Jews did this

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

So, feminism is going to disappear because feminists don't breed. Does he think feminism is hereditary?

I'm wondering how their "theory" explains the rise of feminism in the first place from presumably traditional mothers.

And given how much of that sub consists of rebelling against PC culture and liberalism, I don't know why he thinks a future of conservatism won't just lead to resurgence of feminism.

/u/alphabetacal45 Were you serious with that post? I can't imagine someone actually being that dumb. I hope you don't breed and pass on your chromosome disorder.

Your hopes are not relevant to me, snowflake.

Please, explain your reasoning. How do you think feminism evolved as a genetic trait in some parts of humanity?

Example 1:

The Black Death was so widespread that it even affected human evolution. In 1998, Stephen O'Brien and colleagues showed that a mutation that confers resistance to HIV first appeared in the human population in the 1300's. They concluded that this mutation can best be explained by "a widespread fatal epidemic"; in other words, the Black Death. I should be careful to explain that the plague didn't actually cause the mutation: the mutation occurred naturally. The Black Death selectively killed more people without the mutation, leaving us with a population of humans that tended to have the mutation.

Replace "black death" with feminism, and "mutation" in the cellular sense with behavioral or temperamental changes.

Example 2:

For a resistance genotype to spread through a population or to drastically change in frequency, some selective pressure is likely to play a role. Most commonly this is due to genetic drift or selection events in a severely bottlenecked or small population [2,11]. For example, consider a population of 100 members that is about to get struck by a disease. Before the outbreak only a small portion of the population, say 10 (10%), had a mutation that provided resistance to the pathogen while 90 (90%) did not. However, when the disease sweeps through the population it kills 50 of the susceptible population and no resistant members. Now the population has 50 members, 10 of which (20%) are resistant and 40 (80%) of which are susceptible. The frequency of the resistance doubled through that event, and the disease was the selective force for that increase.

For a better understanding of how selective forces evolve species over generations, I would recommend taking a Biology 101 course at your local university.

I know you guys like to call feminism cancer but you realize it isnt an actual disease, right?

I know you guys like to call feminism cancer but you realize it isnt an actual disease, right?

You did actually read my post, right? Here, I'll repeat my first sentence for you:

No, feminism isn't cancer.

While I'm at it, I'll repeat what I said a couple sentences later, regarding what feminism does to its host:

rendering them sterile

Feminists breed very little, and over time the problem will solve itself. Good riddance.

You said it isnt cancer, but you still seem to think its an actual disease since literally your entire post is about diseases.

Also lots of women who self identify as feminists have kids. Do you actually have any sort of research or evidence for this feminism makes women sterile assertion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQCU36pkH7c

Feminism was so widespread that it even affected human evolution. In 1998, Stephen O'Brien and colleagues showed that a behavioral change that confers resistance to men first appeared in the female population in the 1920's. They concluded that this behavioral change can best be explained by "a widespread fatal epidemic"; in other words, feminism. I should be careful to explain that feminism didn't actually cause the behavioral changes: the changes occurred naturally. Feminism selectively killed more people without the changes, leaving us with a population of women that tended to have the behavioral change.

Wow, I understand that you would use disease as a metaphor for feminism, but you do realize that it isn't actually a disease, right? I can't tell whether that's what you're saying or not.

selective forces evolve species over generations

Let's count how many generations of feminist women there have been in history. I'm not gonna count 1st wave, since demanding the right to vote doesn't seem quite as cancerous in hindsight. I hope you agree. The 2nd wave started in the 1960's. That's like 3 generations.

Are you really trying to say that these 3 generations of feminists have affected human evolution? Are you trying to say that they're a sub-species with a certain feminist mutation that are starting to die out because they can't procreate? All of this within 3 generations.

Feminism is an abstract idea that is taught to people after they are born. It doesn't exist as a mutation in their brains caused by natural selection. Do you not realize how crazy that sounds? It's pretty funny though and it makes for good copypasta.

Are you really trying to say that these 3 generations of feminists have affected human evolution? Are you trying to say that they're a sub-species with a certain feminist mutation that are starting to die out because they can't procreate? All of this within 3 generations.

No, I never said that and continue not to say that.

I said that in the future, humanity will not be feminist, because whatever traits inherent within people give them proclivity towards feminism, will lead toward their sterilization. It's going to take much longer than 3 generations though.

Radical, extremist, 3rd wave feminism is a brand new condition humanity has never faced before, and because these radical leftists don't breed (or breed very little), they will die off over time.

Imagine a religion where all followers are forbidden from having any children. Think it will last long? Same thing with feminism. Won't be around in the long term.

Now imagine a religion telling you to "be fruitful and multiply." Think it will last long? Thousands of years and counting. That's conservatives.

I feel genuinely bad for you

It's the same thing they say about like religious people breeding more than atheists, or conservatives having more kids than liberals

I think they're under the impression that ideologies and belief systems are genetic

Evidently so as only conservatives will breed in the future. No wonder hard core conservatives disagree with evolution, their understanding of it is retarded.

Political leanings can tend to run in families without being strictly genetic, as anyone who isn't a stone-cold moron would understand.

Sure, that's why thanksgiving is such a peaceful time, all those people with the same political leanings getting together and all agreeing with each other.

how does the rise of feminism from traditional women factor into your theory? How would it not happen again when "conservative women" are the only ones left?

He doesn't think much at all because all of those goofs are co.pletely dysfunctional. You have to be a giant fucking moron if you think nyc's court jester should run the country

Pretty accurate.

The good news is that in 100 years, feminism probably won't be around. This is because they hardly ever breed, while traditional women have 4+ kids.

So political ideas are hereditary traits? Is that how it works?

Political ideas are hereditary traits passed on genetically, as we all know. That's why conservatives only ever produce conservative children, no matter what.

Family Ties was an inside job

Look mom, I made another the_Donald agendapost!

i know isn't it grrat

look at ur own post history faggo, it's agenda post central

thank god, i was going through tD with-drawl here

The whole point of bulls on wall street is that they punch upward. Where as bears swipe downwards. This is a monument to women not needing to worry about bulls because they're always below. That's why a downwards trending market is called a bear market and signs of it are "bearish" and an upward trending market is a bull market and signs of it are "bullish".

This is what happens when retardes women who aren't involved at all in a culture create a monument about it without any understanding of it at all.