Speaking as a fellow butter fluid individual i won't let this attack on u/ed_butteredtoast go unchallenged. This isn't r/uncensorednews we here at drama are an open and affirming community and will not stand for that toxic rhetoric!
I don't even know why anyone wants him impeached. I want him in office for as long as possible, I want him there doing as much damage to the GOP brand as possible.
I too am hoping that thousands of Trumpanzees die in the Zagros mountains, with their last words being "I should'a claimed bone spurs", but it's not obvious how an event that happened before today's draftees were born guarantees that a draft is impossible.
Define lose. Not achieve our political goal or find the cost of victory to high relative to the will to achieve those goals? Take the lose, lose some international political capital, in 20 years make movies symbolically winning the war.
Best Korea's God-King pulls a logistical support train out of his voluptuous bussy that can sustain an actual invasion of a country fuckloads bigger and more populous that his, that is the world's biggest ocean away from him? I mean, I guess nukes, but if we're that far from reality we're probably dealing with aliens or wizards, so who knows if that would work.
The worst case scenario is not that NK somehow invades the US. It's that Americans get bogged down in the mountains and it ends up like Russia vs Finland, or US vs North Korea.
Will Fox News and talk radio even report that we're losing, if it comes down to it?
An NK war would be the same as the Afghan/Iraq war; an offhand war. We wouldn't reorganize the economy, start selling war bonds, start a draft, or do really much of anything that would impact the day to day citizen. If we start needing more bodies, we'd do the same thing as before; start lowering enlistment standards and upping signing bonuses.
Also, you do know the Soviets won the Winter War, right?
An NK war would be the same as the Afghan/Iraq war
Persians and Koreans aren't tribal savages living in the desert. The American military has gotten complacent fighting against nobodies. They're going to kill the invaders, and it's going to be such a debacle that the US will have no choice but to mobilize, give up, or go to first-strike nuclear warfare.
Also, you do know the Soviets won the Winter War, right?
They got a tiny amount of territory after suffering 6-figure losses.
Trump isn't dumb enough to actually go to war with anyone. He just likes shit stirring on Twitter. Plus, there's no way the GOP would let him actually go after NK.
I don't even know why anyone wants him impeached. I want him in office for as long as possible, I want him there doing as much damage to the GOP brand as possible.
If anyone can do more damage to the republican brand than bush its trump.
Except that the economic fortunes of this country always have far more to do with international business cycles and the policies of presidents a few decades ago than whatever the current president does.
Trump is literally trying to rip up trade deals. Once the world sees how he handles NAFTA, this country will be damaged enough on the international stage to suffer an actual downside.
If we're replaced by China, we deserve to be replaced by China.
You've got a very small, very limited perspective world view. All you know about the world is informed by a world that only knows Obama as president.
You went through puberty during his administration and you and your other tribe members traded hilarious memes with him. He's kind of the biggest celebrity in your world.
Seeing that world move on and progress into a different direction scares you, hence you're just a reactionary screaming at clouds.
But we all went through that phase. It'll end once you make it to the other side of 25.
You've got a very small, very limited perspective world view. All you know about the world is informed by a world that only knows Obama as president.
You went through puberty during his administration and you and your other tribe members traded hilarious memes of him. He's kind of the biggest celebrity in your world. Your status quo is being threatened and you're frightened.
But we all went through that phase. It'll end once you make it to the other side of 25.
When you control the status quo (Pax Americana), any change is likely to be bad for the USA. But not necessarily for anyone else, Mayocide Now.
The Americans have anyway lost influence in the middle east to Russia and that was in the first few months. Seeing how that turned out, it's obviously better for the Americans to lose control.
Until they suffer consequences for the things they do they'll keep doing those those things.
Being a leftist makes people have AIDS and get cuckolded and cut their own dicks off. I don't think you are going to find any consequences more severe than that.
no amount of consequences will sway me from my stance.
hence why dumb rednecks stay in their little shit towns, fear education, watch all their local businesses die, shop at walmart, and vote for people bought out by greedy tycoons. Maybe the opioid epidemic will fix this problem for the country
The fact you think the US won't suffer economic damage from a decline on the world stage leads me to believe you don't know much about why the US is where the US is.
The fact that you unironically said this doesn't change my opinion of you at all, because I'd already come to the conclusion you're a dope.
The United States is the largest economy in the world and the most powerful military, if Trump started up death squads to lynch gypsys in Time Square the world would react the same way that they do to countries like Saudi Arabia beheading gays: some stern condemnation to appease their leftist voters whilst business carries on as usual.
Take a look at China: they're actually doing the things that hysterical leftist fucktards accuse Trump of doing/planning (mass internment camps for dissidents, removing Muslims' rights, mass censorship, occupation and suppression of neighboring land, restricting and destroying the cultures of minorities, destroying the environment, promoting fervent nationalism and racial hatred etc).
Now take a look at the nearest plastic object to you: where was it made?
Do you think that the China's position on "the world stage" has any bearing on whether companies will use them to produce their cheap tat and whether politicians will trade with them?
You're delusional, Pizzashill. Get some fucking help.
He's done more than enough to remove him as an acting president, but that also requires his own party to hold him responsible. The mutant GOP ain't so keen on giving up its keys to the castle quite yet.
Liberals wave around the dossier like it's actually real when it's already been discredited. Anything they can do to keep the Trump/Russia narrative alive.
Meanwhile there's actual evidence of Obama/Hillary/Russia bribery that is seemingly ignored by the non-conservative media.
It is virtually impossible to view these donations as anything other than an attempt to curry favor with Clinton. Donations alone do not, however, prove that Clinton was actually influenced by money to vote in favor of the Uranium One sale — or to overlook the FBI investigation. Again, there is no evidence that she even knew about the investigation.
Typically we hold public officials to the "smell test" when it comes to ethical issues. But for whatever reason, the clintons have a horde of journos already to wave their hands and dismiss things that look like smoke.
But this shit has been happening since the foundation of this country (and many others). I'm not sure why everyone is all upset now about Russia. It's like no one was paying attention to Fast and Furious under Obama, Halliburton kickbacks under bush, Chinese donations to the DNC to get Bill elected, Iran-Contra etc etc. same story different chapter
So this is the same deal the NYT reported on years ago that multiple government agencies Clinton has no control over also signed off on or no? I have no doubt of Clinton's lack of ethical conduct but this seems like really old news.
Yes. But your characterization is incorrect. Clinton was sitting on a nine man panel at the time (I think it's the cmte for foreign investment in the US or some such) that largely rubber stamps as a final approval after other agencies have signed off on it.
Regardless, foreign donations to a sitting cabinet member's foundation should be troubling, and doubly so when that foreign entity has a proposal in front of that cabinet member.
It just doesn't seem to pass the "smell test", would you agree?
So the only issue here is she potentially took shit donations? Lock her up then. If this ends up like the last two scandals it'll be millions in wasted taxpayer dollars for someone who isn't even in a position of power anymore.
You're really dropping bombs with these revelations that people in power do shady shit 😂
People bringing up old issues that barely matter in the grand scheme of things to deflect current issues is also as old as time. Just let her die and stop wasting taxpayer money chasing this hag. This will be benghazi/buttery mail all over again just so some people that own the entire government can stroke their justice boner.
I don't care enough to click the downvote button. That's someone else. A "smell test" isn't evidence. You said yourself she rubber stamped this deal after other agencies approved it.
You just said she rubber stamped it. How is it a conflict of interest when she didn't have the authority to approve it if multiple other agencies & parties had to first?
Because they only approved it after like a half dozen other agencies approved it. Do you know what "rubber stamped" means ? It means your approval isn't important. It means you're just signing off on the work of others.
No, silly. I'm talking about how cabinet officials should have more power than career government agents and not kowtow to "someone who's been here for 20 years" just because
That makes you retarded. That old bitch couldn't figure out an email account and you think she should be able to override career expects in a half dozen fields?
They all misuse email fucktasrd. Trump' s team, Bush's team, and Hillary. If you think she did anything the other admins didn't keep your basic ass safe.
The beginning of this was your attempt to prove there was something new to the old russia-clinton donation story and instead you ended up proving you don't understand the nuance of the processes the deal in question passed through.
It is virtually impossible to view these donations as anything other than an attempt to curry favor with Clinton. Donations alone do not, however, prove that Clinton was actually influenced by money to vote in favor of the Uranium One sale — or to overlook the FBI investigation. Again, there is no evidence that she even knew about the investigation.
So then there's no evidence against Hillary. Of course people tried to curry favor with her, that in itself isn't evidence she did anything wrong.
The fact that her foundation took those donations in the first place is it's own issue, but nowhere near the scandal people are implying it is
^ I really wish people would understand the consequences of this. If/when the Clinton cartel collapses, Trump will literally lose ontological inertia and evaporate.
Also "establishment" vs "not" is more important in the current climate than "left" vs "right" (or at least it was last year; time will tell if the current frothing Trump mania will change priorities)
I always love the Jacob Wohl responses. Failed teen investment wiz turned wannabe internet talk radio host constantly pushing his dumb streams in any trump thread. Have to give the guy credit for creativity since he lost his credibility and right to trade futures
I don't really take anything Trump says seriously at this point. I assumed he extremely mentally ill shortly after he took office and have kind of just been dismissing him since then.
I mean I'm calling Trump a moron for thinking the FBI/Russia had anything to do with attack research. Idk what you're on about.
The Dems did pay for the opposition research and the guy is likely pleading the fifth so they don't have to admit they just wantonly made shit up to make money.
Oh man that's rich, you must be top of the class in the idiot academy. Many different parts have been proven to be categorically false, like 'failure to do any due diligence' level false. Remember the modus is to say "All parts are true" not some of it's true therefore all of it is. The dossier is essentially a bunch of word of mouth from Russian connections some former spook had. He trumped it up to something more than it ever was. Hence why:
The Republicans who originally payed for it didn't use it
The Dems didn't use it
Everyone stopped giving a shit after the news broke
Now I remember, you were our Graduation speaker at the academy, wish I could have wasted my life as much as an incel like you has. What an inspiration.
As for the dossier, what part do you claim is false? Specifically. I bet you have no answer, because of the whole idiot thing.
As for who is taking it seriously... the FBI and Mueller sure don't seem to think it was 'discredited.' Which is smart of them, because literally the opposite is true. But I'm sure a chucklefuck like you is a better judge of what's true or not than a team of FBI agents and prosecutors
How about having the wrong Cohen traveling to Prague?
Literally mistaking people. False allegations about Carter Page, etc.
The dossier is essentially "the Russians tried to do a bunch of bad shit to our election" a lot of which was true. With a bunch of unsubstantiated claims about Trump and the Trump campaign mixed in.
How about having the wrong Cohen traveling to Prague?
There's no evidence that they did have the wrong one. You don't seriously take Cohen's word for it, do you? The guy is a pure fucking scumbag, but you probably trust him implicitly
Literally mistaking people. False allegations about Carter Page, etc.
There were no false allegations about Carter Page.
The dossier is essentially "the Russians tried to do a bunch of bad shit to our election" a lot of which was true. With a bunch of unsubstantiated claims about Trump and the Trump campaign mixed in.
Who told you those claims were false?
the FBI and Mueller sure don't seem to think it was 'discredited.' Which is smart of them, because literally the opposite is true.
It'd be dumb as shit if they did. Their job is to investigate so there are going to investigate all claims. That doesn't give any credence to whether the shit inside is true or not. If that were the case I guess every person Mueller interviewed will turn out to be a Russian spy.
Now you're just bloviating.
The truth is that you have no information that any of the elements of the Dossier are false. Isn't that right?
There's no evidence that they did have the wrong one. You don't seriously take Cohen's word for it, do you? The guy is a pure fucking scumbag, but you probably trust him implicitly
lol he has no passport stamp and claims he didn't go. No one can back up Steele's Claim. I mean Christ, by your standards I would need to fucking be there myself taking pictures to prove that is false.
The truth is that you have no information that any of the elements of the Dossier are false. Isn't that right?
Imagine being so pathetic you are literally blinded to the fact that the thing may be a load of shit and riddled with unsubstantiated claims because it agrees with your world view. I really pity you it must be sad.
Trump may be an incompetent retard but the idea that he's a Russian tool from 15 years ago is a fairy tale.
My point was honestly trying to point out how stupid it was for Trump to tweet like we didn't know who paid for the dossier. Like it was some super conspiracy and not "Enemies of Trump were looking for dirt" just like every other election since time immemorial.
Accusing the FBI of treason is always justified. Too bad my favorite hobby is being appropriated by an angry business who LARPs as president of the US.
Of course not, you missed how I embarrassed myself when I asked her out last weekend? I guess (((they))) don't put their best people to watch over r/drama users. Stop playing minecraft during office hours.
207 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-10-19
Buzzword is, itself, a buzzword now.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Brothaniels 2017-10-19
This is surely the end of drumpf.
1 ioiidnsksi 2017-10-19
he's picking a fight with the lizard people, he's dead in a week
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
This but no ironic
1 Brothaniels 2017-10-19
Hopefully the banning of u/ed_butteredtoast as well
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
Speaking as a fellow butter fluid individual i won't let this attack on u/ed_butteredtoast go unchallenged. This isn't r/uncensorednews we here at drama are an open and affirming community and will not stand for that toxic rhetoric!
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-19
Preach brother preach! 🙏
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
Mod u/ed_butteredtoast
1 neupainneugain 2017-10-19
Turn Ed into communal bussy boy
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
Done
1 Going_up_the_Country 2017-10-19
Mod Ed_ButteredToast, then ban him.
1 froibo 2017-10-19
Fake news!
1 zeldaisaprude 2017-10-19
According to Reddit he's been impeached like 100 times now.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
I don't even know why anyone wants him impeached. I want him in office for as long as possible, I want him there doing as much damage to the GOP brand as possible.
A slow bleed.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2017-10-19
KYS
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-10-19
Don't get your hopes up. It's not like it can possibly get any worse.
1 giroth 2017-10-19
Things can always get worse
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
It's not going to seem like such a slow bleed to the draftees dying in North Korea and Iran.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Thankfully most people fighting that war on the ground will be Trump supporters, that elected Donald Trump.
There will be no draft, though.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
Hmmm.
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
I too am hoping that thousands of Trumpanzees die in the Zagros mountains, with their last words being "I should'a claimed bone spurs", but it's not obvious how an event that happened before today's draftees were born guarantees that a draft is impossible.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
This country does not have the political culture to ever support a draft again, outside of the direst of circumstance.
Vietnam did a lot for this country culturally, and people didn't take kindly to having their children die in a pointless war against their own will.
If the US government ever tried to draft people into another pointless war it'd be a huge shitstorm the likes of which we've never seen.
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
So what do we do if we start losing? Just nuke them?
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
We lose. And Trump and Trump alone will be to blame.
1 tilmoph 2017-10-19
Define lose. Not achieve our political goal or find the cost of victory to high relative to the will to achieve those goals? Take the lose, lose some international political capital, in 20 years make movies symbolically winning the war.
Best Korea's God-King pulls a logistical support train out of his voluptuous bussy that can sustain an actual invasion of a country fuckloads bigger and more populous that his, that is the world's biggest ocean away from him? I mean, I guess nukes, but if we're that far from reality we're probably dealing with aliens or wizards, so who knows if that would work.
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
The worst case scenario is not that NK somehow invades the US. It's that Americans get bogged down in the mountains and it ends up like Russia vs Finland, or US vs North Korea.
Will Fox News and talk radio even report that we're losing, if it comes down to it?
1 tilmoph 2017-10-19
An NK war would be the same as the Afghan/Iraq war; an offhand war. We wouldn't reorganize the economy, start selling war bonds, start a draft, or do really much of anything that would impact the day to day citizen. If we start needing more bodies, we'd do the same thing as before; start lowering enlistment standards and upping signing bonuses.
Also, you do know the Soviets won the Winter War, right?
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
Persians and Koreans aren't tribal savages living in the desert. The American military has gotten complacent fighting against nobodies. They're going to kill the invaders, and it's going to be such a debacle that the US will have no choice but to mobilize, give up, or go to first-strike nuclear warfare.
They got a tiny amount of territory after suffering 6-figure losses.
1 froibo 2017-10-19
We lost Nam. Draft didn't help much when you demoralize your entire country.
1 RichEvansSextape 2017-10-19
Trump isn't dumb enough to actually go to war with anyone. He just likes shit stirring on Twitter. Plus, there's no way the GOP would let him actually go after NK.
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
If anyone can do more damage to the republican brand than bush its trump.
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
He already has done more damage than Bush. Republicans are turning on themselves despite owning the entire government.
1 SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-10-19
Why the hell do you want that to happen?
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
The only way this country is going to change is if the population experiences some type of downside to electing the people they elect.
US international decline will come with economic decline which will lead to these people suffering economically on some level.
1 SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-10-19
Except that the economic fortunes of this country always have far more to do with international business cycles and the policies of presidents a few decades ago than whatever the current president does.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Trump is literally trying to rip up trade deals. Once the world sees how he handles NAFTA, this country will be damaged enough on the international stage to suffer an actual downside.
If we're replaced by China, we deserve to be replaced by China.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
What's with you reactionaries always afraid of things changing and progressing?
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Nothing Trump is doing is "progress." It's the exact opposite, it's trying to roll back progress.
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
Meh, you sound like a startled reactionary.
1 trotogertrot 2017-10-19
It's kinda true, though. You're a reactionary.
You've got a very small, very limited perspective world view. All you know about the world is informed by a world that only knows Obama as president.
You went through puberty during his administration and you and your other tribe members traded hilarious memes with him. He's kind of the biggest celebrity in your world.
Seeing that world move on and progress into a different direction scares you, hence you're just a reactionary screaming at clouds.
But we all went through that phase. It'll end once you make it to the other side of 25.
1 trotogertrot 2017-10-19
It's kinda true, though. You're a reactionary.
You've got a very small, very limited perspective world view. All you know about the world is informed by a world that only knows Obama as president.
You went through puberty during his administration and you and your other tribe members traded hilarious memes of him. He's kind of the biggest celebrity in your world. Your status quo is being threatened and you're frightened.
But we all went through that phase. It'll end once you make it to the other side of 25.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Are you just making shit up now?
1 trotogertrot 2017-10-19
Being born during Bush doesn't count.
You're a little young person, and that's ok. Don't hide from it.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
I could be 15 and Donald Trump would still be a retard. Like do you honestly think Donald Trump is a normal president?
The guy has straight up gone on Infowars and very clearly has no idea what he's talking about.
1 Yiin 2017-10-19
When you control the status quo (Pax Americana), any change is likely to be bad for the USA. But not necessarily for anyone else, Mayocide Now.
The Americans have anyway lost influence in the middle east to Russia and that was in the first few months. Seeing how that turned out, it's obviously better for the Americans to lose control.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
Being a leftist makes people have AIDS and get cuckolded and cut their own dicks off. I don't think you are going to find any consequences more severe than that.
1 TheEquimanthorn 2017-10-19
You sound like a leftist to me from that description.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
Fight me, bitch.
1 JumbledFun 2017-10-19
hence why dumb rednecks stay in their little shit towns, fear education, watch all their local businesses die, shop at walmart, and vote for people bought out by greedy tycoons. Maybe the opioid epidemic will fix this problem for the country
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
It's Her Turn
1 JumbledFun 2017-10-19
What's with you trumptards always talkin hillary, it's like you're stuck in the past...oh right
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
She is the most qualified ever.
1 JumbledFun 2017-10-19
Taking the kids to the Trump rally
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
#MAGA!
1 JumbledFun 2017-10-19
One plunge at a time
1 ucstruct 2017-10-19
That rarely happens historically though.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Yes, but when it does happen people learn a lesson for a long time afterward.
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
Man, you are an habitual SRSPOSTER. What a downer.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Cry me a river.
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
How many replies do you have in this post?
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Not enough.
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
Your emotions are pouring over eh?
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
Yeah they just changed my autism meds and I'm kind of lost.
1 Yiin 2017-10-19
You're worth a reply.
1 LemonScore 2017-10-19
[Reality needed]
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
The fact you think the US won't suffer economic damage from a decline on the world stage leads me to believe you don't know much about why the US is where the US is.
1 kippot 2017-10-19
its a centipedo, he doesnt know how to tie his own shoelaces
1 LemonScore 2017-10-19
The fact that you unironically said this doesn't change my opinion of you at all, because I'd already come to the conclusion you're a dope.
The United States is the largest economy in the world and the most powerful military, if Trump started up death squads to lynch gypsys in Time Square the world would react the same way that they do to countries like Saudi Arabia beheading gays: some stern condemnation to appease their leftist voters whilst business carries on as usual.
Take a look at China: they're actually doing the things that hysterical leftist fucktards accuse Trump of doing/planning (mass internment camps for dissidents, removing Muslims' rights, mass censorship, occupation and suppression of neighboring land, restricting and destroying the cultures of minorities, destroying the environment, promoting fervent nationalism and racial hatred etc). Now take a look at the nearest plastic object to you: where was it made? Do you think that the China's position on "the world stage" has any bearing on whether companies will use them to produce their cheap tat and whether politicians will trade with them?
You're delusional, Pizzashill. Get some fucking help.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
I'm not delusional, you're just a really stupid person dude.
Our position in the world has benefits. If we lose our position in the world, then we lose those benefits.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2010-09-01/americas-global-advantage-us-hegemony-and-international
Some reading on this topic.
http://www.foreignpolicyi.org/content/why-america-must-lead
You are seriously just not educated on the subject at all.
1 SDIHTD 2017-10-19
You're like a real life Chicken Little.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.
1 LemonScore 2017-10-19
That wasn't my argument, at all, I'm saying that Amertica's dominant position and relations aren't going to change because of Trump.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
So do I. MAGA!
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-19
what
i mean someone moved to impeach, i don’t think it even had a second
1 Obskulum 2017-10-19
He's done more than enough to remove him as an acting president, but that also requires his own party to hold him responsible. The mutant GOP ain't so keen on giving up its keys to the castle quite yet.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
but seriously, we can't let this guy get his hands on the nuclear codes.
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
This is surely the end of fbi.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
Great. What am I going to do with all these Female Body Inspector t-shirts?
1 Somenakedguy 2017-10-19
Send em to Africa
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-19
i think the joke is the fact that it’s so obviously not, despite being yet another example of him being an unqualified retard
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
"qualified"
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-19
🍊 Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
4:56 PM · Oct 19, 2017
4,478 Retweets · 14,320 Likes
Beep Boop I'm a bot!
1 APPLE_NUGGETS 2017-10-19
Good bot. Ban botchlings
1 umar4812 2017-10-19
Praise /u/botchlings
1 MrUnsmileyMan 2017-10-19
Both plz
1 Dopella 2017-10-19
bad bot
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-19
Bad human.
1 Dopella 2017-10-19
ye I've been bad, would you punish me daddy? 0w0
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-10-19
C'mere you kinky little slut ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)
1 Going_up_the_Country 2017-10-19
Mod Ed_ButteredToast.
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
This but unironically
1 boomboomlaser 2017-10-19
This but butteronically
1 buttermyself 2017-10-19
Lol, you said butt butter.
1 EarnestNoMeta 2017-10-19
it's what this sub honestly deserves
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-10-19
This level of nuance is very unusual for Daddy
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-10-19
Nuance is for cucks
1 botchlings 2017-10-19
He's not wrong.
Liberals wave around the dossier like it's actually real when it's already been discredited. Anything they can do to keep the Trump/Russia narrative alive.
Meanwhile there's actual evidence of Obama/Hillary/Russia bribery that is seemingly ignored by the non-conservative media.
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
" The Russian scandal against daddy is fake but the Russian scandal against Hillary is real" 🤔
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-10-19
difference: evidence
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
Let's see it then
1 Stuntman119 2017-10-19
I think he's asking for it.
1 SpotNL 2017-10-19
Which took years to gather.
1 dood98998 2017-10-19
When u/botchlings needs 2 accounts to post the same lame response.
Feelsbadman
1 TraurigAberWahr 2017-10-19
everyone is botchlings
1 botchlings 2017-10-19
There's actually evidence against Hillary.
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
Don't hold back then. Post the evidence!
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
Here's a good, even handed rundown from reddit's first paid news sponsor, WaPo
Important part at the end:
Typically we hold public officials to the "smell test" when it comes to ethical issues. But for whatever reason, the clintons have a horde of journos already to wave their hands and dismiss things that look like smoke.
But this shit has been happening since the foundation of this country (and many others). I'm not sure why everyone is all upset now about Russia. It's like no one was paying attention to Fast and Furious under Obama, Halliburton kickbacks under bush, Chinese donations to the DNC to get Bill elected, Iran-Contra etc etc. same story different chapter
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
So this is the same deal the NYT reported on years ago that multiple government agencies Clinton has no control over also signed off on or no? I have no doubt of Clinton's lack of ethical conduct but this seems like really old news.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
Yes. But your characterization is incorrect. Clinton was sitting on a nine man panel at the time (I think it's the cmte for foreign investment in the US or some such) that largely rubber stamps as a final approval after other agencies have signed off on it.
Regardless, foreign donations to a sitting cabinet member's foundation should be troubling, and doubly so when that foreign entity has a proposal in front of that cabinet member.
It just doesn't seem to pass the "smell test", would you agree?
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
So the only issue here is she potentially took shit donations? Lock her up then. If this ends up like the last two scandals it'll be millions in wasted taxpayer dollars for someone who isn't even in a position of power anymore.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
You seem mad online friend. My point was this shit is as old as time. Switch the names and players and it's been happening literally forever
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
You're really dropping bombs with these revelations that people in power do shady shit 😂
People bringing up old issues that barely matter in the grand scheme of things to deflect current issues is also as old as time. Just let her die and stop wasting taxpayer money chasing this hag. This will be benghazi/buttery mail all over again just so some people that own the entire government can stroke their justice boner.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
Russ, buddy, I can tell you're Booty blasted because you started using emojis
Take a walk outside. Think about how little it matters what's happening or what has ever happened in DC in relation to your life. Maybe sing a song
Then swallow a shotgun shell
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
I can tell you've already shot your load because you're resorting to "u mad" memes.
Also you should know at close range the gas from the shotgun is what blows a head off, not the actual shell itself.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
Bud, I posted the "evidence" you wanted and then you proceeded to sperg out, start autodownvoting and posting emojis.
Also, I just wanted to make sure you weren't anemic
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
I don't care enough to click the downvote button. That's someone else. A "smell test" isn't evidence. You said yourself she rubber stamped this deal after other agencies approved it.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
No, the evidence was Russian donations to her foundation while it would have been a conflict of interest. The smell test refers to ethical actions
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
You just said she rubber stamped it. How is it a conflict of interest when she didn't have the authority to approve it if multiple other agencies & parties had to first?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
She could have denied it, as she was part of the final authority, but the committee apparently rarely met and generally just rubber stamped things
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
Because they only approved it after like a half dozen other agencies approved it. Do you know what "rubber stamped" means ? It means your approval isn't important. It means you're just signing off on the work of others.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
Yes, but that's not how a high level committee of cabinet members should operate, correct?
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
It is when all the actual separate experts/agencies are doing the actual work..
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
well then we have a fundamental disagreement in how the executive branch should work
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
You're right. They should just be directly supported from the start by Russia. I'm with you!
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
No, silly. I'm talking about how cabinet officials should have more power than career government agents and not kowtow to "someone who's been here for 20 years" just because
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
That makes you retarded. That old bitch couldn't figure out an email account and you think she should be able to override career expects in a half dozen fields?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
She knew what she was doing
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
They all misuse email fucktasrd. Trump' s team, Bush's team, and Hillary. If you think she did anything the other admins didn't keep your basic ass safe.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
The beginning of this was me stating "all administrations do dumb shit". Congrats on coming back to my main point
1 TheGreatWolfRuss 2017-10-19
The beginning of this was your attempt to prove there was something new to the old russia-clinton donation story and instead you ended up proving you don't understand the nuance of the processes the deal in question passed through.
1 Ls777 2017-10-19
So then there's no evidence against Hillary. Of course people tried to curry favor with her, that in itself isn't evidence she did anything wrong.
The fact that her foundation took those donations in the first place is it's own issue, but nowhere near the scandal people are implying it is
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
well, as I said in the above post, these things are nothing new
1 its_jebs_turn 2017-10-19
Mayocide now
1 Ennui2778 2017-10-19
Welcome to your first Daddy threat ft. /u/botchlings
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-19
that’s literally the kid’s job
1 shitpersonality 2017-10-19
You support the harvey weinstein of presidents.
1 Honk4Tits 2017-10-19
Does that make Bill Clinton the Alfred Hitchcock of presidents?
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
Sure
1 shitpersonality 2017-10-19
No he is the Jeffrey Epstein of presidents.
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
^ I really wish people would understand the consequences of this. If/when the Clinton cartel collapses, Trump will literally lose ontological inertia and evaporate.
1 botchlings 2017-10-19
Not really.
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
YA RLY.
I'm praying that Clinton gets locked up - because the Bernie wing would take over, and probably make it to the White House in 2020.
Why do I like this? Trump tickles CNN's drama prostate, but Bernie will literally take their paycheck. Maximum drama.
You heard me. I want my to TV do sound like /r/drama.
1 botchlings 2017-10-19
You're either insane or stupid if you think the DNC would ever let the "Bernie wing" of the party take over, much less win an election.
If the Clinton cartel goes down there will be plenty of center-left candidates waiting in the wings.
Beyond that, a Bernie-like candidate running for office is the GOP's wet dream. The election would be the biggest Republican landslide in history.
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
The DNC ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) "let" them ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
You mean like Trump was the Dem's dream? LOL.
1 scatmunchies 2017-10-19
Bernie lost to Hillary, among the left leaning part of the national voter base. Why would he do better than she did in the general?
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
Politically further out, but doesn't scare as many children and small animals.
1 Wordshark 2017-10-19
Lol
Also "establishment" vs "not" is more important in the current climate than "left" vs "right" (or at least it was last year; time will tell if the current frothing Trump mania will change priorities)
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
Nothing screams establishment like shutting down the
Wall Street cocaine partiesI mean credit default swap over-leverage.1 scatmunchies 2017-10-19
Hah. You have no idea what the oppo research on Bernie would look like, do you?
He wouldn’t have won the popular vote.
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
What, he wants to grab women by their wallet?
1 froibo 2017-10-19
This is a mirror argument we heard last year about Trump.
1 UmmahSultan 2017-10-19
We had that before with Hubert Humphrey. It didn't end well.
1 Prysorra 2017-10-19
Humphry = won the 1972 popular Dem Primary vote just like Clinton in 2008.
1 SlavophilesAnonymous 2017-10-19
Bad bot
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
That the FBI is conspiring against him? The crackhead drooling on the street corner told me the same thing.
Unverified ≠ discredited
Like an active investigation with a special prosecutor and multiple bi-partisan congressional panels?
1 SnackBier 2017-10-19
The first answer twitter displays for me is pure #winning. Self awareness level 99.
1 JumbledFun 2017-10-19
I always love the Jacob Wohl responses. Failed teen investment wiz turned wannabe internet talk radio host constantly pushing his dumb streams in any trump thread. Have to give the guy credit for creativity since he lost his credibility and right to trade futures
1 wwaalleess 2017-10-19
/u/pizzashill how should I feel about this development. Keep in mind that I voted for Trump.
1 pizzashill 2017-10-19
I don't really take anything Trump says seriously at this point. I assumed he extremely mentally ill shortly after he took office and have kind of just been dismissing him since then.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
Oh I can answer this one.
The Dems paid for it.
Those people are pleading the fifth because they don't want to admit they just took money and made shit up
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
Is that you u/botchlings? What a clever disguise.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
I mean I'm calling Trump a moron for thinking the FBI/Russia had anything to do with attack research. Idk what you're on about.
The Dems did pay for the opposition research and the guy is likely pleading the fifth so they don't have to admit they just wantonly made shit up to make money.
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
Shhhh bby, is okay
1 dood98998 2017-10-19
Botchlings alts too scared to get tagged!
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
Cept there's no evidence any of it was 'made up'
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
Just like there's no evidence Hillary Clinton didn't have a bunch of people killed. Because you prove a positive not a negative you fucking mook.
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
Many different elements of the dossier have in fact been proven to have occurred.
Maybe read up on it a bit before talking about it in the future and you won't come off as ignorant
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
Oh man that's rich, you must be top of the class in the idiot academy. Many different parts have been proven to be categorically false, like 'failure to do any due diligence' level false. Remember the modus is to say "All parts are true" not some of it's true therefore all of it is. The dossier is essentially a bunch of word of mouth from Russian connections some former spook had. He trumped it up to something more than it ever was. Hence why:
The Republicans who originally payed for it didn't use it
The Dems didn't use it
Everyone stopped giving a shit after the news broke
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
Now I remember, you were our Graduation speaker at the academy, wish I could have wasted my life as much as an incel like you has. What an inspiration.
As for the dossier, what part do you claim is false? Specifically. I bet you have no answer, because of the whole idiot thing.
As for who is taking it seriously... the FBI and Mueller sure don't seem to think it was 'discredited.' Which is smart of them, because literally the opposite is true. But I'm sure a chucklefuck like you is a better judge of what's true or not than a team of FBI agents and prosecutors
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
How about having the wrong Cohen traveling to Prague?
Literally mistaking people. False allegations about Carter Page, etc.
The dossier is essentially "the Russians tried to do a bunch of bad shit to our election" a lot of which was true. With a bunch of unsubstantiated claims about Trump and the Trump campaign mixed in.
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
There's no evidence that they did have the wrong one. You don't seriously take Cohen's word for it, do you? The guy is a pure fucking scumbag, but you probably trust him implicitly
There were no false allegations about Carter Page.
Who told you those claims were false?
Now you're just bloviating.
The truth is that you have no information that any of the elements of the Dossier are false. Isn't that right?
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
lol he has no passport stamp and claims he didn't go. No one can back up Steele's Claim. I mean Christ, by your standards I would need to fucking be there myself taking pictures to prove that is false.
Imagine being so pathetic you are literally blinded to the fact that the thing may be a load of shit and riddled with unsubstantiated claims because it agrees with your world view. I really pity you it must be sad.
Trump may be an incompetent retard but the idea that he's a Russian tool from 15 years ago is a fairy tale.
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
You don't need a passport stamp to move from country to country in the Schengen area, dumbass. Seriously do some basic research before commenting
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
Oh Christ, even Bzzfeed itself reported it was highly unlikely in every way shape and form.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/anthonycormier/trumps-lawyer-showed-you-the-cover-of-his-passport-heres
HOW DEEP DOES THE CONSPIRACY GO!
1 LemonScore 2017-10-19
Is that you, Clitler? How's the book tour going?
1 Strictlybutters 2017-10-19
Yes
1 ProphetRith 2017-10-19
Sauce on that first claim pls
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
Literally on the wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier#Creation
1 ProphetRith 2017-10-19
wtf i love u now
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
Republicans paid for it first
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
I mean it's still oppo research that at one point Dems paid for. It's not a big deal who paid for it either way.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
That was your point tho
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-10-19
My point was honestly trying to point out how stupid it was for Trump to tweet like we didn't know who paid for the dossier. Like it was some super conspiracy and not "Enemies of Trump were looking for dirt" just like every other election since time immemorial.
1 SpotNL 2017-10-19
If it is such an obvious fake, why does he keep obesessing over it?
1 grungebot5000 2017-10-19
when has Trump ever focused on anything important for more than a day
1 xthorgoldx 2017-10-19
Implying kneeling isn't the most critical topic of the century
1 umar4812 2017-10-19
Because there are many people who legitimately still believe it's real.
1 SpotNL 2017-10-19
But by obsessing over it he isn't proving those people wrong.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2017-10-19
He doesn't want to prove anyone wrong. He wants to keep people talking about bullshit so that no one is paying attention to gridlock.
1 LemonScore 2017-10-19
TiL occasionally tweeting about it is "obsessing."
1 SpotNL 2017-10-19
Yes, when you are the president of the US.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
Accusing the FBI of treason is obsessing
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-10-19
Accusing the FBI of treason is always justified. Too bad my favorite hobby is being appropriated by an angry business who LARPs as president of the US.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
For the everyman that dream is still alive, bby. When you're literally The Man, it's ridiculous to continue screaming about The Man keeping you down.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-10-19
Blah blah (((the powers that be))), blah blah subliminal messages and mind control blah blah... and that's why he's a puppet.
Plz don't disrupt my vibe fam.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
I promise u (((we're))) always watching
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-10-19
I know that u know that I know. Don't think that I don't know that u know that I know.
I know.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
Are you gonna finally fuck Susan or no? We got an office pool bet riding on this.
1 MakeAmericaSageAgain 2017-10-19
Of course not, you missed how I embarrassed myself when I asked her out last weekend? I guess (((they))) don't put their best people to watch over r/drama users. Stop playing minecraft during office hours.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-10-19
I was sick and Moishe keeps shitty notes!
1 Cycloptichorn 2017-10-19
They believe that because it is real.
1 umar4812 2017-10-19
lmaoooooooo
1 Obskulum 2017-10-19
Needs to distract from something, maybe?
1 scatmunchies 2017-10-19
Because it’s not a fake.
1 cnac1 2017-10-19
It was used as evidence by the Obama administration to wiretap Trump's campaign.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-10-19
Honestly Obama should uave just Dronestiked the RNC
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-10-19
Its real.
If it was fake he wouldnt care about it
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-10-19
They are.
1 arandomloser21 2017-10-19
>8am tweet
I just love the fact that the first thing daddy does when he wakes up is shitpost on twitter.