¿Qué carajo acabas de mierda dices de mí, pequeña perra? Voy a tener que sabes que me gradué parte superior de mi clase en los Navy Seals, y he estado involucrado en numerosas incursiones secretas sobre Al-Qaeda, y tengo más de 300 muertes confirmadas. Estoy capacitado en la guerra gorila y yo soy el francotirador superior en todas las fuerzas armadas de Estados Unidos. No eres nada para mí, pero sólo otro objetivo. Yo limpiaré usted a la mierda con la precisión de la talla de la que nunca se ha visto antes en esta tierra, recuerda mis palabras malditas. ¿Crees que puedes salir a decir que una mierda para mí a través de Internet? Piense otra vez, hijo de puta. En estos momentos me pongo en contacto con mi red secreta de espías en los EE.UU. y su IP está siendo rastreado en este momento para prepararse mejor para la tormenta, gusano. La tormenta que arrasa con lo poco patético que llamas tu vida. Estás muerto, hijo. Puedo estar en cualquier parte, en cualquier momento, y te puedo matar en más de siete mil maneras, y eso es justo con mis propias manos. No sólo soy ampliamente entrenado en combate sin armas, pero no tengo acceso a todo el arsenal de la Marina de los Estados Unidos y lo voy a utilizar en toda su extensión para limpiar el culo miserables de la faz del continente, pedazo de mierda. Si sólo te podías saber qué castigo impío su pequeño comentario "inteligente" estaba a punto de hacer caer sobre ti, tal vez le haya poseído su maldita lengua. Pero no podía, no lo hiciste, y ahora está pagando el precio, Maldito idiota. Cagaré furia sobre ti y te ahogaré en ella. Estás muerto, chico.
Lol? Are you just making shit up? What are you basing this on exactly, because the exact opposite seems to be true, Trump supporters have lower education levels than the rest of the country.
The kinds of congressional districts Democrats are now winning also tilt toward the well-to-do. Data on the median household income of congressional districts provided by ProximityOne, a company that specializes in the analysis of geographic, demographic and economic data, shows the following:
In 2014, the median income of households in Democratic districts was higher than in Republican districts, $53,358 to $51,834. Democrats represent seven of the 10 most affluent districts, measured by household income (four in California, two in Virginia and one in New York). Democrats also represent a majority of the 100 most affluent districts, 54-46.
How about data that uses individuals, instead of districts?
One analysis earlier this year found that Trump voters have a median household income of $72,000 (U.S.), more than the $62,000 average U.S. household income and more than Clinton voters earn.
Of the one in three Americans who earn less than $50,000 a year, a majority voted for Clinton. A majority of those who earn more backed Trump.
Broken down by income bracket, 52% of voters earning less than $50,000 a year – who make up 36% of the electorate – voted for Clinton, and 41% for Trump.
But among the 64% of American voters who earn more than $50,000 a year, 49% chose Trump, and 47% Clinton.
Trump supporters have lower education levels than the rest of the country.
Yes, it is truly spectacular how Trump supporters have lower levels of education, maybe if something like in the 1960s the country was 90% white and 10% college educated, to today where the country in 62% white and 35% college educated
This is hilarious, you have no clue what you're talking about.
The problem here is your understanding of numbers. While it's true democrats win the majority of low-income voters, they also win other income brackets as well.
No, I'm not going to stop anything, you're literally retarded dude.
I'm also not sure where you're getting those numbers, because they conflict with exit polls from other sources.
Either way, the median income for Trump voters is not higher than it is for Clinton voters, and the median income for democrats is higher than it is for republicans.
The only reason democrats win lower-income voters in the way they do is because democrats dominate minority voters. Your average white democrat is better off economically than your average white republican.
You're just a profoundly ignorant moron dude, you've made that clear 4 times already.
I don't understand how this is an argument. Trump voters earn more money. They're right wing. Of course they earn more. My first quote has destroyed your argument.
Either way, the median income for Trump voters is not higher than it is for Clinton voters, and the median income for democrats is higher than it is for republicans.
Please read the first link dude. I suspected you were trolling when you replied without apologising for wasting my time, now it's just embarrassing.
I'm also not sure where you're getting those numbers, because they conflict with exit polls from other sources.
Uh, no they don't dude. Business insider has the same figures as the New york times exit poll
The only reason democrats win lower-income voters in the way they do is because democrats dominate minority voters. Your average white democrat is better off economically than your average white republican.
Narrative shifts
You're just a profoundly ignorant moron dude, you've made that clear
Honestly at this stage I'm more interested in knowing why you are so insecure about this? Conservatives are better at pretty much all aspects of life, that is part of the reason they are conservative. The system benefits them
They're fucking less likely to notice it because they're morons getting duped.
Seriously, you realize a large swathe of republican voters are poor people that think they aren't poor people, right?
One of my favorite quotes:
“For decades, Americans have experienced a populist uprising that only benefits the people it is supposed to be targeting.... The angry workers, mighty in their numbers, are marching irresistibly against the arrogant. They are shaking their fists at the sons of privilege. They are laughing at the dainty affectations of the Leawoof toffs. They are massing at the gates of Mission Hills, hoisting the black flag, and while the millionaires tremble in their mansions, they are bellowing out their terrifying demands. 'We are here,' they scream, 'to cut your taxes.”
Thomas Frank, What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America
And even more hilarious here is you think conservatives don't notice "inequality."
They notice it alright, they're just fucking delusional:
The people who stuck out, whose perceptions were radically different from others in the survey, were white evangelical Protestants. Among this group, 57 percent said there’s a lot of discrimination against Christians in the U.S. today. Only 44 percent said the same thing about Muslims. They were the only religious group more likely to believe Christians face discrimination compared to Muslims.
Nevertheless, the Justice Department's move will likely be popular among white conservatives who believe that "anti-white bias" is a serious problem in society today. Recent polling underscores the point. A Huffington Post/YouGov survey from last fall, for instance, found that Trump voters believe that whites are more discriminated against than Muslims, blacks, Jews and Latinos.
Read a book nigga this literally answers 90% of the typical talking points.
Btw, there is literally nothing wrong with having poor people vote for you, just like how there's nothing wrong with have rich people vote for you. I don't understand why you're upset about this
And even more hilarious here is you think conservatives don't notice "inequality."
Can you please, for the love of everything holy and, calm the fuck down? When I say conservatives aren't likely to notice inequality, I'm talking about real inequality that you cunts care about
The data in what your linking seems to be pretty old, actually. For example, Obama won more high-income voters than Romney did.
This was also before Democrats started shifting more towards the well off as well.
The only area it might be correct in is the mega rich, where they tend to favor Republicans interested in slashing regulations/taxes so they can pillage some more.
I think Obama did do better among the wealthy than Mccain, but Romney won the rich vote by like 10 points lol
<$50,000
41
60
38
$50,000-90,000
31
46
52
$100,000 & over
28
44
54
This was also before Democrats started shifting more towards the well off as well.
This isn't represented very well in the data, but I still find this fucking hilarious because its so true in their message. Not sure how I'd feel having my party for the poors doing so well with the rich
Good. Now provide some useful statistics (i.e. those that account for age and race). Trump supporters skew significantly older, and age has a positive correlation that significantly outpaces the figures you've provided. While it may sound classist or elitist of me to say, younger Trumptards (like yourself) tend to be one medical bill away from the poor house. I'd imagine you fit the bill nicely.
It always surprises me how republicans go from rich whites to poor whites in stereotypes. I thought young trumpers were rich white frat bros who are going to be taking over daddies investment firm?
"I don't have an understanding of the basic principles of statistics or how elections work, so let me throw out two mean ages of party identification to make it sound like I do."
Now go do some actual research (e.g. who actually votes at what age), and do some basic reading up on PhDs and master's degrees.
Throwing out "nu-male" is the dead giveaway you've got no girl-game, bro. You have my sympathies. Genetics are the likely culprit, so you aren't entirely at fault.
I showed age wouldn't change anything, and how the fuck do you adjust for race? I just showed that college educated whites and minorities lean R, because what else could possibly be your argument here?
(e.g. who actually votes at what age),
Irrelevant cause all the young cunts don't fucking vote you retard. That's why it's so close
Just admit the median Republicans earn more than the median Democrat? Why does this make you so insecure? Aren't you meant to be the party of the working class? I won't mention anything about how typically conservatives are above the median at pretty much every trait society deems positive in case I cause any more hurt feefees
Even if this is completely accurate, all it says is that having a good job and making good money doesn't mean someone doesn't have their head up their ass.
I don't know the situation but, as someone on the left, I find it hilarious how the left is trying to take back "triggered" and "snowflake" as if it totally doesn't refer to a good chunk of the American variety of leftist.
I really don't get anything about that show or the fandom. I guess I'm either too stupid for it, or I'm too smart for it. I'm pretty sure that I'm just too stupid to get any of it.
I have never seen a science reference or meme that wasn't in the introductory section of a textbook on that subject. Most of the math ones are literally just putting a symbol for a fucking word.
Either that or people writing shitty erotic stories for thebhorny OP to spank to. What a pathetic sub. Some serious threads are a bit interesting, but all nsfw threads are shit.
"Reddit, what's the sexiest sex you've ever sexed with a sexy person? Sex?"
Who said it had to be a "person of import"? There are entire activist groups built around the notion. A lack of borders, in the freedom-of-movement sense, is the necessary and direct consequence of the slogan "no one is illegal".
"Some random guy on the street says there should be no borders, this is clearly a national crisis and should be reacted to with the clutching and pearls and pissing onesself at the sight of a brown person."
"No One Is Illegal" is a prominent activist group with their own website, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines, guerilla advertising up around the downtown area of my city all the time etc. etc. You are being willfully obtuse if you think these are just "some random guy on the street".
What if both sides are right, and 99% of posts from either side are all paid shills? Wouldn't it make more sense to come to an agreement where they both stop posting? Both campaigns save millions of dollars, reddit literally dies overnight, everybody wins.
Chill the fuck out for a second and think about that. 1.) compilation videos of stupid people doing stupid things and falling down.
2.) dogs.
3.) cats
4.) video games.
The Hundred Flowers Campaign, also termed the Hundred Flowers Movement (simplified Chinese: 百花运动; traditional Chinese: 百花運動; pinyin: Bǎihuā yùndòng), was a period in 1956 in the People's Republic of China during which the Communist Party of China (CPC) encouraged its citizens to openly express their opinions of the communist regime. Differing views and solutions to national policy were encouraged based on the famous expression by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong: "The policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and the progress of science." The movement was in part a response to the demoralization of intellectuals, who felt estranged from The Communist Party. After this brief period of liberalization, Mao abruptly changed course and pressed those who challenged the communist regime by using force. The crackdown continued through 1957 as an Anti-Rightist Campaign against those who were critical of the regime and its ideology.
147 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-08-05
No wonder you have an army of pretentious neckbeard losers following you around
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
I am a mexican living in the US and I support Trump
1 Wowbagger1 2017-08-05
really makes you think.
Totally not a t_d playing ident pol on their burner account.
1 flipkt 2017-08-05
Tbf it could be a bot. I've seen a few running around with user histories like that.
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
Lol now playing detective. And you couldn't be more wrong. Pendejo fracasado
1 Wowbagger1 2017-08-05
I'm convinced
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
Yep I am convinced too that you are a pendejo fracasado🤣
1 Wowbagger1 2017-08-05
¿Qué carajo acabas de mierda dices de mí, pequeña perra? Voy a tener que sabes que me gradué parte superior de mi clase en los Navy Seals, y he estado involucrado en numerosas incursiones secretas sobre Al-Qaeda, y tengo más de 300 muertes confirmadas. Estoy capacitado en la guerra gorila y yo soy el francotirador superior en todas las fuerzas armadas de Estados Unidos. No eres nada para mí, pero sólo otro objetivo. Yo limpiaré usted a la mierda con la precisión de la talla de la que nunca se ha visto antes en esta tierra, recuerda mis palabras malditas. ¿Crees que puedes salir a decir que una mierda para mí a través de Internet? Piense otra vez, hijo de puta. En estos momentos me pongo en contacto con mi red secreta de espías en los EE.UU. y su IP está siendo rastreado en este momento para prepararse mejor para la tormenta, gusano. La tormenta que arrasa con lo poco patético que llamas tu vida. Estás muerto, hijo. Puedo estar en cualquier parte, en cualquier momento, y te puedo matar en más de siete mil maneras, y eso es justo con mis propias manos. No sólo soy ampliamente entrenado en combate sin armas, pero no tengo acceso a todo el arsenal de la Marina de los Estados Unidos y lo voy a utilizar en toda su extensión para limpiar el culo miserables de la faz del continente, pedazo de mierda. Si sólo te podías saber qué castigo impío su pequeño comentario "inteligente" estaba a punto de hacer caer sobre ti, tal vez le haya poseído su maldita lengua. Pero no podía, no lo hiciste, y ahora está pagando el precio, Maldito idiota. Cagaré furia sobre ti y te ahogaré en ella. Estás muerto, chico.
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
Good Google translation amigo! ¡Me impresionaste!
🤣🤣I am sooo scared of you like.. OOOMGGGG💀☠️😱😱😱🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Voy a tener que sabes que me gradué..."🤣
1 Wowbagger1 2017-08-05
I'm ashamed of you, Luis.
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
Hahahahahahahahah so my name is Luis?
Well at least you didn't say "Juan"
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-05
Si Si amigo puta que rico mi gusta 🌮🌮🌮 danke danke!
1 LordBlackmore 2017-08-05
You're right. You're dumber than a box of bots.
1 UW-Love 2017-08-05
Otro pendejo 🤣🤣
1 LordBlackmore 2017-08-05
Si eres quien dices que eres, entonces usted tiene un problema de salud mental o cayeron en la cabeza cuando eras un niño.
1 Minimum_T-Giraff 2017-08-05
Shit i'm not even a Hamburger and i fucking love Trump over the drama he creates.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-08-05
Mmmm k mr taco
1 Works_of_memercy 2017-08-05
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/04/04/the-last-ditch-effort-to-save-a-trump-voters-husband-from-deportation/?utm_term=.de758bb63365
1 ay_what_up 2017-08-05
idc at all
1 yetanothercfcgrunt 2017-08-05
So what
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
There should be a study done on Trump supporters, maybe not now, but in the future.
I feel like they have a lot to contribute in relation to just how far cognitive bias can go.
And the interesting think about them is they aren't forced like North Koreans, they're willfully this delusional.
1 ChickenTwelve 2017-08-05
I think South Africa has played a key roll in US libertarian military. The poor starving kids in Africa such as democracy party
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Yet they are statistically likely to earn more money than you
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Lol? Are you just making shit up? What are you basing this on exactly, because the exact opposite seems to be true, Trump supporters have lower education levels than the rest of the country.
And even more interesting:
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/11/29/another-clinton-trump-divide-high-output-america-vs-low-output-america/
Or:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
How about data that uses individuals, instead of districts?
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/us-politics/the-average-trump-supporter-is-not-an-economic-loser/article32746323/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/white-voters-victory-donald-trump-exit-polls
Yes, it is truly spectacular how Trump supporters have lower levels of education, maybe if something like in the 1960s the country was 90% white and 10% college educated, to today where the country in 62% white and 35% college educated
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
This is hilarious, you have no clue what you're talking about.
The problem here is your understanding of numbers. While it's true democrats win the majority of low-income voters, they also win other income brackets as well.
The exit polls:
http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls
$50k-$99,999
30%
46% Clinton 49% Trump.
$100k-$199,999
24%
47% Clinton 48% Trump.
$200k-$249,999
4%
49% Clinton 47% Trump.
$250,000 or more
6%
46% Clinton 46% Trump.
Even more hilarious:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Maybe reread my comment next time retard
" Yet they are statistically likely to earn more money than you"
I expect an apology in the next line, kid.
Btw [1] from business insider suggests otherwise
1 imguralbumbot 2017-08-05
Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image
https://i.imgur.com/NgTq3ga.png
Source | Why? | Creator | ignoreme | deletthis
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
They aren't statistically earning more money, you're just again, retarded.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/
The primary predictor of support is education, not income.
And again - the counties Clinton won are 64% of this countries GDP.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/11/29/another-clinton-trump-divide-high-output-america-vs-low-output-america/
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Stop with the districts, you're trying to shift the argument (which I've already won)
Anywho, how about instead of districts, we look at individual data? Hmm
http://www.ianwelsh.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016-votes-by-income.png
Wow, looks like I've blown out your argument again.
Just give me your bussy already
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
No, I'm not going to stop anything, you're literally retarded dude.
I'm also not sure where you're getting those numbers, because they conflict with exit polls from other sources.
Either way, the median income for Trump voters is not higher than it is for Clinton voters, and the median income for democrats is higher than it is for republicans.
The only reason democrats win lower-income voters in the way they do is because democrats dominate minority voters. Your average white democrat is better off economically than your average white republican.
You're just a profoundly ignorant moron dude, you've made that clear 4 times already.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
I don't understand how this is an argument. Trump voters earn more money. They're right wing. Of course they earn more. My first quote has destroyed your argument.
Please read the first link dude. I suspected you were trolling when you replied without apologising for wasting my time, now it's just embarrassing.
Uh, no they don't dude. Business insider has the same figures as the New york times exit poll
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
Narrative shifts
Honestly at this stage I'm more interested in knowing why you are so insecure about this? Conservatives are better at pretty much all aspects of life, that is part of the reason they are conservative. The system benefits them
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Again, you've been irrefutably proven wrong.
Better at what? Producing nothing of value?
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/11/29/another-clinton-trump-divide-high-output-america-vs-low-output-america/
Being uneducated?
http://verdantlabs.com/politics_of_professions/
Being gullible rubes?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/28/pizzagate-theory-believed-by-nearly-half-of-republ/
You're clueless dude, it's like when they claim democrats are on the welfare when in reality it's them sucking up federal dollars:
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700/
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Holy shit you are seething hahahhha
Again, break data down to an individual level, otherwise it's completely and utterly fucking pointless.
Everything that society deems positive? Everything that means they are less likely to notice the inequality within the system?
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
They're fucking less likely to notice it because they're morons getting duped.
Seriously, you realize a large swathe of republican voters are poor people that think they aren't poor people, right?
One of my favorite quotes:
And even more hilarious here is you think conservatives don't notice "inequality."
They notice it alright, they're just fucking delusional:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/perceptions-discrimination-muslims-christians/519135/
Or how Trump voters believe this as well:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/08/02/white-trump-voters-think-they-face-more-discrimination-than-blacks-the-trump-administration-is-listening/?utm_term=.607b31bbb645
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9030.html
Read a book nigga this literally answers 90% of the typical talking points.
Btw, there is literally nothing wrong with having poor people vote for you, just like how there's nothing wrong with have rich people vote for you. I don't understand why you're upset about this
Can you please, for the love of everything holy and, calm the fuck down? When I say conservatives aren't likely to notice inequality, I'm talking about real inequality that you cunts care about
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
There's nothing wrong with having poor people vote for you.
It isn't that they're poor, it's that they're delusional. These people literally believe white people are oppressed, and they're the victims.
Graham was joking about it in 2012:
Then along comes Donald Trump. Surprise suprise.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/9030.html
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
Doesn't refute literally anything I've said to you.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
B-bb-but... they don't..
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
The data in what your linking seems to be pretty old, actually. For example, Obama won more high-income voters than Romney did.
This was also before Democrats started shifting more towards the well off as well.
The only area it might be correct in is the mega rich, where they tend to favor Republicans interested in slashing regulations/taxes so they can pillage some more.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
I think Obama did do better among the wealthy than Mccain, but Romney won the rich vote by like 10 points lol
<$50,000 41 60 38
$50,000-90,000 31 46 52
$100,000 & over 28 44 54
This isn't represented very well in the data, but I still find this fucking hilarious because its so true in their message. Not sure how I'd feel having my party for the poors doing so well with the rich
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
I guess Romney did do better with high income voters, with the stipulation it's by state/gender.
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2012/results/president/exit-polls.html
For example, Obama won the rich in blue states, Romney won them in fairly red states.
Obama won women earning over 200k, Romney won men earning over 200k.
1 lifesbrink 2017-08-05
This much serious posting in MY drama? Get the fuck out of here you dumb cucks and say 100 hail bussy's. This includes you, u/PM_ME_FREE_FOOD
1 SethRichOrDieTryin 2017-08-05
Are you guys gonna fuck already or what?
1 LordBlackmore 2017-08-05
It'll be a cold day in hell, gramps.
1 EarnestNoMeta 2017-08-05
Shut up faggot
1 ChitteringCathode 2017-08-05
Good. Now provide some useful statistics (i.e. those that account for age and race). Trump supporters skew significantly older, and age has a positive correlation that significantly outpaces the figures you've provided. While it may sound classist or elitist of me to say, younger Trumptards (like yourself) tend to be one medical bill away from the poor house. I'd imagine you fit the bill nicely.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
It always surprises me how republicans go from rich whites to poor whites in stereotypes. I thought young trumpers were rich white frat bros who are going to be taking over daddies investment firm?
Uhhh
The average Republican is 50, while the average Democrat is 47.1
1 ChitteringCathode 2017-08-05
"I don't have an understanding of the basic principles of statistics or how elections work, so let me throw out two mean ages of party identification to make it sound like I do."
Now go do some actual research (e.g. who actually votes at what age), and do some basic reading up on PhDs and master's degrees.
Throwing out "nu-male" is the dead giveaway you've got no girl-game, bro. You have my sympathies. Genetics are the likely culprit, so you aren't entirely at fault.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
This is such a cope holy shit hahah
I showed age wouldn't change anything, and how the fuck do you adjust for race? I just showed that college educated whites and minorities lean R, because what else could possibly be your argument here?
Irrelevant cause all the young cunts don't fucking vote you retard. That's why it's so close
Just admit the median Republicans earn more than the median Democrat? Why does this make you so insecure? Aren't you meant to be the party of the working class? I won't mention anything about how typically conservatives are above the median at pretty much every trait society deems positive in case I cause any more hurt feefees
1 FuckingWrites 2017-08-05
Not really. Though a lot of people that throw out nu-male are red pill frequenting fat asses, nu-males actually exist and they're frickin' hilarious.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
No not at all, you do you, hero of the poors!
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Republicans do better with college educated minorities, and Republicans win the white college educated vote
Lol
1 riemann1413 2017-08-05
why are you arguing about whose team has the richest people when you're both broke
1 JohnBlind 2017-08-05
Argueing about that is an international sport for poor ppl
1 LordBlackmore 2017-08-05
Even if this is completely accurate, all it says is that having a good job and making good money doesn't mean someone doesn't have their head up their ass.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
Source?
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
"I need a source to show that high income voters are right wing"
I understand this is America, where everyone votes against their self interest, but fucking hell
Just scroll
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
I mean, its better than being a gender-confused bitch-idiot leftard.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
No, it's not. Trumptards are maybe the most profoundly ignorant and delusional demographic on the planet.
They're literally, at this point, claiming the recent grand jury is actually part of Trumps master plan to bring Hillary/Obama down.
1 Crowsworth 2017-08-05
Are you saying people who love Trump are retards, or anyone right of centre is a retard?
1 Matues49 2017-08-05
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
Pretty much everyone in American politics is right of center, so yes.
1 pizzashill 2017-08-05
I would argue anyone that loves Trump is either retarded or extremely delusional.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
LOCK HER UP!
1 ChitteringCathode 2017-08-05
Nah. Trumptards are essentially the Bizzaro cousin couterpart to SJWs -- just as obnoxious and somehow put together the wrong way.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
Nation of the United States of America!
1 ay_what_up 2017-08-05
hahaha youre the triggered retard who told me to blow my brains out after I said neck vagina
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
Then why are you still here?
1 ay_what_up 2017-08-05
cause idc about subhuman opinions
1 FuckingWrites 2017-08-05
I don't know the situation but, as someone on the left, I find it hilarious how the left is trying to take back "triggered" and "snowflake" as if it totally doesn't refer to a good chunk of the American variety of leftist.
1 yetanothercfcgrunt 2017-08-05
The thing is that it applies just as well to a very good chunk of the right.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Guys, guys, remember the war on christmas! Conservatives are the REAL snowflakes
1 RogueDinosaur 2017-08-05
Remember that time you sperged out on the last trump thread because people were mean to daddy?
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Yes
1 yonicthehedgehog 2017-08-05
time for a victory lap champ
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
I will after you give my top comment an upvote
1 yonicthehedgehog 2017-08-05
you drive a hard bargain
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
I'll let you link to my comments whenever I'm agendaposting
1 yonicthehedgehog 2017-08-05
but you're always agendaposting
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Sometimes it's unironic though
1 pvijay187 2017-08-05
They are. Every slight mention of Trump in this subreddit sends you into a froathy rage like someone anally raped your mom
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-08-05
Yes you are right I do get outraged whenever Trump is mentioned like someone anally raped my mom
1 neutralvoter 2017-08-05
every question and answer in ask reddit is just people pontificating about why they are so much better and smarter than everyone around them.
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-08-05
Reddit, what is your favorite le super obscure and unknown scientific fact that only you can comprehend?
Top answer: some bullshit from rick and morty
1 LedinToke 2017-08-05
i actually like that show but god damn son, these kids need to relax
1 TeutonicPlate 2017-08-05
Whoa you actually like Rick and Morty? On Reddit? Get outta here
1 icyhat 2017-08-05
I really don't get anything about that show or the fandom. I guess I'm either too stupid for it, or I'm too smart for it. I'm pretty sure that I'm just too stupid to get any of it.
1 LedinToke 2017-08-05
i'm just easily amused
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-05
you're right in the sourspot
1 icyhat 2017-08-05
Great for me?
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-05
You're the only one who can stop the brawnspawn invasion
1 icyhat 2017-08-05
At least I can tell my girlfriend that I will eventually be useful.
1 snappleteadrink 2017-08-05
I have never seen a science reference or meme that wasn't in the introductory section of a textbook on that subject. Most of the math ones are literally just putting a symbol for a fucking word.
1 CondeTrocola 2017-08-05
1 ReallyConfusedMurray 2017-08-05
Either that or people writing shitty erotic stories for thebhorny OP to spank to. What a pathetic sub. Some serious threads are a bit interesting, but all nsfw threads are shit.
"Reddit, what's the sexiest sex you've ever sexed with a sexy person? Sex?"
1 cuteman 2017-08-05
Not just smarter, better looking.
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
Ahahahahahaha, /u/exforce actually believes this.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
Which person of import has argued in favor of no borders?
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
Who said it had to be a "person of import"? There are entire activist groups built around the notion. A lack of borders, in the freedom-of-movement sense, is the necessary and direct consequence of the slogan "no one is illegal".
How is this not completely and utterly obvious?
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
"Some random guy on the street says there should be no borders, this is clearly a national crisis and should be reacted to with the clutching and pearls and pissing onesself at the sight of a brown person."
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
"No One Is Illegal" is a prominent activist group with their own website, meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines, guerilla advertising up around the downtown area of my city all the time etc. etc. You are being willfully obtuse if you think these are just "some random guy on the street".
1 cultish_alibi 2017-08-05
Holy shit, they have a website? This is an outrage!
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
An actual, working website!!!????!!!??!?!?!?
1 zahlman 2017-08-05
It appears to be functional, yes.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
So, you agree that there should not be open borders. Good.
1 StingAuer 2017-08-05
I do not support the elimination of borders.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-08-05
I do
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
Good. You are learning.
1 cruelandusual 2017-08-05
It's also the position of any ancap or libertarian who isn't a hypocrite.
1 icyhat 2017-08-05
You got me there. My father was imported and he was fine with borders.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
I am a MAGA-American.
1 RogueDinosaur 2017-08-05
Fuck, is it to late to join ISIS?
1 pepperouchau 2017-08-05
Yeah we figured out how to destroy them in 30 days remember
1 moudougou 2017-08-05
and take the oil
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
Probably not!
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
It's spelled "maggot".
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
Maggot, faggot, biggot. Whatevs!
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
Sometimes I wonder if you just copy paste random words when things get a little hard for you.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
I'm definitely not spending any brain cells on your stale opinions, if that is what you mean.
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
But of a running theme with you, no? Not "spending" any braincells.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
You don't merit any
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
You keep responding, though, mr. I-don't-care lol
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
You are a bit of a bitch, aren't you.
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
I always hope you can bant a little, but you always end up boring as hell. Work on your personality or something.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
If you arent enjoying it, stop doing it.
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
I said your banter is boring. Your reactions are amusing, though.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
You aren't doing very well.
1 SpotNL 2017-08-05
I know you think you said something clever, but I have no idea what you are trying to say.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-08-05
mm hmm
1 ahbslldud 2017-08-05
mfw
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-08-05
What if both sides are right, and 99% of posts from either side are all paid shills? Wouldn't it make more sense to come to an agreement where they both stop posting? Both campaigns save millions of dollars, reddit literally dies overnight, everybody wins.
1 izuerial 2017-08-05
Unfortunately it's impossible to prove it so we are forced to live in a world where people can post on this damned website.
The internet was a mistake.
1 fellumptuous 2017-08-05
Chill the fuck out for a second and think about that. 1.) compilation videos of stupid people doing stupid things and falling down. 2.) dogs. 3.) cats 4.) video games.
1 ragnathorn 2017-08-05
This is level 100 south park Neutrality
1 Nicholai_Dimitri 2017-08-05
He should be mod 4 this tbh
1 Xaguta 2017-08-05
Politicians know better than to trust politicians.
1 Neronoah 2017-08-05
Easier explanation for you: almost no shills, redditors are complete imbeciles.
1 grungebot5000 2017-08-05
pfff who do you think you are, willem of ockham?
1 telandrias 2017-08-05
Yeah every real user voted for Gary Johnson.
1 hurrff 2017-08-05
Oh boy, drama inside the drama
1 Thulean-Dragon 2017-08-05
It's mostly two autists arguing back and forth.
1 froibo 2017-08-05
Yeah but it's a rerun.
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-08-05
Reddit drama is always a rerun
1 froibo 2017-08-05
True, but it's always disappointing when you already seen the performers play the same parts.
1 Nicholai_Dimitri 2017-08-05
So... every thread here?
1 Pepperglue 2017-08-05
What's the point of shitting on him if the thread's topic was to discuss unpopular opinion? Is this some kind of "Hundred Flower Campaign"?
1 WikiTextBot 2017-08-05
Hundred Flowers Campaign
The Hundred Flowers Campaign, also termed the Hundred Flowers Movement (simplified Chinese: 百花运动; traditional Chinese: 百花運動; pinyin: Bǎihuā yùndòng), was a period in 1956 in the People's Republic of China during which the Communist Party of China (CPC) encouraged its citizens to openly express their opinions of the communist regime. Differing views and solutions to national policy were encouraged based on the famous expression by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong: "The policy of letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend is designed to promote the flourishing of the arts and the progress of science." The movement was in part a response to the demoralization of intellectuals, who felt estranged from The Communist Party. After this brief period of liberalization, Mao abruptly changed course and pressed those who challenged the communist regime by using force. The crackdown continued through 1957 as an Anti-Rightist Campaign against those who were critical of the regime and its ideology.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.24
1 Geisterjager 2017-08-05
Probably because his post was ended with basically, "disagreeing with me means you're brainwashed or a shill" while posting his unpopular argument.
1 Pepperglue 2017-08-05
Well, you do have a point. Then it's just two retards sperging out at each other
1 mohkohnsepicgun 2017-08-05
There are many people on the reddit who love trump and there are many who hate him.
My crime is that I don't give a fuck about him.
1 cuteman 2017-08-05
Some would say the only winning move is not to play.
1 aliceunknown 2017-08-05
I was gonna say 4chan.