I love how selective people are in throwing out the "there's no evidence for it" argument about ancient history. There's "no evidence" for 99% of Greek history. It's all just stuff that was written in books, so do we have to throw that out too?
In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called original source or evidence) is an artifact, a document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, a recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic. Similar definitions can be used in library science, and other areas of scholarship, although different fields have somewhat different definitions. In journalism, a primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation, or a document written by such a person.
Wow. You managed two kinds of retardation at once. First, failing at reading comprehension and completely missing my point. Second, imagining that there are primary sources for all of Greek history.
source of information that was created at the time under study
So there's no evidence on Greek history before Herodotus' own lifetime?
14 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2017-12-26
I can take a 9-inch dildo up my butt, because I'm an adult and I solve my own problems
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Redactor0 2017-12-26
I love how selective people are in throwing out the "there's no evidence for it" argument about ancient history. There's "no evidence" for 99% of Greek history. It's all just stuff that was written in books, so do we have to throw that out too?
1 BornIn1142 2017-12-26
Huh? Written records are evidence.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2017-12-26
Which can be forged. Just saying ¯\_(ツ) _/¯
1 Redactor0 2017-12-26
That's my point. If we accept written records from Greek sources as evidence, we can't just completely ignore written records from other cultures.
1 TheEquimanthorn 2017-12-26
Did your parents forget to get your monthly subscription of anti-retardation pills in all the excitement of Christmas?
1 WikiTextBot 2017-12-26
Primary source
In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called original source or evidence) is an artifact, a document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, a recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic. Similar definitions can be used in library science, and other areas of scholarship, although different fields have somewhat different definitions. In journalism, a primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation, or a document written by such a person.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
1 Protect_Me 2017-12-26
!isretard Redactor0
1 perry_cohen 2017-12-26
I am 100.00% sure that Redactor0 is not a retard.
I am a Neural Network being trained to detect retards | Summon me with
!isretard <username>
| Optout | Feedback: /r/RetardBotDetection | GitHub1 Redactor0 2017-12-26
Good bot. 😘
1 fuckyourcontext 2017-12-26
!isretard fuckyourcontext
1 Redactor0 2017-12-26
Wow. You managed two kinds of retardation at once. First, failing at reading comprehension and completely missing my point. Second, imagining that there are primary sources for all of Greek history.
So there's no evidence on Greek history before Herodotus' own lifetime?
1 Protect_Me 2017-12-26
You sound triggered but I don't care enough to figure out why
1 justanotherusername_ 2017-12-26
Nah just running with a theme
1 C1de 2017-12-26
OP is a baby.