"Forgot " in this context means - discussed with spouse, decided to stop taking bc, mutually start trying for baby in the near future and bought back-up birth control that spouse then refused to use.
Or just throw her down the stairs. Even if that means a few years in jail. Because that dude is gonna regret having a kid with her for a lot longer than that.
I feel like she isn't telling them the whole story. I think it's time for an alternate abortion. Maybe she falls down the stairs, or a couple crushed up morning after pills are in her food.
I get how the husband is being an asshole to her though. Like he could make up his mind. Seems like those two idiots are going to be unhappy no matter what. I'm team abortion + divorce because they shouldn't reproduce together.
I agree, if it being a few months early is too big a deal, he shouldn't have kids at all. He doesn't want them it seems and the wife is gonna hate him and herself and she aborts and they will inevitably get divorced.
Please. There is literally nothing this woman could say or do that would make you judge her for it. And there is literally nothing a man could say or do that would absolve him from guilt in your eyes.
You're just bigots over there. And like most bigots I've known, you've convinced yourselves that you're the oppressed ones.
Honestly, this attitude is why nearly everything done by, or for, women just completely sucks.
They refuse to accept criticism--not just of themselves, but of any other woman, ever, under any circumstances. They are unwilling to portray female characters in unflattering ways, or to have bad things happen to them. They are unwilling to even chastise women who start sucking dick in public or walking around with their genitals exposed.
Honestly, how is any man supposed to respect a bunch of prickly little children who won't accept responsibility for anything they do, or allow anyone else to lay blame when a woman does wrong.
Could you imagine if men just decided to pretend that no man would ever rape, steal or murder? Because women have pretty much already decided that other women will never do bad things.
Could you imagine if men just decided to pretend that no man would ever rape, steal or murder?
You mean like how every rape case discussed on reddit has about 5000 dudes all like "Well hang on, let's not be hasty here, maybe she drugged herself, tied herself up, and this poor gentleman just tripped and fell cock-first into her."
When you're describing rape cases that boil down to regret as the woman being drugged and tied up, then it's little wonder that people stop believing them.
They'd been married all of a month and were just about to buy a house, that's a shit-awful time to have a kid; they're basically going to be incurring the two largest expenses of their lives at the same time one of them is going to be out of work. Not only is it a stupid idea, not being able to put things off for a few months would be a gigantic red flag as to her ability to plan and work for the future. Hubby is rightfully shitting bricks over this situation and the idiot he married.
Tbf, him going in unprotected was also dumb as hell, so they're probably made for each other until the inevitable divorce.
It still is just a bunch of cells but she wants to let it develop into a child. This shouldn't be as hard of a concept for you to grasp as it seems to be.
'Consistency' shouldn't be a hard thing to grasp, nor should 'Other people are real and have feelings independent of my own'. And yet, you people fail that one time and time again.
I will now, against my better judgement, try to reason with someone on the internet before your very eyes!
You cannot simultaneously argue for and against two mutually exclusive concepts and expect anyone to take you seriously. "It's not a baby unless it's convenient for me to say it is" isn't a point, it's an unabashed double standard. Either a month old fetus is a baby or it's not. It can't be both.
I think the position of most pro-choicers is pretty clear... They maintain it should be the mother's choice, up to a certain point(which for most countries seems to be the end of the first trimester) And people who don't want to get an abortion but are still pro-choice aren't contradicting themselves. This isn't some gotcha moment man, pro-choice people can very easily hold in their minds that a bundle of cells isn't a human being but that obviously given some time to develop in a womb, will become one in a matter of months.
We're not arguing that cells becoming a child in the future is stupid, because it's not. We're arguing that a single person using "a month old fetus is just cells" to convince someone to get an abortion and "a month old fetus is a baby" to convince someone not to get an abortion is stupid. And that's exactly what we're seeing in that thread. Their definition of what is or is not a human changes based on how convenient it is for them.
I see. I wasn't referring to specific individuals. I was speaking generally. Yes obviously someone using both arguments simultaneously would be moronic. My bad.
She totally has the right. The part that is dumb is that she wants her husband to magically be ok with it, and she turns to the echo chamber to hear that it's totally fine to do what she's doing against his wishes.
She wants to have her cake and eat it too because she clearly expects some magic formula to make her husband submit. She's probably going to go through with it and later either complain her marriage isn't going well, or that the husband left.
This woman has all the right to keep her child. I know people don't like TwoX, but they're in the right here.
The part that makes it funny is when these arguments go the opposite way in trollx or twox it isnt a child anymore, but a bunch of cells. Its only a baby when the man dosent want it.
This sounds real nice, but how does it play out? The implication is that the man has the unilateral decision over whether his partner has an abortion, no?
No. Both decide if they want the baby. If the man doesn't want the baby he gives ways parental rights. If the woman doesn't want the baby, abortion or adoption.
Even if we did have a system of legal paternal surrender, this case would get laughed out of the fucking courtroom (assuming OP isn't lying): planned to have a kid after buying house, in middle of buying house, wife goes off birth control, tracks ovulation, he refuses to use condoms.
If I were a judge I'd legally require them both to get sterilized and the baby to be abandoned deep in the jungle to emerge more powerful than any regular human
Abortion does have some physical consequences, one of which being you can't get pregnant for a little while, but discussion about that is strangely missing
Abortion does have some physical consequences, one of which being you can't get pregnant for a little while, but discussion about that is strangely missing
You know, considering that fact it does make you wonder what human evolution will look like if we manage to survive another hundred thousand years.
Probably a population that is mostly men and like 10% women because abortion treatments over thousands of years have caused evolutionary infertility. The only women that will be left are the descendants of Mormons, Islamists, Roman Catholics, and different gradiations of red n3ck bible thumpers.
I mean, in cases of botched abortions, sometimes it results in infertility for life. I don't know how to respond to the rest because you've just kind of thrown shit at the wall to see what could possibly stick
You arent getting what I am talking about buddy, follow me along here and lets spitball. I am talking about the change to our evolutionary path that human women mostly all taking chemical birth control and getting chemical abortions could have over thousands of years.
If the only women that are breeding a lot are ones that dont go on birth control, then it stands to reason by evolutionary science, that the only women who are going to be successful mates in the far future are those that arent descended from woman who get abortions and are habitual birth control users from the age of 16. Now. That being said, the haibitual use of strong hormone affecting drugs also over the course of thousands of years is its own story.
We're talking about infertility in people who get botched abortions, right?
Noooo im talking about the infertility of family lines over thousands of years that where females of said lines consistently alter their fdrtility with chemical abortion and birth control etc.
I am just bullshitting.
That's like saying you can genetically pass on having your nuts ripped out
A percentage of botched circumcisions result in the lost of the penis, but it's still socially acceptable to perform them without consent. Both abortions and circumcision are about the convenience of others, not the ones having the operation performed upon them. I don't see why it should be treated any differently.
You don't know how evolution works. Its ok most don't.
It won't take 100k years really. Prior to the last 50 years, even women without strong maternal instincts had "oops" kids, and usually after that those instincts kicked in. They weren't at a major disadvantage evolutionary.
Now that those women can "opt out" they will quickly be removed from the gene pool, leaving only women stronger maternal instincts both genetic and culture. There won't ever be a 90% male thing since it doesn't produce any long term evolutionary advantage. Infertility is only selected for in species where everyone is very closely related, like a bee hive, where the workers are basically genetic slaves but due to their relatedness as all sisters its genetically viable.
You don't know how evolution works. Its ok most don't.
Fair. Go on.
It won't take 100k years really. Prior to the last 50 years, even women without strong maternal instincts had "oops" kids, and usually after that those instincts kicked in. They weren't at a major disadvantage evolutionary.
Now that those women can "opt out" they will quickly be removed from the gene pool, leaving only women stronger maternal instincts both genetic and culture. There won't ever be a 90% male thing since it doesn't produce any long term evolutionary advantage. Infertility is only selected for in species where everyone is very closely related, like a bee hive, where the workers are basically genetic slaves but due to their relatedness as all sisters its genetically viable.
Wow they had a plan and couldn't follow it and now this timeless argument happens once again. Mistakes were made on both sides and I agree when they suggested couple's counseling. Hoping for an update.
It's sad, because either way this marriage is doomed. If she aborts, she's going to end up resenting him for it. If she doesn't, he's going to hate her.
I don't think you people know anything about fertility. It takes years on average for people in their 30s to succeed in getting pregnant. It makes total sense to me that in the time leading up to when they want to begin the process of attempting to conceive that she would go off her birth control and had the husband really been gung-ho about waiting a whopping two months he could have put a rubber on it.
Humans aren't machines, there's no guarantee whatsoever that just because they were easily able to conceive the first time, that all subsequent pregnancies will go similarly. She could abort this one and then not be able to re-conceive for years.
whatever, both of these people seem retarded as fuck I don't know why I'm defending them
Isn't it infuriating, when every side of the story is retarded, you can't really pick one, and then you know there's probably who's going to grow up in the middle of all that.
I just don't understand how like, when she bought him the condoms and he turned them down, did she not say anything like, 'ok well don't be mad if I get pregnant early then?' Or were they really too stupid to understand sperm + egg = maybe a baby or two
Let's be real : they sounds dumb as fuck. And the nail in the coffin is when her reaction is like "lets ask TwoX what they think", instead of fucking making up her mind on her own like an adult who's gonna have to care for a child.
I really hope she gets and abortion that leaves her sterile, she's going to fuck up a kid someday (maybe that one, or if it's aborted the next).
145 comments
n/a SnapshillBot 2017-07-10
Jews did this
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
n/a kuro-no-shinigami 2017-07-10
Fucking Jews impregnating wives!
n/a ironicshitpostr 2017-07-10
Stop kinkshaming (((me)))!
n/a subpoutine 2017-07-10
"Oops, forgot to take my birth control for a few months but it's still your fault!"
Everyone one of those mongo TwoXers deserves a postterm abortion.
n/a TSA_Precheck 2017-07-10
You have a strange understanding of the word "forgot".
n/a AfterTowns 2017-07-10
"Forgot " in this context means - discussed with spouse, decided to stop taking bc, mutually start trying for baby in the near future and bought back-up birth control that spouse then refused to use.
Right?
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
You forgot "and then had sex with him anyway"
It takes two to make a baby with congenital low IQ
n/a buartha 2017-07-10
They discussed it and tracked her cycle and condoms were bought but he didn't want to use them 'cause muh penis feelz
I hope she has quadruplets
n/a SamWhite 2017-07-10
You're stretching here.
n/a bytewake 2017-07-10
unlike those condoms tbh
n/a Norci 2017-07-10
Legal abortion, please.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
Or just throw her down the stairs. Even if that means a few years in jail. Because that dude is gonna regret having a kid with her for a lot longer than that.
n/a Ultrashitpost 2017-07-10
Or just get a baseball bat and hit her when she's asleep. Then just pass it off as a vivid nightmare
n/a SamWhite 2017-07-10
Ah, the Pistorious method of birth control.
n/a boyoyoyoyong 2017-07-10
I feel like she isn't telling them the whole story. I think it's time for an alternate abortion. Maybe she falls down the stairs, or a couple crushed up morning after pills are in her food.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
That's what I said earlier : even if that dude was convicted for it, still better than a lifetime sentence having a child with her.
n/a PussMonster_ 2017-07-10
Did you miss the part where the husband said he wanted her to abort so he could hold off for a few months?
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
So what? If a woman wanted an abortion for the same reason, it would be her reproductive right.
n/a PussMonster_ 2017-07-10
ok I'll just let you jerk yourself raw in peace
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
I get how the husband is being an asshole to her though. Like he could make up his mind. Seems like those two idiots are going to be unhappy no matter what. I'm team abortion + divorce because they shouldn't reproduce together.
n/a PussMonster_ 2017-07-10
I agree, if it being a few months early is too big a deal, he shouldn't have kids at all. He doesn't want them it seems and the wife is gonna hate him and herself and she aborts and they will inevitably get divorced.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
/u/sporksmakemyday by agreement of /r/drama : flush that baby, and dump your husband.
n/a ThatDamnedImp 2017-07-10
Please. There is literally nothing this woman could say or do that would make you judge her for it. And there is literally nothing a man could say or do that would absolve him from guilt in your eyes.
You're just bigots over there. And like most bigots I've known, you've convinced yourselves that you're the oppressed ones.
n/a PussMonster_ 2017-07-10
Sorry I couldn't hear you I was too busy judging penises and persons with penises
n/a Sebaceous_Sebacious 2017-07-10
You mean people
n/a PussMonster_ 2017-07-10
No
n/a Sebaceous_Sebacious 2017-07-10
but you mentioned the only two types of people, it seemed redundant
n/a _R_E_C_K_O_N_E_R_ 2017-07-10
t. mensrights and KiA user
n/a AltRightRulesReddit 2017-07-10
What does that even mean?
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Keep it Anakin
n/a BannaHamHock 2017-07-10
It means he drives one of these
n/a some-other 2017-07-10
/r/indieheads user.
Yeah. There.
n/a 80BAIT08 2017-07-10
"Lonely harpies. Please confirm what I'm already thinking."
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
At least she's transparent.
n/a ThatDamnedImp 2017-07-10
Honestly, this attitude is why nearly everything done by, or for, women just completely sucks.
They refuse to accept criticism--not just of themselves, but of any other woman, ever, under any circumstances. They are unwilling to portray female characters in unflattering ways, or to have bad things happen to them. They are unwilling to even chastise women who start sucking dick in public or walking around with their genitals exposed.
Honestly, how is any man supposed to respect a bunch of prickly little children who won't accept responsibility for anything they do, or allow anyone else to lay blame when a woman does wrong.
Could you imagine if men just decided to pretend that no man would ever rape, steal or murder? Because women have pretty much already decided that other women will never do bad things.
n/a StingAuer 2017-07-10
dude what
n/a uniqueguy263 2017-07-10
A girl didn't text him back
n/a -Princeps- 2017-07-10
you sound like an incel but you're right, women are like jews and protect their own right or wrong
n/a CucksLoveTrump 2017-07-10
Yeah not like those pesky blacks who shoot up their own neighborhoods and deal crack to their local youth
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
I believe you meant to say "Jews of Color"
n/a uhohohno221 2017-07-10
You mean like how every rape case discussed on reddit has about 5000 dudes all like "Well hang on, let's not be hasty here, maybe she drugged herself, tied herself up, and this poor gentleman just tripped and fell cock-first into her."
n/a AltRightRulesReddit 2017-07-10
When you're describing rape cases that boil down to regret as the woman being drugged and tied up, then it's little wonder that people stop believing them.
n/a uhohohno221 2017-07-10
Yep, good thing men never stick together.
n/a AltRightRulesReddit 2017-07-10
I don't know what that's supposed to mean in this context.
n/a bytewake 2017-07-10
it's like water and oil fam. they dont stick together
n/a SamWhite 2017-07-10
Are you fucking serious?
n/a crudehumourisdivine 2017-07-10
he likes sticky men
n/a shaneoffline 2017-07-10
Men sticking together is noble and good.
n/a some-other 2017-07-10
This feels hyperbolic.
n/a uniqueguy263 2017-07-10
Turn your computer off and go outside
n/a some-other 2017-07-10
n/a 444455555666666 2017-07-10
I mean the husband is the retarded one in this scenario.. if you're having a kid the fuck does it matter if it comes a few months early
n/a ashent2 2017-07-10
no it seems more like the husband was hoping they'd do it a little later, maybe a little later, oops maybe never.
n/a lickedTators 2017-07-10
That's why you use a condom. And get a secret vasectomy.
n/a backltrack 2017-07-10
Oops, now you're infertile!
n/a die_rattin 2017-07-10
They'd been married all of a month and were just about to buy a house, that's a shit-awful time to have a kid; they're basically going to be incurring the two largest expenses of their lives at the same time one of them is going to be out of work. Not only is it a stupid idea, not being able to put things off for a few months would be a gigantic red flag as to her ability to plan and work for the future. Hubby is rightfully shitting bricks over this situation and the idiot he married.
Tbf, him going in unprotected was also dumb as hell, so they're probably made for each other until the inevitable divorce.
n/a lifesbrink 2017-07-10
Gas the breeders
n/a JohnGalt316 2017-07-10
b-b-but i thought it was just a bunch of cells
oh suddenly it becomes a child when the woman wants to keep it
n/a MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-07-10
It still is just a bunch of cells but she wants to let it develop into a child. This shouldn't be as hard of a concept for you to grasp as it seems to be.
n/a die_rattin 2017-07-10
Take your own advice, cupcake.
n/a ThatDamnedImp 2017-07-10
'Consistency' shouldn't be a hard thing to grasp, nor should 'Other people are real and have feelings independent of my own'. And yet, you people fail that one time and time again.
n/a MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-07-10
How is this inconsistent with early abortion? It's just potential for life, your feelings won't change that.
n/a AltRightRulesReddit 2017-07-10
Why can't she wait a few months and let the next clump of cells develop into a child?
n/a Cavhind 2017-07-10
Why can't her husband be less of a babby?
n/a AltRightRulesReddit 2017-07-10
Why can't she?
n/a Cavhind 2017-07-10
Problem is she too much babby formed
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
Through the power of what a woman's imagination (which other women will take for an objective truth), anything can become :
*mansplaining *rape *harassment *a child
n/a mithandr 2017-07-10
Why is mansplaining on this list?
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
https://twitter.com/NuclearTakes/status/883183950608252929
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
Shanley isn't really representative of anyone who hasn't had a railroad spike forced into and then removed from their frontal lobe by a hobo on meth
n/a backltrack 2017-07-10
It's a parasite remember!
n/a Sw2029 2017-07-10
It's called pro-choice for a reason dingus. That's literally the whole point.
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
I will now, against my better judgement, try to reason with someone on the internet before your very eyes!
You cannot simultaneously argue for and against two mutually exclusive concepts and expect anyone to take you seriously. "It's not a baby unless it's convenient for me to say it is" isn't a point, it's an unabashed double standard. Either a month old fetus is a baby or it's not. It can't be both.
n/a Sw2029 2017-07-10
I think the position of most pro-choicers is pretty clear... They maintain it should be the mother's choice, up to a certain point(which for most countries seems to be the end of the first trimester) And people who don't want to get an abortion but are still pro-choice aren't contradicting themselves. This isn't some gotcha moment man, pro-choice people can very easily hold in their minds that a bundle of cells isn't a human being but that obviously given some time to develop in a womb, will become one in a matter of months.
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
We're not arguing that cells becoming a child in the future is stupid, because it's not. We're arguing that a single person using "a month old fetus is just cells" to convince someone to get an abortion and "a month old fetus is a baby" to convince someone not to get an abortion is stupid. And that's exactly what we're seeing in that thread. Their definition of what is or is not a human changes based on how convenient it is for them.
n/a Sw2029 2017-07-10
I see. I wasn't referring to specific individuals. I was speaking generally. Yes obviously someone using both arguments simultaneously would be moronic. My bad.
n/a SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-07-10
This woman has all the right to keep her child. I know everyone hates TwoX, but they're in the right here.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
She totally has the right. The part that is dumb is that she wants her husband to magically be ok with it, and she turns to the echo chamber to hear that it's totally fine to do what she's doing against his wishes.
She wants to have her cake and eat it too because she clearly expects some magic formula to make her husband submit. She's probably going to go through with it and later either complain her marriage isn't going well, or that the husband left.
n/a SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-07-10
If abortion wasn't legal this wouldn't be a problem. Just saying.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
I agree. That dude wouldn't have played fast and loose with condoms.
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
The part that makes it funny is when these arguments go the opposite way in trollx or twox it isnt a child anymore, but a bunch of cells. Its only a baby when the man dosent want it.
n/a Pornthrow1697 2017-07-10
I mean, if you believe a woman's life is disproportionately affected more by pregnancy than a man's life, then it makes sense.
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
That depends entirely on who's working 40 life-shortening hours a week for the next 18 years to pay for the result of said pregnancy
n/a [deleted] 2017-07-10
[removed]
n/a DangerAcademy 2017-07-10
You right, you right, but the dude is still hilarious in this. He wanted a kid a month from now, not right now! Sounds like a freak.
n/a subpoutine 2017-07-10
Your mistake is believing she's telling the truth. They're probably much further off from a house than she's telling TooManyChromosomes.
n/a DangerAcademy 2017-07-10
"I didn't want a kid this week, I wanted it next week. Abort! "
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Nobody has the right to burden a man with a child.
n/a WithoutAComma 2017-07-10
This sounds real nice, but how does it play out? The implication is that the man has the unilateral decision over whether his partner has an abortion, no?
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Yes. Islam will fix this.
n/a WithoutAComma 2017-07-10
You're being weird.
n/a rickhora 2017-07-10
No. Both decide if they want the baby. If the man doesn't want the baby he gives ways parental rights. If the woman doesn't want the baby, abortion or adoption.
n/a gybryant 2017-07-10
Whereas now, beyond implication, is the fact that the woman is granted the unilateral decision for reproduction. That doesn't sound very fair, either.
n/a jaredschaffer27 2017-07-10
Even if we did have a system of legal paternal surrender, this case would get laughed out of the fucking courtroom (assuming OP isn't lying): planned to have a kid after buying house, in middle of buying house, wife goes off birth control, tracks ovulation, he refuses to use condoms.
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Why are you seriousposting in /r/drama?
n/a jaredschaffer27 2017-07-10
Oh, my mistake. This guy is a dumbfuck retard and you are an incel pleb.
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Lol
n/a SpectroSpecter 2017-07-10
If I were a judge I'd legally require them both to get sterilized and the baby to be abandoned deep in the jungle to emerge more powerful than any regular human
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
I love how it becomes a kid and not just a bunch of meaningless cells only when the argument is this way. Lol
Im all for abortion, have at it. However, you cant pull the scientific rationalist act and the "its my babbbbby" act at the same time.
n/a boyoyoyoyong 2017-07-10
That's women logic, it comes with the vagina.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
Abortion does have some physical consequences, one of which being you can't get pregnant for a little while, but discussion about that is strangely missing
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
You know, considering that fact it does make you wonder what human evolution will look like if we manage to survive another hundred thousand years.
Probably a population that is mostly men and like 10% women because abortion treatments over thousands of years have caused evolutionary infertility. The only women that will be left are the descendants of Mormons, Islamists, Roman Catholics, and different gradiations of red n3ck bible thumpers.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
I mean, in cases of botched abortions, sometimes it results in infertility for life. I don't know how to respond to the rest because you've just kind of thrown shit at the wall to see what could possibly stick
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
I think this goes further to my point.
You arent very good at just getting high and bullshitting, are you?
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
You can't pass down infertility.
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
You arent getting what I am talking about buddy, follow me along here and lets spitball. I am talking about the change to our evolutionary path that human women mostly all taking chemical birth control and getting chemical abortions could have over thousands of years.
If the only women that are breeding a lot are ones that dont go on birth control, then it stands to reason by evolutionary science, that the only women who are going to be successful mates in the far future are those that arent descended from woman who get abortions and are habitual birth control users from the age of 16. Now. That being said, the haibitual use of strong hormone affecting drugs also over the course of thousands of years is its own story.
This just makes sense.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
If you're infertile you can't have kids
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
Fertile parents can pass down genes that make their children infertile just like parents with sight can have blind children.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
We're talking about infertility in people who get botched abortions, right? That's like saying you can genetically pass on having your nuts ripped out
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
Noooo im talking about the infertility of family lines over thousands of years that where females of said lines consistently alter their fdrtility with chemical abortion and birth control etc.
I am just bullshitting.
Oh, I agree.
n/a Karmaisforsuckers 2017-07-10
What other fantasies do you make up to dull the pain of your life devoid of human touch?
n/a notthegreatestcatch 2017-07-10
But it wouldn't make sense that that affects the sex ratio (which you implied it does, there being only 10% women in your hypothetical society)
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
A percentage of botched circumcisions result in the lost of the penis, but it's still socially acceptable to perform them without consent. Both abortions and circumcision are about the convenience of others, not the ones having the operation performed upon them. I don't see why it should be treated any differently.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
How is this related? Go join one of the 1,000,000 anti-circumcision circlejerks already in promise
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
/r/drama
n/a Chicup 2017-07-10
You were only pretending to be retarded.
n/a Thestateyest 2017-07-10
n/a Maxwyfe 2017-07-10
When a foreskin gains consciousness and grows up to compose a symphony you might have a point.
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
/r/drama
n/a Maxwyfe 2017-07-10
Awww, now. All I really wanted is a little gif of a dick conducting an orchestra.
n/a Chicup 2017-07-10
Lol, no. Thats a retarded comparison and you should feel bad about it.
n/a Chicup 2017-07-10
You don't know how evolution works. Its ok most don't.
It won't take 100k years really. Prior to the last 50 years, even women without strong maternal instincts had "oops" kids, and usually after that those instincts kicked in. They weren't at a major disadvantage evolutionary.
Now that those women can "opt out" they will quickly be removed from the gene pool, leaving only women stronger maternal instincts both genetic and culture. There won't ever be a 90% male thing since it doesn't produce any long term evolutionary advantage. Infertility is only selected for in species where everyone is very closely related, like a bee hive, where the workers are basically genetic slaves but due to their relatedness as all sisters its genetically viable.
The more you know
n/a lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-10
Fair. Go on.
This is a A-👌 post.
n/a Karmaisforsuckers 2017-07-10
Yeah, only the pregnant woman gets to secide if its a potential kid or a cancerous tumor Not that hard to figure out you incel.
n/a JiffyPopp 2017-07-10
Wow they had a plan and couldn't follow it and now this timeless argument happens once again. Mistakes were made on both sides and I agree when they suggested couple's counseling. Hoping for an update.
n/a mrmcdude 2017-07-10
That doesn't sound like very good drama tbh
n/a uhohohno221 2017-07-10
I think they should abort because the dad is clearly of inferior genetic stock.
> have discussion with wife about going off birth control
> refuse to use condoms
> HOW IS BABBY FORMED???
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
Yup that's why retards can't legally consent to sex.
n/a LuntiX 2017-07-10
Not to mention she said she was monitoring her fertility as birth control as well. That works 0% of the time.
n/a lsord 2017-07-10
Sounds like she raped and took advantage of a differently abled vulnerable person.
n/a cigr 2017-07-10
It's sad, because either way this marriage is doomed. If she aborts, she's going to end up resenting him for it. If she doesn't, he's going to hate her.
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
I'm pretty sure they marriage was shit way before that. It's just that now she'll have to admit it.
n/a filo4000 2017-07-10
I don't think you people know anything about fertility. It takes years on average for people in their 30s to succeed in getting pregnant. It makes total sense to me that in the time leading up to when they want to begin the process of attempting to conceive that she would go off her birth control and had the husband really been gung-ho about waiting a whopping two months he could have put a rubber on it.
Humans aren't machines, there's no guarantee whatsoever that just because they were easily able to conceive the first time, that all subsequent pregnancies will go similarly. She could abort this one and then not be able to re-conceive for years.
whatever, both of these people seem retarded as fuck I don't know why I'm defending them
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
Isn't it infuriating, when every side of the story is retarded, you can't really pick one, and then you know there's probably who's going to grow up in the middle of all that.
n/a filo4000 2017-07-10
I just don't understand how like, when she bought him the condoms and he turned them down, did she not say anything like, 'ok well don't be mad if I get pregnant early then?' Or were they really too stupid to understand sperm + egg = maybe a baby or two
n/a IAintThatGuy 2017-07-10
Let's be real : they sounds dumb as fuck. And the nail in the coffin is when her reaction is like "lets ask TwoX what they think", instead of fucking making up her mind on her own like an adult who's gonna have to care for a child.
I really hope she gets and abortion that leaves her sterile, she's going to fuck up a kid someday (maybe that one, or if it's aborted the next).
n/a neutralvoter 2017-07-10
all I could see in that wall of text was 'i want' over and over again
n/a BannaHamHock 2017-07-10
/r/lordperiwinkle show us on the doll where the bad man touched you. Holy shit lady, you're one angry piece of work.