I submit a NSFW photo album of a former redditor. Someone sends me a sexually explicit PM as if I'm the woman featured. I Correct The Record, his autism is triggered, and he sends me thinly veiled legal threats.
41 2017-09-16 by FuckJakeNightly
41 2017-09-16 by FuckJakeNightly
65 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-09-16
Buzzword is, itself, a buzzword now.
Snapshots:
This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is
The photo album - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is
The post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, snew.github.io, archive.is
/r/slightlychubby - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is*
The autistic PMs - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-09-16
Lmfao, u wild OP
1 WarSanchez 2017-09-16
Secondly, why the fuck are you commenting on NSFW subs?
Do you also comment on pornvideos and if so, link us to your works.
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-09-16
The government should set up honeypot porn videos and then drone everyone that comments on them.
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2017-09-16
Eh, Pornhub comments are a better community than 99% of Reddit.
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-09-16
True. So basically, drone everyone on reddit
1 Curlgradphi 2017-09-16
Or just commit mayocide instead of all this convoluted bullshit.
1 MAGA_Chicken 2017-09-16
You don't have to actively copyright something, copyright is automatic.
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/copyright-automatic.html
1 WarSanchez 2017-09-16
Artists and writers, for original "works".
Pretty sure, an album of rando nudes shared with the public doesn't fit that criteria...
1 MAGA_Chicken 2017-09-16
Selfies are "works."
1 wwyzzerdd 2017-09-16
The Montreal Screwjob was a work.
1 MAGA_Chicken 2017-09-16
Buh gawd, that kayfabe had a family!
1 DeathBahamutXXX 2017-09-16
Bret screwed Bret!
1 kermit_was_right 2017-09-16
Photography counts. Posting it is irrelevant - photographer has the right to decide how and where it is displayed, or not.
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-09-16
This isn't even a matter of copyright haha
1 explohd 2017-09-16
True, however if you want to sue the infringer in court you have to register the works with the copyright office.
1 MAGA_Chicken 2017-09-16
Nope.
1 explohd 2017-09-16
Yes
1 MAGA_Chicken 2017-09-16
Nope.
1 explohd 2017-09-16
Here's another article saying the exact same fucking thing
How about the same informaton from Copyright.gov?
1 DeathBahamutXXX 2017-09-16
Nope
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
Did you read the rest of that?
This is a law firm trying to sell its services to allow would-be clients to register copyrights. Of course they are going to suggest it is mandatory. Kek.
1 explohd 2017-09-16
In Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, the requirement was not struck down
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
Precondition of being able to file a claim in court =/= existence of a copyright. You realise there is a difference, right?
1 explohd 2017-09-16
I get that copyright is granted automatically and that the Copyright Office has the right to refuse a registration (and you can still file a claim).
I keep looking at the code and getting the same answer-
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
Copyright automatically exists. A breach can happen pre-registration. The only thing registration does is smooth the process for commencing suit, and only in the US courts. Pretty much every other possible jurisdiction does not have a registration requirement, so you can absolutely get sued in, say, Canada.
TL/DR - the US has a ridiculously outdated process and the existence of copyright is unquestioned, whether or not it is registered. This has been fundamental since the Berne Convention in 1886.
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-16
can you normies take this shit elsewhere cheers
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
You say this like I am not also pounding your dad right in his festering bussy at this very moment.
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-16
he's literally dead, you degenerate. Please send pics, I love that shit.
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
I did say festering.
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-16
keep going, I'm almost there.
1 ComedicSans 2017-09-16
MOIST.
1 kermit_was_right 2017-09-16
Clearly this is questionable as per your discussion with comedicsans - but this is also a step that can be done at any time, and is more or less rubber stamped for original creators.
1 SDIHTD 2017-09-16
You seem like an asshole.
That person is morbidly obese, not slightly chubby.
1 mmason3891 2017-09-16
Quality shit post
1 SDIHTD 2017-09-16
They went from 0 to full on homicidal rage at each other almost instantly. 100% these are both spectrum residents.
1 mmason3891 2017-09-16
The reeeeeeeing is strong with these two
1 PlateStain 2017-09-16
Thinking about exchanging PMs with porn sub users just made me projectile vomit.
1 explohd 2017-09-16
/r/GWCommentsOnEarthPorn
1 Honk4Tits 2017-09-16
those really gross who wants to fuck that what a loser.
1 Neon_needles 2017-09-16
I keep thinking I am hearing a massive jug of water sloshing around.
1 edc_svr_wxf_qaz 2017-09-16
/u/fastfish21 why are you such a loser?
1 edc_svr_wxf_qaz 2017-09-16
/u/fastfish71 why are you such a loser?
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-16
r/me_irl
1 edc_svr_wxf_qaz 2017-09-16
Are you referring to me? I don't know what you mean by your post.
1 glmox 2017-09-16
r/me_irl
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-09-16
I still don't get it? 🤔
1 lifesbrink 2017-09-16
She's not too bad looking for a trans girl
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-16
/u/fastfish71
the fact that you comment on NSFW subs tells me that you smell like stale cum, unwashed clothes & are a generally sweaty individual. Please sort yourself out.
1 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-09-16
All recent comments are on cuckhold subs too
1 neutralvoter 2017-09-16
maybe it's best you don't link the album and save us from witnessing that disaster.
1 ghostchamber 2017-09-16
His last post was about eight hours ago, and this post is only four hours old.
I'm willing to be we'll have a deleted account not too long after he wakes up.
1 _Norm_ 2017-09-16
Here's hoping for a deleted life.
1 ManhattanTransFur 2017-09-16
Do fat guys post nudes of themselves, or is it just fat girls? Asking for a friend.
1 moush 2017-09-16
I'm sure there's a bear sub somewhere.
1 Mughi 2017-09-16
Well, of course there is!
1 gives-out-hugs 2017-09-16
No, they generally jist mod /r/drama
1 geraldo42 2017-09-16
We only have one fat on the mod team, at least that I'm aware of, and I imagine him more as the cuddly sort of fat guy, not the morbidly obese neckbeard.
1 RedditNewsThrowaway 2017-09-16
In what world is she "slightly" chubby?
Fucking europoors are right. We Americans are so used to seeing massive ham planets on a daily basis that even this women classifies as "slightly" chubby for us.
1 kermit_was_right 2017-09-16
That is actually not important, and the copyright is hers from the point of creation. You're probably thinking about registering said copyright with the government.
The photographer has the right to decide how people use their work and reposting without their permission is not exactly legal. You're probably not liable for damages unless you're trying to turn a profit - but that can be argued in court and is dependent on the exact situation and what you're doing with their work.
That said, you're pretty goddamn unlikely to get into trouble over it.
1 SmearMeWithPasta 2017-09-16
Your replies are pure gold! I lost my shit when you said let's peel this autistic onion layer by layer 😂
1 lunchza 2017-09-16
Am I the only one that wants to fuck her? Those udders are quite something
1 ricardogce 2017-09-16
Not at all. Really cute face, spectacular boobs, and closer to chubby than lardo.
1 ricardogce 2017-09-16
You don't get to call anyone autistic when you were part of this.
1 aliceunknown 2017-09-16
I think you broke his brain lololololol.
1 lemur84 2017-09-16
I don't understand why either of you reacted the way you did. You're both as bad as each other.
1 ThrowAwayForTheCure 2017-09-16
/u/fuckjakenightly is def gay