Tulpa is a concept in mysticism and paranormal of a being or object which is created through spiritual or mental powers. It was adapted by 20th century theosophists from Tibetan sprul-pa (Tibetan: སྤྲུལ་པ་, Wylie: sprulpa) which means "emanation" or "manifestation". Modern practitioners use the term to refer to a type of willed imaginary friend which practitioners consider to be sentient and relatively autonomous.
Well it’s generally considered taboo and an ethical issue to have sex with tulpas, but provided you respect their status as persons and don’t create them strictly for that purpose, sure. With walk-ins there’s less of an ethical issue because they aren’t consciously directly created by you.
Do you ever wonder if god created us just to watch us fuck? Is that why lifeforms that reproduce more tend to stay around for longer? Did Darwin actually prove creation by a lewd god?
In a small Discord server that OP is in, a user named Vesper deleted the general chat. In that server, "vespering" has become the term for trollishly deleting content.
Not sure why he's using it as though it's a word people would know.
A tulpa is an entity created in the mind, acting independently of, and parallel to your own consciousness. They are able to think, and have their own free will, emotions, and memories. In short, a tulpa is like a sentient person living in your head, separate from you
Tulpas are a bunch of people who try and deliberately make themselves mentally ill so that they can believe that their imaginary friend is real and lives in their head. A mod of a tulpa discord server didn't like how it was being done so they torpedoed the server. The two people you see writing an explanation in there? That's one guy.
In a certain small Discord server, a user who went by the name Vesper deleted the general chat. Inside that server, "vespering" has become the term for trollishly deleting content.
I as a trans person was disgusted by the way we saw some users fetishizing trans people (especially "chicks with dicks").
So many ways to go there, but why do people give a shit about being "fetishized", like its a negative thing? If any hot women fetish middle aged white guys who look like they could really use more time in the sun, let me know.
Consider: when people fetishize someone based on specific aspects of them (IE: fetishizing people because they're trans), they tend to boil down those people to just that thing. They're no longer a person, just a chick with a dick. Or a "trap". Or something else
Think of it like fetishizing incest (oh hey, guess who's a survivor of that! lmao). You're basically telling someone "Hey, I think what happened to you is really hot."
That's the best way I can put it. It's gross and makes some people (like me) really uncomfortable :b
Saying I don't get the big deal about being a fetish is hardly something that should be "day ruining".
Consider: when people fetishize someone based on specific aspects of them (IE: fetishizing people because they're trans), they tend to boil down those people to just that thing. They're no longer a person, just a chick with a dick. Or a "trap". Or something else
I'm into casual sex. I don't know the last names of most of my partners, and in a few cases I don't know their first names. I knew them only well enough to know their personality, but as a person, they were just a chick with a vagina. I can't see why this is wrong. She uses me, I use her, we have a good time. Its just sex not a relationship.
It goes the other way to. You are trans, lets say you looked 100% hot female, think Courtney Act on Rupauls drag race. You have one trait thats a total turn off deal breaker to me a penis, despite this being 2017. Is that difference than a fetish the other way?
Think of it like fetishizing incest
But its nothing like that. I have a thing for redheads, a 5'4" thin red head with Irish white skin is my thing. I don't think you can compare it at all with an incest fetish, or any other fetish where someone else may be harmed.
It might make you uncomfortable but I see it as just over sensitive due to other issues.
Saying I don't get the big deal about being a fetish is hardly something that should be "day ruining".
No, but your last statement about women that fetishize middle aged men sure was
I'm into casual sex.
I don't care? I didn't ask?? Hi I'm a minor fuck off
I'm not reading past that in the paragraph.
By the way I'm a trans male actually, but was pointing out that they fetishized trans women a Lot
But its nothing like that.
Actually, here's a better way to look at it. You're telling someone 'I think the parts you were born with are hot but only because you're a woman that has them.' That make more sense?
It might make you uncomfortable but I see it as just over sensitive due to other issues.
I don't really care what you see it as, especially after the first part of that sentence
Wow. I'm almost ashamed to say it considering I used to browse the Something Awful forums, but I really had no idea that people were actually this retarded and not just joking.
35 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-11-03
No wonder you have an army of pretentious neckbeard losers following you around
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-11-03
Um wtf did I just read?
1 fargoniac 2017-11-03
A mod power tripped and destroyed a huge community.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-11-03
Oh wow. Not just that.
He literally destroyed a community because people were using 'mysticism' to jerk it.
1 WikiTextBot 2017-11-03
Tulpa
Tulpa is a concept in mysticism and paranormal of a being or object which is created through spiritual or mental powers. It was adapted by 20th century theosophists from Tibetan sprul-pa (Tibetan: སྤྲུལ་པ་, Wylie: sprulpa) which means "emanation" or "manifestation". Modern practitioners use the term to refer to a type of willed imaginary friend which practitioners consider to be sentient and relatively autonomous.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
1 fargoniac 2017-11-03
Most folks see it as a psychological rather than mystical thing but yeah
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-11-03
If I generate 2 Tulpas at once can I have a 3-way?
1 fargoniac 2017-11-03
Well it’s generally considered taboo and an ethical issue to have sex with tulpas, but provided you respect their status as persons and don’t create them strictly for that purpose, sure. With walk-ins there’s less of an ethical issue because they aren’t consciously directly created by you.
1 genericusername348 2017-11-03
Is it ethical to make black tulpas to work my imaginary plantation?
1 AnschlussZugpferd 2017-11-03
Do you ever wonder if god created us just to watch us fuck? Is that why lifeforms that reproduce more tend to stay around for longer? Did Darwin actually prove creation by a lewd god?
1 WorldStarCroCop 2017-11-03
the word "vesper"
1 toynbeeidea16 2017-11-03
What's this "vesper" thing? I only know the scooter, the James Bond character, and the drink named after her.
1 GhostFaceShiller 2017-11-03
Vespers are evening prayers. I don't think they mean that either.
Drowned in a lift, maybe?
1 aqouta 2017-11-03
Vesper gas is one of two resources used in starcraft.
1 toynbeeidea16 2017-11-03
Sure, that and Maneriles.
1 PRAISETHEFARG 2017-11-03
In a small Discord server that OP is in, a user named Vesper deleted the general chat. In that server, "vespering" has become the term for trollishly deleting content.
Not sure why he's using it as though it's a word people would know.
1 TSwizzlesNipples 2017-11-03
Fuck...I forgot that tulpas and headmates were a thing. Fuck you for reminding me, OP.
1 ShaggyO_0Rogers 2017-11-03
😯😮 Can someone👆 eli5 🚸 wtf this 😕 is 💩 ?
1 SAC-Lawn_Gnome 2017-11-03
1 Chicup 2017-11-03
So like Trump would be the Tulpa in /u/pizzashill 's head?
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-11-03
I hear /u/pizzashill had to block at least 3 tulpas from his head.
They were probably too boring.
1 SamWhite 2017-11-03
Tulpas are a bunch of people who try and deliberately make themselves mentally ill so that they can believe that their imaginary friend is real and lives in their head. A mod of a tulpa discord server didn't like how it was being done so they torpedoed the server. The two people you see writing an explanation in there? That's one guy.
1 ShaggyO_0Rogers 2017-11-03
My God! 😇 I thought I 👨 was the most 🐸 autistic guy 💩 on reddit 💻.
1 SamWhite 2017-11-03
Well, that's the beauty of this shithole site. There's always someone even worse than us.
1 XLauncher 2017-11-03
"Tulpamancy"
Lolwtf I can't even
1 Strictlybutters 2017-11-03
tfw you're the harassment community
1 AnschlussZugpferd 2017-11-03
Thank you for your service.
1 Jackson_six 2017-11-03
What's "vespered," precious?
1 PRAISETHEFARG 2017-11-03
Not sure why he used that publicly.
In a certain small Discord server, a user who went by the name Vesper deleted the general chat. Inside that server, "vespering" has become the term for trollishly deleting content.
1 Chicup 2017-11-03
So many ways to go there, but why do people give a shit about being "fetishized", like its a negative thing? If any hot women fetish middle aged white guys who look like they could really use more time in the sun, let me know.
1 greyskiessystem 2017-11-03
|K|
Welp thanks for ruining my day. Great job
Consider: when people fetishize someone based on specific aspects of them (IE: fetishizing people because they're trans), they tend to boil down those people to just that thing. They're no longer a person, just a chick with a dick. Or a "trap". Or something else
Think of it like fetishizing incest (oh hey, guess who's a survivor of that! lmao). You're basically telling someone "Hey, I think what happened to you is really hot."
That's the best way I can put it. It's gross and makes some people (like me) really uncomfortable :b
1 Chicup 2017-11-03
Saying I don't get the big deal about being a fetish is hardly something that should be "day ruining".
I'm into casual sex. I don't know the last names of most of my partners, and in a few cases I don't know their first names. I knew them only well enough to know their personality, but as a person, they were just a chick with a vagina. I can't see why this is wrong. She uses me, I use her, we have a good time. Its just sex not a relationship.
It goes the other way to. You are trans, lets say you looked 100% hot female, think Courtney Act on Rupauls drag race. You have one trait thats a total turn off deal breaker to me a penis, despite this being 2017. Is that difference than a fetish the other way?
But its nothing like that. I have a thing for redheads, a 5'4" thin red head with Irish white skin is my thing. I don't think you can compare it at all with an incest fetish, or any other fetish where someone else may be harmed.
It might make you uncomfortable but I see it as just over sensitive due to other issues.
1 greyskiessystem 2017-11-03
No, but your last statement about women that fetishize middle aged men sure was
I don't care? I didn't ask?? Hi I'm a minor fuck off
I'm not reading past that in the paragraph.
By the way I'm a trans male actually, but was pointing out that they fetishized trans women a Lot
Actually, here's a better way to look at it. You're telling someone 'I think the parts you were born with are hot but only because you're a woman that has them.' That make more sense?
I don't really care what you see it as, especially after the first part of that sentence
Kindly fuck off now, thanks
1 VidiotGamer 2017-11-03
So... imaginary friends are definitely a thing.
Wow. I'm almost ashamed to say it considering I used to browse the Something Awful forums, but I really had no idea that people were actually this retarded and not just joking.
1 WorldStarCroCop 2017-11-03
thanks dickead