Providing a Safe Space™ from SRD since 2009!

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

2. Whole thread - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

3. The biggest retard in the thread - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

4. Race purity and self loathing white... - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

5. Funny sounding native names - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

6. Clearly white sounding names - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

7. Dot vs feather - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

8. Some of her other NSFW activities - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

You would think the last name would be a hint

Or the trashy tattoos that look like Urban Outfitters art.

At least it isn't like some gay ass phoenix or something like that

Or the trashy tattoos that look like Urban Outfitters art.

Or the trashy tattoos that look like Urban Outfitters art.

Just giver her the ol' smallpox test, and you'll know it in no-time.

That girl is a fucking whindian.

23andMe used to (maybe still does?) have a disclaimer that was basically to the effect of 'just because you have 0% Native American DNA doesn't necessarily mean your Grandma lied to you' because so many Americans with a 'cherokee ancestor' were having mental breakdowns over their results.

It's really weird how many Americans (and nearly 100% of middle aged women) have this almost group delusion.

the results you get out of 23andMe are not nonsense but they are also in no sense generally reliable. that disclaimer isn't just political correctness for snowflakes, it's the literal truth.

(not that the 1/32dth Cherokee thing isn't a super common, lame delusion)

the disclaimer is the truth

the test results are a vague approximation based on all kinds of shortcuts and sketchy assumptions

How's that work. First time hearing of this 23andme. Might be worth $200 if the medical history is usable.

Who would want rain-dancing tipi heritage, anyway.

Have to pretend your unique and special, somehow.

"Being cool and awesome on my merits alone? Fuck that!! You should appreciate me because my great grandfather maybe fucked a gross overweight Navajo whore, maybe."

It's really weird how many Americans (and nearly 100% of middle aged women) have this almost group delusion.

Maybe because it's not politically correct to show pride in being white and/or to celebrate your white, European heritage so they claim they are 1/16th Native American just so they can feel special in a politically correct way?

yeah good thing there are never any parades or festivals or street fairs based on the cultures of mayo nations

no fake Indian will ever top Ward Churchill

I don't know Fauxahontas comes pretty close.

if you mean Elizabeth Warren, she really does not at all, and it's laughably partisan of you to say otherwise

Ward Churchill cosplayed as a radical Indian activist for three decades. the hair, the fake accent, everything. demonstrably owed his entire career, despite very marginal scholarship and no real credentials, to a desire to hire woke Indians "to tell their own story" in university Greivance Studies departments. became mildly famous on the left for his Indian radicalism. published a book titled "Notes From a Native Son" with himself on the cover looking as Indian as possible.

Liz Warren... mentioned that she had Naive American heritage in a self-submitted "who's who" bio, and to her employers when they asked in a survey. that's it, that's literally the entire "controversy." her heritage is unverifiable, although there is no reason to doubt she believed it. there is no evidence that it affected her career in any way; the quality, number, and frequency of citation of her academic works very clearly justifies her holding the academic positions that she did. the entire "controversy" was demonstrably caused only by the fact that her opponents during political campaigns publicized it. there was never any underlying factual basis to justify it.

saying these two things are at all comparable is completely ridiculous

Both are retards

she was already one of the leading legal scholars of her generation (top 50 or so) before she entered the Senate and became one of the most knowledgeable policy-oriented people there on economic policy

zoz

zle

zozzle

zoz

zle

zozzle

Liz Warren... mentioned that she had Naive American heritage in a self-submitted "who's who" bio, and to her employers when they asked in a survey. that's it, that's literally the entire "controversy."

No, she listed it as her ethnicity on her applications to Penn and Harvard. She used affirmative action to help her get ahead in life based on a lie. She's done some really good work, but the reason she was hired by Harvard (the first Harvard professor ever that got her law degree from a public university) is that she ticked all the right diversity checkboxes. There are a lot of legal minds out there that are just as talented (or even more) that wouldn't have been hired by Harvard because they didn't lie about their ethnicity.

I'm sorry, this is just a lie in every way.

I was about to reply, then I saw who it was. Never mind. I know you're just a shill.

The fact that she didn't list Native American heritage on her job applications is specifically cited by the "Pocahontas" people as evidence that she was lying when she claimed Native American heritage elsewhere.

This is insane. It's a controversy with absolutely no substance that has been allowed to percolate in the media simply because they have a convention of reporting whatever "both sides" are saying. And now you're mis-remembering the media reports to fabricate details that were never in them.

Fuck indians. Fuck banks, too.

Heil Andrew Jackson.

Favorite president. Highest Indian kill count. That's not even counting the trail of tears