teaching an “introduction to philosophy with a background in teaching ethics, critical thinking, and comparative philosophy East/West” with “primary research interests” of ethics and politics
I had an ethics class in high school. Basically his stance was "My ethics are superior to yours, so you will write what I want you to think or you will get a C or lower grade". I got a C, no ragrets.
I suppose it all depends on context. A trap having sex with a woman is just regular straight porn with a weird actor. A trap having sex with a dude is about as gay as it gets.
But this is /r/drama, so you KNOW how it's going to play out.
No because you're not jerking it to the guy. What's the point of watching trap porn if you aren't also jerking it to the trap because it looks like a woman
Nothing as hot as being attracted to a femmy looking guy, then finding out she's just a skinny flat-chested tomboy who's flattered by your attention and willing to do anything to keep your interest.
At least for a glorious two weeks until her manwhore of an ex-boyfriend comes back and she breaks it off to back to his cheating ass.
Then you scroll down and see what he looked like at 15 and realize he looked like he would grow up to be a mass murderer. BTW, this shows the problem I have with beards. They really distort how a person looks.
Everyone's on a "don't publicize the perpetrator" kick but I really think Elliot should have been made famous. Decently attractive, took care of himself, nice car, rich family, probably had some connections. Minus big muscles and a bigger cock, he's everything incels say women only care about. And yet he got absolutely nowhere with women.
I didn't realize it but you're right. Another example my uncle was one of the best looking 18 year olds in the world if his graduation photo is anything to go by (this was 1993 pre Photoshop) but he only had one girlfriend his entire life and was a heroin addict after high school and killed himself on his mid30s.
You could tell he was crazy apparently. He also got his ads kicked a lot and has an abusive mom. So he probably got what was coming to him
Stalin would never cut a very imposing figure – he grew to just five feet four inches, and for the rest of his life his shortness rankled him, causing him to resort to platform shoes and other devices in an effort to appear taller than he actually was.
Was Chomsky ever a communist though? He seems to go even further into the "impossible to even implement in the first place" political ideology than even commies do.
He was a standard New Leftist up to the 1980s, so, basically more Communist than the USSR and constantly falling for Third World revolutionary hellholes. Go read what he thought about North Vietnam at the time. Basically on the road to anarcho-communist federated direct democratic blah blah blah, with some minor impedances from the overly bureaucratic and centralized Party, which are probably there because of the imperialist war and will go away naturally with time.
This stuff has really been buried today but the New Left was just a bunch of fucking Maoists. They broke with the USSR not because they "found out" it was violent or authoritarian but because it stopped pretending to have a revolutionary new approach to building Utopia in a generation or two.
If "Anarchists don't get to make fun of other people's intelligence" isn't one of The Rules of the Internet it probably should be. Chomsky is the original "Blame America First" retard. He feigns concerns about human rights when he thinks he can use them to paint a picture of America as a terrible colonial empire. If you take a look at the laundry list of totalitarian leftist regimes he's defended it becomes obvious he doesn't give a shit about human rights unless he can use the subject as a cudgel against American foreign policy. The man is little more than a cult leader. He's only popular because his rhetoric is designed to make people who agree with him feel good about their prejudices and their hatreds. He portrays everyone who disagrees with him as evil, with a strong implication that if you do agree with him you must be on the side of good and right. He's the original purveyor of the kind of secular puritanism you see in places like /r/politics, where it's all "us vs. them, and we are smarter and more moral." The man has literally made the left dumber by turning intellectual conversations into moral arguments on the basis of his idea that there is a moral and ethical order that is hardwired into human beings (see his debate with Focault). He's not an intellectual. He argues like a middle-schooler or, even worse, like a Redditor. Anyone who takes the man seriously is mentally deficient.
/u/jubbergun, /u/MRB2012 and other r/drama idiots get very salty whenever Chomsky is mentioned. They haven't studied American foreign affair policy for over 50 years, domestic policy, labour laws, linguistics, AI, evolution, they think their /pol/ tier shitposting is an "argument" against Chomsky.
r/drama is an example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
/u/jubbergun [+548], /u/MRB2012 [+34] and other r/drama idiots get very salty whenever Chomsky is mentioned.
Not nearly as salty as you get when anyone takes a shot at the guy and it knocks his cock out of your mouth for a few seconds. The way you gargle his balls is the result of exactly the kind of cultish secular puritanism I mentioned. The man had one original idea in his actual field in the 50s and his spent the rest of his career playing apologist for tyrants.
The American government has funded and propped up dictators like Pinochet, Saddam Hussein.
He's had several original ideas, you are a worthless internet troll trying to attack someone who is vastly better than you.
The American government has funded and propped up dictators like Pinochet, Saddam Hussein.
Yes, because the American government, unlike a certain doctor of linguistics, has to occasionally eat a shit sandwich and make do with the least bad of all possible options in order to keep things from falling apart. No one is happy about it, but you'd have to be naive to pretend there are/were better options. Chomsky doesn't have the excuse of needing to get his hands dirty that the government has. He chooses of his own free will to interject his opinion on matters that are clearly beyond his ken, and unfailingly opines in favor of the worst abusers of human rights every time he opens his smelly face hole. His picture should be next to "Useful Idiot" in the dictionary.
TLDR: /u/jubbergun is actually defending the American government propping up dictators, bombing brown people, killing dissidents, torturing prisoners, and having a higher incarceration rate than the Soviet Union ever had at it's peak.
TIL that the Iraq war, concentration camps for the Japanese, CIA assassination of Allende and support for Pinochet, selling weapons to Saddam, are all "least bad of all possible options".
And I thought Trump supporters were stupid.
You are literally saying "I, some random salty ESS shitposter, know more than one of the top academics in the world."
TL;DR: You're 14 and don't understand foreign policy, so to make yourself feel smart you parrot the ramblings of someone who applies their keen and penetrating intellect to come up with nothing but wrong answers. Hopefully you grow out of this after your balls drop and you grow some pubes.
0/10 troll attempt.
Such garbage belongs in the trashcan of ideology.
You literally embody r/im14andthisisdeep.
What's it like having Dunning Kruger syndrome on r/drama?
What's it like having Dunning Kruger syndrome on r/drama?
I don't know, but since you're the one that seems to think you're a rocket surgeon because you bought into a cult of personality maybe you can fill us in?
That makes no sense.
I never claimed to be a "rocket surgeon" when it comes to foreign affairs. The fact that Noam Chomsky actually knows what he's talking about seems to trigger you far more than any Bernie Bro.
/u/jubbergun thinks he knows more than one of the greatest academics in the world. It's like watching anti vaxxers argue with doctors. You are just embarrassing yourself.
You haven't published any books, or participated in any public debate regarding foreign affairs. You are worthless.
thank god I checked this like a week ago and there were no new articles. Thought everyone just forgot this dude went around stabbing people and hitting people with bike locks and shit. What a psycho
If you're going to smack people in the head with something can legit fuck them up better be prepared for the consequences. It would have been funnier though if he had managed to potato a few of them before getting caught. Let the extremists eat each other
Probably not, since beating one another about the head and neck with blunt objects was a popular pastime in the 30s. "Knockle-Noggins," as it was called, was especially popular on college campuses. Contrary to popular belief, it was a game of Knockle-Noggins gone wrong that put FDR in a wheelchair, and the press was given the Polio story so the public wouldn't think he was some sort of cranium clunking degenerate. It's also a big part of the reason he married an ugly lesbian, but I don't want to delve too deep into a historical serious-post this early in the day.
Not only all stairways had inclines added for "Tsarina" Roosevelt's com-puterized wheelchair but a football field-sized glass house-type building was built in back of the White House for his medicinal, piped-in pure warmed seawater into his gigantic suicide-proof two feet-deep swimming pool where he waded naked with his nurses and had SODOMY AFFAIRS. Ones very near to him have written POPULAR BOOKS about his *SODOMY** oy vey love affairs! Already in his third term he was a HELPLESS AND USELESS STRETCHER CASE, incapable of even appearing at his fourth term convention!
Reminds me of all those retarded leftists on Twitter who were claiming that /pol/'s detective work made no sense and couldn't possibly form the basis for an arrest. I wish I could find their posts now to rub it in their faces.
I went to protest Trump when he spoke in LA, but when I got there several high schools kids broke a beer bottle on my head. They assumed I was a Trump fan, simply because I am white.
I posted several photos of the incident on my Facebook page and some of my liberal Democrat friends thought it was funny. I learned that people who knew me for years secretly resented me for my white skin. Some of which are even white themselves! And I used to think like them.
Now I'm a Trump fan and much happier with some new friends who don't hate my skin color.
121 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-05-25
Neat.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a Spectre_06 2017-05-25
Bot on point again!
n/a cruelandusual 2017-05-25
but muh ethics!
n/a ironicshitpostr 2017-05-25
Ethics professors are actually less ethical than the average person.
n/a Chicup 2017-05-25
I had an ethics class in high school. Basically his stance was "My ethics are superior to yours, so you will write what I want you to think or you will get a C or lower grade". I got a C, no ragrets.
n/a Mark_Kozelek 2017-05-25
Uh, it's not about violence. It's about ethics in anti-fascism.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-05-25
/u/drunkentune these are the types of people that inhabit /r/badphilosophy now. You have to go private or everything will be lost.
n/a drunkentune 2017-05-25
?
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-05-25
read the article bby
n/a drunkentune 2017-05-25
Nah.
n/a Dial_A_Dragon 2017-05-25
Kill you're self, then.
n/a drunkentune 2017-05-25
That's a bit disproportionate.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
Don't worry, you'll never see yourself coming. You just have to sneak up on yourself.
n/a Clark_Savage_Jr 2017-05-25
The problem is, if I'm drunk enough to let my guard down, I'm too drunk to get anything done.
n/a JumbledFun 2017-05-25
he would probably teleport
n/a Western_Promises 2017-05-25
Nothing personal, kid
n/a TSwizzlesNipples 2017-05-25
famalam no
n/a DennisRader 2017-05-25
That's a valid form of your nowadays.
n/a freet0 2017-05-25
Expecting people to use proper English is racism
n/a MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-05-25
Are you implying that most people on /r/badphilosophy have more philosophical knowledge than an introduction to philosophy course?
n/a heavenlytoaster 2017-05-25
Are you implying they have that much?
n/a DistortedLines 2017-05-25
/pol/ is always right
n/a SperglockHolmes 2017-05-25
The saddest words of tongue or pen.
n/a jPaolo 2017-05-25
So are traps gay?
n/a DistortedLines 2017-05-25
No
n/a Kodiak_Marmoset 2017-05-25
Yes.
n/a jPaolo 2017-05-25
Let's see which answer has more uparrows after 24h
n/a Kodiak_Marmoset 2017-05-25
I suppose it all depends on context. A trap having sex with a woman is just regular straight porn with a weird actor. A trap having sex with a dude is about as gay as it gets.
But this is /r/drama, so you KNOW how it's going to play out.
n/a jPaolo 2017-05-25
I didn't say I'll think of the more upvoted one as the right one.
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
If it's a trap Fucking a woman then you're jerking off to the trap as well which is gay
n/a Kodiak_Marmoset 2017-05-25
So your argument is that vanilla man+woman porn is gay as well?
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
No because you're not jerking it to the guy. What's the point of watching trap porn if you aren't also jerking it to the trap because it looks like a woman
n/a Kodiak_Marmoset 2017-05-25
I concede that you know way more about tranny porn than I do.
n/a WhyTrumpWillWin2020 2017-05-25
Depends
n/a ironicshitpostr 2017-05-25
Not if it's a reverse trap.
Nothing as hot as being attracted to a femmy looking guy, then finding out she's just a skinny flat-chested tomboy who's flattered by your attention and willing to do anything to keep your interest.
At least for a glorious two weeks until her manwhore of an ex-boyfriend comes back and she breaks it off to back to his cheating ass.
n/a NotJIm99 2017-05-25
The Board of Peace strikes again.
n/a OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-05-25
And of course he's a manlet.
n/a FTFallen 2017-05-25
Show me a physically attractive and independently successful communist and I'll show you my unicorn.
n/a mohkohnsepicgun 2017-05-25
http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/young-stalin-1894-1919/
n/a OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-05-25
Then you scroll down and see what he looked like at 15 and realize he looked like he would grow up to be a mass murderer. BTW, this shows the problem I have with beards. They really distort how a person looks.
n/a mohkohnsepicgun 2017-05-25
Remember: Elliot Rodgers was objectively attractive. Women could just smell the awkward, high-strung crazy on him from 500 yards away.
n/a OnlyRacistOnReddit 2017-05-25
Everyone knows about "Don't stick your dick in crazy", they often forget about "Don't stick crazy's dick in you."
n/a pervent-account 2017-05-25
In that case it might have worked out better to allow crazy to stick their dick in you. Or at least some volunteer.
n/a mohkohnsepicgun 2017-05-25
Elliot never stuck his dick in anyone: that was part of the problem apparently...
n/a ahbslldud 2017-05-25
Nah the equivalent is "Don't slam your clam on crazy."
n/a AntiLuke 2017-05-25
Don't have genital interactions with crazy.
n/a wowbagger88 2017-05-25
Everyone's on a "don't publicize the perpetrator" kick but I really think Elliot should have been made famous. Decently attractive, took care of himself, nice car, rich family, probably had some connections. Minus big muscles and a bigger cock, he's everything incels say women only care about. And yet he got absolutely nowhere with women.
n/a mohkohnsepicgun 2017-05-25
He oozes creepiness and that, in turn, made him unattractive: not his physical appearance per se.
If that's what you mean, the yeah: you're right.
n/a ironicshitpostr 2017-05-25
You forgot to mention his lovely puffy dick-sucking lips. *swoons*
n/a SWIMsfriend 2017-05-25
I didn't realize it but you're right. Another example my uncle was one of the best looking 18 year olds in the world if his graduation photo is anything to go by (this was 1993 pre Photoshop) but he only had one girlfriend his entire life and was a heroin addict after high school and killed himself on his mid30s.
You could tell he was crazy apparently. He also got his ads kicked a lot and has an abusive mom. So he probably got what was coming to him
n/a flooptrooper 2017-05-25
bahahahahahaha
n/a clarkeff 2017-05-25
This photo was edited for propaganda purposes. In reality, his face was pockmarked sue to disease.
n/a ShitCommentBelow 2017-05-25
Disease from all the rancid pussy he was getting.
n/a SWIMsfriend 2017-05-25
And clearly the propaganda worked because it's 80 years later and people still fall for it.
1930s propaganda so good people still believe it.
n/a 12broombroom 2017-05-25
For real tho commies still believe Holodomor propaganda.
n/a handsomestalin 2017-05-25
I based my username on it :<
n/a ay_what_up 2017-05-25
hes a fucking manlet
n/a niggerpenis 2017-05-25
n/a mohkohnsepicgun 2017-05-25
Oh well if you actually read the article of course you'll burst my bubble.
I just looked at the Keanu-esque photo, I don't do that there book-learnin'
n/a 90231232453151353311 2017-05-25
M A N L E T
n/a Thhueros 2017-05-25
Frederich Engels.
Give unicorn now.
n/a FTFallen 2017-05-25
Never heard of her.
n/a Raven0520 2017-05-25
All he needed was a small loan of a million dollars, and his dad's textile factory.
n/a Thhueros 2017-05-25
Thats how most of them get their money anyway.
n/a ieatpussy69 2017-05-25
Noam Chomsky was pretty qt in his time
n/a 12broombroom 2017-05-25
Was Chomsky ever a communist though? He seems to go even further into the "impossible to even implement in the first place" political ideology than even commies do.
n/a ieatpussy69 2017-05-25
idk but he could have seized my means of reproduction
n/a Kodiak_Marmoset 2017-05-25
He's never met a communist regime he wouldn't make excuses for, I think that counts.
n/a EvanHarper 2017-05-25
He was a standard New Leftist up to the 1980s, so, basically more Communist than the USSR and constantly falling for Third World revolutionary hellholes. Go read what he thought about North Vietnam at the time. Basically on the road to anarcho-communist federated direct democratic blah blah blah, with some minor impedances from the overly bureaucratic and centralized Party, which are probably there because of the imperialist war and will go away naturally with time.
This stuff has really been buried today but the New Left was just a bunch of fucking Maoists. They broke with the USSR not because they "found out" it was violent or authoritarian but because it stopped pretending to have a revolutionary new approach to building Utopia in a generation or two.
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
nobody can mention chomsky without an EvanHarper wall of text lmao
n/a EvanHarper 2017-05-25
129 words
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
Nobody can mention retard ideologies without you smugly defending them
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
good point genius
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
lmao are you basing that off anything or is your go-to argument now "ur dumb"
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
Nothing significant, just literally everything you say
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
I need to start posting less if people here actually remember me
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
just looked at your user account
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
Lol looking at my account just because I insulted you. Have you always been this much a fag or is it a recent development?
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
You don't get round lips from eating square meals.
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
boring
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
If "Anarchists don't get to make fun of other people's intelligence" isn't one of The Rules of the Internet it probably should be. Chomsky is the original "Blame America First" retard. He feigns concerns about human rights when he thinks he can use them to paint a picture of America as a terrible colonial empire. If you take a look at the laundry list of totalitarian leftist regimes he's defended it becomes obvious he doesn't give a shit about human rights unless he can use the subject as a cudgel against American foreign policy. The man is little more than a cult leader. He's only popular because his rhetoric is designed to make people who agree with him feel good about their prejudices and their hatreds. He portrays everyone who disagrees with him as evil, with a strong implication that if you do agree with him you must be on the side of good and right. He's the original purveyor of the kind of secular puritanism you see in places like /r/politics, where it's all "us vs. them, and we are smarter and more moral." The man has literally made the left dumber by turning intellectual conversations into moral arguments on the basis of his idea that there is a moral and ethical order that is hardwired into human beings (see his debate with Focault). He's not an intellectual. He argues like a middle-schooler or, even worse, like a Redditor. Anyone who takes the man seriously is mentally deficient.
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
copypasta?
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
/u/jubbergun, /u/MRB2012 and other r/drama idiots get very salty whenever Chomsky is mentioned. They haven't studied American foreign affair policy for over 50 years, domestic policy, labour laws, linguistics, AI, evolution, they think their /pol/ tier shitposting is an "argument" against Chomsky.
r/drama is an example of the Dunning Kruger effect.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
Not nearly as salty as you get when anyone takes a shot at the guy and it knocks his cock out of your mouth for a few seconds. The way you gargle his balls is the result of exactly the kind of cultish secular puritanism I mentioned. The man had one original idea in his actual field in the 50s and his spent the rest of his career playing apologist for tyrants.
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
The American government has funded and propped up dictators like Pinochet, Saddam Hussein. He's had several original ideas, you are a worthless internet troll trying to attack someone who is vastly better than you.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
Yes, because the American government, unlike a certain doctor of linguistics, has to occasionally eat a shit sandwich and make do with the least bad of all possible options in order to keep things from falling apart. No one is happy about it, but you'd have to be naive to pretend there are/were better options. Chomsky doesn't have the excuse of needing to get his hands dirty that the government has. He chooses of his own free will to interject his opinion on matters that are clearly beyond his ken, and unfailingly opines in favor of the worst abusers of human rights every time he opens his smelly face hole. His picture should be next to "Useful Idiot" in the dictionary.
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
TLDR: /u/jubbergun is actually defending the American government propping up dictators, bombing brown people, killing dissidents, torturing prisoners, and having a higher incarceration rate than the Soviet Union ever had at it's peak.
TIL that the Iraq war, concentration camps for the Japanese, CIA assassination of Allende and support for Pinochet, selling weapons to Saddam, are all "least bad of all possible options".
And I thought Trump supporters were stupid. You are literally saying "I, some random salty ESS shitposter, know more than one of the top academics in the world."
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
TL;DR: You're 14 and don't understand foreign policy, so to make yourself feel smart you parrot the ramblings of someone who applies their keen and penetrating intellect to come up with nothing but wrong answers. Hopefully you grow out of this after your balls drop and you grow some pubes.
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
0/10 troll attempt. Such garbage belongs in the trashcan of ideology. You literally embody r/im14andthisisdeep. What's it like having Dunning Kruger syndrome on r/drama?
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
I don't know, but since you're the one that seems to think you're a rocket surgeon because you bought into a cult of personality maybe you can fill us in?
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
That makes no sense. I never claimed to be a "rocket surgeon" when it comes to foreign affairs. The fact that Noam Chomsky actually knows what he's talking about seems to trigger you far more than any Bernie Bro.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
...is laughable.
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
/u/jubbergun thinks he knows more than one of the greatest academics in the world. It's like watching anti vaxxers argue with doctors. You are just embarrassing yourself. You haven't published any books, or participated in any public debate regarding foreign affairs. You are worthless.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
n/a Deity_Of_Darkness 2017-05-25
Stay mad. And keep projecting your insecurities.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
n/a MRB2012 2017-05-25
I can make it much simpler: Chomsky can get rhinofucked.
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
/u/EvanHarper isn't the person you told me is obsessed with how police never do anything wrong
n/a MRB2012 2017-05-25
I'm also obsessed with hating Noam Chomsky.
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tke_27wbW-0
n/a youtubefactsbot 2017-05-25
bot info
n/a EvanHarper 2017-05-25
yeah he has a bunch of obsessions. thinks social sciences are all a left wing conspiracy, etc. a real piece of work
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
/u/MRB2012 you gonna take that? bring out your inner cop and dispense some unaccountable, pointlessly violent street justice
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
What are we now? Antifa?
n/a a_normal_human 2017-05-25
Shouldn't you be whining in /r/neoliberal these days?
n/a Prince_Kropotkin 2017-05-25
i'll whine wherever i wanna
n/a MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-05-25
For a while Albert Camus was a communist. Then he realized they're all fucked and he ended up hating them. For a bit though at least one existed.
n/a heavenlytoaster 2017-05-25
Being a dumbass was totally reasonable preinternet. Now commies just deserve a foot up the ass.
n/a ay_what_up 2017-05-25
thank god I checked this like a week ago and there were no new articles. Thought everyone just forgot this dude went around stabbing people and hitting people with bike locks and shit. What a psycho
n/a jpflathead 2017-05-25
I had checked just two days ago and was disappointed that "as expected" he had gotten off.
And hey, I have to give /pol credit for their face matching skills and detective work.
Makes me think that the NSA as well as Facebook can probably do all of the same as well, programmatically.
n/a ironicshitpostr 2017-05-25
So this is the power of weaponized autism...
Not bad, not bad at all...
n/a JumbledFun 2017-05-25
If you're going to smack people in the head with something can legit fuck them up better be prepared for the consequences. It would have been funnier though if he had managed to potato a few of them before getting caught. Let the extremists eat each other
n/a Thhueros 2017-05-25
If only we had more people hitting college republicans with bike locks in the 1930s, maybe the holocaust wouldn't have happened.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
Probably not, since beating one another about the head and neck with blunt objects was a popular pastime in the 30s. "Knockle-Noggins," as it was called, was especially popular on college campuses. Contrary to popular belief, it was a game of Knockle-Noggins gone wrong that put FDR in a wheelchair, and the press was given the Polio story so the public wouldn't think he was some sort of cranium clunking degenerate. It's also a big part of the reason he married an ugly lesbian, but I don't want to delve too deep into a historical serious-post this early in the day.
n/a LSU_Coonass 2017-05-25
that meme with the acending brains
you described the first two, now get on my level
n/a EvanHarper 2017-05-25
Not only all stairways had inclines added for "Tsarina" Roosevelt's com-puterized wheelchair but a football field-sized glass house-type building was built in back of the White House for his medicinal, piped-in pure warmed seawater into his gigantic suicide-proof two feet-deep swimming pool where he waded naked with his nurses and had SODOMY AFFAIRS. Ones very near to him have written POPULAR BOOKS about his *SODOMY** oy vey love affairs! Already in his third term he was a HELPLESS AND USELESS STRETCHER CASE, incapable of even appearing at his fourth term convention!
n/a headasplodes 2017-05-25
They tried that but unsurprisingly the commies got their assessment beat
n/a FalmerbloodElixir 2017-05-25
I wonder if Professor Clanton would be alright with having a bike lock shoved up his ass. You know, for LGBT tolerance purposes.
n/a jubbergun 2017-05-25
I dare say it would be homophobic to refuse a bike lock up one's ass if asked politely. That would just be poor form.
n/a Zappert 2017-05-25
n/a ChateauJack 2017-05-25
He's gonna see a lot of diversity behind those bars, good for him!
n/a princessCuck 2017-05-25
Reminds me of all those retarded leftists on Twitter who were claiming that /pol/'s detective work made no sense and couldn't possibly form the basis for an arrest. I wish I could find their posts now to rub it in their faces.
n/a anothertosser221 2017-05-25
Some serious /r/thathappened material in the comments...