Why does no one believe the flat earth theory ?

23  2017-06-25 by Alienabducteebelieve

We have tons of evidence to prove its true!

54 comments

What's more pressing is why NO-ONE BELIEVES CATDOGS EXIST. THEY HAD TO COME UP WITH THE IDEA FOR THE CARTOON SOMEHOW

Soft disclosure

NOW we're talking about the real issues. Why is it the governments are hiding the existence of the catdog? It's because being in the presence of a catdog opens your pineal gland and then the government can't hide the existence Nibiru.

You don't need to believe in something factually true. belief is for myths and spaghetti monsters

> tfw you're super epistemologically naive

tfw you don't realise I'm using the cucumber method

I don't care what you stick in your ass, though

OP is an extravagant bonanza of childhood trolling.

OP which number is greater?

Years hard drug abuse or post secondary education

Lmao drug abuse

OK buddy, well you try to navigate at sea using flat earth hypothesis and tell us how it went.

If it's true then how come I can't see Mt. Everest from here?

BC it's so far away. You can only see so far as a human

so mt. everest is closer than the moon?

It's smaller than the moon. Tape a penny to a stop sign and drive a mile away from it. Can you still see the penny? How come you can still see tall buildings?

magic

What I'm trying to say is that the Earth is a tortilla. A tasty, fresh tortilla. Ready to be wrapped into a delicious burrito. Earth is God's tortilla and he's going to slather it with Tapatio sauce.

Cholula or nothing

So that's the fire that rains on the earth in revelations.

but with a telescope, you could also see the penny. More importantly, with a radio transmitter, you could send/receive messages from the building, because that's how line-of-sight works.

So if Mt. Everest is above the horizon, but just too far away to see, then it should be possible to see it with a telescope, and send radio messages to it - just as it's possible to do with the moon.

The reason you can't see it with a telescope is because there are too many things in the way. Buildings, hills, bridges, trees, boats, molecules, etc. You'd have to go higher than those things to see Mt. Everest with a telescope. Also, because of distortion in the atmosphere, you might not be able to see that far.

None of those things are as tall as Mt. Everest

None of those things are as tall as Everest

Are you saying that you can see the Empire State Building from Strawberry Fields in Central Park with no problems?

I've never been to New York, I wouldn't know.

because of distortion in the atmosphere, you might not be able to see that far.

What prevented you from seeing far enough into my post to where I mentioned radio?

i have to get above a molecule? Everest is 29,000, the rocky mountains 14,439, the tallest building in America 1709 in new York. on a flat plane from where I am all I should have to do to see Everest is go up 14,440 with a powerful enough telescope. flat earthers in my mind are the ultimate click bait bandits, make wild claims and see who triggers. I'm out

So the photons... like... disappear? What do you mean by that? If I can see the stars in the sky, then how can I not see something that is far closer than them?

Well when you see a star you actually are just seeing the light produced by the star from thousands or millions of years ago. Light stands out in dark. Big difference

But that still does not explain how the light from Mt. Everest just goes away. Ow would that work?

How many of you actually scientifically proved the curvature of the earth? No one? So you are saying you just believe what some person told you? Sounds as reliable as a religious person. Look into it.

Sure, I have. Here is an easy experiment: fly across the equator and look up at the night sky. You will see different constellations. How would this be possible with a flat earth?

The sky moves over time; this is observable. How would you get across the "equator" in enough time to know that you were looking at the same sky? It would take several hours of chemtrail dispersion to get there. Checkmate.

Do you observe the stars in roughly the same position at the same time from night to night? If so, you can assume that the sky is in roughly the same position one day later.

Really, you don't actually need to cross the equator, it just makes the effect more dramatic (Polaris/the little dipper will appear/disappear and the reverse will happen to the southern cross). You simply observe that as you travel far enough "north" or "south," the angle of the stars along that axis will be different. How is this the case for a flat earth?

The problem is that you're assuming such an "equator" even exists. Where is this "equator"? Can we see it somewhere?

I don't have to assume that an equator exists. The effect is just more extreme if you go to the opposite "hemisphere," but I'm not sure how to relay that concept to a flat earther. But really, you just have to travel "north"/"south" and take some photos. Unless you're too poor to do that.

You're saying that if you move thousands of miles over the course of several hours the sky changes. So does the ground, but that just means that you're somewhere else.

But didn't your read my last comment:

Do you observe the stars in roughly the same position at the same time from night to night?

Go thousands of miles north/south and take a photo of the sky 24 hours from the time you left. It will change more than it did back home.

So will the ground though

But why would I see different stars? How high is the sky in the flat earth world?

The sky doesn't exist

But then how can our eyes be real?

Ten.

The stars are actually only a few hundred miles away from the surface of the Earth. It's like a big cloche that covers the brown, green, and blue platter that is the ground.

Are all the stars the same distance away?

And who is powering those lights? Why would someone keep lights that are so faint above the earth?

And who is powering those lights?

Jews. Duh.

You know how seeing stars inspires people? They change the patterns as a form of mind control.

EARTH IS NEITHER SPHERE NOR FLAT SURFACE AND IT'S CURVATURE IS A SPECTRUM

SCIENCE IS A LIAR

sometimes

Cultural Marhxisum funded by ZE JOOS!

StayWoke, fuckers.

You foolish monkey. Everything is a simulation, this was proven YEARS AGO

There is no point arguing about bits in 2d simulation 😂

If you're going to get completely fucked up and come here you should bring enough to share with the whole class. Rude tbh.

I feel bad for flat earthers in about 10 years when trips to space are fairly normal.