Well /u/Aluzky does have a more relevant accuser: /u/EvilDog70 and his/her aunt utilized his dog walking service and he raped/u/EvilDog70's dog. Sodomized him to be exact, dog needed surgery. Of course Aluzky is denying it.
Forward all of Aluzkys videos and pictures to the proper authorities in his country. Fucking animals was just recently outlawed there.
Laws are not retroactive in my country. Videos of me having LEGAL sex with animas can't be used to punish me for something that is now illegal. All my videos out there where filmed when it was legal.
Maybe if we hand together, /r/Drama can do one good thing for the world, while still having a laugh.
And what good there is in punishing a zoosexual for having zoosexual sex? How is that different from outing a gay person for having gay sex in a country that has gay sex as illegal?
Aluzky we're talking about the crimes you committed AFTER all this was made illegal.
I have not done any crimes.
You're being punished for being a lying dog raping piece of shit
I haven't been punished at all. And you nor anyone has ever provided any proof that I have either lied or raped a dog.
as well as someone who supports child porn.
Your claim is too vague, I don't support child porn.
I wonder.......if they take a good look at your computer I'll bet they'll find all kinds of rightfully illegal and horrific stuff on there won't they? I bet they will.
My computer has nothing illegal nor criminal in it. Well... actually, that is false. I do play pirated games and that is illegal in some places, duno if it is illegal in my country.
Above, most likely. He's literally so demented that he attempts to be smug in his defense of being a dog rapist so it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to think that he views himself as a better person than incels.
Because you keep trying to argue against the fact that you fucking an animal is not rape when multiple people have explained it to you that it is indeed rape.
Every argument you've lost here in r/drama defending it. You keep asking for proof when you have none to prove your innocence and when pestered enough by those that have already defeated you in simple debate, trolled you, and/or made posts with alleged proof you hide after trading a few remarks.
Every argument you've lost here in r/drama defending it.
Do you have scientific evidence that I have ever defended animal rape in r/drama or any place on the internet on in real life?
You keep asking for proof when you have none to prove your innocence
Innocent till proven guilty. You are the ones accusing me of rape, you are the ones who have the onus to prove that I have raped. Or, burden of proof. You are the one claiming that I rape animals, the burden of proof is on you, not on me.
and when pestered enough by those that have already defeated you in simple debate, trolled you, and/or made posts with alleged proof you hide after trading a few remarks.
Citation needed that I have ever been defeated in an argument. Citation needed that I ever hide. Else, you are only doing false attribution fallacies.
The fact that you keep coming back to stake drama and continuing the circle of strife here is both amusing and sad. This is the internet not a court of U.S. law therefore we can say you're guilty of rape all we want. How many threads will it take before you go crying to your sub and close it again because you can't handle being shit on?
Even if I where that, it is not a crime to be that. :)
Actually you are, you have a dislike of people to the point that actively support the legalization of horrible crimes against the most vulnerable of humans. Yet you view yourself as being the lone exception to the rule, that's narcissistic Aleks.
I don't u/aluzky can resist the opportunity to gain attention tbh. He's drawn to threads that shit him and his dog raping ways like a flies are to shit. If he keeps this up he might become a mod of our sub.
humans have the right to a fair punishment if they have done something criminal. Example, it is not fair punishment to sentence some one to death for stealing a candy bar. Having sex with a dog is a victimless crime. It has no victim. Punishing a human to death by gas chamber just because they had sex with a dog is literally an extreme and unfair punishment and it would be in violation of the human rights.
Unless you can support your claims with evidence, your claims won't be facts but just delusions in your mind.
I agree. Good thing that I can support my claims with evidence. :)
I was making fun of your retarded statement you degenerate mongoloid.
Also, morality and human rights don't come from science you smug pug fuck. Science tells us what is. It does not tell us how we should act. That comes from culture and religion, which you obviously have a deficiency of. People can use the results of science to argue for a movement within our culture/religion to change how we act (ex. currently climate change).
Why will it be a good thing if society accepts dog fuckers? What's their contribution to society besides sexually transmitted fleas?
It's scientifically proven that one zoosexual (/u/Aluzky) can cause others around him to be unhappy and thus unproductive. By eliminating just one zoosexual from society, we can raise the happiness and productivity of many many others.
It's more efficient and beneficial to society to just gas the few dog fuckers than to get the rest of society to accept dog fuckers. Otherwise, it would take a lot of wasted effort and lots of lost productivity spent convincing nearly everyone to accept that degeneracy.
Also, scientific data suggests that it's probably a mental disorder. These people are sick in the head and should be put down like the bitches they fuck.
It's scientifically proven that one zoosexual (/u/Aluzky) can cause others around him to be unhappy and thus unproductive. By eliminating just one zoosexual from society, we can raise the happiness and productivity of many many others.
If you cannot understand such a simple comment and have to resort to the classic "you have shitty grammar" technique you should probably just get some rope and a chair to end all of this already. Make sure that you live stream your mayocide though.
Hanging a dog is an act with a victim. THE ACT of hanging the dog is a crime. You have yet to prove that the ACT of having sex with the dog was a crime.
Not every person who does zoosex ends up hanging their lover after the sex.
Oh so now the unfortunate vicitim is called a lover after being raped and killing afterwards. You certainly have a very skewed opinion on what constitutes as someone being a lover and victim.
86 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-10-03
Your condescending, contradictory bullshit isn't attractive to anyone except your frothing, basement-dwelling, virgin army.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Basically_Trash 2017-10-03
You're clearly just kinkshaming the dogs that have human fetishes. How could you do this
1 bleepis 2017-10-03
i can’t believe he’s done this
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-10-03
There are videos. /u/Thot_Crusher
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-10-03
I know, I've sent them to relevant authorities in Costa Rica, and I suggest you do the same.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Believe me I am
1 Malkalack 2017-10-03
Dogs have died from this
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-03
Boo hoo. They died doing what they loved!
1 tathrowaway666 2017-10-03
Only yours
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Well /u/Aluzky does have a more relevant accuser: /u/EvilDog70 and his/her aunt utilized his dog walking service and he raped/u/EvilDog70's dog. Sodomized him to be exact, dog needed surgery. Of course Aluzky is denying it.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
It is obvius that EvilDog70 is demented or a troll.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
You mean "obvious" right?
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Yes, I mean that.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Then learn how to spell it.
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-10-03
Forward all of Aluzkys videos and pictures to the proper authorities in his country. Fucking animals was just recently outlawed there.
Maybe if we hand together, /r/Drama can do one good thing for the world, while still having a laugh.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Laws are not retroactive in my country. Videos of me having LEGAL sex with animas can't be used to punish me for something that is now illegal. All my videos out there where filmed when it was legal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retroactive%20law
And what good there is in punishing a zoosexual for having zoosexual sex? How is that different from outing a gay person for having gay sex in a country that has gay sex as illegal?
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-10-03
Tbh, all animal fuckers should be lined up and shot
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Aluzky we're talking about the crimes you committed AFTER all this was made illegal.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
I have not done any crimes.
I haven't been punished at all. And you nor anyone has ever provided any proof that I have either lied or raped a dog.
Your claim is too vague, I don't support child porn.
My computer has nothing illegal nor criminal in it. Well... actually, that is false. I do play pirated games and that is illegal in some places, duno if it is illegal in my country.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Oh so you aren't making videos with your new unfortunate dog? Guess you lied.
More lying.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Making videos is neither illegal nor criminal in my country.
Baseless accusation.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Oh so why is that you claimed you no longer made videos the? If it's not illegal or a crime then you might as well start making them again.
1 incineratechicken 2017-10-03
u/Aluzky, do you think of yourself as being above or below incels in terms of your little social niche? I'm curious.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Above, most likely. He's literally so demented that he attempts to be smug in his defense of being a dog rapist so it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to think that he views himself as a better person than incels.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Citation needed that I'm demented.
Citation needed that I have ever raped dogs or defended dog rape.
What makes some one a better person?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
I'm not defending animal rape.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Yes you are. Your ego and your need to fuck animals just clouds your vision.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Where is the evidence that i have defended animal rape?
Prove it.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
You're defending animal rape right now
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Explain yourself, how does my comments defend animals rape?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Because you keep trying to argue against the fact that you fucking an animal is not rape when multiple people have explained it to you that it is indeed rape.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Argumentum ad nauseam or argumentum ad populum are not valid proof that I rape animals.
Do you have any scientific evidence that I rape animals? Yes, or no?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Every argument you've lost here in r/drama defending it. You keep asking for proof when you have none to prove your innocence and when pestered enough by those that have already defeated you in simple debate, trolled you, and/or made posts with alleged proof you hide after trading a few remarks.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Do you have scientific evidence that I have ever defended animal rape in r/drama or any place on the internet on in real life?
Innocent till proven guilty. You are the ones accusing me of rape, you are the ones who have the onus to prove that I have raped. Or, burden of proof. You are the one claiming that I rape animals, the burden of proof is on you, not on me.
Citation needed that I have ever been defeated in an argument. Citation needed that I ever hide. Else, you are only doing false attribution fallacies.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
The fact that you keep coming back to stake drama and continuing the circle of strife here is both amusing and sad. This is the internet not a court of U.S. law therefore we can say you're guilty of rape all we want. How many threads will it take before you go crying to your sub and close it again because you can't handle being shit on?
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
What is an incel?
1 incineratechicken 2017-10-03
Virgins who are grumpy about the fact that no woman would touch them.
I mean, honestly, they could just take your example and solve their problems with the family pooch.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Hmmm... can't answer you question as it is still too vague/unclear.
When you said: "being above or below" you mean above/below what? And what you mean by my little social niche? What is exactly my little social niche?
If they don't find the pooch sexually attractive then it is not going to solve their "virginity" problem. Can't incels just pay a prostitute?
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Spoken like a true moron.....
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Clearly you have never hear a true moron. Else, you would not be thinking that I spoke like one.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
I'm still conversing with you and you constantly prove that you're an moron time and time again. As well as being an apathetic narcissist.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Subjective opinion unless you can prove it with facts.
Even if I where that, it is not a crime to be that. :)
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Actually you are, you have a dislike of people to the point that actively support the legalization of horrible crimes against the most vulnerable of humans. Yet you view yourself as being the lone exception to the rule, that's narcissistic Aleks.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
I don't u/aluzky can resist the opportunity to gain attention tbh. He's drawn to threads that shit him and his dog raping ways like a flies are to shit. If he keeps this up he might become a mod of our sub.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
What dog raping ways?
Even if offered, I would kindly decline the position.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Ahem
*Why you always lying
Why you always lying
Ooh oh my God
Just stop fucking lying*
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Is that a song?
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Just offer /u/Aluzky a dog to rape-I mean fuck and he'll accept
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Alright lads, time to round up some strays
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Find ones with rabies
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Good idea, the frothing at the mouth look really gets him all riled up
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Maybe he'll mistake the froth for cum
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
With the way his shitty mind works I wouldn't doubt it
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Count on it
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
I would never have sex with a dog that doen't want sex. Doing that would be rape/abuse.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
A dog cannot consent to fucking you therefore it's rape
1 Eatsnotalot 2017-10-03
Someone should report /u/aluzky to PETA
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Considering that PETA kills domesticated species I'm not sure if they'd kill him too or just have him join in an animal rape orgy.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Considering you like to call other Zoophiles rapists I doubt that.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
The only way I would call another zoophile a rapist is if they are actually a rapist.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
/u/DogFF22 are you a rapist?
1 DogFF22 2017-10-03
No! I'm not!
1 aGolfHipster 2017-10-03
u/Aluzky, what scientific evidence do you have that "gassing the dog fuckers" is always unacceptable?
Unless you can support your claims with evidence, your claims won't be facts but just delusions in your mind.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
humans have the right to a fair punishment if they have done something criminal. Example, it is not fair punishment to sentence some one to death for stealing a candy bar. Having sex with a dog is a victimless crime. It has no victim. Punishing a human to death by gas chamber just because they had sex with a dog is literally an extreme and unfair punishment and it would be in violation of the human rights.
I agree. Good thing that I can support my claims with evidence. :)
1 aGolfHipster 2017-10-03
I was making fun of your retarded statement you degenerate mongoloid.
Also, morality and human rights don't come from science you smug pug fuck. Science tells us what is. It does not tell us how we should act. That comes from culture and religion, which you obviously have a deficiency of. People can use the results of science to argue for a movement within our culture/religion to change how we act (ex. currently climate change).
Why will it be a good thing if society accepts dog fuckers? What's their contribution to society besides sexually transmitted fleas?
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Only humans can be retarded. A statement can't be retarded. And it was not funny, so, you suck at making fun statements.
I don't have any missing chromosomes or surplus of them, calling me a mongoloid is not fact.
1 aGolfHipster 2017-10-03
It's scientifically proven that one zoosexual (/u/Aluzky) can cause others around him to be unhappy and thus unproductive. By eliminating just one zoosexual from society, we can raise the happiness and productivity of many many others.
It's more efficient and beneficial to society to just gas the few dog fuckers than to get the rest of society to accept dog fuckers. Otherwise, it would take a lot of wasted effort and lots of lost productivity spent convincing nearly everyone to accept that degeneracy.
Also, scientific data suggests that it's probably a mental disorder. These people are sick in the head and should be put down like the bitches they fuck.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Doing that would be in violation of human rights.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
You violate the right to a rape free life for animals. Why should your right to live not be revoked?
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Sorry, your sentence is not grammatically correct and it doesn't make any sense. Try rephrasing what you just say but this time use decent grammar.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
If you cannot understand such a simple comment and have to resort to the classic "you have shitty grammar" technique you should probably just get some rope and a chair to end all of this already. Make sure that you live stream your mayocide though.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Since you didn't rephrase it, it is clear that you don't continue the conversation, so bye.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2017-10-03
Lol, that's right run away you fucking tard
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Sorry, I don't understand your reply.
1 LadySaberCat 2017-10-03
No surprise there
1 GirlLover50 2017-10-03
Oh look at that, Aluzky doesn't understand. How shocking.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Is not shocking at all, I have a hard time understanding irrational comments.
1 GirlLover50 2017-10-03
Do you have proof that the comments are irrational.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Yes, I could easily prove that the comment is irrational.
1 GirlLover50 2017-10-03
Then prove it
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Yeah tell that to Diamond the Pit Bull, try not to jerk off to the picture of her hanging for a tree.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
I don't understand your argument as it doen't prove that zoosex is a victimless crime and I'm not into necrophilia.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
She was hung after the fact you retard.
1 Aluzky 2017-10-03
Hanging a dog is an act with a victim. THE ACT of hanging the dog is a crime. You have yet to prove that the ACT of having sex with the dog was a crime.
1 MAPM28 2017-10-03
Oh so now the unfortunate vicitim is called a lover after being raped and killing afterwards. You certainly have a very skewed opinion on what constitutes as someone being a lover and victim.