Leftists will never criticize the religion of peace no matter what it does. To do so would break their narrative that muslims are a poor, oppressed people so they refuse to address any of the religion's faults.
For example:
Refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding? You're a terrible person who deserves to go to have your business ruined and go to jail but if you're a angry muslim throwing gay people off a roof? Well then, you're just fine.
Refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding? You're a terrible person who deserves to go to have your business ruined and go to jail but if you're a angry muslim throwing gay people off a roof? Well then, you're just fine.
/u/smackthelight , I'm pretty fuckin right wing but this is horse shit
both groups want to control women's reproductive organs
at this point the war against abortion is over, the main thing conservatives want is that their tax money won't go to funding planned parenthood.
both groups broadly believe that women are a temptation. And should hold the blame If they are the victim of sexual assault
yeah, no.
both groups are anti gay. Anti transgender
Anti gay, no, anti trans, kinda. My main issue with trannies and fags is that they have become overrepresented in politics and in media. Your sexuality is the last fucking thing I care about, unless I'm trying to fuck you. Trannies are gross though, don't destroy your genitals and endocrine system, see a shrink.
both groups want religious education in schools
That war has also been lost long ago, I can't even remember the last time that came up politically.
both groups want laws to be written on God's will.
Which do you disagree with so we have a more precise goalpost: a) broadly speaking many conservatives across the west are reactionary. Especially the alt-right/alt-light/manosphere and T_D like the user linked or b) the bullet points I listed are traits of a person with reactionary beliefs
You haven't really answered my questions so I really can't go forward. To clarify a) and b) where claims I was making, these are not "reactionary stances". I wanted to know what idea you disagreed with.
Responding back with a query about the left is not an answer.
I'm trying to have a conversation. Reactionary views are very popular in the right wing, and they are as I described them. I guess you don't disagree with either premise? If not - great, we agree on something.
What about what I said meant nothing? Do you understand what a reactionary is? Do you know what the alt-right/alt-light is? Do you most of the alt-light is reactionary?
A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which they believe possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante.
Political reactionaries are at the right-wing of a political spectrum; yet, reactionary ideologies can be radical, in the sense of political extremism, in service to re-establishing the status quo ante. In political discourse, being a reactionary is generally regarded as negative; the descriptor "political reactionary" has been adopted by the likes of the Austrian monarchist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, the Scottish journalist Gerald Warner of Craigenmaddie, the Colombian political theologian Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and the American historian John Lukacs.
62 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-09-25
Buzzword is, itself, a buzzword now.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 chancellorjay 2017-09-25
leave
1 botchlings 2017-09-25
Leftists will never criticize the religion of peace no matter what it does. To do so would break their narrative that muslims are a poor, oppressed people so they refuse to address any of the religion's faults.
For example:
Refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding? You're a terrible person who deserves to go to have your business ruined and go to jail but if you're a angry muslim throwing gay people off a roof? Well then, you're just fine.
Same with Islam's treatment of women...
1 dogbref 2017-09-25
Zizek criticizes it plenty
1 die_rattin 2017-09-25
And he gets smeared as a racist and closet right-winger for his trouble.
1 dogbref 2017-09-25
Solidarity with comrade Zizek, and so on and so on.
1 whenweriiide 2017-09-25
Man my nose is suddenly itchy
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
The itch that you are feeling is, too, ideology.
1 whenweriiide 2017-09-25
fuck!
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-09-25
So ideology is cocaine? Why's that supposed to be bad again?
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
Well, you are going to need some heroin and benzos to come down. Heroin, in this analogy is, uh............
1 JarlGearth 2017-09-25
Wtf I love Zizek now
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
Zizek has a sense of humor and some self-awareness.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-09-25
Dude needs his sniff sinuses rotorootered sniff
1 SovietWarfare 2017-09-25
The religion of peace could be the most opposite ideology from them and they'd still support it (Oh wait it is).
1 ay_what_up 2017-09-25
jfc you’re the worst user in r/drama ever
1 AnnoyingSeaAnt 2017-09-25
Zizek is not a US PC-crazy shithead, it helps.
1 NotYetRegistered 2017-09-25
What. Just no.
1 newcomer_ts 2017-09-25
What's the point then?
1 giroth 2017-09-25
/u/swimmininthesea are you always so hostile towards people giving you a compliment?
Follow-up question, how much élan vital does a person need sucked out of their body before they can make a post in CB2?
1 hitlerallyliteral 2017-09-25
you're talking about cum, right?
1 giroth 2017-09-25
Cummies, and yeah it's a dog whistle
1 attaca89 2017-09-25
They can't agree that treating women as property cum dumpsters is bad, because a trump supporter stated it. That's the American left for you.
Arguments and evidence don't matter, only the personality of the speaker does.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
That's the thing. Islam, as far as monotheisms go, is pretty great. It is the personalities and aesthetics that are shit.
1 MAGAParty 2017-09-25
Thanks, assholes. Because of your linking they banned me.
1 PhysicsIsMyMistress 2017-09-25
You are welcome.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
Bans are inevitable.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2017-09-25
We accept blowjobs as signs of appreciation
1 holy_black_on_a_popo 2017-09-25
Cummies 4 jesus
1 holy_black_on_a_popo 2017-09-25
You're better off, faggot. Now, put your fist in my ass.
1 MAGAParty 2017-09-25
I just needed a little more time to troll them.
1 wwyzzerdd 2017-09-25
If only Osama Bin Laden were still around to witness this generation of apologists. It would probably bring a tear to his eye.
1 snallygaster 2017-09-25
implying he's not
looks like the (((((mainstream media)))))) got to your head.
1 captainpriapism 2017-09-25
pretty sure he died in like 04
1 uniqueguy263 2017-09-25
Those parentheses make me sick. Half the comment's in one of them
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-09-25
Go read about the Altamont Festival and hippies thinking that bikers were "allies" that they could use as muscle.
This is the same thing, except jihadis instead of bikers.
1 SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-09-25
Jihadis wouldn't have gotten into drunken brawls with the hippies.
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
/u/smackthelight , I'm pretty fuckin right wing but this is horse shit
at this point the war against abortion is over, the main thing conservatives want is that their tax money won't go to funding planned parenthood.
yeah, no.
Anti gay, no, anti trans, kinda. My main issue with trannies and fags is that they have become overrepresented in politics and in media. Your sexuality is the last fucking thing I care about, unless I'm trying to fuck you. Trannies are gross though, don't destroy your genitals and endocrine system, see a shrink.
That war has also been lost long ago, I can't even remember the last time that came up politically.
What does this even mean?
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
Which do you disagree with so we have a more precise goalpost: a) broadly speaking many conservatives across the west are reactionary. Especially the alt-right/alt-light/manosphere and T_D like the user linked or b) the bullet points I listed are traits of a person with reactionary beliefs
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
Do you not think that it's at all possible we've leaned too far to the left in the west?
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
You haven't really answered my questions so I really can't go forward. To clarify a) and b) where claims I was making, these are not "reactionary stances". I wanted to know what idea you disagreed with.
Responding back with a query about the left is not an answer.
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
Quit being a stubborn ass, lets have a conversation. You just want me to reinforce what ever shitty thoughts are in your big ol brain
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
I'm trying to have a conversation. Reactionary views are very popular in the right wing, and they are as I described them. I guess you don't disagree with either premise? If not - great, we agree on something.
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
Yeah that's what I said, but what's wrong with having your marxist views challenged?
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
So you disagree with the premise then? If so why?
I'm not a Marxist
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
u/CIRCLONT6 you didn't respond to my last comment?
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
yeah, cause it was retarded
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
Why was it retarded?
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
word soup, semantics, retardation
the very fact that you wanted to "correct" my use of the word "cause" is proof of your sever autism
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
I understand you think it was retarded. But I'm asking Why you think it was retarded.
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
are you being an idiot on purpose?
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
Why are you frightened of answering questions?
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
I did answer it you fucking mong
what you wrote meant literally nothing, it was just some dumb bullshit that you thought sounded smart
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
What about what I said meant nothing? Do you understand what a reactionary is? Do you know what the alt-right/alt-light is? Do you most of the alt-light is reactionary?
1 WikiTextBot 2017-09-25
Reactionary
A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which they believe possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante.
Political reactionaries are at the right-wing of a political spectrum; yet, reactionary ideologies can be radical, in the sense of political extremism, in service to re-establishing the status quo ante. In political discourse, being a reactionary is generally regarded as negative; the descriptor "political reactionary" has been adopted by the likes of the Austrian monarchist Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, the Scottish journalist Gerald Warner of Craigenmaddie, the Colombian political theologian Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and the American historian John Lukacs.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.27
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
u/CIRCLONT6
You still never responded bud
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
cause you're retarded
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
Video doesn't work
Why are you frightened to have a reasonable discussion buddy?
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
u/CIRCLONT6
1 CIRCLONT6 2017-09-25
We can't even have a solid discussion, you're too far down into the buzzword left that your whole mind is a swamp or marxist retardation
Also, that video does work
1 smackthelight 2017-09-25
Why am I so far down into the buzzword left?
Video must be geo-blocked
1 TotesMessenger 2017-09-25
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 Strich-9 2017-09-25
wow look how much fun you guys are having in this thread, just joking around and stuff and not seriousposting