It's Cucks vs Copes in this multi-reddit rumble, /r/IncelTears fires back against the Incel Blackpill with a two-part analysis. Accusations of not knowing statistics and being a roastie flap all around

16  2017-08-10 by [deleted]

[deleted]

6 comments

Promoting anarchofascism for 5 years and counting.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  2. The infamous black pill post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  3. /r/Incels - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is*

  4. /r/incels - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is*

  5. /r/IncelTears - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is*

  6. Part 1 - basic math - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  7. "You may actually be retarded. We l... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  8. "That's not how statistics works. H... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  9. "Women will do anything to lick cha... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

  10. Part 2 - "truth bomb" - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

I don't know why some people find it so hard to believe women can be extremely shallow

Feminists promote the idea that women can do no wrong and only men are shit

They want to kill off the anti-incel narrative that the reason they can't get laid is because they're mean misogynists rather than just plain ugly.

I'm not a super nice person and I'm slightly misogynistic and I don't really have any trouble dating. So I already know that the anti-incel narrative is wrong. But they just wanted to prove it with data. (They didn't)

Yeah I don't think it's shocking that women are as shallow as men and would be extremely shallow on dating websites that are famous for how shallow they are. But it does seem to be something that people will defend.

For incels reading this, you need to run the following 2x2 experiment and look at match rates and message rates. Ideally you do in in a bunch of locations/slightly different pictures:

You have a chad picture and a normie or incel picture.

You have a pedo profile and a normal profile.

You show us match rates/message rates for:

  1. Pedo chad
  2. Pedo normie
  3. Normal chad
  4. Normal normie

Incel science prediction is rates for 1 and 3 are similar, 2 and 4 are similar (i.e. Profile text doesn't matter) and 1 and 3 are much larger than 2 and 4 (i.e. Looks matter a lot) You also probably want to look at the difference in difference, i.e. 3-1 is probably smaller than 4-2, so women care less about pedo for chad than they do for normie.

Please run this experiment!!!