Is everyone too retarded to read the article they're referring to where cops forced a kid to masturbate in front of them? People are acting like the tweet suggests the answer could be yes. I guess Reddit isn't the only place people base their opinion of something on the tingles they get when they read a headline.
Right, but that's because they're the police. Actual human beings with brains and morals should react to that headline by saying, "Holy shit, the police have gone too far this time," not, "OMG the person tweeting is advocating for rape, time to post an image to signal my virtues in the most preadolescent (heh) manner possible!"
Should police should have the right to force children to masturbate in front of them so they can take photos? What if it's part of a legal investigation?
Lmao imagine being so humorless that not only do you not understand certain types of humor, but you actively seek and destroy humor elsewhere that you don't understand. src
Should police should have the right to force children to masturbate in front of them so they can take photos? What if it's part of a legal investigation?
17 comments
14 starship_litterbox 2017-12-23
Is everyone too retarded to read the article they're referring to where cops forced a kid to masturbate in front of them? People are acting like the tweet suggests the answer could be yes. I guess Reddit isn't the only place people base their opinion of something on the tingles they get when they read a headline.
6 UmmahSultan 2017-12-23
According to the official policy of some police department somewhere (obviously I'm not going to read the article), the answer is and must be yes.
7 starship_litterbox 2017-12-23
Right, but that's because they're the police. Actual human beings with brains and morals should react to that headline by saying, "Holy shit, the police have gone too far this time," not, "OMG the person tweeting is advocating for rape, time to post an image to signal my virtues in the most preadolescent (heh) manner possible!"
1 Thestateyest 2017-12-23
(That’s the joke)
1 Korn_Bread 2017-12-23
Then the headline shouldn’t be a question lmao
7 starship_litterbox 2017-12-23
Is a rhetorical mechanic you fool
5 DoctorMort 2017-12-23
I think the only reason it's a question is because the answer is so obviously "no."
9 Fucking_Christ 2017-12-23
the article literally disagrees with what did police did u fukin mong
5 Matues49 2017-12-23
Nuke Americanistan
5 maybeifiwerestronger 2017-12-23
op is a low IQ degenerate.
5 UnexpectedLizard 2017-12-23
Libertarians are staunchly anti-state and anti-cop. They are implying the answer is "no," you illiterate twats.
2 SnapshillBot 2017-12-23
Lmao imagine being so humorless that not only do you not understand certain types of humor, but you actively seek and destroy humor elsewhere that you don't understand. src
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
2 Chronicopia420 2017-12-23
Only libertarians take themselves seriously
3 lewildcard 2017-12-23
no libertarians wouldn't want police involvement because they're for less government. feel the bern idiot
1 Morgoff 2017-12-23
The case of the wanking kid?
1 Chicup 2017-12-23
At least you can call u/xbettel a faggot and be factually correct.
1 xbettel 2017-12-23
You would have to be one to check.