He could have, but the fat fucker would have gone into cardiac arrest. I think holding that lame ass wooden shield was the most exercise he's had in years. He looked like the kinda puss that requires a car to do any real damage, like most trump supporters I'm guessing.
Antifa are probably the least intimidating activists possible. Especially in the US, where it's practically legal to kill them if they start shit on your property.
This. Basically the only intimidating antifa type I have seen is the MMA fighter Jeff Manson. Dude is 5'9 and weighs like 230.
Those black dudes that your disheveled, filthy white commie cucks love fanboying over only look good in comparison to their disgusting "comrades". They are just cut, not that scary.
this sub was so much better when all these nerds didn't join in and start downvoting the pinged tards cause they got them in their feelings. Control urselves jfc
They missed the point if that cartoon. It's not saying Nazis are better people than antifas, it's saying antifa is a more dangerous organization than the neo-Nazis. I'd be more concerned to deal with 500k terrible than 10 absolutely abhorrent people.
What do you expect from a subreddit built entirely on "hahahaha those old people who are multiple times older than us and have had much more filling lives sure are stoopid! Dumb old people! Lol!"
Few argue that there are or should be no limits to freedom of expression. Last week on The Torch, I discussed the boundaries of several categories of speech that are unprotected by the First Amendment, such as true threats and incitement to imminent lawless action.
That doesn't actually refute me nor support you. "true threats" and "incitement to imminent lawless action" describe a fundamentally different thing from "screaming 'fire' in a theater".
I don't know how sarcastically pointing out that call to genocide by nazi can definitely be considered as a threat by jew could ever be relevant to the discussion either. My bad.
The problem you encounter is when the words are advocating violence.
So? That is still not even remotely morally equivalent to actual violence.
The way you respond to "you should be violent" is by saying "no, that's wrong". If you respond instead by being violent, well guess what, you fucking lose.
Well I mean they got their followers somehow. Somebody found them convincing and then those people joined them, and often times they were otherwise pretty normal people before.
Unlike your normal Klansmen that are basically just racist Republicans, Nazis are an actual party of sorts. They have their ideology, outlined goals, and they have plans. To give them even a platform to speak on is to enable them and support their efforts.
I never said they don't have other ways, but we can deny them the implied legitimacy of a public event. It would be best if nobody would host their websites either and cesspools like /pol/ were purged, but that's not something that should be done at a governmental level.
Is this your only method of discussion? To downvote and assert that the other party does not understand logic?
The first and foremost way to combat these Nazis is to deny them public demonstration. In public they can appear on TV, the internet, in newspapers, and to random passerby. It is their largest method of exposure and it must be prevented.
/u/sprickles, trying to tie shitty helicopter maintainence to Nazis is like Pizzagate level retarded. Actually, it's more retarded.
Are you honestly special needs enough to believe that that argument holds water or are you just so high on dat agenda that you don't see anything wrong with using misleading and objectively dumb arguments just to push your agenda? Maybe when you have to include a completely irrelevant helicopter crash in your argument as evidence it means that you don't have enough evidence to support that argument.
If you want some actual non-bullshit cop-deaths then how about trying this one on for size?
71 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-09-01
This, but unironically.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-01
2 WOKE
1 pizzashill 2017-09-01
REEEEE I HAVE THE RIGHT TO VIOLENTLY ASSAULT ANYONE I WANT AS LONG AS I DECLARE THEM A NAZI!!
1 theycallmeryan 2017-09-01
How dare you believe in small government and personal responsibility you fucking fascist REEEEEEEE
1 Mothu 2017-09-01
/u/Labargoth3
Jesus Christ, imagine being so deluded in your beliefs that you sincerely view people who own burger shops as not being "people" anymore.
1 BasicallyADoctor 2017-09-01
That individual was a real winner althroughout the thread! And probably in life as well 😂
1 Gothmog26 2017-09-01
If Hitler had killed Commies instead of people, he would be remembered as the greatest hero Europe had ever seen.
1 ZeitgeistNow 2017-09-01
For now, our boy Pinochet holds the top spot
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/191/011/17f.jpg
1 Nubthesamurai 2017-09-01
/u/Labargoth3
Retards like you need to be gassed
1 CantWakeUpJPG 2017-09-01
I see the commies are working double time on Reddit trying to deny the Holodomor.
1 Neon_needles 2017-09-01
Sometimes I wish communist revolution in America did happen just so tranny, hipsters, and academia would be purged in a hail of bullets.
Would make reddit more enjoyable for a week or so, until the bread lines start kicking up.
1 80BAIT08 2017-09-01
/u/vfxdev my fav part is when they run them over.
1 vfxdev 2017-09-01
A trump supporter leaves the safe space of his mom's basement for 1 day and ends up in jail. SAD!
1 80BAIT08 2017-09-01
Guess he made the space.... Unsafe...
1 vfxdev 2017-09-01
Yep, a bit less safe than when he was beating his own mother for sure.
1 80BAIT08 2017-09-01
Like 7 more unsafes.
1 ZeitgeistNow 2017-09-01
Yeah, he could've expended that energy in a more productive way, like taking an antifa members' head and bashing it against a rock
1 vfxdev 2017-09-01
He could have, but the fat fucker would have gone into cardiac arrest. I think holding that lame ass wooden shield was the most exercise he's had in years. He looked like the kinda puss that requires a car to do any real damage, like most trump supporters I'm guessing.
1 redrobin65 2017-09-01
Damn
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-09-01
Antifa are probably the least intimidating activists possible. Especially in the US, where it's practically legal to kill them if they start shit on your property.
1 SlayerofKings4 2017-09-01
This. Basically the only intimidating antifa type I have seen is the MMA fighter Jeff Manson. Dude is 5'9 and weighs like 230.
Those black dudes that your disheveled, filthy white commie cucks love fanboying over only look good in comparison to their disgusting "comrades". They are just cut, not that scary.
1 Ranilen 2017-09-01
/r/iamverybadass
1 SlayerofKings4 2017-09-01
I basically admitted that a guy who is 5'9 AND a socialist can be scary. That is being humble.
1 metric_units 2017-09-01
5'9" | 1.75 metres
metric units bot | feedback | source | block | v0.7.9
1 Ranilen 2017-09-01
So humble.
1 DAM1313 2017-09-01
Post pics you smoothbrain protozoan
1 SlayerofKings4 2017-09-01
Why the fuck would I post pics? Holy nigger droppings.
1 DAM1313 2017-09-01
talking out of your extremely dilated shitpipe
1 ay_what_up 2017-09-01
you're my favorite new drama troll. It's so obvious but somehow retards in this sub almost always fall for it
1 cannedairspray 2017-09-01
Lmao what
1 theycallmeryan 2017-09-01
1615 pounds??? I'm calling bullshit unless you've been on some serious cycles my man.
1 18aidanme 2017-09-01
what a shit comment like no original jokes whatsoever.
1 ay_what_up 2017-09-01
this sub was so much better when all these nerds didn't join in and start downvoting the pinged tards cause they got them in their feelings. Control urselves jfc
1 Thulean-Dragon 2017-09-01
This is some of the worst banter I've ever seen.
1 aqouta 2017-09-01
They missed the point if that cartoon. It's not saying Nazis are better people than antifas, it's saying antifa is a more dangerous organization than the neo-Nazis. I'd be more concerned to deal with 500k terrible than 10 absolutely abhorrent people.
1 KingNothing305 2017-09-01
Its amazing how easily they excuse the assaults, destruction of property and their communist leaning.
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
What do you expect from a subreddit built entirely on "hahahaha those old people who are multiple times older than us and have had much more filling lives sure are stoopid! Dumb old people! Lol!"
1 BasicallyADoctor 2017-09-01
Fuck the elderly 🖕
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
CAUSE WE'RE JUST GONNA KILL EM
1 Gothmog26 2017-09-01
Whatever . It's your dick.
1 NationalDenbt 2017-09-01
Where you puttin that finger bb
1 Coltrane23 2017-09-01
uh u wot m8
1 Raven0520 2017-09-01
The only people Marxists can feel superior to are the senile.
1 ay_what_up 2017-09-01
whatever makes u feel better about being old and having gross raisin skin I guess
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
Success breeds jealousy
1 SpectroSpecter 2017-09-01
I think it's more like "my parents are over 30, my parents are gay for not letting me play call of duty, therefore everyone over 30 is also gay"
I will literally eat an entire live sheep if any of the mods of that sub are over 15
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
That's more along the lines of r/oldpeoplefacebook. Forwards from Grandma is more about grandma's trash political opinions.
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
Conservatism is no worse than Liberalism.
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
It's demonstrably worse but they're both pretty bad. Any political party right of center is nothing short of evil.
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
Any political party LEFT of center is just as evil. Radical centrist extremism is the only true ideology of peace
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
RADICAL CENTRISTS UNITE
TOP OF THE POLITICAL PYRAMID
MUH HORSESHOE THEORY
1 shabbos-goy 2017-09-01
It's not a horseshoe. It's a ⟂.
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
I feel like I'd like your joke but Sync just gives me the mystery box where that emote should be. [x]
1 double-happiness 2017-09-01
Pff. Just looks like a typical Glaswegian barbecue.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
/u/error404brain
You are unbelievably, completely, utterly wrong about both the analogy and what you are actually trying to get at. Also relevant.
1 error404brain 2017-09-01
You own fucking source. l2r
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
That doesn't actually refute me nor support you. "true threats" and "incitement to imminent lawless action" describe a fundamentally different thing from "screaming 'fire' in a theater".
1 error404brain 2017-09-01
Right, I forgot that nazis pushing for extermination of the jews aren't making true threat. My bad for knowing what happening between 39-45.
1 Tobans 2017-09-01
It's "peaceful ethnic cleansing," you bigot.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
Have you ever tried saying things that are actually relevant to the conversation?
1 error404brain 2017-09-01
I don't know how sarcastically pointing out that call to genocide by nazi can definitely be considered as a threat by jew could ever be relevant to the discussion either. My bad.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
/u/millcitymiss
So? That is still not even remotely morally equivalent to actual violence.
The way you respond to "you should be violent" is by saying "no, that's wrong". If you respond instead by being violent, well guess what, you fucking lose.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
/u/IdiotaRandoma
How? Are you worried people will find them convincing?
If so, then don't you think the rational response is to present a stronger counterargument? No? Why not?
Surely you aren't suggesting that coming up with a stronger counterargument is too difficult or something?
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
Well I mean they got their followers somehow. Somebody found them convincing and then those people joined them, and often times they were otherwise pretty normal people before.
Unlike your normal Klansmen that are basically just racist Republicans, Nazis are an actual party of sorts. They have their ideology, outlined goals, and they have plans. To give them even a platform to speak on is to enable them and support their efforts.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
You understand that this does not actually logically follow, right?
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
How so?
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
Because there are other ways for them to get followers.
Please take an introductory course in logic.
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
I never said they don't have other ways, but we can deny them the implied legitimacy of a public event. It would be best if nobody would host their websites either and cesspools like /pol/ were purged, but that's not something that should be done at a governmental level.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
Again, please take an introductory course in logic.
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
Is this your only method of discussion? To downvote and assert that the other party does not understand logic?
The first and foremost way to combat these Nazis is to deny them public demonstration. In public they can appear on TV, the internet, in newspapers, and to random passerby. It is their largest method of exposure and it must be prevented.
1 zahlman 2017-09-01
No, but it's the one that I find appropriate here.
lol
1 IdiotaRandoma 2017-09-01
thanks m8y gret banter ave a gud one
1 NationalDenbt 2017-09-01
/u/sprickles, trying to tie shitty helicopter maintainence to Nazis is like Pizzagate level retarded. Actually, it's more retarded.
Are you honestly special needs enough to believe that that argument holds water or are you just so high on dat agenda that you don't see anything wrong with using misleading and objectively dumb arguments just to push your agenda? Maybe when you have to include a completely irrelevant helicopter crash in your argument as evidence it means that you don't have enough evidence to support that argument.
If you want some actual non-bullshit cop-deaths then how about trying this one on for size?