u/InfinityIsAnIllusion ask yourself how a conservative institution like the military would react to trannies in the military. How do you think a marine is going to react to Charles becoming charlene. Trannies don't make the country safer and I can't imagine they'd be welcome in most units.
So they were a trannie at the time. I'll spew whatever I want, and the military is allowed to have standards you think in a war zone they can be like hey sarge I can't go out on mission I've got to dialate my fakegina or that they should be provided their hormones on the side of a mountain where things can only get choppered in. Not sure why people like you freak out about something most militaries in the world don't allow. maybe you should complain about how asthmatics aren't allowed in or autists.
First of all, its a cost/risk assessment to disallow trans people in the military. Dont want to pay for their surgeries, high suicide rate among trans, and its a distraction you don't need. Plus you don't want dudes lowing their testosterone when your in war.
Ftm get stronger over time though. Frankly, transitioning to male should be mandatory for any woman who wants to serve. I mean look, I was a male when I was in the army. Therefore, it's just simply a matter of equality that women should have to be males too.
The military denies people with diabetes due to their regular need for insulin being a liability in the field, I'm not sure why everyone is surprised they don't want to admit a bunch of people who require constant ingestion of artificial hormones to keep from killing themselves.
Hey /u/PlanetaryPeak when you say dumb stuff like this you're really just showing everyone that you're still a child. If you were old enough to remember Bush, you would remember the lefties saying this same dumb shit back in '06. It's always "oooh they're going to take over the election they're not going to leave ooooh" but it never ever actually happens and nobody ever even tries that shit.
What makes you say that? Gender non-conformity is not a mental illness. The distress some individuals experience with dysphoria is currently categorized as a disorder, but many trans individuals work through their dysphoria as they transition. I'm also willing to bet that the more support they receive from society, the more the dysphoria is minimized.
Something to keep in mind, since a lot of folks have been using the high suicide rates among trans individuals as justification to keep them out of the military, trans individuals who still have strong family ties and support have much lower suicide rates than those who are ostracized by their social groups. They're just like anyone else; the more we call them sick and push them out of society, the more they suffer.
but many trans individuals work through their dysphoria as they transition.
well, since "many" do, its ok then, right? We have height, age, and physical requirements. Kind of makes sense to have a "head screwed on straight requirement."
lot of folks have been using the high suicide rates among trans individuals as justification to keep them out of the military, trans individuals who still have strong family ties and support have much lower suicide rates than those who are ostracized by their social groups
Why the fuck do I care? The military exists to kill people and break shit...its not a welfare program to make people "self-actualize."
The issue of my tax dollars paying for someone to enjoy a mental delusion aside, by the time a solder is done "transitioning," zer's contract will nearly be expired and zer will not have been deployable for the majority of the contract. Moreover, it is simply not good for unit cohesion or morale.
They're just like anyone else; the more we call them sick and push them out of society, the more they suffer.
Again, the individual and zer's personal suffering is irrelevant in the military context. They are there to conform, protect, obey, and kill.
Gender non-conformity is not categorized as a mental illness. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I'll need a source other than how you feel.
I have no issue with the military having mental health requirements. I don't think anyone has issue with that. That's not why people take issue with this blanket ban on trans individuals in the military.
There are plenty of mentally stable trans individuals already in the military. Those folks now risk being outed and losing their jobs. They've fought and many have died for out country.
I'm done arguing here. The fact that you see gender non-conformity as a "delusion" tells me how ignorant you are of this topic. Read some phsych papers. Talk to some nonbinary folks.
We're talking about gender here, not sex, not genetalia. I'll be happy to link you some studies once I'm not stuck on mobile, but I get the impression you wouldn't read or trust them anyway, regardless of source.
Either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of their reproductive organs and structures
Either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.
As you can see, gender is a way to describe social behaviors and tendencies. Sex is how you define an animal (including humans) biologically. Gender is a social label, sex is a biological label.
Correct. It's too bad you're the one calling a cat a table. Do you have a better source than folks that write dictionaries? Do you have any sources at all? Everything you've said is based off of your own feelings. Nothing you've said is based on fact, but I'm still waiting for the lawyer in you to present some tangible evidence.
Surgically mutilating your body to cut off your genitals and artificially reconstruct the outer service of female genitalia does not a woman make. You are still a dude that has been surgically altered to look like a facsimile of a woman. You still have an adams apple, lack the 2 x chromosomes, and do not have a fully functioning vagina.
Its like the dude that spent 100K to look like an elf. Sure...he may look like one, and he has every right to do so...buy stop forcing me to indulge in his fantasy that he actually IS an elf.
If the source is psychology absolutely not they'd be retarded to take it as gospel. Have you seen how little of their "studies" can be replicated .let's face it wanting to cut of perfectly good parts of the human anatomy is mental illness wether it's become pc or Not
This guy isn't even wrong, that's exactly what he'll do. He can't even admit he lost the popular vote in an election he won, what makes anyone think he'll admit it when he loses?
Trump has a severe mental illness, the guy lives in his own reality.
Listen man, I have seen your posts and I like your work. I really dont want to believe that you actually think Trump would go full Maduro because he has his head up his own ass. Lol
I don't think he'd be able to stay in office or his gambit would work, but you can bet your ass he's going to claim he actually won and claim millions of illegals made him lose.
I don't think he'd be able to stay in office or his gambit would work, but you can bet your ass he's going to claim he actually won and claim millions of illegals made him lose.
Presidential candidates in the past have claimed foul play and demanded multiple unnecessary recounts and investigations. This isn't a Trump based phenomena. Also, objectively, its more likely that republicans would be able to take a presidental loss without rioting every month.
So, I dont really see any indication that the original comment that we are both responding to has any merit except to raise the specter of "Trump Maduro Fusion Ha"
I don't know of any presidential candidate that has outright declared the election was rigged against him and claimed the only reason he lost was millions of illegal voters.
I don't know of any presidential candidate that has outright declared the election was rigged against him and claimed the only reason he lost was millions of illegal voters.
Al Gore has said many times that he thinks the 2000 was rigged. Then again, trump is just being up his own ass about popularity, he won fair and square in the elector college, the popular vote literally dosent matter a lick in this case.
Even if he does whine about the pop vote next election, he wouldnt have any party support at all from his own party as Republicans rely on the electoral college for equal representation in elections and he was a college based winner.
I don't agree with anything else in the comment other than Trump is without a doubt going to claim he really won and the illegal voters are to blame for his loss.
That isnt the point, the original comment you are defending is claiming that is he is going to use that as a excuse to become a dictator. Which, is nonsense. Its "OMG TRUMP DEATH SQUADS" level stupid.
Al Gore has said many times that he thinks the 2000 was rigged. Then again, trump is just being up his own ass about popularity, he won fair and square in the elector college, the popular vote literally dosent matter a lick in this case.
Can you provide citation of Gore saying it was rigged?
That isnt the point, the original comment you are defending is claiming that is he is going to use that as a excuse to become a dictator. Which, is nonsense. Its "OMG TRUMP DEATH SQUADS" level stupid.
I'm not defending anything other than his claim that Trump will claim he didn't lose the election, everything else is bullshit.
Al Gore has said many times that he thinks the 2000 was rigged. Then again, trump is just being up his own ass about popularity, he won fair and square in the elector college, the popular vote literally dosent matter a lick in this case.
Can you provide citation of Gore saying it was rigged?
I dont know if you were alive during that time and watched the news, but cmon man.
That isnt the point, the original comment you are defending is claiming that is he is going to use that as a excuse to become a dictator. Which, is nonsense. Its "OMG TRUMP DEATH SQUADS" level stupid.
I'm not defending anything other than his claim that Trump will claim he didn't lose the election, everything else is bullshit.
You were talking about the original quote and said they weren't even wrong and that's exactly what he will do. Whining about losing is a political past time. In fact, democrats have been specifically claiming formonths the election was rigged. Not by votes or anything like that, but because the DNC got exposed as scummy in emails.
Fuck man, you have articles by main stream news networks calling for the abolishment of the electoral college and that Hillary won the popular vote and that's all that matters, despite that not being how our government works.
The door swings both ways. Politicians ALWAYS call elections unfair or complain when they lose.
I dont know if you were alive during that time and watched the news, but cmon man.
I was actually, which is why I know this is pretty much bullshit.
You were talking about the original quote and said they weren't even wrong and that's exactly what he will do. Whining about losing is a political past time. In fact, democrats have been specifically claiming formonths the election was rigged. Not by votes or anything like that, but because the DNC got exposed as scummy in emails.
Lol? I don't recall anyone credible claiming the election was rigged, influenced, but not rigged.
Fuck man, you have articles by main stream news networks calling for the abolishment of the electoral college and that Hillary won the popular vote and that's all that matters, despite that not being how our government works.
You realize people have been calling for the end of the electoral college since the 1940s, right? In fact, even in 2012 democrats wanted to end it.
In fact, the majority of Americans, both republicans and democrats supported the end of the electoral college, the interesting part is republicans only started supporting it after Bush/Trump, democrats have been consistent in their views on the electoral college, win or lose, republicans on the other hand? Not so much.
And even more hilarious, while the popular vote might not matter, Trump thinks it does - and how do we know that? Ever read his tweet storm in 2012 when he thought Obama lost the popular vote?
I dont know if you were alive during that time and watched the news, but cmon man.
I was actually, which is why I know this is pretty much bullshit.
Yeah, I am totally going to dig for news articles from 2000 internet because you weren't watching the tv. Sorry, no.
You were talking about the original quote and said they weren't even wrong and that's exactly what he will do. Whining about losing is a political past time. In fact, democrats have been specifically claiming formonths the election was rigged. Not by votes or anything like that, but because the DNC got exposed as scummy in emails.
Lol? I don't recall anyone credible claiming the election was rigged, influenced, but not rigged.
Do you like not use reddit? Like the list of articles and calling the election specifically rigged or invalid is pretty staggering. I assume since I have seen you on politics you cant be this thick.
Fuck man, you have articles by main stream news networks calling for the abolishment of the electoral college and that Hillary won the popular vote and that's all that matters, despite that not being how our government works.
You realize people have been calling for the end of the electoral college since the 1940s, right? In fact, even in 2012 democrats wanted to end it.
Regardless, they are using the same argument to pretty much call this election wrong and that "Hillary was the real winner" same salt. Its no different than Trump whining about illegals because its all nonsense.
In fact, the majority of Americans, both republicans and democrats supported the end of the electoral college, the interesting part is republicans only started supporting it after Bush/Trump, democrats have been consistent in their views on the electoral college, win or lose, republicans on the other hand? Not so much.
I am sure over the course of time both parties have supported or decriedit based on results. Its the way the system works.
And even more hilarious, while the popular vote might not matter, Trump thinks it does - and how do we know that? Ever read his tweet storm in 2012 when he thought Obama lost the popular vote?
I am not a trump supporter, and I dont care. Democrats and Republicans do and say stupid shit to whine when they lose. Why are you trying to get me to defend the stupid shit trump says? I dont care.
However, you seem to have a hard on for thinking that trump is the first person on the planet to whine about polling results and call "unfair" or "rigged". When we are living in a age where people make a living on calling the election rigged by russians. Lol
Yeah, I am totally going to dig for news articles from 2000 internet because you weren't watching the tv. Sorry, no.
It didn't happen.
Do you like not use reddit? Like the list of articles and calling the election specifically rigged or invalid is pretty staggering. I assume since I have seen you on politics you cant be this thick.
Who credible claimed the election was rigged?
Regardless, they are using the same argument to pretty much call this election wrong and that "Hillary was the real winner" same salt. Its no different than Trump whining about illegals because its all nonsense.
Who credible claimed Hillary was the real winner?
I am sure over the course of time both parties have supported or decriedit based on results. Its the way the system works.
No, not actually. Democrats have supported ending it for as long as polls have existed in relation to this, same for republicans, until 2000 and 2016.
I am not a trump supporter, and I dont care. Democrats and Republicans do and say stupid shit to whine when they lose. Why are you trying to get me to defend the stupid shit trump says? I dont care.
I don't think you're a Trump supporter, I think you're just delusional. My point is, and the reason I linked Trump is to prove how HE views it, which will impact his claims in 2020.
However, you seem to have a hard on for thinking that trump is the first person on the planet to whine about polling results and call "unfair" or "rigged". When we are living in a age where people make a living on calling the election rigged by russians. Lol
Again, can you provide some citation from a credible, mainstream source, claiming the election was rigged by the Russians?
Yeah, I am totally going to dig for news articles from 2000 internet because you weren't watching the tv. Sorry, no.
It didn't happen. There was a call for a recount because it was so close, but Gore never outright claimed the election was rigged.
Lmao I literally remember on tv claiming thatFlorida was turned assist him by underhanded means. Ok though.
Do you like not use reddit? Like the list of articles and calling the election specifically rigged or invalid is pretty staggering. I assume since I have seen you on politics you cant be this thick.
Who credible claimed the election was rigged?
Credible? What constitutes credibility in this matter?
The main stream media has been ruining op eds non stop since the election calling it rigged, calling for instant impeachment, blah blah. Also, like I said, you are from the politics sub. I men jfc man, the top posts over there are about this bs. Lol
Regardless, they are using the same argument to pretty much call this election wrong and that "Hillary was the real winner" same salt. Its no different than Trump whining about illegals because its all nonsense.
Who credible claimed Hillary was the real winner?
Wtf you mean credible? The amount of op eds out of the mainstream and the salt here on reddit is pretty obvious. Im aaying the opinion exists and is a pretty popular bullshitting point, especially in politics subs.
I am sure over the course of time both parties have supported or decriedit based on results. Its the way the system works.
No, not actually. Democrats have supported ending it for as long as polls have existed in relation to this, same for republicans, until 2000 and 2016.
Well, it must be in place for good reason then?
I am not a trump supporter, and I dont care. Democrats and Republicans do and say stupid shit to whine when they lose. Why are you trying to get me to defend the stupid shit trump says? I dont care.
I don't think you're a Trump supporter, I think you're just delusional. My point is, and the reason I linked Trump is to prove how HE views it, which will impact his claims in 2020.
Who the fuck cares? There is no consequence to people having his view. He won't remain emperor, so who gives a shit? I never implied he dosent have a crazy world view.
However, you seem to have a hard on for thinking that trump is the first person on the planet to whine about polling results and call "unfair" or "rigged". When we are living in a age where people make a living on calling the election rigged by russians. Lol
Again, can you provide some citation from a credible, mainstream source, claiming the election was rigged by the Russians?
Dude. Cmon. Its all over the media? Op eds dont need to be credible, they just need to hit a target audiences sweet spot.
Also, I dont consider any main stream news source credible anyways.
The main stream media has been ruining op eds non stop since the election calling it rigged
Ok so, we'll just ask this one more time. Show me where the "mainstream media" claimed the election was "rigged."
Well, it must be in place for good reason then? Huh... til that thete was bipartisan support to abolish the college for all that time, and nothing happened. Wiiiierd
Lol? The electoral college isn't even being used as intended. The entire point was to stop populist demagogues that had no business being president.
Not only that, but the founders had intended for us to expand the size of the house as the population grew but we capped it in the early 1900s, that alone should be reason enough to end the electoral college.
It serves literally no purpose other than to disenfranchise millions of Americans. It leads to lower voter turnout as well and every election is about 3-4 swing states while every other state is just ignored for the most part.
Our entire electoral system needs to be overhauled because the one put in place by the founders is just not good today for many reasons.
The Electoral College is just one example of how an increasingly urban country has inherited the political structures of a rural past. Today, states containing just 17 percent of the American population, a historic low, can theoretically elect a Senate majority, Dr. Lee said. The bias also shapes the House of Representatives.
It exists, as a result, in the formulas that determine where highway funds are spent or who gets Homeland Security dollars. It exists in state capitols, where bills preferred by urban delegations have been much more likely to be rejected.
Today, the influence of rural voters also evokes deeply rooted ideals about who should have power in America. Jefferson and James Madison argued that the strength of the nation would always derive from its agrarian soil.
“They had this vision of what they called the ‘yeoman farmer’: this independent, free-standing person who owed nothing to anybody, who didn’t receive any payments from the government, who didn’t live by a wage, but who could support himself and his family on a farm growing everything they needed — and that these were the people who were going to be the backbone of democracy,” said Gerald Gamm, a political scientist at the University of Rochester, describing what could be the forefathers of the rural voters who tilted this year’s election.
And even worse:
But even when you control for policy need, Dr. Lee’s research has found that a significant rural bias in resources persists. You can see it in Homeland Security funding that gave Wyoming, for example, seven times as much money per capita as New York after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. You can see it in Alaska’s proposed “bridge to nowhere.”
“In that case,” Dr. Ansolabehere said, “Alaska has so much disproportionate power in the negotiation over funds that in order for California to get some, Alaska gets a lot — to the point of not knowing what to spend the money on.”
1
Dude. Cmon. Its all over the media? Op eds dont need to be credible, they just need to hit a target audiences sweet spot.
Lol? So to be clear, you believe op-eds are somehow relevant? If this is all over the media, you should find it pretty easy to simply point out which mainstream news source is claiming "rigged."
Also, I dont consider any main stream news source credible anyways.
70 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-07-26
You probably don't get bussy because you're the type of guy who fucking nails his dick to a board
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-07-26
Why do they have rape fantasies involving Trump?
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Internalized trumpaphobia
1 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-07-26
Dudes got a nice pair of titties. Don't kinkshame.
1 cultish_alibi 2017-07-26
I regret reading this comment.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-07-26
He thicc
1 worldjewsisfakenews 2017-07-26
THICC
1 worldjewsisfakenews 2017-07-26
what the fuck why was it deleted
1 nanonan 2017-07-26
One of the best images from the election.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-07-26
POTUS penis power.
1 worldjewsisfakenews 2017-07-26
http://i.imgur.com/iss9DU0.jpg
1 Cauchemar89 2017-07-26
I know I shouldn't be surprise what shit people put out on Twitter.
But still: why?
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-07-26
Vapid whores have the singular goal of finding a rich man they can leech off of
Twitter has many vapid whores
Trump is a rich man
Add a great big smile and presto it's kirby
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-07-26
lol
1 Hellkyte 2017-07-26
Honestly it's the ultimate cuck fantasy. Him holding me down against my will with those tiny little hands. It's like my own body is cucking me.
uhhhhhbubhhbhhhh
1 Lumene 2017-07-26
your hips move on their own
1 nio151 2017-07-26
Because his neck looks like a vagina
1 cuteman 2017-07-26
He's their favorite topic. Snoopsnoo their word clouds. Trump is #1 in their hearts and minds so of course he gets their dreams for free.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-07-26
u/InfinityIsAnIllusion ask yourself how a conservative institution like the military would react to trannies in the military. How do you think a marine is going to react to Charles becoming charlene. Trannies don't make the country safer and I can't imagine they'd be welcome in most units.
1 grungebot5000 2017-07-26
they weren't a fan of bringing in the gays either
oh well, whatever makes sarge happy
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
The military has done just fine with it's current thousands of trans individuals serving. Google for yourself and quit spewing hate.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-07-26
So they were a trannie at the time. I'll spew whatever I want, and the military is allowed to have standards you think in a war zone they can be like hey sarge I can't go out on mission I've got to dialate my fakegina or that they should be provided their hormones on the side of a mountain where things can only get choppered in. Not sure why people like you freak out about something most militaries in the world don't allow. maybe you should complain about how asthmatics aren't allowed in or autists.
1 headasplodes 2017-07-26
That's such a huge variance that those numbers are pretty much worthless.
1 nmx179 2017-07-26
Left wingers never do this of course, u/voskul
1 Honk4Tits 2017-07-26
First of all, its a cost/risk assessment to disallow trans people in the military. Dont want to pay for their surgeries, high suicide rate among trans, and its a distraction you don't need. Plus you don't want dudes lowing their testosterone when your in war.
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-07-26
The army doesn't want people who cost 100 times more than average and actually get physically weaker over time no matter how much you train them
Super weird, I know!
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-07-26
Also trannies are gross and insane.
1 nicethingyoucanthave 2017-07-26
Ftm get stronger over time though. Frankly, transitioning to male should be mandatory for any woman who wants to serve. I mean look, I was a male when I was in the army. Therefore, it's just simply a matter of equality that women should have to be males too.
1 KULAKS_DESERVED_IT 2017-07-26
But the baseline strength is still lower than a man's, esp with the skeletal system.
It's better than your standard woman, but it's pretty obvi that women shouldn't be in the military either
1 -absolutego- 2017-07-26
The military denies people with diabetes due to their regular need for insulin being a liability in the field, I'm not sure why everyone is surprised they don't want to admit a bunch of people who require constant ingestion of artificial hormones to keep from killing themselves.
1 no_maps_no_plans 2017-07-26
tfw you will never suck a feminine penis
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-07-26
Don't let your dreams be dreams
1 h8speech 2017-07-26
Hey /u/PlanetaryPeak when you say dumb stuff like this you're really just showing everyone that you're still a child. If you were old enough to remember Bush, you would remember the lefties saying this same dumb shit back in '06. It's always "oooh they're going to take over the election they're not going to leave ooooh" but it never ever actually happens and nobody ever even tries that shit.
1 glmox 2017-07-26
/u/intersectv3 im glad you recognize the necessity of eugenics. we need to produce a master race of right-thinking people
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-07-26
Well, illegals can't vote and trannies can't reproduce, so.
1 smokes_degrass 2017-07-26
/u/planetarypeak boy that sounds like a horrible dystopic future.
you should kill yourself to avoid seeing it.
1 wisty 2017-07-26
I don't think anyone thinks the margin in the next election will be 5 million.
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-07-26
/u/ScorpioSpork
HAHAHAHA
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
Want to remind me what's funny about the comment chain I was involved in? Is making a blanket statement about a group of people funny?
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Well, they technically are...
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
What makes you say that? Gender non-conformity is not a mental illness. The distress some individuals experience with dysphoria is currently categorized as a disorder, but many trans individuals work through their dysphoria as they transition. I'm also willing to bet that the more support they receive from society, the more the dysphoria is minimized.
Something to keep in mind, since a lot of folks have been using the high suicide rates among trans individuals as justification to keep them out of the military, trans individuals who still have strong family ties and support have much lower suicide rates than those who are ostracized by their social groups. They're just like anyone else; the more we call them sick and push them out of society, the more they suffer.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Yes it is
well, since "many" do, its ok then, right? We have height, age, and physical requirements. Kind of makes sense to have a "head screwed on straight requirement."
Why the fuck do I care? The military exists to kill people and break shit...its not a welfare program to make people "self-actualize."
The issue of my tax dollars paying for someone to enjoy a mental delusion aside, by the time a solder is done "transitioning," zer's contract will nearly be expired and zer will not have been deployable for the majority of the contract. Moreover, it is simply not good for unit cohesion or morale.
Again, the individual and zer's personal suffering is irrelevant in the military context. They are there to conform, protect, obey, and kill.
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
Gender non-conformity is not categorized as a mental illness. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I'll need a source other than how you feel.
I have no issue with the military having mental health requirements. I don't think anyone has issue with that. That's not why people take issue with this blanket ban on trans individuals in the military.
There are plenty of mentally stable trans individuals already in the military. Those folks now risk being outed and losing their jobs. They've fought and many have died for out country.
I'm done arguing here. The fact that you see gender non-conformity as a "delusion" tells me how ignorant you are of this topic. Read some phsych papers. Talk to some nonbinary folks.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Oh, the same "psych papers" that are never peer review and use studies that 80% of the time cannot be replicated?
Tells me all I need to know. You either have a dick or a vag...end of story.
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
We're talking about gender here, not sex, not genetalia. I'll be happy to link you some studies once I'm not stuck on mobile, but I get the impression you wouldn't read or trust them anyway, regardless of source.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Nope. Unless you were born with both parts, your gender is your sex.
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
Gender as defined by Merriam-Webster:
Gender as described by Oxford Dictionary:
Sex as defined by Merriam-Webster:
Sex as defined by the Oxford Dictionary:
As you can see, gender is a way to describe social behaviors and tendencies. Sex is how you define an animal (including humans) biologically. Gender is a social label, sex is a biological label.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
You can call a cat a table...Its still a fucking cat.
1 ScorpioSpork 2017-07-26
Correct. It's too bad you're the one calling a cat a table. Do you have a better source than folks that write dictionaries? Do you have any sources at all? Everything you've said is based off of your own feelings. Nothing you've said is based on fact, but I'm still waiting for the lawyer in you to present some tangible evidence.
I'm done, have a good one.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Surgically mutilating your body to cut off your genitals and artificially reconstruct the outer service of female genitalia does not a woman make. You are still a dude that has been surgically altered to look like a facsimile of a woman. You still have an adams apple, lack the 2 x chromosomes, and do not have a fully functioning vagina.
Its like the dude that spent 100K to look like an elf. Sure...he may look like one, and he has every right to do so...buy stop forcing me to indulge in his fantasy that he actually IS an elf.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-07-26
If the source is psychology absolutely not they'd be retarded to take it as gospel. Have you seen how little of their "studies" can be replicated .let's face it wanting to cut of perfectly good parts of the human anatomy is mental illness wether it's become pc or Not
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-07-26
What's the implication? That a man sucking transgender dicks is a bad thing? Why are you so transhomophobic?
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-07-26
Every day I'm rustlin'
Every day I'm rustlin'
Every day I'm rustlin'
E-every day I'm rustlin'
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
This guy isn't even wrong, that's exactly what he'll do. He can't even admit he lost the popular vote in an election he won, what makes anyone think he'll admit it when he loses?
Trump has a severe mental illness, the guy lives in his own reality.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Listen man, I have seen your posts and I like your work. I really dont want to believe that you actually think Trump would go full Maduro because he has his head up his own ass. Lol
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
I don't think he'd be able to stay in office or his gambit would work, but you can bet your ass he's going to claim he actually won and claim millions of illegals made him lose.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Presidential candidates in the past have claimed foul play and demanded multiple unnecessary recounts and investigations. This isn't a Trump based phenomena. Also, objectively, its more likely that republicans would be able to take a presidental loss without rioting every month.
So, I dont really see any indication that the original comment that we are both responding to has any merit except to raise the specter of "Trump Maduro Fusion Ha"
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
I don't know of any presidential candidate that has outright declared the election was rigged against him and claimed the only reason he lost was millions of illegal voters.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Al Gore has said many times that he thinks the 2000 was rigged. Then again, trump is just being up his own ass about popularity, he won fair and square in the elector college, the popular vote literally dosent matter a lick in this case.
Even if he does whine about the pop vote next election, he wouldnt have any party support at all from his own party as Republicans rely on the electoral college for equal representation in elections and he was a college based winner.
That isnt the point, the original comment you are defending is claiming that is he is going to use that as a excuse to become a dictator. Which, is nonsense. Its "OMG TRUMP DEATH SQUADS" level stupid.
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
Can you provide citation of Gore saying it was rigged?
I'm not defending anything other than his claim that Trump will claim he didn't lose the election, everything else is bullshit.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
I dont know if you were alive during that time and watched the news, but cmon man.
You were talking about the original quote and said they weren't even wrong and that's exactly what he will do. Whining about losing is a political past time. In fact, democrats have been specifically claiming formonths the election was rigged. Not by votes or anything like that, but because the DNC got exposed as scummy in emails.
Fuck man, you have articles by main stream news networks calling for the abolishment of the electoral college and that Hillary won the popular vote and that's all that matters, despite that not being how our government works.
The door swings both ways. Politicians ALWAYS call elections unfair or complain when they lose.
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
I was actually, which is why I know this is pretty much bullshit.
Lol? I don't recall anyone credible claiming the election was rigged, influenced, but not rigged.
You realize people have been calling for the end of the electoral college since the 1940s, right? In fact, even in 2012 democrats wanted to end it.
In fact, the majority of Americans, both republicans and democrats supported the end of the electoral college, the interesting part is republicans only started supporting it after Bush/Trump, democrats have been consistent in their views on the electoral college, win or lose, republicans on the other hand? Not so much.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-electoral-college-history-20161219-story.html
And even more hilarious, while the popular vote might not matter, Trump thinks it does - and how do we know that? Ever read his tweet storm in 2012 when he thought Obama lost the popular vote?
http://imgur.com/a/uZIUw
1 imguralbumbot 2017-07-26
Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image
https://i.imgur.com/UVlEPyW.jpg
Source | Why? | Creator | state_of_imgur | ignoreme | deletthis
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Yeah, I am totally going to dig for news articles from 2000 internet because you weren't watching the tv. Sorry, no.
Do you like not use reddit? Like the list of articles and calling the election specifically rigged or invalid is pretty staggering. I assume since I have seen you on politics you cant be this thick.
Regardless, they are using the same argument to pretty much call this election wrong and that "Hillary was the real winner" same salt. Its no different than Trump whining about illegals because its all nonsense.
I am sure over the course of time both parties have supported or decriedit based on results. Its the way the system works.
I am not a trump supporter, and I dont care. Democrats and Republicans do and say stupid shit to whine when they lose. Why are you trying to get me to defend the stupid shit trump says? I dont care.
However, you seem to have a hard on for thinking that trump is the first person on the planet to whine about polling results and call "unfair" or "rigged". When we are living in a age where people make a living on calling the election rigged by russians. Lol
1 imguralbumbot 2017-07-26
Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image
https://i.imgur.com/UVlEPyW.jpg
Source | Why? | Creator | state_of_imgur | ignoreme | deletthis
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
It didn't happen.
Who credible claimed the election was rigged?
Who credible claimed Hillary was the real winner?
No, not actually. Democrats have supported ending it for as long as polls have existed in relation to this, same for republicans, until 2000 and 2016.
I don't think you're a Trump supporter, I think you're just delusional. My point is, and the reason I linked Trump is to prove how HE views it, which will impact his claims in 2020.
Again, can you provide some citation from a credible, mainstream source, claiming the election was rigged by the Russians?
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Lmao I literally remember on tv claiming thatFlorida was turned assist him by underhanded means. Ok though.
Credible? What constitutes credibility in this matter?
The main stream media has been ruining op eds non stop since the election calling it rigged, calling for instant impeachment, blah blah. Also, like I said, you are from the politics sub. I men jfc man, the top posts over there are about this bs. Lol
Wtf you mean credible? The amount of op eds out of the mainstream and the salt here on reddit is pretty obvious. Im aaying the opinion exists and is a pretty popular bullshitting point, especially in politics subs.
Well, it must be in place for good reason then?
Who the fuck cares? There is no consequence to people having his view. He won't remain emperor, so who gives a shit? I never implied he dosent have a crazy world view.
Dude. Cmon. Its all over the media? Op eds dont need to be credible, they just need to hit a target audiences sweet spot.
Also, I dont consider any main stream news source credible anyways.
1 pizzashill 2017-07-26
Ok so, we'll just ask this one more time. Show me where the "mainstream media" claimed the election was "rigged."
Lol? The electoral college isn't even being used as intended. The entire point was to stop populist demagogues that had no business being president.
Not only that, but the founders had intended for us to expand the size of the house as the population grew but we capped it in the early 1900s, that alone should be reason enough to end the electoral college.
It serves literally no purpose other than to disenfranchise millions of Americans. It leads to lower voter turnout as well and every election is about 3-4 swing states while every other state is just ignored for the most part.
Our entire electoral system needs to be overhauled because the one put in place by the founders is just not good today for many reasons.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/upshot/as-american-as-apple-pie-the-rural-votes-disproportionate-slice-of-power.html
And even worse:
1
Lol? So to be clear, you believe op-eds are somehow relevant? If this is all over the media, you should find it pretty easy to simply point out which mainstream news source is claiming "rigged."
Lmao.
1 Thulean-Dragon 2017-07-26
/u/DeliciouScience
Maybe you'd stay out of the news better if you weren't constantly trying to force your retarded ideology onto everyone else.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Sweden will the fucking easiest country to overthrow someday. Lol
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
I don't get it....no one is stopping you from cutting off your wang.....just don't force me to accept and share in your delusion that you are a woman.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Here is an easy litmus test: Will accommodating your "status" make it easier or more efficient to kill people or break shit. No? Then GTFO.
1 lvl99SkrubRekker 2017-07-26
Username checks out
👌
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-07-26
Fuck yeah it does. I'm not here to build a brand and suck my own cock.