Thank you. But his is worth erasing. It was absurd. Hers was unprecedented and amazing.
This has to be a troll. /u/wonderful_wonton are you for real or just play-acting the creepily-obsessed freakshow who regularly masturbates to Clinton shots from the 90s?
As a lady PK booster, I can say that I demand that brocialists fill my holes with only the finest of uncased sausages. How do you sere your community, you degenerate?
Note that deleting Bernie's page is not meaningful as his list of endorsements was extremely weak, and nowhere near as stunning and remarkable as Clinton's
his is worth erasing. It was absurd. Hers was unprecedented and amazing.
I'm sure you've written a book or two worth of over-the-top praise about Dearest Mother yourself, you shouldn't be talking about political "cults". Do you also think Clinton was Athena, The Light of the World?
It must suck that your guy lost to said robot so badly. I mean, she really wiped the floor with him.
And most of his came from sketchy wins in caucus states. Like, he won the Washington state caucus (which counts) but lost the popular vote primary (which doesn't count) to her big time. That suggests the caucus states he did win in (which were fewer caucus states than she won) were gamed by his activist supporters.
Sanders lost to her so big, that after Super Tuesday, his run turned into what was basically a bitter zombie campaign.
It must really, really suck that he failed so badly vs her, given that Hillary Clinton was such a robot.
If Trump manages to swing some legislation by pulling off some bipartisanship, and getting the freedom caucus in line, he will be doing more than what Sanders could have ever pulled off with extremist left wing demands vs. a GOP majority, IMO.
oh i see. so one's list of endorsements was "people whose livelihood is built on popularity and who could suffer serious losses of income from weighing in on any political matter," and the other's list of endorsements was "people she hired who owed her favors, and people whose interests run entirely contrary to those of the United States"
i hadn't noticed that myself but thanks for pointing it out
the only thing active about Bernie Sanders is his fecal incontinence, you guys are just a circlejerk echo chamber crying about how the worst democratic candidate of all time got beaten by a clown and then try to think up ways that it wasn't her fault
Clinton faces 1 opponent in primaries, blamed him for everything even though she helped her later.
I think that story told is much differently outside the cult. Bernie deserves whatever he gets from her supporters and Clinton. If he and his supporters aren't happy with that, maybe they should have rethunk their face-punching that they engaged in then (and still are).
Trump faces 16 opponents in primaries, can't talk about them because he is too busy shitposting on Twitter.
WTF? Trump is the biggest grudge-holding sensitive guy out there. He's even still tweeting one-way drama at Clinton, months after the election.
I don't know but I'm not sure you're capable of saying something funnier than the average T_D chud anyway. Too many neurons in use to compose Odes to Mother.
I like to leave sparring with T_D supporters to those on the left wing who most resemble those pathological bullies, except for the differences in the flavor economic delusional absolutism they ascribe to, of course.
what are your thoughts on Hillary suggesting in her book that women were too weak to be able to vote for her? That doesn't sound like a feminist speaking tbh
I think she sounds like an old school feminist talking. Feminists today seem too rootbound defending female oppression (burqas) and about a gazillion other non-female-empowering issues to actually be FOR women. By the time they're done toeing the line on everything every Bernie Bro around them finds more important than women's rights, they're too exhausted to recall whether or not they actually agreed to the sex they had the night before, apparently. But somehow they still manage to call themselves feminists.
Meanwhile, they can't even hold only the hard-fought gains of reproductive rights and agency that the previous generation of feminists fought hard for and handed down to them.
Old school feminists wanted equality, not to use government and laws to control men. And they sure as hell didn't fight so that their daughters could live their lives under a shroud.
I think a lot of older feminists view third wave (millennial) feminists as weak, tools for other any leftist agenda but the ones that actually benefit women. Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright came out and said so during the primary, and got blasted on social media and took it back.
I think Clinton was speaking from that point of view, but more politely.
46 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-09-18
MRW
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-09-18
Honestly, Sanders supporters would be doing the Dems a favor by erasing HRC from Wikipedia.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-09-18
This has to be a troll. /u/wonderful_wonton are you for real or just play-acting the creepily-obsessed freakshow who regularly masturbates to Clinton shots from the 90s?
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
So speaks a Chapo Traphouse denizen. If you didn't emerge from Chapo Traphouse from time to time, you'd never interact with a female, incel bait.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
As a lady PK booster, I can say that I demand that brocialists fill my holes with only the finest of uncased sausages. How do you sere your community, you degenerate?
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
I like to be a smartass to sad people who crouch in their safe space and try to troll me from a distance.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
>mfw irony is back on the menu
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
LOL. OK. You're kind of funny.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-09-18
Extremely recent quotes from you:
I'm sure you've written a book or two worth of over-the-top praise about Dearest Mother yourself, you shouldn't be talking about political "cults". Do you also think Clinton was Athena, The Light of the World?
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
Objectively, Hillary Clinton's list of endorsements is amazing. Sanders' list of endorsement was very, very weak.
I'm sorry that objective opinion defies rationality so much for you that you think it reflects "cult" thinking.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-09-18
Woah, check out this Barack Obama endorsement page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Barack_Obama_presidential_campaign_endorsements,_2008
Holy smokes, it's almost as if every Democratic nominee gets a metric fucking ton of endorsements.
I'm sure if Sanders won primary he'd get a ton of endorsements as well.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
With all due respect, Hillary Clinton's list was much more weighty than Obama's.
And this was before the nomination, before she won the primary.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
Not as remarkable as a trashcan robot losing the presidency to a game show host.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
It must suck that your guy lost to said robot so badly. I mean, she really wiped the floor with him.
And most of his came from sketchy wins in caucus states. Like, he won the Washington state caucus (which counts) but lost the popular vote primary (which doesn't count) to her big time. That suggests the caucus states he did win in (which were fewer caucus states than she won) were gamed by his activist supporters.
Sanders lost to her so big, that after Super Tuesday, his run turned into what was basically a bitter zombie campaign.
It must really, really suck that he failed so badly vs her, given that Hillary Clinton was such a robot.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
Sanders sucks.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
If Trump manages to swing some legislation by pulling off some bipartisanship, and getting the freedom caucus in line, he will be doing more than what Sanders could have ever pulled off with extremist left wing demands vs. a GOP majority, IMO.
1 ilikehillaryclinton 2017-09-18
Oh you really are braindead
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
Why? Because you can't admit to a reality where Trump actually accomplishes something?
I hate the guy too, but not enough to be a reality-denier. If he pulls things off, I'll back off. If what he does is reasonable, I'm on board.
1 glmox 2017-09-18
pick one and only one
1 Fucking_That_Chicken 2017-09-18
oh i see. so one's list of endorsements was "people whose livelihood is built on popularity and who could suffer serious losses of income from weighing in on any political matter," and the other's list of endorsements was "people she hired who owed her favors, and people whose interests run entirely contrary to those of the United States"
i hadn't noticed that myself but thanks for pointing it out
1 mathgraduate 2017-09-18
This whole thing going on in here is really pathetic, to be honest, from everybody.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
https://i.imgur.com/VMKIXk0.jpg
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-18
o yup
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
Sanders is still active. And he faces ongoing opposition in the form of some of us Hillary Clinton supporters.
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-18
the only thing active about Bernie Sanders is his fecal incontinence, you guys are just a circlejerk echo chamber crying about how the worst democratic candidate of all time got beaten by a clown and then try to think up ways that it wasn't her fault
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
Not really. I actually aim to oppose Bernie Sanders, tooth and nail, for what he pulled in 2016. Online popularity be damned.
1 cheers_grills 2017-09-18
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
I think that story told is much differently outside the cult. Bernie deserves whatever he gets from her supporters and Clinton. If he and his supporters aren't happy with that, maybe they should have rethunk their face-punching that they engaged in then (and still are).
WTF? Trump is the biggest grudge-holding sensitive guy out there. He's even still tweeting one-way drama at Clinton, months after the election.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-09-18
How many candles do you light around the Hillary Clinton shrine in your closet?
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
How many upvotes do I get for making clever alliterations of Crapo Craphouse?
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-09-18
I don't know but I'm not sure you're capable of saying something funnier than the average T_D chud anyway. Too many neurons in use to compose Odes to Mother.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
I like to leave sparring with T_D supporters to those on the left wing who most resemble those pathological bullies, except for the differences in the flavor economic delusional absolutism they ascribe to, of course.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
You're an extremely unfunny moron.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
I'm really hurt. I thought you guys enjoyed negative attention from females.
I'll have to get out the psycho cheats n' hacks file and recheck my Bernie Bro assumptions.
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
Quit erasing my cunt.
1 Prince_Kropotkin 2017-09-18
Oh shit were you cyber-bullied by the mean Democrat-haters?
OK, you've gotta be a troll. I'll let you get back to the Clinton worshiping.
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
OK. Catch you later. Maybe we'll agree on something someday.
1 cuteman 2017-09-18
How many different names/slurs do you use for Trump? Do you do that to avoid "Trump" being your #1 used word on reddit?
1 TedBundyAMA 2017-09-18
what are your thoughts on Hillary suggesting in her book that women were too weak to be able to vote for her? That doesn't sound like a feminist speaking tbh
1 wonderful_wonton 2017-09-18
I think she sounds like an old school feminist talking. Feminists today seem too rootbound defending female oppression (burqas) and about a gazillion other non-female-empowering issues to actually be FOR women. By the time they're done toeing the line on everything every Bernie Bro around them finds more important than women's rights, they're too exhausted to recall whether or not they actually agreed to the sex they had the night before, apparently. But somehow they still manage to call themselves feminists.
Meanwhile, they can't even hold only the hard-fought gains of reproductive rights and agency that the previous generation of feminists fought hard for and handed down to them.
Old school feminists wanted equality, not to use government and laws to control men. And they sure as hell didn't fight so that their daughters could live their lives under a shroud.
I think a lot of older feminists view third wave (millennial) feminists as weak, tools for other any leftist agenda but the ones that actually benefit women. Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright came out and said so during the primary, and got blasted on social media and took it back.
I think Clinton was speaking from that point of view, but more politely.
1 cheers_grills 2017-09-18
Tl;dr Women can't focus on one thing too long.
1 cincilator 2017-09-18
Whose dick did you have to suck to get custom flair?
1 WarSanchez 2017-09-18
His own.
Pass the Challenge, earn your Flair!
1 Malkalack 2017-09-18
Prince Kropotkin is back pls wreck my bussy daddy
1 russian_grey_wolf 2017-09-18
/u/wraith20 is the smartest of them all.
1 cuteman 2017-09-18
https://imgur.com/fcwq7rv
Don't worry, she will forever be enshrined in the annals of Costco.
1 ExtreemWeenie 2017-09-18
imagine america with a non-interventionist neoliberal government