The fact that most Right Wing politicans, a major one of being the President, are climate change deniars/skeptics. And that if you vote Left Wing politicians, they are more likely to understand climate change. The current administration might just take all of this as 'bad luck' where as a democrat might attribute it as a part played out by our changing climate and what's caused it.
/u/explodingsheeple I hope you're literally retarded, there's no other excuse for posting this.
Both of you are missing their point. You cherrypicked the fuck out of this sentence
The fact that most Right Wing politicans, a major one of being the President, are climate change deniars/skeptics. And that if you vote Left Wing politicians, they are more likely to understand climate change. The current administration might just take all of this as 'bad luck' where as a democrat might attribute it as a part played out by our changing climate and what's caused it.
By only responding to this one point
a major one of being the President, are climate change deniars/skeptics
To make sure everybody knows DRUMPF is an idiot. We already all know that, and you're being a liberal idiot again by bringing it up, just like you do in every other thread.
God I need to keep myself safe, fuckin seriousposting and everything.
Dude FIRST OF ALL i never started an argument. Even if it looked like it. Daddy is a retard. I simply posted his retarded tweets regarding climate change. But these guys went all "but her turn" "buttery males" on my comment. Lol
u/explodingsheeple you understand complaining about global warming is like complaining about a solar flare. To prevent the temperature going up were going to have to destroy the world economy. Bitching about trump refusing to sign the Paris accord(one of the good things he's done) is pointless too unless you think wealth redistribution from the first world to third is a good idea.
Go fuck your tranny you degenerate faggot. read the accords they first don't do anything about climate change in realitg and the target date is in the middle of the century, around 40 years.
Pulling out of the Paris accords does nothing if you don't focus on cutting emissions and such on your own with a closer target. Plus a large part of emissions is cattle and such in the US and if we can subsidize the shit out of corn we can subsidize the shit out of less polluting animals.
at least putting in the effort instead of talking about "clean coal" and cutting the budget drastically for those of us who need clean water and air.
The govt already subsidizes corn a ton. Its the most versatile crop and pretty much what all the major farms out in the flyover states grow. Beef farms are normally in places that would struggle to grow anything more exciting than hay.
So one dude, Dr. Bates manipulated some numbers to show we were warming faster? Ok sure I believe that. I'm still not convinced that the changes aren't happening. It's a natural occurrence, I still think we are having an influence on it.
I don't doubt the climate is changing--it always is. But, the central premise of man-made global warming--the hockey stick model has proven inaccurate. We stopped warming for 20 years. That did not fit with the preconceived narrative so the data was altered to eliminate the "pause" to make the figures correspond to the model.
Do you know it is not possible to see or verify HOW NOAA altered the raw temp data because NOAA will not release its algorithms? Yet, that "altered data" is then used as the basis for all the analyses, papers, and models. --All based on data that cannot be peer-reviewed and verified...it is simply taken as a given. That is not how "science" works.
Of course it changes constantly, obviously then making up daily weather patterns. This is the first I've heard of any altered data. Im not sure why we would have stopped warming for 20 years, I know that global warming doesn't mean we don't have periods of cooling just that average global temperatures have risen. These articles seem to focus solely on the US where it's possible we could have seen a cooling here and warming elsewhere globally.
Yeah I know how "science" works and specially global warming and cooling. A large portion of my undergrad degree in geography, specifically Urban and Regional Planning (city planning) was focused on sustainable practices and climate change. So the idea NOAA's fabricated data could have corrupted my own research is frustrating.
Note: The Rules are subject to update at a later time.
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely an ad hominem, you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely another of the classical, recognised fallacies (for example, but not limited to, Strawmen, No True Scotsman, Red Herrings, Whataboutisms), you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely a criticism of tone (aside from polite corrections of spelling, usage, or grammar), you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is a bald contradiction (example: "No, you're wrong"), then you have three subsequent comments or 24 hours, whichever comes first, to expand upon the bald contradiction with a substantive line of reasoning (no matter how thin or poor that line of reasoning may be), or you have conceded your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me argues for misogyny, white supremacism, transphobia, homophobia, racism, or any alt-Right position, you have conceded the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your position is forfeit under these Rules, you have declared to the world that you are defective (inferior) and a loser. This is irrevocable and unavoidable, and in all other ways permanent.
• By commenting to me, you understand and signify that the consequences of forfeit include, but are not limited to, being banned from any and all communities (subreddits) on Reddit and further comments of yours being blocked from being delivered. You further understand and signify that the use of other accounts, and the hiring of other users for any compensation whatsoever to undertake circumvention of these bans and blocks, is a violation of your contract with Reddit, Inc. under the User Agreement and that such actions may result in termination of your use of the service as put forth under the User Agreement.
Take your fucking trash elsewhere, or eat it yourself and choke on it. Stop leaving it on my doorstep.
Yeah that's what I'm talking about. If you're interested in circlejerk about a certain political position (except of radical centricism) then this place isn't for you.
I've been here for two years. Didn't comment much. For no particular tbh. I abandoned my last account because of some private info i left here and there. Enough to doxx me. I was dumb :(
It's a copy pasta. I don't man. I'm addicted to copy pastas. Copy pasted it from a comment sometime ago in r/worldnews. I have copy pasta about sex offender republican GOP politicians list.
Do you really believe I would have complied that?
Also posting copy pastas for me is literally two taps. I have a jailbreak tweak called "pasithea" that turns the Tibetan keyboard into a clipboard for copy pastas. About 100.
Also please don't get me even started on SRD. Why do you think i come here? It's basically SRS v.2.0. And if this place turn into SRS or TD, then whooosh i go. Lol
Sure is seriouspost in here. Go back to Donald you inhuman garbage, this is a south park neutral sub, we accept global warming is real and try to harness it to raise the real estate value of our high sea level properties.
We need more of u/ManhattanTransFur u/IvankaTrumpisMyWaifu and u/Imgur_Lurker to tell us why Global Warning is a Chinese hoax just likey daddy said it is. We're waiting fellas ;)
"remember that time I agreed with people in /r/drama, that was when they were real, but all the other times where I disagree with them, they were all paid astroturfers"
Imagine thinking /r/drama, an obviously South Park neutral leaning site visited by a South Park neutral leaning demographic, is South Park neutral leaning in /r/drama ENTIRELY because of paid astroturfing, this is bordering on lunatic fringe mentality, you realize this right? It's an equally likely that that day was just a major brigade from SRDines, or maybe it's more complex than who has the bigger amount of shills.
cranks A/C as my mcdonalds induces the pre-diarrhea sweats. Takes a sip from my plastic bottled natural spring (tap) water that I bought from a CVS I drove to in my SUV even though it's easily in walking distance, proudly types
'ISN'T SOMEONE GOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE'
There's also the people who eat organic everything (of course imported from other continents), travel all over the world to admire nature and fawn about how we're destroying it (with first class airplane tickets that means another shitload of carbon for their vacation) and then post about it all over facebook complaining about how poor people don't do enough for the environment.
If these people cared as much as they say they do they would go live like cavemen. Everything they own was made in huge pollution causing factories that even exist because of deforestation.
108 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-09-07
We can submit quotes?
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 LemonScore 2017-09-07
/u/explodingsheeple I hope you're literally retarded, there's no other excuse for posting this.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/265895292191248385?lang=en
1 jacksfilmsbot 2017-09-07
Add some protein.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Y-you too!
1 jacksfilmsbot 2017-09-07
Cool cool.
1 wwyzzerdd 2017-09-07
IT WAS HURTURN!!!
Everyone knows that if you elect a vagina you won't have natural disasters. And when you elect a dick you'll get repeated natural disasters.
Its simple science folks; dicks = disaster. Tuck them back for the sake of humanity.
1 ay_what_up 2017-09-07
the point here is that trump is mentally retarded, not that Hillary can stop hurricanes
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
But do you think he really gives a shit about that? He straw manned right in the first sentence. DAE "BUTTERY MALES? 😋"
This is advanced Cognitive Dissonance™! Powered by Autism!
He has to defend daddy! Daddy can do no wrong!
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
He doesn't care about the point. He wants to defend daddy at all costs. Lol
1 eeso99 2017-09-07
Both of you are missing their point. You cherrypicked the fuck out of this sentence
By only responding to this one point
To make sure everybody knows DRUMPF is an idiot. We already all know that, and you're being a liberal idiot again by bringing it up, just like you do in every other thread.
God I need to keep myself safe, fuckin seriousposting and everything.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Dude FIRST OF ALL i never started an argument. Even if it looked like it. Daddy is a retard. I simply posted his retarded tweets regarding climate change. But these guys went all "but her turn" "buttery males" on my comment. Lol
1 grungebot5000 2017-09-07
this has never been disproven
when was the last time Germany got hit by a hurricane?
1 wwyzzerdd 2017-09-07
You can't argue with that.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
BUTTERY MALES? Huh? Lol
1 Tzcar 2017-09-07
British cuisine is a natural disaster.
1 grungebot5000 2017-09-07
yeah but they were inflicted with that under the reign of the great King Æthelstan
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Try straw manning harder. I heard it cures autism.
1 Sober_Sloth 2017-09-07
This sub needs to suck Trumps dick to appear south park neutral. Dont worry.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Lol
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-09-07
u/explodingsheeple you understand complaining about global warming is like complaining about a solar flare. To prevent the temperature going up were going to have to destroy the world economy. Bitching about trump refusing to sign the Paris accord(one of the good things he's done) is pointless too unless you think wealth redistribution from the first world to third is a good idea.
1 ieatpussy69 2017-09-07
Implying global warming wont destroy the global economy
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-09-07
You rather do that now or in 40 years where we probably have developed technology to mitigate the effects
1 ieatpussy69 2017-09-07
Implying the effects of climate change are decades away and not already well underway
Implying we don't already have the technology to mitigate it
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Dude! Don't you ever doubt a Redditor. I'm pretty sure he's done his research. He knows what he's saying.
1 ieatpussy69 2017-09-07
Pretty lulz that climate denial is suddenly big on reddit considering it's just as retarded as anti-vaxx or creationism.
Reddit is full of low-level tech workers who think they're scientists though so not surprising.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Oh look we're both getting downvoted. The short bus brigade must be in full force lmao
1 wow___justwow 2017-09-07
You can't refuse, because of the implication.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-09-07
40 years will be too late. Take a fucking science class.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2017-09-07
Go fuck your tranny you degenerate faggot. read the accords they first don't do anything about climate change in realitg and the target date is in the middle of the century, around 40 years.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
S A L T Y B O Y E
1 Mircy 2017-09-07
Pulling out of the Paris accords does nothing if you don't focus on cutting emissions and such on your own with a closer target. Plus a large part of emissions is cattle and such in the US and if we can subsidize the shit out of corn we can subsidize the shit out of less polluting animals.
at least putting in the effort instead of talking about "clean coal" and cutting the budget drastically for those of us who need clean water and air.
1 alphetasauce 2017-09-07
How does subsidizing corn make us eat steak and burgers less?
1 Mircy 2017-09-07
government incentive for preferred crops and animals and cracking down on big beef and such
that's the reason beef is so prevalent in the first place
1 alphetasauce 2017-09-07
The govt already subsidizes corn a ton. Its the most versatile crop and pretty much what all the major farms out in the flyover states grow. Beef farms are normally in places that would struggle to grow anything more exciting than hay.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Lmao classic u/boyoyoyoyong
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
OK. I have three years in each of Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering. It was many, many science class.
Global warming is a scam.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-09-07
There's no such thing as more science than me
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
False, you think women have penises.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-09-07
Not when all the "warming" is based on manipulation of the raw temperature data to make it conform to the models that were not accurate.
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
Ahh let's see that source
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-09-07
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/5/climate-change-whistleblower-alleges-noaa-manipula/
https://realclimatescience.com/2016/12/100-of-us-warming-is-due-to-noaa-data-tampering/
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/noaa-fiddles-with-climate-data-to-erase-the-15-year-global-warming-hiatus/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/16/changing-the-data-to-get-climate-change/
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
So one dude, Dr. Bates manipulated some numbers to show we were warming faster? Ok sure I believe that. I'm still not convinced that the changes aren't happening. It's a natural occurrence, I still think we are having an influence on it.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-09-07
I don't doubt the climate is changing--it always is. But, the central premise of man-made global warming--the hockey stick model has proven inaccurate. We stopped warming for 20 years. That did not fit with the preconceived narrative so the data was altered to eliminate the "pause" to make the figures correspond to the model.
Do you know it is not possible to see or verify HOW NOAA altered the raw temp data because NOAA will not release its algorithms? Yet, that "altered data" is then used as the basis for all the analyses, papers, and models. --All based on data that cannot be peer-reviewed and verified...it is simply taken as a given. That is not how "science" works.
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
Of course it changes constantly, obviously then making up daily weather patterns. This is the first I've heard of any altered data. Im not sure why we would have stopped warming for 20 years, I know that global warming doesn't mean we don't have periods of cooling just that average global temperatures have risen. These articles seem to focus solely on the US where it's possible we could have seen a cooling here and warming elsewhere globally.
Yeah I know how "science" works and specially global warming and cooling. A large portion of my undergrad degree in geography, specifically Urban and Regional Planning (city planning) was focused on sustainable practices and climate change. So the idea NOAA's fabricated data could have corrupted my own research is frustrating.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
Compared to when? There are plenty of other periods in Earth's history hotter than now.
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
Some cooler times there too, lest we forget about the ice ages and mini ice age too. Technically speaking it's all relative heat.
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/16/climate/british-press-watchdog-climate-change.html?module=WatchingPortal&region=c-column-middle-span-region&pgType=Homepage&action=click&mediaId=thumb_square&state=standard&contentPlacement=3&version=internal&contentCollection=www.nytimes.com&contentId=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2017%2F09%2F16%2Fclimate%2Fbritish-press-watchdog-climate-change.html&referer=
Boom.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
GLOBAL WARMING IS A CHCHCHCHCYNESE HOAX
R E A L C L I M A T E S C I E N C E.COM
1 kennewickman 2017-09-07
Www.garybuseyisalizard.com if you enter that incorrectly it will take you to an illegal viagra website
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Neat!
1 brianpv 2017-09-07
This is why people in the sciences laugh at lawyers btw.
1 AMD_2017 2017-09-07
You do realize that the activity on the surface of Sol can change the average temp on Earth for thousands of years, right?
1 ieatpussy69 2017-09-07
Which activity is that specifically?
1 AMD_2017 2017-09-07
What have they been teaching you in middle school?
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
Fusion of hydrogen into helium, mainly.
1 TrailerParkBride 2017-09-07
The Venn diagram of people who call the sun Sol and people who own hugboxes is one big ol' circle.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-09-07
Yay..someone gets it
1 Letterbocks 2017-09-07
So much bad science in that thread. And plenty of comments pointing out how retarded the post is.
Who's botting upvptes of such a plainly retarded crap meme? 🤔
1 Fading_Joy 2017-09-07
Why the fuck is that sub even called Political Humor, it's just agenda posting and low effort facebook memes
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
FTFY
1 clarkeff 2017-09-07
Signs of butthurt: when you reply to literally every comment in a thread
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
RULES ON HOW TO REPLY TO ME ON REDDIT
Note: The Rules are subject to update at a later time.
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely an ad hominem, you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely another of the classical, recognised fallacies (for example, but not limited to, Strawmen, No True Scotsman, Red Herrings, Whataboutisms), you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is substantially or entirely a criticism of tone (aside from polite corrections of spelling, usage, or grammar), you are conceding your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me is a bald contradiction (example: "No, you're wrong"), then you have three subsequent comments or 24 hours, whichever comes first, to expand upon the bald contradiction with a substantive line of reasoning (no matter how thin or poor that line of reasoning may be), or you have conceded your side of the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your comment to me argues for misogyny, white supremacism, transphobia, homophobia, racism, or any alt-Right position, you have conceded the argument (your position is forfeit).
• If your position is forfeit under these Rules, you have declared to the world that you are defective (inferior) and a loser. This is irrevocable and unavoidable, and in all other ways permanent.
• By commenting to me, you understand and signify that the consequences of forfeit include, but are not limited to, being banned from any and all communities (subreddits) on Reddit and further comments of yours being blocked from being delivered. You further understand and signify that the use of other accounts, and the hiring of other users for any compensation whatsoever to undertake circumvention of these bans and blocks, is a violation of your contract with Reddit, Inc. under the User Agreement and that such actions may result in termination of your use of the service as put forth under the User Agreement.
Take your fucking trash elsewhere, or eat it yourself and choke on it. Stop leaving it on my doorstep.
1 RobKaBobby 2017-09-07
Bussy or GTFO
1 Obskulum 2017-09-07
spahgetti is all right
1 ieatpussy69 2017-09-07
Ed is a beautiful spazposter don't be ableist to him
1 Wordshark 2017-09-07
Man, you're obnoxious. As bad as automod in r/imgoingtohellforthis
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Woah there! Next time, please refrain from using that horribly bigoted term. Instead, please use the universally accepted "Trump Supporter".
Thank you for your understanding.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 cleverseneca 2017-09-07
Man i don't think I can handle such screechy sperging. Please keep you serious posting to a dull roar. Kthnxbai
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
The comment you replied to originally isn't even a serious post you retard. Smh
1 cleverseneca 2017-09-07
Impossible to tell anymore TBH Fam, you've gone that crazy.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Tbh there's a lot of butthurt.
Yeah that's what I'm talking about. If you're interested in circlejerk about a certain political position (except of radical centricism) then this place isn't for you.
1 cleverseneca 2017-09-07
Been here a lot longer than you Fam, I just know how not to shit up the place with effort posting like some kind of SRDine.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
I've been here for two years. Didn't comment much. For no particular tbh. I abandoned my last account because of some private info i left here and there. Enough to doxx me. I was dumb :(
1 cleverseneca 2017-09-07
Actually goes and links to relevant Trump Tweets
Doesn't effort post
Pick one.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
It's a copy pasta. I don't man. I'm addicted to copy pastas. Copy pasted it from a comment sometime ago in r/worldnews. I have copy pasta about sex offender republican GOP politicians list.
Do you really believe I would have complied that?
Also posting copy pastas for me is literally two taps. I have a jailbreak tweak called "pasithea" that turns the Tibetan keyboard into a clipboard for copy pastas. About 100.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Also please don't get me even started on SRD. Why do you think i come here? It's basically SRS v.2.0. And if this place turn into SRS or TD, then whooosh i go. Lol
1 grungebot5000 2017-09-07
historical reasons
1 aqouta 2017-09-07
Sure is seriouspost in here. Go back to Donald you inhuman garbage, this is a south park neutral sub, we accept global warming is real and try to harness it to raise the real estate value of our high sea level properties.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
We need more of u/ManhattanTransFur u/IvankaTrumpisMyWaifu and u/Imgur_Lurker to tell us why Global Warning is a Chinese hoax just likey daddy said it is. We're waiting fellas ;)
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
u/boyoyoyoyong is already here i see lol. Bless his heart.
1 JohnBlind 2017-09-07
/u/imgur_lurker is never seriousposting tbh, idk why u retards keep falling for it
1 eeso99 2017-09-07
It's pretty easy to get the SRDines who browse /r/drama all in a tizzy. Keeps the rest of us on our toes for invaders I guess.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Or maybe you guys took my comment too seriously. Geez. I'm here to have fun and collect copy pastas. For agenda and politics I have r/circlejerk.
1 TrailerParkBride 2017-09-07
"I'm just pretending to be retarded!"
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-09-07
HAHAHA jokes on them I was only acting retarded
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
How do you feel about the part of TD shitting on (((IVANKA))) for being a globalism apologist? They sure turned against her lol. Genuinely curious.
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-09-07
[citation needed]
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Dude do i really need to link all those comments? :(
Maybe like 20-30%? Maybe less?
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-09-07
Please do, I need something to do this afternoon
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/6q1i1e/game_theory_and_the_golden_rule/
Enjoy!
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-09-07
Says the_donald hates on ivanka.
Links to /r/philosophy
Wow, /u/Ed_ButteredToast I thought the jokes about you being retarded were jokes... now I understand that might not be the case.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Oh no am i actually retarded? 😱😱😱
Btw it's a really interesting game. Try it! There are also a few others on his site. Check them out if you can :)
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-09-07
Believing (((they))) aren't making the planet warmer to save on heating bills in the [current year]
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Btw why aren't people happy that the earth is warming? Penguins over at Antarctic need some warmth too :(
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
It's actually "Climate Change" now.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Climate (((Change))) 😱👻
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
5000 years from now, Manhattan will be under a mile of ice but women and neuter-men will be shrieking about global warming.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
But we'll all dead by then! The sweet sweet release of death 😍😍😍
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Climate (((Change))) 😱👻
1 RobKaBobby 2017-09-07
"remember that time I agreed with people in /r/drama, that was when they were real, but all the other times where I disagree with them, they were all paid astroturfers"
Imagine thinking /r/drama, an obviously South Park neutral leaning site visited by a South Park neutral leaning demographic, is South Park neutral leaning in /r/drama ENTIRELY because of paid astroturfing, this is bordering on lunatic fringe mentality, you realize this right? It's an equally likely that that day was just a major brigade from SRDines, or maybe it's more complex than who has the bigger amount of shills.
1 aqouta 2017-09-07
I already know what the \([world order])/ is.
1 RobKaBobby 2017-09-07
(((They))) are behind the reason why SRDines are serious posting
1 pepperouchau 2017-09-07
Come to think of it, the weather machine in Red Alert 2 wasn't a Soviet weapon. Leftists finally unequivocally btfo.
1 disgruntled_lawyer 2017-09-07
Still not as cool as the tesla soldiers....
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2017-09-07
She would have told Hurricane Harvey to Pokemon Go Hit Brazil Instead!
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
Your comment and your username gave me a good chuckle. Bless your heart.
1 neutralvoter 2017-09-07
social media on climate change:
cranks A/C as my mcdonalds induces the pre-diarrhea sweats. Takes a sip from my plastic bottled natural spring (tap) water that I bought from a CVS I drove to in my SUV even though it's easily in walking distance, proudly types
'ISN'T SOMEONE GOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE'
1 IAintThatGuy 2017-09-07
There's also the people who eat organic everything (of course imported from other continents), travel all over the world to admire nature and fawn about how we're destroying it (with first class airplane tickets that means another shitload of carbon for their vacation) and then post about it all over facebook complaining about how poor people don't do enough for the environment.
1 zeldaisaprude 2017-09-07
If these people cared as much as they say they do they would go live like cavemen. Everything they own was made in huge pollution causing factories that even exist because of deforestation.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-07
5000 years from now, Manhattan will be under a mile of ice but women and neuter-men will be shrieking about global warming.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-07
https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/6q1i1e/game_theory_and_the_golden_rule/
Enjoy!