After the number of users indicating their discontent with the moderation of a subreddit (secret vote which can be withdrawn if the user becomes satisfied again) reaches a dynamic threshold, a period of revolution begins.
Users can pay money towards points for the current moderator list or the accounts of self-declared challengers. There are minigames and activities and such that can provide bonuses on top of the funds and engage the autistic tendencies, but primarily pay to win. If one of the challengers has the most points at the end of the period of revolution they become the sole moderator. Points contributed are public and cannot be transferred.
Imagine how much the political fandoms would have paid to control r/politics during the election.
I remember playing minecraft and servers banning people for saying the IP's or mentions of other servers, the (correct) logic being that it encourages people to leave theirs.
So you've basically got control freak sub owners who fear they might not browse their things as often as they like?
10 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-04-06
Did you know that the bathtub was first marketed in north america as a horse trough and dog scalder?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a none_to_remain 2017-04-06
/u/spez suggestion
After the number of users indicating their discontent with the moderation of a subreddit (secret vote which can be withdrawn if the user becomes satisfied again) reaches a dynamic threshold, a period of revolution begins.
Users can pay money towards points for the current moderator list or the accounts of self-declared challengers. There are minigames and activities and such that can provide bonuses on top of the funds and engage the autistic tendencies, but primarily pay to win. If one of the challengers has the most points at the end of the period of revolution they become the sole moderator. Points contributed are public and cannot be transferred.
Imagine how much the political fandoms would have paid to control r/politics during the election.
n/a LovelyLeahMarried 2017-04-06
That would mean no more /r/anarchism mod drama though.
n/a Works_of_memercy 2017-04-06
On the contrary, imagine the tempers flaring when the users are forced to spend their actual lunch money on reddit politics.
n/a none_to_remain 2017-04-06
I must inform you there is a typo in your post it seems you accidentally typed "no".
n/a LovelyLeahMarried 2017-04-06
I think you might be right actually.
It might be interesting watching the teenagers of /r/anarchism spending their parents' money to demod each other.
n/a HINDBRAIN 2017-04-06
uh
n/a OnSnowWhiteWings 2017-04-06
I remember playing minecraft and servers banning people for saying the IP's or mentions of other servers, the (correct) logic being that it encourages people to leave theirs.
So you've basically got control freak sub owners who fear they might not browse their things as often as they like?
n/a extrasparkling 2017-04-06
place was really awful.
a bunch of soulless redditors paying tribute to trademarked logos.
n/a Quizlop 2017-04-06
/r/place and every derivative sub should have been nuked after they closed the canvas. The only good thing to come out of it is the sweet drama.
n/a tomato-123 2017-04-06
Pixel art is trash. Why is Reddit so obsessed with pixel art?
n/a EvanHarper 2017-04-06
http://i.imgur.com/XQudAjW.jpg