Some countries litteraly have different ages of consent for heterosexual and homosexual activity. Or for any kind of anal for instance. Plus some US states straight up forbade some sex acts for everyone.
This article is badly formatted, but look up "Homosexual and heterosexual age discrepancies" paragraph in the linked section.
The threshold age for engaging in sexual activity varies between jurisdictions (see below). Most jurisdictions have set a fixed age of consent. However, some jurisdictions permit sex with a person after their puberty, such as Yemen, but only in marriage. Ages can also vary based on the type of calendar used, such as the Lunar calendar, how birth dates in leap years are handled, or even the method by which birth date is calculated.
Weak dude, you started it, nodody reacted, because they saw you as a troll. 1/10, even the plot of Suicide Squad ( a movie that is watchable because of the explosions and Margot Robbie) was deeper.
No I started it in 2 places. But it was posted before on funnier subs (/r/feminism and such). I predict by tomorrow it'll be reposted in at least 20 places.
Exactly. NC is woke, it's the other states that don't get it. Once you're invited in, you can't be charged with breaking and entering. Makes perfect sense.
Yes you can. You can be invited in and still not be in the house. And besides you're still breaking several laws like trespassing. you're fucking rapetarded.
Yes but then it's trespassing, not breaking and entering. Just like NC doesn't define staying inside a vagina "rape" (but you can get sued under other sex crimes).
It looks like a state Supreme Court ruling on a case 30-40 years ago, that's going to be removed soon.
That's good, but they should give any justices still alive, who were on the court and made the ruling, a couple of hard kicks to the dick for good measure.
Did you even bother reading that article or u just took clickbait title as 100% truth? I guess the later so mayocide when?
"If the actual penetration is accomplished with the woman's consent, the accused is not guilty of rape, although he may be guilty of another crime because of his subsequent actions," the High Court wrote.
No from what I read, it was still a dumb ruling. I consider fucking someone against their stated wishes to be rape, even if the fucking started mutually.
"Right now, if a woman tells a man to stop having sex he is under no legal obligation to do so..."
I also maintain my stance that the occasional corporal punishment of Supreme Court justices would be both entertaining and make for a better justice system. But mostly I just want to see people in legal outfits get spanked.
So if I leave my credit card info to some shop to make purchases like every week, then cancel this and they still fulfill my order and take my money that's CARDING?
"Right now, if a woman tells a man to stop having sex he is under no legal obligation to do so..."
That's not the law, that's a clickbaity interpretation of it. If penetration began with consent, then the accused can't be charged with rape specifically but can still be charged with any other crimes.
Under this law, if the woman withdraws consent and the man refuses, then he can be charged with false imprisonment, assault, battery, or anything else the prosecution can make stick. Just technically not rape.
It's a flawed ruling, but interpretations like this article's don't help.
Ah, fair enough. The language is definitely looking to stoke some outrage there.
And I'm not in the "if you feel you've been raped, you have been" crowd. I'm talking about when someone sends a clear message during the act. But, I'd still rather the prosecution was also able to put rape as a charge in a situation like that, along with those others.
Eh, either way, it looks like they're getting around to changing it and the whole thing will be done with soon enough.
"On March 30, state Sen. Jeff Jackson, a Democrat, filed a bill that would change this horrific law. (He filed a similar bill with two Republican co-sponsors in 2015.)"
I'm wondering if this applies to anal sex as well. If two men are banging the bussy and consent is withdrawn, does this work there too? You'd think it would, if a test case had come up during that time.
51 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-06-23
Here's the thing. You said a "trilby is a fedora."
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a lokichilde 2017-06-23
NC about to get extra rapey
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Cranking it up to 11.
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-23
The age of consent or volume level?
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Depends where is the age of consent in NC? I could believe it was under 11, seeing how they handle their sex related laws.
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-23
I have never needed to research consent laws and I'm okay with that.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Incel?
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-23
I've just only been into women in my age group.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
You could be 11? In France it's easy. Anything goes as long as you're 15. No limits on age difference, allowed sex acts, and whatnot.
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-23
I'm pretty sure certain sex acts are frowned upon there.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Some countries litteraly have different ages of consent for heterosexual and homosexual activity. Or for any kind of anal for instance. Plus some US states straight up forbade some sex acts for everyone.
This article is badly formatted, but look up "Homosexual and heterosexual age discrepancies" paragraph in the linked section.
n/a WikiTextBot 2017-06-23
Age of consent: Age
The threshold age for engaging in sexual activity varies between jurisdictions (see below). Most jurisdictions have set a fixed age of consent. However, some jurisdictions permit sex with a person after their puberty, such as Yemen, but only in marriage. Ages can also vary based on the type of calendar used, such as the Lunar calendar, how birth dates in leap years are handled, or even the method by which birth date is calculated.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.22
n/a HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-06-23
Thanks.
n/a mehforeverybody 2017-06-23
Weak dude, you started it, nodody reacted, because they saw you as a troll. 1/10, even the plot of Suicide Squad ( a movie that is watchable because of the explosions and Margot Robbie) was deeper.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
No I started it in 2 places. But it was posted before on funnier subs (/r/feminism and such). I predict by tomorrow it'll be reposted in at least 20 places.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-06-23
This really takes all of the fun out of the rape imho.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
This makes AIDS rodeo legal though.
n/a autourbanbot 2017-06-23
Here's the Urban Dictionary definition of aids rodeo :
I just gave her the aids rodeo.
about | flag for glitch | Summon: urbanbot, what is something?
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-06-23
We need to notify those kebabs from the incel thread yesterday that they should move to North Carolina.
n/a GoMLism 2017-06-23
Kebabs?
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-06-23
That's a slur for rapey turkmen.
n/a GoMLism 2017-06-23
One of those dudes is white idk about the other one.
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-06-23
In the post with the guys picture he mentions being turkish.
The other guy is just a bad troll, so he gets to be a kebab as well.
n/a GoMLism 2017-06-23
They are both trolls.
n/a jubbergun 2017-06-23
I thought Rapey Turkmen was the guy that played the Soup Nazi on Seinfeld?
n/a wwyzzerdd 2017-06-23
I think his name was RAAAAAALPH!
n/a SperglockHolmes 2017-06-23
NC is now my favorite Carolina.
n/a Kekistanian9000 2017-06-23
wtf i love nc now
n/a EarnestNoMeta 2017-06-23
Come for the Cheerwine and Neese's. Stay for the rape.
n/a jubbergun 2017-06-23
Whether you want to or not.
n/a Kekistanian9000 2017-06-23
If you don't want someone to fuck you untill he/she finishes, why do you start fucking anyway?
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Exactly. NC is woke, it's the other states that don't get it. Once you're invited in, you can't be charged with breaking and entering. Makes perfect sense.
n/a Kekistanian9000 2017-06-23
this but unironically
n/a OccasionallyClueless 2017-06-23
Would you not be charged with trespassing if you refused to leave?
n/a thesnakeinthegarden 2017-06-23
Not if you haven't come yet. That's law!
That's why i come in every house I'm invited to. which are few
n/a WorseThanHipster 2017-06-23
Yes you can. You can be invited in and still not be in the house. And besides you're still breaking several laws like trespassing. you're fucking rapetarded.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
I mean once you're in after having been invited.
n/a LordBlackmore 2017-06-23
If I invite you in and then tell you to get the fuck out for some reason, you don't get to stay inside my house.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
Yes but then it's trespassing, not breaking and entering. Just like NC doesn't define staying inside a vagina "rape" (but you can get sued under other sex crimes).
n/a LordBlackmore 2017-06-23
Ok, yeah I see what you mean.
n/a ThatGaymer 2017-06-23
haha jokes on them i've never came during sex anyway
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-06-23
It means you get to stick it in the same women you started having sex with at any time, until you come inside them. Nice loophole.
n/a lifesbrink 2017-06-23
Have a taste of this buss and I guarantee buckets
n/a JasonJewnova 2017-06-23
brb moving to north carolina
n/a rarestpepesforsale 2017-06-23
It looks like a state Supreme Court ruling on a case 30-40 years ago, that's going to be removed soon.
That's good, but they should give any justices still alive, who were on the court and made the ruling, a couple of hard kicks to the dick for good measure.
n/a Kekistanian9000 2017-06-23
Did you even bother reading that article or u just took clickbait title as 100% truth? I guess the later so mayocide when?
n/a rarestpepesforsale 2017-06-23
No from what I read, it was still a dumb ruling. I consider fucking someone against their stated wishes to be rape, even if the fucking started mutually.
I also maintain my stance that the occasional corporal punishment of Supreme Court justices would be both entertaining and make for a better justice system. But mostly I just want to see people in legal outfits get spanked.
n/a Kekistanian9000 2017-06-23
So if I leave my credit card info to some shop to make purchases like every week, then cancel this and they still fulfill my order and take my money that's CARDING?
n/a ricardogce 2017-06-23
That's not the law, that's a clickbaity interpretation of it. If penetration began with consent, then the accused can't be charged with rape specifically but can still be charged with any other crimes.
Under this law, if the woman withdraws consent and the man refuses, then he can be charged with false imprisonment, assault, battery, or anything else the prosecution can make stick. Just technically not rape.
It's a flawed ruling, but interpretations like this article's don't help.
n/a rarestpepesforsale 2017-06-23
Ah, fair enough. The language is definitely looking to stoke some outrage there.
And I'm not in the "if you feel you've been raped, you have been" crowd. I'm talking about when someone sends a clear message during the act. But, I'd still rather the prosecution was also able to put rape as a charge in a situation like that, along with those others.
Eh, either way, it looks like they're getting around to changing it and the whole thing will be done with soon enough.
I'm wondering if this applies to anal sex as well. If two men are banging the bussy and consent is withdrawn, does this work there too? You'd think it would, if a test case had come up during that time.
n/a thesnakeinthegarden 2017-06-23
BRB. I gota spam this on my FB, tumblr, IG, Digg, Napchat, kik and grindr accounts.
n/a jPaolo 2017-06-23
WTF USA
n/a Thulein 2017-06-23
Based North Carolina.