ugh... i'm so fucking sick of trump's racism. i swear, the next time the republicans win another vote in the senate, i'm moving to [AFFLUENT WHITE NATION]
Casados are literally the most unhealthy (and the most popular) meal we have lol. The CCSS (our social security system) even made a campaign some time ago asking people to stop eating a full Casado every day.
this isn't the first time I've seen an individual think the media isn't doing enough to crush the opposition party. Where do they get the idea that eastern bloc style media should be the new norm?
You should neck yourself. Don't get mad that white women are throwing themselves at black guys and blacks are having easy sex with them. This is only the beginning of it too.
So you want to get started fishing, but donât know anything about rods, reels, line or terminal tackle. You donât know what terminal tackle is, you say? Not to worry. Iâm going to break it all down for you. Iâm going to explain basic tackle to you: what itâs called and what it does. Letâs start with the basic fishing rod: fishing rod diagram There are different kinds of fishing rods on the market; different sizes, made of different materials for different purposes. But the terms you see above are common to all fishing rods.
*By the way: its called a fishing rod not a fishing pole. Fishing rods have guides and a way to attach a reel to it. An old fashioned fishing pole is made of cane, has no guides and the line is attached to the tip (it has no reel). The basic parts of a rod: Butt Cap: This is at the bottom of the handle: sometimes made of rubber, sometimes of cork. This is the end you might press into your stomach if youâre fighting a good fish. Handle: Referred to as a Grip, as well. This is where you hold the rod; can be made of foam or cork. Reel Seat: This is where your reel gets attached to the rod. There are different mechanisms available to attach the reel. Some rods will have rings that go over the reel foot (see the reel diagram below to see a reel foot). Most rods have some sort of hood mechanism that screws either up or down on the foot of the reel to keep it in place. See the picture below: reel seat photo Hook Keeper: Also called a Keeper Ring. This little ring is a big convenience, as it gives you a place to hook your hook so you wont impale yourself when your on the move.
Butt: This is the thick part of your rod that closest to the handle. Ferrule: If you have a rod that breaks down into 2 pieces or more, the ferrule is the joint where sections of the rod fit together. See below for a close up of what ferrules look like. fishing rod ferrule Butt Guide: This is the guide closest to the handle end of your rod. Its located on the thickest part of the rod (butt), thatâs why the call it the butt guide.
Guides: These are the rings you see going all the way down the rod, they "guide" the line down the length of rod to the tip. The number, spacing, and size of the guides depend on the kind of rod you are using. But, generally speaking, the more guides the better. A higher quality rod will have at least one guide for every foot of its length (i.e. 6 foot rod should have at least 6 guides). Windings: Those windings are how the guides get and stay attached to the rod. Itâs basically string that gets wound around the foot of the guide, and is then painted over with a kind of glossy enamel to protect it. See picture below for a close up. fishing rod windings Tip: This is the uppermost part of the rod, the thinnest and most flexible, nearest the tip top.
Tip Top: This is the guide at the very tip of your fishing rod, its also the smallest, and probably the most important. This is the guide you are most likely to break off. When you are not watching, it likes to get caught in car doors and the like. See picture below. fishing rod tip Learning new terminology can be a bit of a pain. But, learning this stuff is important: knowing the names and purpose of tackle will help you compare equipment when youâre ready to buy your first fishing outfit, and make it easier to get your questions answered when you need help (because people will know what youâre talking about).
Before moving on, there is one more term you may hear about when trying to find the right rod and that term is Action. fishing rod action diagramAction: The action of a rod refers to the flexibility of the rod. The action of a rod describes how much and where a rod bends when its "loaded" (bent). There are three main actions: Fast Action: This type of rod is generally stiff, and most of the bend happens at the tip part of the rod. Medium/Moderate Action: This rod bends a little deeper, so it has flexibility in the tip and in the middle of the rod.
Slow Action: This rod is the most flexible, it bends well into the butt end of the rod. The type of action you need depends on what you plan to do with it; what kind of fish you are targeting and what kind of technique you plan to use. \
I don't need all that. Fishing for white girls is easy when you're a black guy. They literally throw themselves at black guys and it's only the beginning of it since they don't want the beta, feminine, and small dick white guys anymore.
No, you're getting rejected gussy. Bussy is not so easy to grow. It's much like veal, we need careful hormone control and even sometimes surgery to achieve peak bussy. Gussy just comes straight from another gussy, ready for plebian consumption.
goddamn get with the times. cuckoldry is old news. set up a /u/ProudSoyboy account where you advocate for soy and how it unlocks male capacity to evolve by being in touch with ones feelings, and how the altright is just angry all the time because they're malnourished.
Make sure to occasionally elliptically reference estrogen supplements and childhood psychological abuse, and then just ignore any attempt people make to call back to that.
Cuckoldry was invented by white men and white men love getting cucked by black guys but it's just the beginning of it. I see more black males with white girls every time I go outside and white girls sucking the superior black cocks.
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationalityâadditionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
Cry more about it, you triggered little bitch. Black people have absolutely zero contribution to anything, and they're all over this thread, either shilling hard against this "serious topic" or trolling like the worthless little maggots that they are. I'm simply pointing out that the shitty little assholes are here and screeching in full force.
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationalityâadditionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
See you in the next depression, lads. It'll be even worse, because we have Brexit, ontop of this.
Boy golly if only there was something that could've warned us about this.
Like Reagan trying these cuts in the 80s, which resulted in an economic disaster.
Or Bush trying these cuts in 2001, and, seeing as how most of America seems to be suffering from short term memory loss, caused another economic disaster.
Oh and Kansas just tried practically the exact same tax plan and now the entire state has gone bankrupt and is one billion clams in debt.
Happy holidays from your friendly neighborhood srsposter.
are you seriously claiming that tax cuts caused the housing property bubble?
Whatever glue you're sniffing, send me some.
All kansas proves is that tax cuts are not, in themselves, sufficient to sustain an economy. You also need to offer a competitive advantage, which surprise cornland doesn't have.
Itâs the red states that take more than they put out. You really think Kansas is driving the economy? lol. Iâm fine with tax cuts though. I like the way they drive conservatives out of office.
You seem to assume that I am for wealth transfer between states, just for my "team." Nah.
We can easily solve a lot of this problem by moving social security and medicare to the state level (going forward for social security) or privatizing them.
Wealth transfer between states, and the financial responsibility incentives it destroys on the state level, is a fundamental problem of taking a tax and spend approach on the federal level. You want less "regressive" policies like Trump's protectionism for dying industries like coal? You think people should just have the guts to move?
Well stop enabling these dying industry life support systems with federal tax and spend which is the biggest regressive policy of all. It's that simple.
America as we know it, is over. In less than two years, the Republicans, the complacent media, and apathetic voters have burned our country to ashes. We are irrelevant on the global stage. The corporate hogs have consolidated their wealth even further. We always knew, but it is now confirmed, we are worthless. Nothing more than a resource to extract wealth for 1% of the country.
There is no hope for my family. There is no hope for my future.
Even if there is a blue wave in 2018; there's a bomb in this bill set to go off in 2019, and these goddamned pedophile supporting SOUTHERN FUCKS will vote these soulless pieces of filth right the fuck back into office.
Go to a betting market and put down 1,000 dollars on a quantifiable future economic prediction. Otherwise, you're the same thing as pizzashill and this retarded linked commenter screaming "we're all gonna diiiie"
America as we know it, is over. In less than two years, the Republicans, the complacent media, and apathetic voters have burned our country to ashes. We are irrelevant on the global stage. The corporate hogs have consolidated their wealth even further. We always knew, but it is now confirmed, we are worthless. Nothing more than a resource to extract wealth for 1% of the country.
There is no hope for my family. There is no hope for my future.
Even if there is a blue wave in 2018; there's a bomb in this bill set to go off in 2019, and these goddamned pedophile supporting SOUTHERN FUCKS will vote these soulless pieces of filth right the fuck back into office.
u/FIREMISSIONOVER are you a professional chef? That's fucking al dente.
These dudes have to get off on this shit, there's no other explanation.
This is straight up fetishized faux 'suffering'. This is the ultimate form of virtue signalling. This is the rock bottom of the decline of masculinity.
These types of people would've been used as bait for predators during foraging outings by our ancestors. There's no other use for them.
u/FIREMISSIONOVER if you could figure out some way to convert your impotent rage into electricity you would never have to worry about providing for your family. That could be your ticket to the 1%.
Pelosi wasn't talking about the literal contents of the ACA bill. It was a shitty way of saying "once it's passed, you'll be able to see exactly how it benefits the country"
No, it was debated thoroughly with numerous concessions to the GOP for nearly a year.
GOP complain it was "shoved down their throat" because as far as legislation goes, it was passed faster than most.
Yet, if we're making genuine comparisons to the ACA and this bill, the ACA wasn't gambling with the health economy by being written the night it was supposed to be voted on.
Honestly, America being destroyed is probably best for the world. It's time time for the Chinese to fuck up and get blamed for all the world's problems.
I'd love to see their's faces when they realize that China will be 10x worse with their foreign policy and that the US maybe wasn't that bad maybe we where just being drama kweens.
It's hard to say what happens now because the bill was being written the day it was voted on, so there's a bunch of extra shit that had nothing to do with taxes thrown in there. However, CBO put it as adding to our national deficit by about $1 trillion in a decade, so there's the 'ten years part.'
Stuff like this doesn't have immediate repercussions obviously. It takes time for regulatory bodies to enact these things. For instance, Devos wanting to privatize education doesn't suddenly mean tomorrow all public schools everywhere are now privatized. It also doesn't mean protected reserves in Alaska will be fucked up by drilling.
But, some closer problems could occur. Since the mandate for the ACA is gone - assuming the bill goes through house - this could cause sudden, economic harm. If millions of healthy people pull out of their plans because they don't need/want it, that cost might get offloaded to everyone else. Those people can't afford the premium hike and then we get some real economic fallout.
Anyway, it's exceptionally frustrating to see people give up at this point. Midterms are less than a year away, and less than a year isn't much time for political policies to mobilize completely. If they want to stop being apathetic about it, they need to vote in midterms.
However, CBO put it as adding to our national deficit by about $1 trillion in a decade,
That's less than 10% of the national debt size. Which, accumulating over 10 years, is less than the historical rate of inflation per year.
The way you stated this it would make no difference because at the end of the decade it only added more of less valuable money, so the effective amount in 2017 dollars wouldn't change.
I'm no economic expert, only quoting what the CBO initial analysis was (1.4 trillion to the deficit to be more accurate). I also don't know if that's the version of the senate bill that was pre-amendments. Regardless, I can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be, which even by what the CBO has reported, will appear over the course of years.
And really that just drives the point home for me - much of this will take a long time to start showing any impact, and it's hard for me to imagine the bill going completely unchallenged in the coming year. So, yeah, political apathy is useless.
I'm no economic expert, only quoting what the CBO initial analysis was (1.4 trillion to the deficit to be more accurate). I also don't know if that's the version of the senate bill that was pre-amendments. Regardless, I can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be, which even by what the CBO has reported, will appear over the course of several years. Granted that just seems to be how policies work, taking years and years before they start to kick in.
You shouldn't be throwing around politically divisive numbers if you admittedly don't know what they really mean or the context to apply them. $1.4 Trillion is actually about 7.5% of our current national debt. If we only add that much in a decade that's worth it when contrasted with the expected rate of inflation of 10%. We have an effective reduction of about 2.5%. This is quite simplified, I admit, but the premise should still stand out in your mind and if it doesn't I think you have some perspective limiting bias against the GOP.
Edit: Also, regardless of things, let's not pretend this isn't going to hurt people. To pay for these tax cuts, the GOP will likely start hacking at social safety net programs like SS, Medicare/Medicaid, and other welfare programs.
So you can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be but at the same time you know they're going to hurt people and it's the GOP's fault? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking?
Like I already pointed out adding 7.5% to the debt over a decade is actually a better position than what we're in now, and we're not currently hacking social safety nets. I'm not saying this is how it will work because I haven't really looked into the CBO projections lately and don't exactly know what the $1.4 trillion is in reference to. But as the info currently stands as we both understand it there seems to be a slight net positive with this tax bill. You're charging forward with the idea GOP = bad a little too quickly and I think you should rethink some of your opinions.
You shouldn't be throwing around politically divisive numbers if you admittedly don't know what they really mean or the context to apply them
I was addressing the poster above about what could be construed as bad in ten years, considering what the CBO analysis revealed. I don't see what's divisive about that.
Both report 1.4 trillion deficit so that's where I got it from.
So you can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be but at the same time you know they're going to hurt people and it's the GOP's fault? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking?
The GOP rushed through a tax cut bill on the night it was to be voted. It was literally being written and having amendments added to it prior to its voting. The process was inclusive, shut out from comment by Democratic senators. That, in itself, should set red flags.
But no, I don't see the problem with this logic. GOP tax senate bill gets passed, goes to house to pass, and directly affects people. Because it's their bill. So when people are inevitably hurt by a GOP tax bill the GOP wrote that was passed by a GOP House/Senate majority, yeah, I can lay the blame at the GOP.
I was addressing the poster above about what could be construed as bad in ten years, considering what the CBO analysis revealed. I didn't realize stating actual figures was politically divisive.
Both report 1.4 trillion deficit so that's where I got it from.
It's politically divisive if you don't explain how this figure works in context with inflation.
The GOP rushed through a tax cut bill on the night it was to be voted. It was literally being written and having amendments added to it prior to its voting. The process was inclusive, shut out from comment by Democratic senators. That, in itself, should set red flags. If it doesn't, then you're not paying attention.
*that would be "exclusive" if the other party is shut out...not inclusive.
Why would anyone care what the obstructionist party says when they knew they had the 51 votes needed? They would just stall and sabotage. It's not red flags at all, it's politics. I voted for one party, I don't care what the other party thinks. Not a single senate republican voted for Obamacare. Don't act like exclusivity suddenly matters to the democrats.
But no, I don't see the problem with this logic. GOP tax senate bill gets passed, goes to house to pass, and directly affects people. Because it's their bill. So when people are inevitably hurt by a GOP tax bill the GOP wrote that was passed by a GOP House/Senate majority, yeah, I can lay the blame at the GOP. "How can you blame the GOP for a bill they wrote, passed, signed, and enacted?!!?"
So people will inevitably be hurt by the GOP tax bill even though you "can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be". There's a problem with that logic. you can't say they will be hurt if you admit you don't know what it's going to do. I know you'll blame the GOP for anything, that's not what I was talking about. I was originally saying
That link is literally just pointing out what the law says but you claim it's showing how it will directly hurt them? Please. There's one single sentence in that whole article where they actually suggest something will hurt them through their own analyzing. Go back and find it yourself and then link me their follow up studies if you want to prove anything to me. I'm asking you to find it yourself because I can almost guarantee you can't tell the difference between what they are actually saying and the tangential, biased opinions you get by "reading into" it.
According to his post history /u/FIREMISSIONOVER/ was like 22 by the end of the Bush administration.
His earliest political memories were the Clinton impeachment proceedings. He got into middle school in the wake of the Columbine shooting. He was an impressionable teenager when the Twin Towers fell. He watched his country march into the quagmire of Iraq and Afghanistan. He watched Hurricane Katrina devastate New Orleans. He watched the financial system crumble as he was searching for post-grad jobs. He watched Congress do its damnedest to screw up the economic recovery, as the EU turned into a dumpster fire, and then the world economy gradually recover. He watched ISIS rise and fall.
Now I'm not saying Trump's great. But Trump has accomplished basically nothing since being elected. And the world is the best it's been for about 16 years. Not great, but better. And he's bitching about a guy who is unable to change the status quo.
Most probably don't understand that policies don't happen overnight. It actually boggles my mind.
I mean, if Democrats got majority next Midterm, what's to stop them from creating their own insane tax bill with a bunch of amendments that contradicts everything about this one? No one wants to think long term.
People in /r/Drama are ignoring this tax bill defines birth at conception, and allows churches to promote candidates. This isn't a tax bill, its a bundle of fascist dreams.
And I for one, am not going to continue to stay here and watch this community ignore its quest for bussy and irony be absorbed by T_D shitposters and the ignorant. This sub has lost its way with the subscribers its gained. I'm leaving.
Huh? Just a few desperate Trump supporters trying to defend a horrible tax bill. Hope you enjoy the breadcrumbs you get from your billionaire overlord; good luck selling those cars!
I'm 24 and I know the interests of everyone and the economic impact of a day old bill that nobody has read. I also speak in a manner completely indistinguishable from a retardedly programmed left wing bot.
The first question asks if GDP will "substantially grow." Is anything short of "substantial GDP growth" a bad plan that destroys the economy like you seem to think it is?
Did you read what the economists actually said? Most of them say "won't change much." Some of them say there will be a marginal gdp growth. How would a no growth/low growth GDP result (assuming of course we can trust the predictions of economists) from this tax bill be a "shit sandwich"?
Growing wealth inequality, blowing a hole in the deficit, gutting healthcare, getting rid of student tax breaks etc. to give tax breaks to corporations for little to no âgrowthâ is a shit sandwich, especially if that growth doesnât accrue to the middle class.
You said "most economists speak freely about how the bill is crap."
I asked you to substantiate that
You sent me a poll of economists, the result of which is that most economists don't expect the GDP to grow "substantially."
I questioned why economists who don't think much will change (or will marginally change) supports your thesis that "economists speak freely about how the bill is crap."
You editorialize, send me a Vox link about the exact same poll, adding their editorializing over the top of it.
If a bill blows a 1 trillion dollar hole in the deficit and has no substantial growth benefits with lots of negatives, itâs crap.
Take it from a noble prize winning economist:
âNothing in the bill suggests it will increase growth,â said Richard Thaler, the University of Chicago professor who last month won the Nobel Prize in economics. âCorporate profits are already high and they are sitting on piles of cash. Why should we think they have profitable investments that they are not doing now but would do if the tax were lower?â
God you trump voters will defend anything. Thank god trumps approval is tanking.
Take it from one person agrees with me, a NOBLE (not Nobel, why would we want to accuse people of being retards while spelling one of the most prestigious prizes on Earth wrong?) prize winner
God you trump voters will defend anything. Thank god trumps approval is tanking.
I will absolutely not defend his stance on climbing change and its effect upon our Earth and rock walls.
Thanks you GOP for destroying the Puertorrican economy in a late night vote. Way to go passing a bill that says "you are not American enough" so that they make us pay more.
Iâm currently negotiating a job offer. Should I edit my counter offer and ask for an additional 15% on top of what I wanted to ask for? Trickle down, yo.
Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say theyâll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trumpâs promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class.
âThis bill will stimulate investment, job creation and economic growth in the United States,â the companyâs chairman and CEO, Randall Stephenson, said in a Nov. 8 statement.
Trump welcomed Broadcom Ltd. CEO Hock Tan to the Oval Office on Nov. 2 to announce that the semiconductor company would move its headquarters to the U.S. from Singapore. Both men credited the pending tax overhaul for the decision -- even though the company already had widespread operations on U.S. soil, and analysts interpreted the move as a politically motivated bid to ensure approval for acquisitions.
You do realize this isn't the first time they've done this nonsense? Trickle-down economics is a proven lie. Giving massive tax cuts to the rich and corporations has never boosted the economy or improved the middle-class.
No. The only goal of 2016 was to stop Trump, not massage feelings and other political leanings. That was the only goal. To just be an adult and stop Donald fucking Trump from being president. And the choice was more than crystal clear. Youâre trying to give them excuses by saying their hands werenât held enough by Debbie and Hillary?
The people who werenât brainwashed cult members (trump supporters) knew the risks and chose not to act anyway. I donât give a fuck about them now. I truly hope their lives are ruined from this for putting so many people in jeopardy when they knew better.
Donât want them in the party, donât want them in the âbase,â donât want them in society, just hope their karma is swift. Play games with peopleâs lives and thatâs what you get.
You're the kind of person who posts this shit on Facebook only to receive zero comments and two likes from people who also enjoy BS hyperbole, aren't you?
Who the fuck reads /r/politics? Like literally who? I spend unseemly amounts of hours on the Internet doing jack shit and I still couldn't stand to burn a second of my worthless time reading r/politics let alone posting on it.
151 comments
1 Death_Trolley 2017-12-02
What a bunch of drama queens
Can I have your stuff after you an hero yourself?
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2017-12-02
As a Costa Rican my offer of trading places with any of these American drama queens still stands.
1 ihavecorrectopinions 2017-12-02
ugh... i'm so fucking sick of trump's racism. i swear, the next time the republicans win another vote in the senate, i'm moving to [AFFLUENT WHITE NATION]
1 hug-bot 2017-12-02
Perhaps you misspelled "hug." Would you like one? đ€
I'm a bot, and I like to give hugs. source | contact
1 ihavecorrectopinions 2017-12-02
yo back off queer
1 TheRootinTootinPutin 2017-12-02
this is a queer friendly sub, all hets may neck themselves
1 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2017-12-02
This soothes me
1 a_normal_human 2017-12-02
Will you hug bussy?
1 PracticalOnions 2017-12-02
WEW
1 SlappaDaBayssMon 2017-12-02
Only if you bring some Ticas and casadas.
1 the_popcorn_pisser 2017-12-02
Casados are literally the most unhealthy (and the most popular) meal we have lol. The CCSS (our social security system) even made a campaign some time ago asking people to stop eating a full Casado every day.
1 SlappaDaBayssMon 2017-12-02
That's probably all I ate when I was there
1 Senator_Chickpea 2017-12-02
"I've been kicked out of the basement"
"Oksana hasn't returned my texts ever since I sent her the last $500 to fix those Visa problems."
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2017-12-02
Yeah the country with the largest GDP just became "irrelevant on the world stage" because we have lord meany pants as President.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
With a maximum lifespan of 8 years, better permanently leave the US or support California leaving.
1 v_is_one_person 2017-12-02
America as we know it, is over. In less than two years, the Republicans, the complacent media, and apathetic voters have burned our country to ashes. We are irrelevant on the global stage. The corporate hogs have consolidated their wealth even further. We always knew, but it is now confirmed, we are worthless. Nothing more than a resource to extract wealth for 1% of the country.
There is no hope for my family. There is no hope for my future.
Even if there is a blue wave in 2018; there's a bomb in this bill set to go off in 2019, and these goddamned pedophile supporting SOUTHERN FUCKS will vote these soulless pieces of filth right the fuck back into office.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
My. fucking. sides.
1 ZeitgeistNow 2017-12-02
24/7 shitpost-style coverage of Drumph is clearly not enough
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
Fucking finally.
1 DoubleCheekedUp 2017-12-02
TWO SCOOPS?! BLUMPFH gets TWO SCOOPS?!
1 CarlosBeltran 2017-12-02
An inbred frog-poster pretending heâs ever seen a newspaper in his life or is literate enough to understand it.
My. Fucking. Sides.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
Sorry, no es Islam
1 CarlosBeltran 2017-12-02
Al-Abama isnât any better, hick. I think some gators might have made their way into your bloodline.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
Aww, it's upset.
1 Mexagon 2017-12-02
Waaaahhh
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-02
this isn't the first time I've seen an individual think the media isn't doing enough to crush the opposition party. Where do they get the idea that eastern bloc style media should be the new norm?
This will make great pasta btw.
1 nanonan 2017-12-02
Must have meant complicit.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-12-02
Can these fucks just get it over with already and neck themselves
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
You should neck yourself. Don't get mad that white women are throwing themselves at black guys and blacks are having easy sex with them. This is only the beginning of it too.
1 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2017-12-02
So you want to get started fishing, but donât know anything about rods, reels, line or terminal tackle. You donât know what terminal tackle is, you say? Not to worry. Iâm going to break it all down for you. Iâm going to explain basic tackle to you: what itâs called and what it does. Letâs start with the basic fishing rod: fishing rod diagram There are different kinds of fishing rods on the market; different sizes, made of different materials for different purposes. But the terms you see above are common to all fishing rods. *By the way: its called a fishing rod not a fishing pole. Fishing rods have guides and a way to attach a reel to it. An old fashioned fishing pole is made of cane, has no guides and the line is attached to the tip (it has no reel). The basic parts of a rod: Butt Cap: This is at the bottom of the handle: sometimes made of rubber, sometimes of cork. This is the end you might press into your stomach if youâre fighting a good fish. Handle: Referred to as a Grip, as well. This is where you hold the rod; can be made of foam or cork. Reel Seat: This is where your reel gets attached to the rod. There are different mechanisms available to attach the reel. Some rods will have rings that go over the reel foot (see the reel diagram below to see a reel foot). Most rods have some sort of hood mechanism that screws either up or down on the foot of the reel to keep it in place. See the picture below: reel seat photo Hook Keeper: Also called a Keeper Ring. This little ring is a big convenience, as it gives you a place to hook your hook so you wont impale yourself when your on the move. Butt: This is the thick part of your rod that closest to the handle. Ferrule: If you have a rod that breaks down into 2 pieces or more, the ferrule is the joint where sections of the rod fit together. See below for a close up of what ferrules look like. fishing rod ferrule Butt Guide: This is the guide closest to the handle end of your rod. Its located on the thickest part of the rod (butt), thatâs why the call it the butt guide. Guides: These are the rings you see going all the way down the rod, they "guide" the line down the length of rod to the tip. The number, spacing, and size of the guides depend on the kind of rod you are using. But, generally speaking, the more guides the better. A higher quality rod will have at least one guide for every foot of its length (i.e. 6 foot rod should have at least 6 guides). Windings: Those windings are how the guides get and stay attached to the rod. Itâs basically string that gets wound around the foot of the guide, and is then painted over with a kind of glossy enamel to protect it. See picture below for a close up. fishing rod windings Tip: This is the uppermost part of the rod, the thinnest and most flexible, nearest the tip top. Tip Top: This is the guide at the very tip of your fishing rod, its also the smallest, and probably the most important. This is the guide you are most likely to break off. When you are not watching, it likes to get caught in car doors and the like. See picture below. fishing rod tip Learning new terminology can be a bit of a pain. But, learning this stuff is important: knowing the names and purpose of tackle will help you compare equipment when youâre ready to buy your first fishing outfit, and make it easier to get your questions answered when you need help (because people will know what youâre talking about). Before moving on, there is one more term you may hear about when trying to find the right rod and that term is Action. fishing rod action diagramAction: The action of a rod refers to the flexibility of the rod. The action of a rod describes how much and where a rod bends when its "loaded" (bent). There are three main actions: Fast Action: This type of rod is generally stiff, and most of the bend happens at the tip part of the rod. Medium/Moderate Action: This rod bends a little deeper, so it has flexibility in the tip and in the middle of the rod. Slow Action: This rod is the most flexible, it bends well into the butt end of the rod. The type of action you need depends on what you plan to do with it; what kind of fish you are targeting and what kind of technique you plan to use. \
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
I don't need all that. Fishing for white girls is easy when you're a black guy. They literally throw themselves at black guys and it's only the beginning of it since they don't want the beta, feminine, and small dick white guys anymore.
1 aqouta 2017-12-02
Ha, black guys are so behind the times. Wasting time with white fussy when premium white bussy is what true coneseurs are consuming.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
The stigma of black males-white females is gone so black guys are getting that premium white bussy. Future is bright.
1 aqouta 2017-12-02
No, you're getting rejected gussy. Bussy is not so easy to grow. It's much like veal, we need careful hormone control and even sometimes surgery to achieve peak bussy. Gussy just comes straight from another gussy, ready for plebian consumption.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
Black males ===D~ premium white pussy
1 youpostyoudie 2017-12-02
We all agreed it's called gussy. Don't come at me with that fussy shit.
1 aqouta 2017-12-02
The etymologically correct term is gick, everything else is equally valid slang.
1 godofdae 2017-12-02
Thanks man.
1 S994 2017-12-02
goddamn get with the times. cuckoldry is old news. set up a /u/ProudSoyboy account where you advocate for soy and how it unlocks male capacity to evolve by being in touch with ones feelings, and how the altright is just angry all the time because they're malnourished.
Make sure to occasionally elliptically reference estrogen supplements and childhood psychological abuse, and then just ignore any attempt people make to call back to that.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
Cuckoldry was invented by white men and white men love getting cucked by black guys but it's just the beginning of it. I see more black males with white girls every time I go outside and white girls sucking the superior black cocks.
1 S994 2017-12-02
congratulations?
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
Bruh he said it wasn't funny the first time. God damn you're dumb.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
I wasn't trying to be funny you moron
Get cucked white boy
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
pretending like black people can cuck anything. the centennial cucks ladies and germs.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
Black men cuck white boys like you everyday
Why do you think white girls are jumping on the superior and larger black cocks more and more?
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
The only white girls jumping on black dudes are trashy drug addicts for the regular black man and gold diggers for the sports black man. Lul.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
Keep coping and lying to yourself
1 Greg_the_Goose 2017-12-02
Tomi Lahren: http://archive.is/WDri9
Marion Marechal-Le Pen: http://archive.is/mHYAu
Ann Coulter: http://archive.is/qhauy
Lauren Southern: https://archive.fo/eVfjw
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
Not clicking any of that lul.
1 shallowm 2017-12-02
Holy shit, look at this guy's submission history.
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
He's definitely a fat role playing mayo.
1 DannyLee90 2017-12-02
We attract only the best of the worst.
1 shallowm 2017-12-02
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationalityâadditionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
1 SwankDogsbody 2017-12-02
Cry more about it, you triggered little bitch. Black people have absolutely zero contribution to anything, and they're all over this thread, either shilling hard against this "serious topic" or trolling like the worthless little maggots that they are. I'm simply pointing out that the shitty little assholes are here and screeching in full force.
1 Bbcloved 2017-12-02
Oh the irony. Did you read your post you moron?
I'm going to sleep with more white girls with my superior black cock and cuck inferior white boys like you
1 shallowm 2017-12-02
The elimination of the "white" race is inevitable. In fact, race is, for the most part, a nonsense construct, but the "white" race even moreso. It is clear that there is no explicit, accurate definition for being "white", the phantasm of "race purity" is far from reality and is grounded in nothing but the fantasies of people who think that those that they do not consider "white" are "taking muh womenz" (read: insecurity, as well as misogyny).
In present-day society, the identity of Western countries and their inhabitants are not pegged down by race, but by nationalityâadditionally, you can now see people mixing their origins with their current nationality, an example being so called "hyphenated Americans". These people range from someone holding some aspects of their culture dear to them, to someone who calls themselves so because "my [insert near ancestor] was from [insert foreign country]". Contrary to the European failure at integrating immigrants, the United States has done well with the integration of immigrants, and miscegenation of races will thus be unavoidable, and the delusion of "white purity" will become extinct.
Even in Europe, although they may not have succeeded in integrating their immigrants well (leading to the formation of ghettos such as the ones in Tower Hamlets, London), there will always be a few immigrants who manage to escape from the grasps of these ghettos and integrate within larger society. This leads to race-mixing as well, albeit to a lesser extent, but every bit counts, and every bit helps. Why? When two people of color have children, you can usually see distinct features from both parents present in the child. When a person of color and a white person have a child, the most commonly (and usually only) feature passed down from the white parent is lighter skin (cumskin). This is due to the fact that the genes that lead to the expression of so-called "white" phenotypes, are for the most part, recessive. This facilitates the elimination of "white" features in society.
Furthermore, children who have blood from both a person of color and a white person are forsaken by those who fantasize about the white race being preserved, even though they carry recessive genes from their white parent, genes that could eventually be expressed again. This will also contribute to the demise of the so-called "white race".
Eventually, no person who considers themselves "white" will have so-called "pure" genes. Hence, the white race will have been eliminated by the standards set by the race purists themselves, having led themselves to their own demise.
1 doughboy011 2017-12-02
Mayocide NOW. đđ«
1 Mayo_Macerator 2017-12-02
FOR THE LOVE OF BUSSY, GET THIS KIND HUMAN SOME đ BREAD!
THAT'S 91 MAYOS SPLATTERED ON SANDWICHES, 91 STEPS CLOSER TO COMPLETE MAYOCIDE!
At this rate, the white race will be finished in no time! DO YOUR PART, FOLKS!
1 MrAlphonzo 2017-12-02
See you in the next depression, lads. It'll be even worse, because we have Brexit, ontop of this.
Boy golly if only there was something that could've warned us about this.
Like Reagan trying these cuts in the 80s, which resulted in an economic disaster.
Or Bush trying these cuts in 2001, and, seeing as how most of America seems to be suffering from short term memory loss, caused another economic disaster.
Oh and Kansas just tried practically the exact same tax plan and now the entire state has gone bankrupt and is one billion clams in debt.
Happy holidays from your friendly neighborhood srsposter.
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
Merry Christmas, and Keep Yourself Safe!
1 S994 2017-12-02
are you seriously claiming that tax cuts caused the housing property bubble?
Whatever glue you're sniffing, send me some.
All kansas proves is that tax cuts are not, in themselves, sufficient to sustain an economy. You also need to offer a competitive advantage, which surprise cornland doesn't have.
1 CarlosBeltran 2017-12-02
They had it when taxes were higher you illiterate hillbilly.
1 S994 2017-12-02
CORRELATION = CAUSATION, Q.E.D. TRUMPTARDS
1 S994 2017-12-02
Wow, look at the huge unemployment spike that happened after the 2012 tax cuts!, oh whoops, I was reading it upside down. Unemployment went way down.
1 CarlosBeltran 2017-12-02
Employment has been going up everywhere genius, we were in a recession lol
1 S994 2017-12-02
TAX CUTS RUIN ECONOMIES.
1 CarlosBeltran 2017-12-02
Itâs the red states that take more than they put out. You really think Kansas is driving the economy? lol. Iâm fine with tax cuts though. I like the way they drive conservatives out of office.
1 S994 2017-12-02
You seem to assume that I am for wealth transfer between states, just for my "team." Nah.
We can easily solve a lot of this problem by moving social security and medicare to the state level (going forward for social security) or privatizing them.
Wealth transfer between states, and the financial responsibility incentives it destroys on the state level, is a fundamental problem of taking a tax and spend approach on the federal level. You want less "regressive" policies like Trump's protectionism for dying industries like coal? You think people should just have the guts to move?
Well stop enabling these dying industry life support systems with federal tax and spend which is the biggest regressive policy of all. It's that simple.
1 ZeitgeistNow 2017-12-02
Nigga what, lmao
1 newprofile15 2017-12-02
Lol what a wild overreaction
1 FalmerbloodElixir 2017-12-02
America as we know it, is over. In less than two years, the Republicans, the complacent media, and apathetic voters have burned our country to ashes. We are irrelevant on the global stage. The corporate hogs have consolidated their wealth even further. We always knew, but it is now confirmed, we are worthless. Nothing more than a resource to extract wealth for 1% of the country.
There is no hope for my family. There is no hope for my future.
Even if there is a blue wave in 2018; there's a bomb in this bill set to go off in 2019, and these goddamned pedophile supporting SOUTHERN FUCKS will vote these soulless pieces of filth right the fuck back into office.
1 Gothmog26 2017-12-02
Just a reminder: don't downvote the lolcows.
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-02
People actually believe this shit in [CURRENT YEAR + 2]
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
Go to a betting market and put down 1,000 dollars on a quantifiable future economic prediction. Otherwise, you're the same thing as pizzashill and this retarded linked commenter screaming "we're all gonna diiiie"
1 glmox 2017-12-02
hey /u/FIREMISSIONOVER, here's a news flash, trump is actually not full fascism, and a resistance movement should be calibrated with those terms
1 grungebot5000 2017-12-02
see, it feels right, but i'm not so sure
ever since the GOP went full retard over Emperobama they've been winning every major election where they haven't haven't had to face the man himself.
maybe the trick is, we have to pretend he's a tankie instead of full fash
1 headasplodes 2017-12-02
Lmao they so desperately wish they were oppressed
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2017-12-02
đdonâtđCallđYourselfđOppressedđIfđYouđHaventđBitchedđAboutđItđOnđRedditđ
1 jko831 2017-12-02
u/FIREMISSIONOVER are you a professional chef? That's fucking al dente.
1 jewdanksdad 2017-12-02
For extra hilarity:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1y2w6l/how_can_i_a_28_year_old_overweight_man_with_no
1 allwordsaredust 2017-12-02
3 years ago. I'm guessing he never got into a sport?
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-02
đđđ how did I know ?
1 zeldaisaprude 2017-12-02
Because r/politics banned me for not voting Hillary.
Hey u/FIRECOMMISIONOVER
1 zeldaisaprude 2017-12-02
u/FIREMISSIONOVER
1 ZeitgeistNow 2017-12-02
These dudes have to get off on this shit, there's no other explanation.
This is straight up fetishized faux 'suffering'. This is the ultimate form of virtue signalling. This is the rock bottom of the decline of masculinity.
These types of people would've been used as bait for predators during foraging outings by our ancestors. There's no other use for them.
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2017-12-02
Anyone here would be TBH.
1 habs76 2017-12-02
as opposed to /r/drama posters like us who are the modern man
1 BigLordShiggot 2017-12-02
Sure thing, bro. Here is a resource for you: https://www.teaparty.org
1 nanonan 2017-12-02
Wait, they pay taxes?
1 kingofthehill5 2017-12-02
Just replace trump with modi and southerns with bhakts and i wouldn't have seen the difference between r/politics and r/india
1 Thulean-Dragon 2017-12-02
That one guy declaring himself a volcel, as though it was a choice lmao.
1 Shangbye 2017-12-02
Because a grown ass man can't decide to not have a girlfriend..?
1 trapochaphouse 2017-12-02
u/FIREMISSIONOVER if you could figure out some way to convert your impotent rage into electricity you would never have to worry about providing for your family. That could be your ticket to the 1%.
1 Karma-Means-Nothing 2017-12-02
Wasn't Obamacara originally a "if you wanna know what's in it vote yes for it" initially?
Why are we upset this time around?
1 GoblinVapes 2017-12-02
Because Republicans are Nazis and Democrats are ALWAYS the good guys. ALWAYS.
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-02
This is what people actually believe. Fantastic year.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-02
To my understanding, no. There is a soundbite about it though.
1 RestoreFear 2017-12-02
Pelosi wasn't talking about the literal contents of the ACA bill. It was a shitty way of saying "once it's passed, you'll be able to see exactly how it benefits the country"
1 Obskulum 2017-12-02
No, it was debated thoroughly with numerous concessions to the GOP for nearly a year.
GOP complain it was "shoved down their throat" because as far as legislation goes, it was passed faster than most.
Yet, if we're making genuine comparisons to the ACA and this bill, the ACA wasn't gambling with the health economy by being written the night it was supposed to be voted on.
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-02
It absolutely was shoved down the GOP's through. They had no chance to stop it and their only power was to have the dems make minor concessions
1 TrumpGolfCourse12 2017-12-02
Honestly, America being destroyed is probably best for the world. It's time time for the Chinese to fuck up and get blamed for all the world's problems.
1 Gothmog26 2017-12-02
About time human Extinction started.
1 Chancehighfill1 2017-12-02
I'd love to see their's faces when they realize that China will be 10x worse with their foreign policy and that the US maybe wasn't that bad maybe we where just being drama kweens.
1 grungebot5000 2017-12-02
wouldn't it take like 10 years for anything bad to happen because of this
1 Obskulum 2017-12-02
Kinda depends on how you define bad, I guess?
It's hard to say what happens now because the bill was being written the day it was voted on, so there's a bunch of extra shit that had nothing to do with taxes thrown in there. However, CBO put it as adding to our national deficit by about $1 trillion in a decade, so there's the 'ten years part.'
Stuff like this doesn't have immediate repercussions obviously. It takes time for regulatory bodies to enact these things. For instance, Devos wanting to privatize education doesn't suddenly mean tomorrow all public schools everywhere are now privatized. It also doesn't mean protected reserves in Alaska will be fucked up by drilling.
But, some closer problems could occur. Since the mandate for the ACA is gone - assuming the bill goes through house - this could cause sudden, economic harm. If millions of healthy people pull out of their plans because they don't need/want it, that cost might get offloaded to everyone else. Those people can't afford the premium hike and then we get some real economic fallout.
Anyway, it's exceptionally frustrating to see people give up at this point. Midterms are less than a year away, and less than a year isn't much time for political policies to mobilize completely. If they want to stop being apathetic about it, they need to vote in midterms.
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-02
That's less than 10% of the national debt size. Which, accumulating over 10 years, is less than the historical rate of inflation per year.
The way you stated this it would make no difference because at the end of the decade it only added more of less valuable money, so the effective amount in 2017 dollars wouldn't change.
1 Obskulum 2017-12-02
I'm no economic expert, only quoting what the CBO initial analysis was (1.4 trillion to the deficit to be more accurate). I also don't know if that's the version of the senate bill that was pre-amendments. Regardless, I can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be, which even by what the CBO has reported, will appear over the course of years.
And really that just drives the point home for me - much of this will take a long time to start showing any impact, and it's hard for me to imagine the bill going completely unchallenged in the coming year. So, yeah, political apathy is useless.
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-02
You shouldn't be throwing around politically divisive numbers if you admittedly don't know what they really mean or the context to apply them. $1.4 Trillion is actually about 7.5% of our current national debt. If we only add that much in a decade that's worth it when contrasted with the expected rate of inflation of 10%. We have an effective reduction of about 2.5%. This is quite simplified, I admit, but the premise should still stand out in your mind and if it doesn't I think you have some perspective limiting bias against the GOP.
So you can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be but at the same time you know they're going to hurt people and it's the GOP's fault? Do you see the problem with that line of thinking?
Like I already pointed out adding 7.5% to the debt over a decade is actually a better position than what we're in now, and we're not currently hacking social safety nets. I'm not saying this is how it will work because I haven't really looked into the CBO projections lately and don't exactly know what the $1.4 trillion is in reference to. But as the info currently stands as we both understand it there seems to be a slight net positive with this tax bill. You're charging forward with the idea GOP = bad a little too quickly and I think you should rethink some of your opinions.
1 Obskulum 2017-12-02
I was addressing the poster above about what could be construed as bad in ten years, considering what the CBO analysis revealed. I don't see what's divisive about that.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/11/the-cbo-just-released-its-analysis-of-the-senate-tax-bill/ If you look at the bottom
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/362905-cbo-senate-tax-bill-increases-deficit-by-14-trillion
Both report 1.4 trillion deficit so that's where I got it from.
The GOP rushed through a tax cut bill on the night it was to be voted. It was literally being written and having amendments added to it prior to its voting. The process was inclusive, shut out from comment by Democratic senators. That, in itself, should set red flags.
But no, I don't see the problem with this logic. GOP tax senate bill gets passed, goes to house to pass, and directly affects people. Because it's their bill. So when people are inevitably hurt by a GOP tax bill the GOP wrote that was passed by a GOP House/Senate majority, yeah, I can lay the blame at the GOP.
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-02
It's politically divisive if you don't explain how this figure works in context with inflation.
*that would be "exclusive" if the other party is shut out...not inclusive.
Why would anyone care what the obstructionist party says when they knew they had the 51 votes needed? They would just stall and sabotage. It's not red flags at all, it's politics. I voted for one party, I don't care what the other party thinks. Not a single senate republican voted for Obamacare. Don't act like exclusivity suddenly matters to the democrats.
So people will inevitably be hurt by the GOP tax bill even though you "can't possibly forsee what kind of economic consequences there will be". There's a problem with that logic. you can't say they will be hurt if you admit you don't know what it's going to do. I know you'll blame the GOP for anything, that's not what I was talking about. I was originally saying
That link is literally just pointing out what the law says but you claim it's showing how it will directly hurt them? Please. There's one single sentence in that whole article where they actually suggest something will hurt them through their own analyzing. Go back and find it yourself and then link me their follow up studies if you want to prove anything to me. I'm asking you to find it yourself because I can almost guarantee you can't tell the difference between what they are actually saying and the tangential, biased opinions you get by "reading into" it.
1 its_jebs_turn 2017-12-02
Mayocide now
1 Mayo_Macerator 2017-12-02
FOR THE LOVE OF BUSSY, GET THIS KIND HUMAN SOME đ BREAD!
THAT'S 92 MAYOS SPLATTERED ON SANDWICHES, 92 STEPS CLOSER TO COMPLETE MAYOCIDE!
At this rate, the white race will be finished in no time! DO YOUR PART, FOLKS!
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-02
didn't pay attention to the sub in my inbox. I should en hero myself for this.
1 wisty 2017-12-02
According to his post history /u/FIREMISSIONOVER/ was like 22 by the end of the Bush administration.
His earliest political memories were the Clinton impeachment proceedings. He got into middle school in the wake of the Columbine shooting. He was an impressionable teenager when the Twin Towers fell. He watched his country march into the quagmire of Iraq and Afghanistan. He watched Hurricane Katrina devastate New Orleans. He watched the financial system crumble as he was searching for post-grad jobs. He watched Congress do its damnedest to screw up the economic recovery, as the EU turned into a dumpster fire, and then the world economy gradually recover. He watched ISIS rise and fall.
Now I'm not saying Trump's great. But Trump has accomplished basically nothing since being elected. And the world is the best it's been for about 16 years. Not great, but better. And he's bitching about a guy who is unable to change the status quo.
1 Trapsarntgay1 2017-12-02
/u/FIREMISSIONOVER your tears make it all worthwhile
1 Gothmog26 2017-12-02
The salt must flow!
1 MG87 2017-12-02
Bitch please, this is a shitty tax bill but it's not the end of the USA. Fucking vote next November, instead of being a pussy.
1 Obskulum 2017-12-02
Most probably don't understand that policies don't happen overnight. It actually boggles my mind.
I mean, if Democrats got majority next Midterm, what's to stop them from creating their own insane tax bill with a bunch of amendments that contradicts everything about this one? No one wants to think long term.
1 ReallyConfusedMurray 2017-12-02
Dems won't gain a majority in both chambers though, so that's kind of a moot point
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-02
NASA just generated a new job, tracking my sides -- they're in fucking ORBIT
1 tilmoph 2017-12-02
16 year olds shouldn't be having kids anyway.
1 SperglockHolmes 2017-12-02
/u/FIREMISSIONOVER
Move or kys.
1 BeNiceStopAgitating 2017-12-02
Sweet I'll get a pretty good turn out of this tax deal apparently.
Also CRUZ amendment is great now I can better support my local catholic school instead of the public marxists one
1 LSU_Coonass 2017-12-02
This, but unironically
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-02
I love how people in the upper bracket are automatically evil. Like they're not allowed to vote in their own interests.
1 BeNiceStopAgitating 2017-12-02
Well they always say vote your class interests
1 PM_ME_HAIRLESS_CATS 2017-12-02
People in /r/Drama are ignoring this tax bill defines birth at conception, and allows churches to promote candidates. This isn't a tax bill, its a bundle of fascist dreams.
And I for one, am not going to continue to stay here and watch this community ignore its quest for bussy and irony be absorbed by T_D shitposters and the ignorant. This sub has lost its way with the subscribers its gained. I'm leaving.
1 becauseiliketoupvote 2017-12-02
Bye.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
/u/dafez7
Even politics subscribers are saying you're out of your mind.
Isn't that a good point to stop and go outside for a while?
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Huh? Just a few desperate Trump supporters trying to defend a horrible tax bill. Hope you enjoy the breadcrumbs you get from your billionaire overlord; good luck selling those cars!
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-02
Jesus how do you people exist
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Anger at seeing people continually vote against their own interests and watching them cheer along while theyâre being robbed.
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-02
You're aware there is an upper tax bracket right? Are those people not allowed to vote in their own interests?
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Yeah, but Iâm not referring to the upper tax bracket. Also, not everyone in the higher brackets supports Trump or this incredibly faulty tax bill.
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Most economists speak freely about how the bill is crap. Itâs bad - end of story.
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
I'm sure
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Sorry, your âdaddyâ delivered you a shit sandwich http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/tax-reform-2
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
The first question asks if GDP will "substantially grow." Is anything short of "substantial GDP growth" a bad plan that destroys the economy like you seem to think it is?
Did you read what the economists actually said? Most of them say "won't change much." Some of them say there will be a marginal gdp growth. How would a no growth/low growth GDP result (assuming of course we can trust the predictions of economists) from this tax bill be a "shit sandwich"?
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Growing wealth inequality, blowing a hole in the deficit, gutting healthcare, getting rid of student tax breaks etc. to give tax breaks to corporations for little to no âgrowthâ is a shit sandwich, especially if that growth doesnât accrue to the middle class.
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
Let's recap:
You said "most economists speak freely about how the bill is crap."
I asked you to substantiate that
You sent me a poll of economists, the result of which is that most economists don't expect the GDP to grow "substantially."
I questioned why economists who don't think much will change (or will marginally change) supports your thesis that "economists speak freely about how the bill is crap."
You editorialize, send me a Vox link about the exact same poll, adding their editorializing over the top of it.
Is this autism or slowness?
1 dafez7 2017-12-02
Dude, going by your posts youâre the autist.
If a bill blows a 1 trillion dollar hole in the deficit and has no substantial growth benefits with lots of negatives, itâs crap.
Take it from a noble prize winning economist:
âNothing in the bill suggests it will increase growth,â said Richard Thaler, the University of Chicago professor who last month won the Nobel Prize in economics. âCorporate profits are already high and they are sitting on piles of cash. Why should we think they have profitable investments that they are not doing now but would do if the tax were lower?â
God you trump voters will defend anything. Thank god trumps approval is tanking.
1 jaredschaffer27 2017-12-02
Hey man, autism speaks. It's time to listen.
Says the resident /r/drama economist.
I will absolutely not defend his stance on climbing change and its effect upon our Earth and rock walls.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
/u/maaseru
Wasn't it the hurricane that destroyed the PR economy?
Do you think $150B in relief just grows on trees when you already owe $100B?
1 maaseru 2017-12-02
Well when put a 20% import tax bevause we are considered foreign.
Well that adds a lot on top. Over 70 pharmaceutical companies in the island will provably leave.
Over 250k jobs they produce.
So where do we stand on top of all the debt we had and the debt added by the hurricane.
I call that kicking us while we are down so that the GOO cronies can get richer.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
Citations needed.
But apparently you're the new rust belt.
Don't worry, coastal liberals will say that if you aren't competitive you should be left to rot.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
/u/never_a_novelty
Only if you want them to know you aren't a serious candidate.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
/u/OliverQ27
Which CEOs? Can you name some?
1 OliverQ27 2017-12-02
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-29/trump-s-tax-promises-undercut-by-ceo-plans-to-reward-investors
Major companies including Cisco Systems Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Coca-Cola Co. say theyâll turn over most gains from proposed corporate tax cuts to their shareholders, undercutting President Donald Trumpâs promise that his plan will create jobs and boost wages for the middle class.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
1 OliverQ27 2017-12-02
You do realize this isn't the first time they've done this nonsense? Trickle-down economics is a proven lie. Giving massive tax cuts to the rich and corporations has never boosted the economy or improved the middle-class.
1 cuteman 2017-12-02
/u/Big_dick_america
You're the kind of person who posts this shit on Facebook only to receive zero comments and two likes from people who also enjoy BS hyperbole, aren't you?
1 49813165465798412565 2017-12-02
Stage 4 Trump Derangement Syndrome
1 BeNiceStopAgitating 2017-12-02
*notices more of my money in my account *
OWO what's this
1 ModerateThuggery 2017-12-02
Who the fuck reads /r/politics? Like literally who? I spend unseemly amounts of hours on the Internet doing jack shit and I still couldn't stand to burn a second of my worthless time reading r/politics let alone posting on it.
1 Ranilen 2017-12-02
1 Mexagon 2017-12-02
Lol oh buddy the left and their pedo army is projecting again.