Huh i saw more comments ass-blasting blm instead of defending them. It must be something in the water people drank, to not act like the dindus did nothing wrong
And that's just not very neutral, to be blunt about it. Particularly after the way the admins behaved after the election, this is an extremely one-sided site, in a way that can't simply be explained by the age-group's demographics.
But as long as we're being blunt, that thread is a breath of fresh air from the near-constant communist finger-wagging that takes place in most threads from most big subs.
Lots and lots of talk of "BothSidesism" or whatever you wanna call it
Did counter-protesters infringe on their right to assemble? Seems like the only thing these folks are guilty of is shouting a little louder than the ACLU.
Sorry. I must be exactly as illiterate as you seem to believe I am, because I didn't see a word about BLM carrying the ACLU out of there over their shoulders.
Look: I don't necessarily agree with the message of this particular protest, but it's still their right.
You understand that in most states, your actions would have triggered the 'fighting words' defense to such a degree that had someone punched these guys, it's very unlikely they could be charged.
Like, it's a literal thing in law that screaming in someone's face means that logically they will kick your ass. That's a provocation of violence, and no protected speech at all.
It never shocks me how often you protest-cunts don't realize that the law has existed for a very long time, and is not going to fall for the kind of bullshit parents fall for when it comes to obnoxious six year olds.
an apprently small crowd of people of indeterminate makeup gathered
a bunch of various melanized soros shills showed up with retarded commie slogans on signs and chanting over people, like last year’s DNC all over again
so they quickly gave up trying to talk about the 1st amendment because too many people were taking advantage of it in the immediate vicinity
Sorry you can't understand that "peacefully assemble" means more than just not committing outright violence, probably as a result of having been dropped on the head too many times as a child.
Having a bigger mob doesn't give you the right to abrogate other people's freedom of speech by mobbing their stage, blocking the stage from view, and shouting down the people who were actually attempting to peacefully assemble.
Yeah, when will these autists figure that the first amendment means that you have to treat a protest zone like a library and you arent permitted to raise your voice to a higher decibel than other people that are protesting in your immediate vincinity.
I agree with you. I even think that the police should be issued Free-Meters (developed by the church of Scientology) that detect when somebody is being too noisy with an opposing opinion within 50 feet of an approved protest zone.
"... the right to take someone's microphone or blast motherfuckers with loudspeakers so that you are the loudest, being necessary to the maintenance of a free press, shall not be infringed."
Shit, my bad. I didn't see it the first time. You're straight, boo.
I guess you haven't seen the undercover videos of speeches by the New Black Panthers. The get taken down on YouTube about as fast as they go up, but they are pretty explicit that they want a race war.
probably the constant rioting and defending violent shithead criminals? Even pretending that police brutality is a big issue is retarded. Blacks have issues with the police because they commit an insane fraction of violent crime. They have lower rates of death per run in with the cops than whites.
how fucking deranged do you have to be to think BLM is "constantly rioting"? there've been like three riots in as many years, none of them were sanctioned by any org, and no one's died or try to kill whitey in any of them
You're not welcome in my inbox, and I don't want to hear from you again. This is a test of your character -- if you reply, you're just proving you don't think consent matters.
87 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-10-05
Providing a Community Safe from TITrCJ's Sexual Advances Since October 2015.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 ltedt 2017-10-05
Huh i saw more comments ass-blasting blm instead of defending them. It must be something in the water people drank, to not act like the dindus did nothing wrong
1 autistitron 2017-10-05
/r/news is pretty neutral, majority goes pro/anti BLM depending on whether they're in the right or being scumbags.
AKA they're literal Nazis, and someones literally shaking right now
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-10-05
And that's just not very neutral, to be blunt about it. Particularly after the way the admins behaved after the election, this is an extremely one-sided site, in a way that can't simply be explained by the age-group's demographics.
1 TheAltRightIsAlright 2017-10-05
But as long as we're being blunt, that thread is a breath of fresh air from the near-constant communist finger-wagging that takes place in most threads from most big subs.
Lots and lots of talk of "BothSidesism" or whatever you wanna call it
1 wwyzzerdd 2017-10-05
Judean Peoples Front! FUCK OFF!!
1 cleverseneca 2017-10-05
I DON'T WANT TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT PEOPLE LIKE ME AS A MEMBER
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
u/slimlovin you are a fucking moron if you think that the right to protest = the right to shut down other people's meetings via mob
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
Why? Is BLM not allowed to assemble and peacefully protest something they don't agree with?
Whether I believe they're on the right side of this issue is moot. They have the right to protest.
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Except that they didn't peacefully protest
They shut down someone else's meeting via a mob
Your inability to tell the difference between that and a peaceful protest makes you a retard, as already noted.
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
Was there violence?
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Do you believe the ACLU doesn't have the right to assemble? Why?
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
Did counter-protesters infringe on their right to assemble? Seems like the only thing these folks are guilty of is shouting a little louder than the ACLU.
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Yes, absolutely, you stunning idiot
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
How? Did they force the ACLU to leave? Did the ACLU have no choice but to leave?
Sorry, but protesting is their right, just as it is the ACLU's right to free speech. Unfortunately, the ACLU backed down.
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Yes to both questions, you absolute mouthbreather
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
Sorry. I must be exactly as illiterate as you seem to believe I am, because I didn't see a word about BLM carrying the ACLU out of there over their shoulders.
Look: I don't necessarily agree with the message of this particular protest, but it's still their right.
1 JasonJewnova 2017-10-05
It's ok, we already know you're black
1 ay_what_up 2017-10-05
you’re not very good at this tbh. It seems like u cant decide whether you want to serious post or shitpost
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
I reject your absurd false dichotomy and the onerous and unnecessary restrictions it would place on my unadulterated correctposting
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
As a Bernie Bro, I say we should elect that school rep President!
1 ragazzo_soup 2017-10-05
Already donated my entire life savings, match me!
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
are you just faking being this retarded? because it’s very convincing
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-10-05
I blame the ACLU for not having the police thrash the protesters and continue with the original talk
They were weak and they forfeited that right
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
I'm with this guy.
1 heavenlytoaster 2017-10-05
Yeah and if the cops won't thrash Marxists then they really are worthless.
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-10-05
You understand that in most states, your actions would have triggered the 'fighting words' defense to such a degree that had someone punched these guys, it's very unlikely they could be charged.
Like, it's a literal thing in law that screaming in someone's face means that logically they will kick your ass. That's a provocation of violence, and no protected speech at all.
It never shocks me how often you protest-cunts don't realize that the law has existed for a very long time, and is not going to fall for the kind of bullshit parents fall for when it comes to obnoxious six year olds.
1 glmox 2017-10-05
lol fighting words is barely a thing anymore and also you dont know what it is
1 Ennui2778 2017-10-05
Lol, okay.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
is “shut down” some kind of euphemisms i’m missing
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Sorry you were too lazy and/or retarded to read the original story being discussed.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
i read the story you retard
an apprently small crowd of people of indeterminate makeup gathered
a bunch of various melanized soros shills showed up with retarded commie slogans on signs and chanting over people, like last year’s DNC all over again
so they quickly gave up trying to talk about the 1st amendment because too many people were taking advantage of it in the immediate vicinity
where’s the violence?
1 nmx179 2017-10-05
Sorry you can't understand that "peacefully assemble" means more than just not committing outright violence, probably as a result of having been dropped on the head too many times as a child.
Having a bigger mob doesn't give you the right to abrogate other people's freedom of speech by mobbing their stage, blocking the stage from view, and shouting down the people who were actually attempting to peacefully assemble.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
lmao
to be fair, you’re almost right about the stage thing- they could have legally made them move, for example. but they didn’t
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
Remember, kids, the first amendment doesn't just give you the right to speak - it gives you the right to stop other people from speaking, too!
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
the first amendment does in fact give you a right to rudely talk over people
this kind of “rudeness is a form of oppression” idiocy needs to be culled
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
I think you'd better re-read it, fam. You are rambling.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
i think you need to rethink what “silencing” means
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
OK, I am done with you. I am going to mute you from this conversation before you trigger me with your ovaryacting.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
kys
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
I get it. You are one of those alt-right people that hates frogs.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
i actually do hate frogs, fucking smug bastards with their airsacs
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
kys
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
on it
1 takesteady12 2017-10-05
Yeah, when will these autists figure that the first amendment means that you have to treat a protest zone like a library and you arent permitted to raise your voice to a higher decibel than other people that are protesting in your immediate vincinity.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
That is neither here nor there. The 1stAm certainly does not convey any right to silence other people.
Now, if the ACLU speakers bitched out and gave away their microphone like Comrade Bernie, then that is their own fault.
1 takesteady12 2017-10-05
I agree with you. I even think that the police should be issued Free-Meters (developed by the church of Scientology) that detect when somebody is being too noisy with an opposing opinion within 50 feet of an approved protest zone.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
Yeah, its called a noise ordinance. I use it to get my dumb Mexican neighbors arrested whenever they play their fucking accordion music.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
it does if you “silence” them with more speech, all you’re doing is oversaturating
interrupting someone isn’t a goddamn crime
what part of this are you too dense to comprehend?
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
"... the right to take someone's microphone or blast motherfuckers with loudspeakers so that you are the loudest, being necessary to the maintenance of a free press, shall not be infringed."
Shit, my bad. I didn't see it the first time. You're straight, boo.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
nope
yes, this shit is extremely simple
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
I already said I missed that clause the first time, fam; chill.
1 Sercantanimo 2017-10-05
It was more peaceful than the Unite the Right rally Gastañaga advocated for...
1 StrawRedditor 2017-10-05
"peacefully".
How is it possible that you even function day to day being that fucking retarded?
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
Oh, I'm sorry! How many people were injured? What was the total death count?
1 StrawRedditor 2017-10-05
My bewilderment rises.
1 doughboy011 2017-10-05
Some whites died, but Mayos don't count as people so the death count was 0
1 SlimLovin 2017-10-05
No they didn't. No one has ever died just because someone shouted louder than them.
1 doughboy011 2017-10-05
Haven't you ever heard of wizards? Words are their weapons. We have heard reports of wizards in the ranks of BLM for a while...
Honestly I'm pretty shocked that you haven't been keeping up with the news.
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-10-05
Are you autistic? Or are you just a cunt?
I mean, I pretty much already know the answer, but I believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt.
1 The_Reason_Trump_Won 2017-10-05
1 DoktuhParadox 2017-10-05
I need to know how, if a race war breaks out, the dindus can think they'll win. They're called a minority for a reason.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
so what part of “black lives matter” sounds like a call to race war to retarded mayos exactly?
i’ve seen this on the youtubes as well
1 DoktuhParadox 2017-10-05
The violence, mainly. I dunno. Not like I've ever been near BLM members.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
all the violence that comes with holding a sign and chanting incoherently huh
1 DoktuhParadox 2017-10-05
Nope, the riots happened. Stop pretending they didn't.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
the infamous BLM riots??
1 Gothmog26 2017-10-05
Don't downvote the lolcows. This one smells Italian.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
jeez i should shower
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
“the riots” didn’t happen lmao, the worst that happened was some tankie grabbed the mic.
like, what the fuck are you even talking about?
1 glmox 2017-10-05
clearly
1 jet199 2017-10-05
You've probably been near some BLM mayo, just when they are not screaming in some cop's face (that's a weekend only thing for most).
1 Mr_mzungu 2017-10-05
I guess you haven't seen the undercover videos of speeches by the New Black Panthers. The get taken down on YouTube about as fast as they go up, but they are pretty explicit that they want a race war.
1 glmox 2017-10-05
you realize this is literally the same as saying everyone who shows up to one of those "free speech rallies" is a member of the kkk, right?
1 strathmeyer 2017-10-05
Youtube isn't /r/the_donald they don't delete stuff just because people don't like it. If its' not there maybe you just imagined it.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
the fuck does nbpp that have to do with blm lol
NBPP is a radical black nationalist party, BLM is a hashtag and loose coalition of orgs dedicated to the idea of not getting shot
that’s the REAL racism here
1 SirTossAside 2017-10-05
the best way for blacks to not get shot is to work on not being ~12% of the population and ~40-50% of murders
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
they tried that but it didn't work
1 SirTossAside 2017-10-05
probably the constant rioting and defending violent shithead criminals? Even pretending that police brutality is a big issue is retarded. Blacks have issues with the police because they commit an insane fraction of violent crime. They have lower rates of death per run in with the cops than whites.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
how fucking deranged do you have to be to think BLM is "constantly rioting"? there've been like three riots in as many years, none of them were sanctioned by any org, and no one's died or try to kill whitey in any of them
1 MaybeNotaTurtle 2017-10-05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D7dljmZ9KY
They tried, they're just incompetent.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
what the FUCK is a milwaukee
1 MaybeNotaTurtle 2017-10-05
Canada has like 5 black people, that video has at least a dozen in it. No way that is in Canada.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
you ever been to a canadian city? and niagara falls doesn’t count.
1 MaybeNotaTurtle 2017-10-05
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, this conversation is done. Don't speak to me again.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
eat your damn vegimals
1 MaybeNotaTurtle 2017-10-05
You're not welcome in my inbox, and I don't want to hear from you again. This is a test of your character -- if you reply, you're just proving you don't think consent matters.
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-05
By participating in /r/Drama, you implicitly waive all claims to harrassment or assault. Sidebar brog
1 dz0id 2017-10-05
Some say Das Racist is at the Pizza Hut, some say the Taco Bell. No one really knows for sure
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-05
They're at the combination Pizza Hut & Taco Bell
1 BussySundae 2017-10-05
So many flavor combinations in one location.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-05
The Left Will Eat Itself.
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-10-05
At this point, I think it's more likely that they'll provoke the right into eating them.
1 Doctor0000 2017-10-05
Ass first
1 botchlings 2017-10-05
Yes and Yes....
1 neutralvoter 2017-10-05
lol your stupid article was tagged 'questionable news source'
even the independent skirts that dab OP well done
1 charlesgrodinfan 2017-10-05
remember
half of all college students think it's ok to shout down speech they oppose