Should cops who shot an innocent man after going to the wrong house with a warrant be given the benefit of the doubt? Many in /r/protectandserve disagree

14  2017-07-26 by Ardvarkeating101

7 comments

You probably don't get bussy because you're the type of guy who fucking nails his dick to a board

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

Why are they so focused on the house being the wrong one? Does that really matter? Is killing people in the right houses not that bad?

Because it shows how sloppy the cops are, and that anyone that sloppy can't be trusted with lethal force?

If someone loses bike, you don't give them the keys to your car.

Who fucking cares if they have to knock two doors instead of one from time to time. The issue is clearly a fucking dead guy.

No. He was still obligated to comply. Castle Doctrine doesn't negate that.

What is stopping a burglar from yelling "police?"

It'd be another crime.

Well good thing nobody commits crimes.

/u/snefsky, you sound like the kind of cunt that arrests people on the sole charge of resisting arrest.

You do realize that the Supreme Court upheld a citizen's right to defend themselves from an unlawful arrest up to and including lethal force, right?

This was a lawful raid that was conducted on the wrong house, which means that it should be considered an unlawful police action, therefore the person in the home, in my eyes, was 100% justified in killing cops to protect himself from an unlawful arrest.

This wasn't a raid. They knocked on a door. There is no way this was unlawful.

And you're grossly misreading the court case. Pretty common mistake.

People like u/Snefsky jump at the chance to suck off a fellow officer. No way they would ever be in the wrong.

They banned me for this and this as far as I can tell. Since every time I try to ask them they just mute me from modmail. shrug