People aren't inherently evil (except middle class white men and that's been proven by science)

64  2017-04-12 by [deleted]

65 comments

MRW

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, ceddit.com, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

/u/Pacific_Rimming do you actually believe white people are, by nature, more evil than others?

Don't worry about controversy, you're in good company here.

He's definitely /our dude/

If he's a real doctor this could be our first towards legitimacy!

He could be a doule agent for (((them))). Or wait, are we working for (((them)))? It's hard to keep track honestly. Why not just put poison in the mayo?

(((Psychology))) is a scam anyways.

Hope he gets chucked out of a plane.

Just the white mens's, which to be honest with you fam is pretty irrefutable

#MAGA #AllLivesMatter

Dumblrinas are looking dumber by the day

Never seen a man go to such lenghts to explain why black ladies don't tip.

Bravo /u/Pacific_Rimming

This guy isn't a psychologist. The Stanford Prison experiment is pseudo science, and no credible psychologist would seriously cite it for anything:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201310/why-zimbardo-s-prison-experiment-isn-t-in-my-textbook

He isn't citing it. The parent comment is citing it as if it is a respected experiment on human behavior. He is disproving it.

His criticisms aren't that the study is wrong, but that it only shows what a middle aged white man would do.

Which he prefaces by saying it is a narrow sample size and then follows it by saying people aren't inherently evil. He is saying the study was inherently flawed.

No he is saying that the narrow sample size only proves that middle aged white men are proven to be ebbil.

And he's right.

Yelping about poor sampling doesn't disprove anything, it just suggests the effects limited to a smaller subgroup. Which is to say: instead of humans being evil we should conclude middle aged white dudes are evil.

That's still a flawed conclusion though, mayocide aside, because the flaws of the experiment are deeper than "they only tested white dudes."

It reads like he is disputing it...

Why the fuck do I always end up reading well sourced expertly written articles whenever I come to r/drama. Makes no goddamn sense.

This guy isn't a psychologist. The Stanford Prison experiment is pseudo science

Being that psychology itself is pseudoscience, I don't see the inconsistency.

That's an interesting perspective, Mr. MyPenisIsAWMD.

Weren't poor people the ones who decided to do the experiment?

is /r/drama really gonna take this bait and REEEEE the fuck out about this

It's not even bait. dumbasses here are going to get unironically triggered by it though.

This is why we need a mayocide. Right here. Right now.

Why do I have a feeling that the same people (like /u/Pacific_rimming) would in the same breath say race is a social construct and criticize a book like The Bell Curve as racist.

Because the bell curve is reproducible and therefore wrong, cause it would be bad if it were correct.

So....religion is a social construct, therefore Islamophobia doesn't real? Are you seriously that retarded?

religion is a social construct, therefore Islamophobia doesn't real?

That's right.

It's as real as Christianphobia

Also religion isn't a race, so not sure why you jumped to that first.

Are you retarded?

You must seriously lack reading comprehension. Here, I'll spell it out for your exceptionally-abled self.

You claim that saying that if something is a social construct (race), then you cant be "-ist" (this case racist) against it without making a contradiction. I'm saying that makes absolutely no fucking sense because religion is a social construct, yet someone can still be islamaphobic.

Nowhere did I say hating Islam makes you racist, you're putting words in my mouth. I'm saying you can still have something be a social construct and be bigoted against it considering the actual definition of bigotry is the "intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself".

Also nobody is claiming that ethnicity is a social construct. Go learn why and how race is a social construct before you decide to post some severely retarded shit.

blah blah blah blah no one cares

Nice argument friendo. You really got me there.

Thanks but it's not that hard to get retardos like you.

You should probably kill your self

Sad!

You're like a more retarded version of "the reason trump won". Fucking neck yourself.

There wasn't a single middle aged white man participating as a research subject in the Sanford Prison Experiment.

So young white men are evil? So Dramas user base is evil?

Gotcha

Some of us are legit old... physically anyway.

Don't forget legit evil.

I remember being able to digest things. Oh, the memories.

Thank god for pancake batter.

Probably due to their laziness and hatred of science.

I suppose it's a coincidence that Rwandans, Congolese, Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans, Germans, Frenchmen, Americans, Haitians, Mexicans, Japanese, and Indians all behave in the exact same way when authority tells them to commit atrocities. Yup. Pure coincidence. No such thing as human nature, no sir.

White middle-aged men are the slave owners of today.

Wait, when does middle-age kick in? Because I can't wait for this shit.

When you notice people crossing the street as you walk towards them.

Because I'm rolling with my dope-ass slaves?

They see you roll'n, they're afraid'n, try'n to catch you oppress'n

Weren't white middle aged men the slave owners of yesterday too?

middle class

Why are you trying to make this distinction, apologist? Remember, AWALT (All Whites Are Like That).

all white men are evil because they scapegoat social classes

huh... really makes you think

god fuck anyone who thinks compliance matters at all. "hey guiz did you hear about this movie (with boobies!!!!) about this fuked up thing that happened once?!?!!? authority...really makes u think....."

People in third world countries were more likely to accept any offer, even when they would get a ridiculously low sum. That is because "money is money" to them. They didn't care that A got more than B, just that they got "something".

How does this dumb just-so storytelling motherfucker just-so things like this? How does it not occur to him that people in third world countries are more acclimated to unfairness, and take what they can get? His explanation is so blindingly stupid (and patronizing to third world denizens) it's like a parody of some bleeding heart science-rejecting hippie.

The fact that his bullshit has 3000 votes actually making me a little angry. The Milgram experiment is not rigorous science, but it is par for the course for the field, and rejecting weak science with shit like "People aren't inherently evil" is in not even wrong territory.

The Milgram experiment was rigorous and has been replicated many times with consistent results and is certainly not par for the course for the field

did u/riemann1413 or u/HAHApointsatyou tag this

omg you're still upset that I berated you that one time for your boring agendapost. lol cute.

Also nah, I don't tag agendaposts. I just remove them for being boring and berate the op until they cry, often well into the future, like you. (:

jeeze i tag you once next to riemann and you'd think we've just gotten out of a rough relationship

also I'm like 90% sure you haven't "berated" me for posting any content here, feel free to point it out

"I'm shitposting because I'm a weirdo who makes up interactions with random dudes on the internet in my own head."

wew

lol nah I didn't make anything up, I just literally don't care about you. (:

Your weird teenafe passive aggressive smilies and morning replies say more to to me about your supposed apathy than words ever could.

(:

(:

why is it backwards

russians ) is better then this

why don't you know how to do correct

because it actually bothers people (:

y do you think it bothers? (; just looks bad.

: ᗡ

ok (: