red and the Westminster blue.
n/a Equus_Bonus 2017-03-02
You must be so sad that you won't be able to murder any more arabs any time soon.
n/a ExterminateTrots 2017-03-02
What would be the point if Labour went blue under some Blarite scum? Westminster would stay blue even if they got in.
Has Blair's pillaging of public education to fund the murder of arabs stopped you lot teaching basic arithmetic and reasoning skills?
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-03-02
Westminster was blue under Blair, dummy. Tony "Dictator Consulting Service" Blair is a fucking war criminal.
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-03-02
Because the 80's ushered in the greatest decade of mankind the 90's!
n/a aonome 2017-03-02
Ghazi actually believes this
They actually think Sargon wants to gas Muslims or whatever
Fucks's sake
n/a Bonzalez 2017-03-02
Apparently they think the leader of the leader of the Labor Party does too.
n/a aonome 2017-03-02
I thought Ghazi were radical socialists? Surely they'd be pro-Brexit
n/a dramallllama 2017-03-02
That subreddits should be called /r/sadtendies.
n/a projectedgeham666 2017-03-02
I think it's safe to say that anything that would duck Diane Abbot shouldn't be leading anything .
n/a Letterbocks 2017-03-02
Most prescient post in the entire thread tbh