Do we have dramanouts from India? I would lije to hear their opinion about dear old Winston.
Because, you know: Bengal famine, using chemical weapons on tribes, a contraversional opinion on Jews, white supremacy, eugenics - that's all on dear Winston...that and also Katyn cover-up.
Which, I mean, he was, but there's some interesting mental gymnastics at play for those vote totals to shake out. They gotta make sure to criticize Trump but then downvote anyone saying Churchill sucks while also upvoting people saying Churchill sucks.
Does the sub do anything other than just be anti-Trump?
Churchill was actually way, way, way worse than Trump. Hell, he was a paranoid fool about fifty different things, that weren't Nazis. He just happened to get the Nazi thing right. Shit, his own country threw him out of office pretty quick after Hitler, because that was pretty much the only thing he was ever right about.
Churchill is pretty universally hated here. First, if you are Bengali like me, you would be rooting for the Axis since we had our own version of Mannerheim, Bose. Then, there's the entire part about refusing food aid from Canada, Australia and Japanese Burma that points to actual malice instead of simple mismanagement.
Overall though I'd say those years weren't that bad. We had our own government, however weak. If the bloody Muzzies hadn't started Muzzing, 20th century would probably be the best century in India since the 11th.
I love how the guardian puts this quote by wilson in its article
*I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. *
But shockingly omits the rest of his quote:
The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.
am Indian, can confirm that my family is left leaning and dislikes Trump, but hates Churchill like 1000 times more. seriously i don't know when Churchill became a hero to the left bc he's a complete shithead
He's never been, which is the main source of drama in that thread. Someone pointed out that usually these exact same people that are getting outrage that Trump could be compared to Churchill also fucking hate Churchill, so most of the thread is pretty disingenuous.
A: "Hahaha Trump isn't half the warrior or patriot that Churchill was, what a dipshit!"
B: "Yeah but don't you guys also hate Churchill as a war criminal and shit. Why are you upvoting this anyway?"
The whole Churchill vs Trump comparison begins and ends at " Churchill fought FOR his country".
Huh.
To be clear, Trump stands with Nazis.
Ok.
No no no, Churchill stood unequivocally against the Nazis.
Trump is no Churchill.
DAE Trump is hitler?
No, that's offensive.
When the time to serve his country came Hitler didn't pretend to have bone spurs and spent the war banging hookers. Hitler was an accomplished speaker, experienced politician, and he came from a blue collar background. Trump is no Hitler.
These people seriously need to step outside and get some sunshine before the Rage stroke causes them to bleed to death in' dem cancer filled brains.
Churchill appreciated Hitler as a man and had pretty clear fascist sympathies. These morons would call Shias Islamophobes because they stood against Sunnis.
I remember the election when everyone was like "it'll all be forgotten by Christmas". Nah. We fully descended to some entirety new worldwide level of actual downs syndrome all because the burgers got a meme leader.
But saying "Some people will say Churchill wasn't so great" is something people are arguing against? I'm not even sure how that makes sense, like logically and consistently.
And finally, Hitler was better than Trump? I honestly didn't know that sub was reaching TrollX/Ghazi/LSC levels of insanity but I guess anything is possible in Trump's America after all.
I don't even know who to ping to hear a weird, rambling non-answer.
Whoever breaks the circlejerk gets punished and downvoted. You can explain why that comment is actually reasonable and be upvoted, but you can't be the one that breaks it.
You could make a flowchart about it. Could criticizing (or saying other people will criticize) Churchill be construed as defending Trump? If yes, downvote. If no, the thread doesn't have anything to do with Trump, upvote.
A simpler explanation other than hordes of zealous liberal serious-posters is that the company called Shareblue emoloys people to manipulate narratives on social media websites.
Can you explain how "Hitler was better than Trump" was upvoted but "People on the left hate Churchill, so it's weird you guys are praising him" was downvoted?
Or is this really just about using any means to attack Trump? Cause that's...weird.
What in God's name makes you think I know anything about politics or history or whatever r/theoryofreddit shit about voting behaviors it sounds like you're asking me about right now? Have you SEEN my post history? I'm amazed people let me drive.
reddits been a trash heap since trump got elected. i left the site two years before trumps election, and the salt was from here was wafting across the internet so hard i came back around nov/dec 2016
so i saw the place well before trump, took a big ol break and came back right after trump, and the difference is yuuuuge
the left has been soiling their panties harder over trump than anything ive seen in my lifetime. its glorious
Not just the left. Mostly it's the pro-free-trade elite and the media organs they control, using the left as cover (hoping that conservatives will blame them, instead of Republican party leaders. Judging by conservative media, it's not working very well. Turns out you're not limited to hating one person at a time). That's why you've got weasel-men like Joe Scarborough (R-Dead Intern) shilling against Trump.
They aren't wrong, though. It is literally slavery. And if women can't be forced to even bring a baby they fucked into existence to term, then why the fuck should men be forced to kill and die?
So the men drafted to protect this country during WW2 were slaves? Look I might not agree with every institution of the draft in history but I'm certainly not going to compare it to slavery because the two things are completely different.
And if women can't be forced to even bring a baby they fucked into existence to term
Sounds like you are pretty angry at women. I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark here and say your comment history is cancer. I won't even bother checking because I've developed a sixth sense for this type of cancer and can literally smell it on you through the computer monitor.
and to add insult to injury, they were only having to enslave men to fight the war because it was such a fucking bungled mess of a conflict to begin with
What are you on about? The country had a draft for like two centuries. Blaming anything on England two centuries after the fact is a bit absurd. It also isn't slavery. Using that logic could lead to taxation is slavery next.
forcing innocent people to serve you is the definition of slavery. you might argue that the ends justify the means, but there is no mistaking what those means are
Serve "you" and who is you? The country is fighting collectively. People are forced into working and giving up their wages. That is slavery too according to your logic.
War is a part of a country. Just the way it works. The bodies get sourced collectively from citizens.
Slaves aren't done for short term either. This conversation is ridiculous.
thats the same arguments levied in defense of forcing negroes into the fields. the economy is a tightly interconnected, collective effort. their labor is needed to feed the nation, and to fuel its industries with raw materials
with this forced labor the country can be fed, clothes can be put on our backs, and taxes can be levied on the imports/exports to provide for common services- transportation, national defense, etc
and since all this effort goes toward the collective benefit of the nation, its not really slavery at all. its happy-funtime-compulsory-labor
Every country used to use slaves, too, though. Many still do today.
If the government can't make abortion illegal because of a woman's sacred bodily autonomy, I don't get how the fuck it's acceptable to force men into war.
For the sake of unending back and forths in the comments I'm just going to pm. You actually didn't make any point, you started by trying to defend the indefensible, then flopped over to whining about not getting any funnies from the comments. Looking at your post history it seems like you're no stranger to people just telling you to shut the fuck up. But, I'm sure you justify all the hate you get as "my political and social opinions are just ahead of the buck" when in reality you don't even know what you stand for yourself. How many people have to take time out of their day to tell you that you need to rethink a lot of your ideological ideals for you to start thinking that maybe the problem is with you. I've officially wasted more time on you than I would have liked to, so I won't be participating in this conversation anymore.
How many people have to take time out of their day to tell you that you need to rethink a lot of your ideological ideals for you to start thinking that maybe the problem is with you.
I think the responses to that comment are about as "same" as any comparison can be without using the literal same exact words. In both instances, they're so excited to yell about Trump that they ignore what they actually believe in order to "GET 'EM".
i dont blame any person for that. forcing somebody is fight in a war is a crime against humanity imo.
Is about as reddit idealist/"fuck you dad, you can't tell me what to do" (no offense) as you can get. But if it doesn't attack Trump? That's a downvotin'.
The only thing getting sucked out of me is my hope for humanity, knowing I share a species with the likes of you. Your existence should be considered a war crime.
hmm churchill yes a leader with such venerable quotes and actions that truly represent peak social justice such as:
I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place
I am strongly in favour of using poisonous gas against uncivilised tribes
or that one time while india was having a famine he shiped 170'000 tons of food from australia to be put into storage in britan and allowing 3'000'000 people to starved to death, people who churchill said had it coming for "breeding like rabbits"
112 comments
1 neveryousay3 2017-12-27
Do we have dramanouts from India? I would lije to hear their opinion about dear old Winston.
Because, you know: Bengal famine, using chemical weapons on tribes, a contraversional opinion on Jews, white supremacy, eugenics - that's all on dear Winston...that and also Katyn cover-up.
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
Still better than Trump!
Which, I mean, he was, but there's some interesting mental gymnastics at play for those vote totals to shake out. They gotta make sure to criticize Trump but then downvote anyone saying Churchill sucks while also upvoting people saying Churchill sucks.
Does the sub do anything other than just be anti-Trump?
1 Baconlightning 2017-12-27
No, which I exploited for karma
1 still_futile 2017-12-27
Eh, that's fair
1 Chancellor740 2017-12-27
No, it's also anti-humor.
1 neveryousay3 2017-12-27
Well, a brick would be a better president than Trump, my point still stands - no major political leader was ever without sin.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
Yes. They also delete conservative posts for no reason other than conveying the wrong message
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
no one knew or had even heard of that sub before trump. they owe their existence to him
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-12-27
Churchill was actually way, way, way worse than Trump. Hell, he was a paranoid fool about fifty different things, that weren't Nazis. He just happened to get the Nazi thing right. Shit, his own country threw him out of office pretty quick after Hitler, because that was pretty much the only thing he was ever right about.
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2017-12-27
Churchill is pretty universally hated here. First, if you are Bengali like me, you would be rooting for the Axis since we had our own version of Mannerheim, Bose. Then, there's the entire part about refusing food aid from Canada, Australia and Japanese Burma that points to actual malice instead of simple mismanagement.
Overall though I'd say those years weren't that bad. We had our own government, however weak. If the bloody Muzzies hadn't started Muzzing, 20th century would probably be the best century in India since the 11th.
1 kissedlordeonce 2017-12-27
Didnt churchill want to use weapons on tribes that specifically would be the least damaging?
1 neveryousay3 2017-12-27
https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2013/sep/01/winston-churchill-shocking-use-chemical-weapons
Maybe this wil help.
1 kissedlordeonce 2017-12-27
I love how the guardian puts this quote by wilson in its article
*I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. *
But shockingly omits the rest of his quote:
The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.
1 lincoln1222 2017-12-27
am Indian, can confirm that my family is left leaning and dislikes Trump, but hates Churchill like 1000 times more. seriously i don't know when Churchill became a hero to the left bc he's a complete shithead
1 lmao_how_old_are_you 2017-12-27
He's never been, which is the main source of drama in that thread. Someone pointed out that usually these exact same people that are getting outrage that Trump could be compared to Churchill also fucking hate Churchill, so most of the thread is pretty disingenuous.
A: "Hahaha Trump isn't half the warrior or patriot that Churchill was, what a dipshit!"
B: "Yeah but don't you guys also hate Churchill as a war criminal and shit. Why are you upvoting this anyway?"
Followed by a flurry of downvotes.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
Virtue signalling is cominv to a head
1 Unkill_is_dill 2017-12-27
Winston is pretty hated over here. But then again, he has been dead for a while. So nobody minds him.
1 Neon_needles 2017-12-27
Huh.
Ok.
Trump is no Churchill.
When the time to serve his country came Hitler didn't pretend to have bone spurs and spent the war banging hookers. Hitler was an accomplished speaker, experienced politician, and he came from a blue collar background. Trump is no Hitler.
These people seriously need to step outside and get some sunshine before the Rage stroke causes them to bleed to death in' dem cancer filled brains.
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-27
Churchill also was a white supremacist. It's why it's important for people to know why nazism doesn't equal white supremacism.
BUt this is Political "humor" we're talking about.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
DAE DRUMPF IS AN ORANGE SUPREMACIST LMAO
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-27
Don't use DAE ever again, capiche
1 Halfcastebastard 2017-12-27
Everything but capiche
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
To the front page! Gold for you, le kind gentlesir! Doin gods work son!
1 YouGuysAreNazisMan 2017-12-27
You could make a dank meme out of this.
Anybody: "drumpf"
/r/politicalhumor: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv9-ojhWAAAsa3c.jpg
1 ThenTheGorursArrived 2017-12-27
Churchill appreciated Hitler as a man and had pretty clear fascist sympathies. These morons would call Shias Islamophobes because they stood against Sunnis.
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-27
Trump has completely broken people's brains lmao.
1 Chicup 2017-12-27
I think Trump just showed the defect that was already there.
1 Thhueros 2017-12-27
Idk, I'm pretty sure that the industrial murder of homosexuals, socialists, Slavs, Jews, and Roma is roughly equivalent to insensitive remarks.
1 SPAMRAAM_ 2017-12-27
Stop dog whistling Himmler.
1 Ultrashitpost 2017-12-27
Fuck you, nazi!
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
Literally exactly the same as tax cuts, for sure
1 SPAMRAAM_ 2017-12-27
I remember the election when everyone was like "it'll all be forgotten by Christmas". Nah. We fully descended to some entirety new worldwide level of actual downs syndrome all because the burgers got a meme leader.
1 cuteman 2017-12-27
Ehhh, it would seem that many of these people were barely functioning to begin with
1 SPAMRAAM_ 2017-12-27
Can't go wrong with a bit of postmodern natural selection.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
"I hate Trump because he is a literal Nazi but at least the Nazis weren't so bad" HAHAHA leftoids be trippin
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
So Churchill was better than Trump. Okay.
But Churchill wasn't so great. Okay.
But saying "Some people will say Churchill wasn't so great" is something people are arguing against? I'm not even sure how that makes sense, like logically and consistently.
And finally, Hitler was better than Trump? I honestly didn't know that sub was reaching TrollX/Ghazi/LSC levels of insanity but I guess anything is possible in Trump's America after all.
I don't even know who to ping to hear a weird, rambling non-answer.
1 LoudGoatsfoot 2017-12-27
Whoever breaks the circlejerk gets punished and downvoted. You can explain why that comment is actually reasonable and be upvoted, but you can't be the one that breaks it.
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
You could make a flowchart about it. Could criticizing (or saying other people will criticize) Churchill be construed as defending Trump? If yes, downvote. If no, the thread doesn't have anything to do with Trump, upvote.
1 LoudGoatsfoot 2017-12-27
/r/politicalhumor flowchart:
1) Is it funny?
If yes - downvote
If no go to step two.
2) Does it attack Trump
If yes - upvote
If no - downvote
3) Is it completely retarded
If yes - upvote
If no - can't happen because everything posted to /r/politicalhumor is literally retarded.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
A simpler explanation other than hordes of zealous liberal serious-posters is that the company called Shareblue emoloys people to manipulate narratives on social media websites.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
Try /u/42words. It's their favorite sub ever
1 42words 2017-12-27
Huh, weird. I was just talking about you, too. ❤️
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
Can you explain how "Hitler was better than Trump" was upvoted but "People on the left hate Churchill, so it's weird you guys are praising him" was downvoted?
Or is this really just about using any means to attack Trump? Cause that's...weird.
1 42words 2017-12-27
What in God's name makes you think I know anything about politics or history or whatever r/theoryofreddit shit about voting behaviors it sounds like you're asking me about right now? Have you SEEN my post history? I'm amazed people let me drive.
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
A simple no would suffice.
1 42words 2017-12-27
Then username summon /u/ASimpleNo next time.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
reddits been a trash heap since trump got elected. i left the site two years before trumps election, and the salt was from here was wafting across the internet so hard i came back around nov/dec 2016
so i saw the place well before trump, took a big ol break and came back right after trump, and the difference is yuuuuge
the left has been soiling their panties harder over trump than anything ive seen in my lifetime. its glorious
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-12-27
Not just the left. Mostly it's the pro-free-trade elite and the media organs they control, using the left as cover (hoping that conservatives will blame them, instead of Republican party leaders. Judging by conservative media, it's not working very well. Turns out you're not limited to hating one person at a time). That's why you've got weasel-men like Joe Scarborough (R-Dead Intern) shilling against Trump.
1 Tell_them_to_shrug 2017-12-27
Morning Joe has been regarded as a RINO since at least 2004. John McCain had a similar reputation when he ran against Barry.
Red tribalism tends to be fairly weak at the level of actual power. Not nearly as cohesive as with the blues.
1 nqtbty 2017-12-27
At least Hitler built roads. What does Trump build?
1 casualrocket 2017-12-27
That sub is cancer so bad it has become Nega Cancer that still gives you cancer. i stated there that
"i dont blame anybody that flees a draft, nobody should be forced to go to war"
it got downvoted
1 bostonbob1987 2017-12-27
Yeah. The term "draft dodger" is like calling a slave who used the underground railroad a pussy.
Forcing someone to fight in a war against their will is slavery.
1 MG87 2017-12-27
Wew fucking lad
1 NovaDose 2017-12-27
Is it bad form to link a comment in /r/drama to a comment in /r/drama because ho-lee-shit son...
1 vodrin 2017-12-27
Especially for fucking Vietnam.
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-12-27
They aren't wrong, though. It is literally slavery. And if women can't be forced to even bring a baby they fucked into existence to term, then why the fuck should men be forced to kill and die?
1 NovaDose 2017-12-27
So the men drafted to protect this country during WW2 were slaves? Look I might not agree with every institution of the draft in history but I'm certainly not going to compare it to slavery because the two things are completely different.
Sounds like you are pretty angry at women. I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark here and say your comment history is cancer. I won't even bother checking because I've developed a sixth sense for this type of cancer and can literally smell it on you through the computer monitor.
1 morerokk 2017-12-27
Yes, for the most part. Even if the draft was for the greater good.
1 NovaDose 2017-12-27
til being conscripted to defend your country and possibly life = working against your will for someone's profit and personal gain
1 cheers_grills 2017-12-27
Slave dodger
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
and to add insult to injury, they were only having to enslave men to fight the war because it was such a fucking bungled mess of a conflict to begin with
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
WWII used a draft. Like every war for most of history used a draft in the USA. Many countries still use it today.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
i know its been common for millennia. i also know the englishmen who founded our country specifically avoided it on matters of principle
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
What are you on about? The country had a draft for like two centuries. Blaming anything on England two centuries after the fact is a bit absurd. It also isn't slavery. Using that logic could lead to taxation is slavery next.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
forcing innocent people to serve you is the definition of slavery. you might argue that the ends justify the means, but there is no mistaking what those means are
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
Serve "you" and who is you? The country is fighting collectively. People are forced into working and giving up their wages. That is slavery too according to your logic.
War is a part of a country. Just the way it works. The bodies get sourced collectively from citizens.
Slaves aren't done for short term either. This conversation is ridiculous.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
thats the same arguments levied in defense of forcing negroes into the fields. the economy is a tightly interconnected, collective effort. their labor is needed to feed the nation, and to fuel its industries with raw materials
with this forced labor the country can be fed, clothes can be put on our backs, and taxes can be levied on the imports/exports to provide for common services- transportation, national defense, etc
and since all this effort goes toward the collective benefit of the nation, its not really slavery at all. its happy-funtime-compulsory-labor
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
Stop being retarded. No country needs cotton to survive. It also doesn't benefit the country as a whole and the profits go to only private citizens.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
cotton was a lot more important to the health of this nation than a war fought in swampy jungles thousands of miles away was, so whats your point?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
No
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
cotton was a gain for the nation, vietnam was loss
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
Draft was not exclusive to Vietnam. Cotton still can be farmed without slavery.
1 wolfsktaag 2017-12-27
irrelevant. if value to the country determines if something is slavery or not, then negroes in the fields werent slaves and vietnam infantry boys were
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-12-27
Every country used to use slaves, too, though. Many still do today.
If the government can't make abortion illegal because of a woman's sacred bodily autonomy, I don't get how the fuck it's acceptable to force men into war.
1 glmox 2017-12-27
lol they got so mad at /u/CirqueDuFuder holy shit
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
You got to at least link it.
1 wwaalleess 2017-12-27
I upvoted you because you seem nice.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
I just found all of this very pleasant and warm
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
I got a PM.
1 glmox 2017-12-27
hahahaha this is amazing
1 CirqueDuFuder 2017-12-27
I only really went there and was asking where the jokes are at and why everyone is so angry all the time.
1 elsiedeez 2017-12-27
I think the responses to that comment are about as "same" as any comparison can be without using the literal same exact words. In both instances, they're so excited to yell about Trump that they ignore what they actually believe in order to "GET 'EM".
Is about as reddit idealist/"fuck you dad, you can't tell me what to do" (no offense) as you can get. But if it doesn't attack Trump? That's a downvotin'.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
"I agree with you, because I am very reasonable. That said, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE FUCK DRUMPFH!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEE"
1 weniscommander 2017-12-27
That whole thread was unreal.
1 King_Drumpf 2017-12-27
Can we tell them that Churchill hated Indian people?
1 Gothmog26 2017-12-27
He was a wise man.
1 saint2e 2017-12-27
Historical figures who did something great for their country do not hold up to current social mores. Film at 11.
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-27
To be clear, Hitler did nothing wrong.
1 error404brain 2017-12-27
Trump is bad but he is nowhere near Churchill level of bad. Or even Bush.
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-27
Praising Hitler to own the fascists.
1 wwaalleess 2017-12-27
🤔🤔🤔 le thinking Nazi emoji
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-27
I can guarantee you Hitler never used the thinking emoji.
1 armbarandgrill 2017-12-27
Has anything in that sub ever been funny?
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-27
on purpose? no.
1 wwaalleess 2017-12-27
The comment sections are unintentionally hilarious so kind of.
1 Electromeatloaf 2017-12-27
Nothing that wasn't immediately reprted by cucks and removed
1 Baconlightning 2017-12-27
My inbox is currently a goldmine
1 Eat_Some_Beer 2017-12-27
Holy Downvoting Dildoshills, Batman!
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
1 KalebCS 2017-12-27
At least try and meme properly, nerd.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
The fuck you talking about. Say that to your computer screen and not on mobile and see what fukken happens m8.
1 KalebCS 2017-12-27
I can out-meme you in ways the little speck of grey matter you call brain is not even capable of computing. Don't fucking test me, kiddo.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
I've been jerking it to shitting dick nipples before mods could even cheesegrater images, you silly sausage.
1 KalebCS 2017-12-27
Disclosign the kind of degeneracy you partake in only reaffirms my assumptions. Do us all a favor and cease your oxygen intake permanently.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
I only want to suck the oxygen out of your chocolate starfish, big boy.
1 KalebCS 2017-12-27
The only thing getting sucked out of me is my hope for humanity, knowing I share a species with the likes of you. Your existence should be considered a war crime.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
Will you hold my hand when Papa Pence shocks the gay out of me?
1 KalebCS 2017-12-27
The only way I'm ever getting near you it's if he sets it up like a voyeur session. Wouldn't miss that for anything.
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-27
Would you be pulling on your big daddy dick while watching? Would my cries make you hard?
1 TotesMessenger 2017-12-27
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 michaelnoir 2017-12-27
I have already decided whether or not I like Churchill. I don't. He, like Trump, was a cunt.
1 glmox 2017-12-27
>liking churchill in current year
fucking liberals
1 grungebot5000 2017-12-27
Say what you will about Hitler, the man got laws passed
1 hlary 2017-12-27
hmm churchill yes a leader with such venerable quotes and actions that truly represent peak social justice such as:
or that one time while india was having a famine he shiped 170'000 tons of food from australia to be put into storage in britan and allowing 3'000'000 people to starved to death, people who churchill said had it coming for "breeding like rabbits"
but ya haha dhubf BTFOED again