Promoting anarchofascism for 5 years and counting.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

u/Sumptuous_Nog by any chance when going to school were you picked up by a short bus

As someone who has studied u/Sumptuous_Nog posts I can tell you he didn't gradually posted like a retarded faggot, but was always an insanely retarded faggot. As you can tell from his pathetic posts where he begs to let men DC to lose his blowjob virginity too, this pathetic ugly fuck not only can't even get a normal date but has to beg men to let him be used a cum dumpster.

Sources: 1- https://www.reddit.com/r/RandomActsOfBlowJob/comments/6t37d7/24_m4m_washingtondc_fit_guy_looking_to_give_his/

Source 2 -

His pics here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SkincareAddiction/comments/5v8xo6/skin_concerns_dermatologist_used_a_vbeam/

Conclusion: This mayo fuck should do some bench presses instead of lookin' like he dying of AIDS.

Hey don't judge gotta fund that fake minor in History somehow

:( I missed it

Guy looks like he's just came right out of a gas chamber

Lol, you got offended that I called out Trump for being a Nazi-sympathizer, so you try to make fun of me for being skinny and bicurious? As if that has literally anything to do with Trump?

Thanks for outing yourself as homophobic, your comment sounds like it was written by a 14-year-old. If a total stranger using the internet to suck some dick aggravates you, then maybe you need to re-analyze your views.

retarded faggot

Niiiice, that's some real creative stuff. But I think now it's time for you to brush off the cheetah dust, leave your mom's basement, and go interact with some more open-minded people.

I love how u/sumptuous_nog thinks everyone who disagrees with him I'd a fascist. And these people wonder why we don't take communism seriously.

As someone who studied History has a minor

No but fucking seriously no one sho has studied Hitler can literally state Trump is going to be Hitler.

Hitler literally wrote a book detailing what he was gonna do. You could have read it when he had it published and foresaw his entire policy

Hitler did things gradually

For a History minor he seems to leave out the point that Hitler tried to instantly disenfranchise and dehumanise the Jews but his boycott was unsuccessful and brought a lot of condemnation in Germany and abroad so then he decided to do things gradually.

No but fucking seriously a history student doing fucking GCSE English would be able to tell you why trip isn't Hitler or becoming it.

Why oh why has retardation become chronic and infectious

this, but literally

Didnt he say he had a minor in "holocaust" studies?

wtf kind of liberal arts bullshit is that?

He's the expert you need if you want to burn people I guess.

QUICK I NEED TO RELATE THIS CURRENT EVENT TO HITLER DO WE HAVE ANYONE WITH A MINOR IN HOLOCAUST STUDIES IN THE HOUSE?

No but fucking seriously no one sho has studied Hitler can literally state Trump is going to be Hitler. Unless he is a literal oxygen thief.

I agree, Trump is no Hitler.

Hitler literally wrote a book detailing what he was gonna do. You could have read it when he had it published and foresaw his entire policy

Strongly disagree, Evans talks about this:

My Struggle has been seen by some historians as a kind of blueprint for Hitler’s later actions, a dangerous and devilish book that was unfortunately ignored by those who should have known better. It was nothing of the kind. Heavily edited by Amann, Hanfstaengl and others in order to make it more literate and less incoherent than the rambling first draft, it was none the less turgid and tedious, and sold only modest numbers of copies before the Nazis achieved their electoral breakthrough in 1930. After that it became a best-seller, above all during the Third Reich, when not to own a copy was almost an act of treason. Those people who read it, probably a relatively small proportion of those who bought it, must have found it difficult to gain anything very coherent out of its confused mélange of autobiographical reminiscences and garbled political declamations. Hitler’s talent for winning hearts and minds lay in his public oratory, not in his writing. Still, no one who read the book could have been left in any doubt about the fact that Hitler considered racial conflict to be the motor, the essence of history, and the Jews to be the sworn enemy of the German race, whose historic mission it was, under the guidance of the Nazi Party, to break their international power and annihilate them entirely. ‘The nationalization of our masses’, he declared, ‘will succeed only when, aside from all the positive struggle for the soul of our people, their international poisoners are exterminated.’

1

For a History minor he seems to leave out the point that Hitler tried to instantly disenfranchise and dehumanise the Jews but his boycott was unsuccessful and brought a lot of condemnation in Germany and abroad so then he decided to do things gradually.

Which time period are you talking about exactly here? Do you have specific dates?

A handicapped student doing fucking GCSE History in a school for window lickers would be able to tell you why Trump isn't Hitler or becoming it.

Agree.

Evans talks about

I disagree just because Evans explains that most could not understand it due to its hard to read nature does not mean it cannot be read and understood. I own the book in german and the ford translation I've read extracts of the one that Germans would've had in 1933. Its hard but it can be understood its just most didn't try. I said you could read it not that people really did. I mean Evans even notes those that read it could see Hitler advocated racial conflict

what time frame

April , 1st 1933 the boycott of German Jews, it was an immense failure and it lead Hitler to realise that average German had no ill will against Jews which led to gradualism which slowly dehumanised them.

I disagree just because Evans explains that most could not understand it due to its hard to read nature does not mean it cannot be read and understood. I own the book in german and the ford translation I've read extracts of the one that Germans would've had in 1933. Its hard but it can be understood its just most didn't try. I said you could read it not that people really did. I mean Evans even notes those that read it could see Hitler advocated racial conflict

The point is the book was completely incoherent for the most part and the Nazis played down a lot of this rhetoric once they started winning elections.

April , 1st 1933 the boycott of German Jews, it was an immense failure and it lead Hitler to realise that average German had no ill will against Jews which led to gradualism which slowly dehumanised them.

Failure in what aspect? Failure to rally the population, sure, but the population did in fact do what the Nazis wanted:

Such incidents were widely reported in the foreign press. This formed the pretext for Hitler, Goebbels and the Nazi leadership to put into action a long-mulled-over plan to stage a nationwide boycott of Jewish shops and businesses. On 1 April 1933 stormtroopers stood menacingly outside such premises warning people not to enter them. Most non-Jewish Germans obeyed, but not with any enthusiasm. The biggest Jewish firms were untouched because they contributed too much to the economy. Realizing it had failed to arouse popular enthusiasm, Goebbels called the action off after a few days. But the beatings, the violence and the boycott had their effect on the Jewish community in Germany, 37,000 of whose members had emigrated by the end of the year. The regime’s purge of Jews, whom it defined not by their religious adherence but by racial criteria, had a particular effect in science, culture and the arts. Jewish conductors and musicians such as Bruno Walter and Otto Klemperer were summarily dismissed or prevented from performing.

And the real reason it was called off seems to be more:

In 1932, a local election pamphlet in Lower Saxony urged retailers and small tradesmen to join the Party to oppose the opening of new branches of ‘the vampire business’ of Woolworth’s, which would supposedly ruin them in the name of ‘finance capital’.133 In March 1933 stormtroopers broke into a branch of Woolworth’s in Gotha and trashed the entire store; violent attacks were launched on a number of department stores irrespective of their ownership. In Braunschweig the restaurant in a local department store was shot to pieces by brownshirts armed with pistols. Less dramatically, there were many demands in the first months of the Third Reich to close down the department stores or tax them out of existence. But the Ministry of Economics and the Nazi leadership quickly realized that closing down enterprises that employed so many scores of thousands of people would seriously damage the ‘battle for work’. Hess stepped in to protect the department stores, and the nationwide boycott of Jewish-owned shops on 1 April 1933 had no impact beyond the day itself.

The fate of the department stores illustrated in microcosm how the Nazi Party’s priorities had changed since 1920. Starting off with a pronounced anti-capitalist message, they had first soft-pedalled it under the influence of economic necessity, then substituted for it a determined drive to remove the Jews from the German economy. The department stores themselves did not disappear; indeed, the campaign against Jewish owners opened up new opportunities for non-Jewish companies to expand their operations. If, as the Nazis claimed, the country’s economic ills in the 1920s and early 1930s had originated with the Jews, then would they not be solved by, among other things, getting rid of the Jewish economic influence on business rather than by attacking business itself? The boycott of 1 April 1933 had already advertised the Party’s intentions in this respect. Although the boycott itself had met with relatively little public support, local Party groups continued to harass and attack Jewish shops and businesses, as the example of the Wertheim store in Breslau indicated. Stormtroopers continued to paint slogans on the display windows of Jewish-owned shops, to discourage people from patronizing such establishments, or to pressure local authorities into placing their orders elsewhere. Alarmed at the economic effects of such actions, the government and the Party issued a series of official warnings. Hitler himself issued a declaration at the beginning of October 1933 expressly permitting civil servants to buy goods in Jewish-owned shops and department stores. Yet in 1933’s Christmas shopping season, gangs of stormtroopers were again standing outside Jewish-owned shops in many localities with placards proclaiming anyone who went inside to be a traitor to the German race. Increasing numbers of local markets barred Jewish traders, no Jewish firms were permitted to advertise any more, local authorities broke off all business relations with Jewish-owned companies, and there were further, quite widespread boycott actions again in the spring of 1934. Violence often accompanied such events, ranging from the smashing of Jewish shop windows to a bomb attack on the synagogue in Ahaus, Westphalia. It culminated in a mass demonstration of up to 1,500 inhabitants of the town of Gunzenhausen, in Franconia - a town whose entire population numbered no more than 5,600. Inflamed by a vehemently antisemitic speech from a local Nazi leader, the demonstrators broke into the houses and flats of Jews in the town, and dragged thirty-five people off to the local prison, where one was subsequently found hanged.138

he's playing racial identity politics,

See, this is what I don't get.

MSM lies about him claiming him to be massively racist and all of that... but I don't think Trump has ever made a statement on race other than: "It doesn't matter what color/gender/religion you are, we're all American".

You want to look at someone playing racial identity politics, look at Obama. He went on and on about BLM and that shit.

You have no idea what racial identity politics is.

Trump going after affirmative action? That's racial identity politics.

Much of Trump's campaign was white identity politics, there's a fantastic article on this:

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-end-of-a-republican-party/

The shock of 2016, though, is just how self-evident the inflection point at which the Republican Party finds itself is; Trump is a one-man crisis for the GOP. The party has been growing more conservative and less tolerant of deviations from doctrine over the past decades, so what does it mean that a man who has freely eschewed conservative orthodoxy on policy is now the Republicans’ standard-bearer?

Many have assumed that adherence to a certain conservative purity was the engine of the GOP, and given the party’s demographic homogeneity, this made sense. But re-evaluating recent history in light of Trump, and looking a bit closer at this year’s numbers, something else seems to be the primary motivator of GOP voters, something closer to the neighborhood of cultural conservatism and racial and economic grievance rather than a passion for small government.

The results of a FiveThirtyEight and SurveyMonkey poll conducted in June1 found that one of the most indicative variables in determining Republican identification this year was agreement with the statement that the “number of immigrants who come to the United States each year” should “decrease.” Trump’s campaign kicked off with a speech last June that labeled Mexican immigrants as the dregs of society — “They’re bringing crime, they’re rapists,” he said — and has hammered on the immigration issue since, adding Muslims to the dragnet of groups deemed undesirable in the United States. The election has taken on a distinctly racial tinge, and in doing so, has clarified the motivations of voters somewhat.

Or:

When I spoke with Tim Miller, Jeb Bush’s former communications director, soon after Trump won the Indiana primary and the nomination, he wasn’t sure what the party might look like after November, much less four or eight years down the line.

There were potential paths back to a more mainstream party line, he theorized, including an economic downturn during a Clinton presidency, making Republicans more appealing by comparison. Miller wasn’t much comforted by that, though.

“I think another very real potential right now — why it’s important that people in the party speak out against Donald Trump and against Trumpism — is that the Republican Party moves to a period of minority status,” he said. “Where it’s essentially a party that’s driven by white grievances and by white — not racial politics, but a set of white identity politics.”

Trump going after affirmative action? That's racial identity politics.

I'd argue that's going against it.

No, because he's painting a false narrative that white people are somehow discriminated against, there's a reason half of his base thinks white people are oppressed and there's a reason he started talking about affirmative action around the time things got really rough for him.

because he's painting a false narrative that white people are somehow discriminated against,

Affirmative action is literally discrimination against Asian and white people. It's even written down for fucks sake.

How is that a "false narrative"?

I don't even agree with affirmative action based on race, but the idea is that it's correcting for the very provable discrimination in the education system in general.

/u/Sumptuous_Nog I sincerely hope Drumpf implements concentration camps, I've been trying to lose 10lbs for ages and if there's one thing the holocaust was good for it's helping those chubby Jews lose the love handles

There's three things you can never forget:

• the "It's still real to me" guy

• 9/11

• the time that holocaust survivor did an AMA and was asked if Trump was like Hitler. He said it was super disrespectful to the millions that Hitler killed. He was fucking downvoted lol

Fucking Holocaust survivor Neo-Nazi scum.

Do you have a link to the AMA? Pls bro i have raygun

It was done by u/Im_a_Survivor_177153

Links pls :(

At least far removed from the ama he is high upvoted (and gilded) now

Hitler and his cronies instituted their racist, genocidal policies gradually

u/Sumptuous_Nog I feel like you're forgetting the two armed insurrections he took part in as well as the mega racist book he wrote after being arrested for one of the said insurrections in which he specifically detailed how much of a mega-racist he was.

Look, even the Holocaust museum is calling you dumb

First we laughed at Trump because he couldn't possibly become president, now we laugh because he couldn't possibly gas all the Jews.

Tweeting?

LITERALLY WORSE THAN HITLER!

Are we going to wait until Trump constructs concentration camps to make this comparison?

To Adolph Hitler? Yeah, I think fucking so.

u/Sumptuous_Nog Have you ever laughed at Alex Jones claiming that Obamas regime was going to declare martial law and herd everyone into FEMA camps? If so, you know how I feel reading your rant.

Probably because you are at the reading comprehension level of 3rd grader. I don't say that Trump will definitely commit large scale atrocities, but anyone who truly claims "never again" regarding the Holocaust should be alarmed by any signs of Nazi-sympathy (especially from a powerful world leader).

But I guess you just like being reactionary!

/u/The_Reason_Trump_Won where are u bb

Sleeping and shit

http://i.imgur.com/7CDxyqa.gifv

You are pretty busy this week.

That's not even a picture why is it on /r/pics?

So happy I unsubbed from that shit hole.