[AGENDA] ba_scrumpf subreddit makes a post - "EIGHT YEARS OF DEMOCRAT FAILURE IN 9 EASY GRAPHS THAT EVEN A LIBERAL CAN READ." Turns out, the graphs are literally illegible.

30  2017-11-26 by DeepDickedHillybilly

32 comments

UNREADABILITY IS A LIEBERAL ATTACK ON CHRISTIAN VALUESTM

Just take an L on this one, bro.

Nah when you post graphs in jpeg, you deserve rope™

This is the only political platform I can get behind tbh.

How can you lose when their are no winners?

How can you lose

  • Get akbarred by Islam
  • antifa
  • Convert to Islam
  • Cut your genitals off
  • Live in an Islamic location and get beheaded because you did not convert to Islam
  • Health At Any Size
  • Live in a location that gets slowly converted to Islam
  • Cuck yourself
  • Be disallowed from any sort of fun because Islam
  • Voluntarily give up your right to arm yourself
  • Have any part of your life run according to the proclivities of some weird angry in-bred goat-beard man in a turban
  • TrollXChromosomes
  • Basically anything to do with Islam

Huh? Was this an auto response or something?

zoz

zle

zozzle

r/therewasanattempt

Pretty sure Biglordshiggot is a bot and not a smart one at that. He's more like a windows prompt.

Why are you frothing at the mouth about Islam while living in the USA?

If anything, Islamic terrorists are just conservatives with initiative.

  • antifa (dissenters are quickly taken care of in an Islamic state)

  • Cut your genitals off (clitoral removal isn't Islamic, Islamic FGM is only supposed to remove the clitoral prepuce, but this was referring to sex reassignment surgery anyway and Islam doesn't recognize gender transitions)

  • Health At Any Size (jihad helps with natural selection, fat people get eliminated on the battlefield while the healthy survive)

  • Cuck yourself (being a cuck is haram)

  • Voluntarily give up your right to arm yourself (self-explanatory)

  • TrollXChromosomes (Islam is a pretty sufficient antithesis to feminism)

Do you see this moral and societal degeneration happening in your average Muslim country? I'll answer that for you: fuck no, because they don't let this degeneracy slide, like fucking liberal CUCKS in the USA. There's only one solution, and that is for everyone to convert to Islam.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) didn't tolerate degeneracy like gay marriage or gender bending—nay! He mandated the ostracization and execution of gays, and made sure they would not become commonplace or accepted by the rest of the community. He made sure to establish clear gender roles and didn't tolerate this "gender identity" trash.

In the meantime, you have Western society accepting gays, slut pride, gender-mixing, new genders, no genders, LGBT, and who knows what else?! Western society is truly degenerating without guidance, and I fear that as time passes, these degenerate groups only gain more and more power.

Muslims and conservatives might think they're enemies, but in reality, they're closer to each other than they think! An alliance would prove very fruitful for both sides.

Just repeat the declaration of faith after me:

أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له وأشهد أن محمدا عبده ورسوله

and you'll be right on your way to becoming a great Muslim!

Why are you safe from most dangers in relation to Islam?

Because I elected the God-Emperor, who keeps us safe from heresy, you dumb motherfucker. :-D

skipping half the sentence

I'm not sure if you're just retarded or if /u/pizzashill was right about whatever he said about illiteracy a while ago.

Inshallah Brüder mein

ba scrumpf

These poor attempts at coming up with a funny name for td just make you look retarded tbh

ba scrumpf

Not even "politicalhumor" has fallen this flat as far as I know. This is a terrible day for /r/drama.

Nah, it's hilarious.

I'm literally retarted tho

I am tha rytorted?

It shoulda been ba_zozzle amirite?

Lol some of those graphs start the X axis in 1965.

You can't read that? Blind cunts

Even if it wasn't incoherent, half the shit on that list has nothing to do with either political party.

"labor force participation" is a good example.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/declining-labor-participation-rates/

They tried to take a natural trend that has been happening for decades and claim it was tied to the democratic party.

The BLS has refuted this meme more than once.

Health insurance costs would be another example. The cost of healthcare in the US has been increasing for decades, the cost increase actually seems to have slowed post-Obama care:

Here's a graph showing healthcare costs per person by year:

http://www.healthscareonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Annual-Healthcare-Expenses-per-Person-by-Year.bmp

Here's a graph on healthcare projections pre and post Obamacare:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/health-care-spending-growth-urban-institute-study

The "federal debt" one is hilarious as well, considering the major spike came under Reagan, dropped under Clinton, sky rocketed again under Bush, and then slowed down under Obama:

http://www.macrotrends.net/2023/national-debt-by-president

I'm not saying the president has that much control over the economy, but still.

So even if that graph was coherent (it's not) the entire premise is horseshit. If anything the economy has performed better under a democratic president by most relevant factors:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/clinton-economy-better-under-democrats/

The authors both told us Clinton was “100 percent accurate” with her claim that the economy does better under Democratic presidents, based on their research (which Blinder said has been thoroughly peer-reviewed and is set to be published in the American Economic Review). Blinder served on President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, and he was an economic adviser to the presidential campaigns of Democrats Al Gore and John Kerry.

The authors in their 2014 paper talked about factors that might be attributed to “just good luck,” while the 2015 report refers to “blends of good policy and good luck.” Blinder told us via email that they avoided the term “just good luck” in the 2015 paper for two reasons.

“One reason for superior performance under Democratic presidents is that oil prices go up less (on average),” Blinder stated. “Is that just luck? Well, the fact that we entered several wars in the gulf area (the latest in 2003) under Republican presidents, thereby driving up oil prices, was not just luck — it was policy, though not economic policy.” “The second main factor underpinning Democratic superiority is that productivity has risen faster under Democrats,” Blinder said. “Well, productivity growth depends on many things, including luck, but also including a myriad of policies.”

In other words, there may very well be policies from Democratic presidents that have led to better economic performance. But the authors were unable to pinpoint what those policies were.

Now, in an effort to bait a retard here, I'll be tagging a Trumptard.

/u/PotatoVarnishOrigin

I have fans!

No, I just picked a random Trumptard to slap with the facts.

Trumptard

that must make you one of the cool kids! friended!!!1!

What else am I going to call people that unironically watch info wars and got caught up in a personality cult?

Seriousposting REEEEEE

Serious posting stirs up the most drama.

But you're the drama.