It's almost like the seven stages of grief. The poor guy tries at the start and by the end of 267 pages is reduced to kinda giving it an effort but you know his heart isn't into it.
Looking at the notes, you have to wonder why they agreed to publish him in the first place (or why this particular editor was assigned). If they didn't want to publish someone calling people cucks, generally insulting people and going off on weird tangents about how everyone who hates him is a defective piece of shit, they contracted the wrong guy.
it's really incredible. I mean dnoush d'souza and rush limbaugh and ann coulter manage to publish dozens of books pandering to conservatives. you've got to be a real fuckup to write something so terrible conservatives won't even touch it.
Milo’s brand of faggotry politics hates traditional conservatives as well. Don’t know if the word started there but ‘cuckservative’ was a name he used for them at one point.
He markets himself to the alt-right, whether he identifies with them or not, and they are less numerous and more illiterate than the people who consume the sort of crap Coulter churns out.
The book’s editor was Mitchell Ivers, who is no stranger to the world of conservative publishing, having edited manuscripts by President Donald Trump, Michelle Malkin, Ben Shapiro and more.
Milo is done. You can make fun of basketball Americans, queers, and Izzlams but the second you defend pedos not even a bad bleach hairdo is going to save your ass.
The whole point was to be obnoxious. Good for him he got his sexual abuse story out of his system. Maybe 10yrs from now he'll have a positive political identity instead of being the teal life version of a pointless flamewar.
Um, huh? Idk what you mean in context, but generally i'd argue a complete political stance includes a judgement of morals, so one superscedes the other if you tryhard enough.
Yes, but there once was a time when a guy like Milo would have been shunned by his political allies because of his behavior alone. Now people are still making excuses for him, as if just being an asshole to piss people off wasn't enough to dislike the guy.
Didn't a memo leak that said that Bannon and his friends more or less created his entire persona and the "flamboyant" style was only used as way to deflect criticism
You missed the leaked memo's where Bannon dispatched milo into the public to be the thing the left hated? Okay. Milo had a long histiry of political debate in the uk pre-trump. Not remarkable stuff, but a different enough presentation.
I mean so far the alt right has a lame duck president who sunk Obamacare repeal, signed a standard Republican tax cut in, had everyone from their wing of the Republican party kicked out of the White House, got caught with a pedophilia promoting spokesperson and managed to lose a senator in the reddest state in America. They're not exactly winning the culture war.
Tbh he also nailed net neutrality and got everyone to hate ajit pai instead of himself. I don't think you can get a publicly known pedo elected, but they got damn close. He's been depressingly competent at the job.
sunk obamacare repeal, signed a standard Republican tax cut in, had everyone from their wing of the Republican party kicked out of the White House, got caught with a pedophilia promoting spokesperson and managed to lose a senator in the reddest state in America.
If the only piece of legislation you've managed to achieve for an entire term is exactly what the standard wing of the party who you don't like wants then it's not much good having the presidency is it?
Here’s still “doing” things. A lame duck is a president in the last years of his second term who doesn’t do anything. Not even try to do anything. Are you a fucking idiot or something?
He didn't do this - he talked about his own relationship as an underage boy with an older man and no one gave a fuck until a year later when it was quote mined to smear him.
Which he didn't. He wanted to talk about how gay teens want to fuck older men, and how older men want to fuck teenage boys. Not that they should, just that the desire is there, and it can be helpful for the development of gay sexuality (try being a gay teen, especially when Milo was a gay teen, with no real role models or outlets for sexuality).
He was disowned for talking about a taboo topic straight people can't/don't/won't understand.
Plenty of people want to fuck older and younger people. It's not something exclusive to the gay community. Nobody ever said the desire wasn't there. If there were no desire for adults to take advantage of children to get a bit of pleasure, there wouldn't be laws against that sort of thing.
Why do you think adults should be able to manipulate vulnerable children while they're trying to sort out their sexuality?
Yeah calling something as silly as "consent" stupid in the context of getting pounded as a teen by a gross old man is totally not gross at all and totally not the reason Milo fell off the face of the earth.
But as we saw with Moore, the homosexuality is what really pushed Milo beyond the pale.
Which is weird because conservatives love uncle toms as much as liberals love ex-mormons. The fact that Milo was gay and shat on left-wingers was basically the only reason he got the airtime he did. If he wasn't such a smug piece of shit they probably would have rallied around him, or at the very least not treated him like a leper in the aftermath.
Well Milo was everything conservatives pretend to hate about homosexuality.
I'm not against homosexuality but just the fact they shove either in your face.
They liked he said it cool to call gay people faggots and then it turned out that a person who was shit enough to say that also did other shit things and they got a little turned off.
This is /r/drama, so don't expect any real discussion. But Milo was abused as a child from a young age. Later in life he had unfortunate encounters that shaped his life. And a lot of gay men had a "coming of age" story that involved men that were older and more experienced.
The pedo stuff was weak, but it was the final nail in the coffin. Even right-wingers were getting sick of his shit and it's no surprise that as soon as someone dug up that one little thing that could be used to shut him up he got dropped like a hot potato even by those circles.
it was just american liberals venting, george takei is fine and he said the same exact shit except he actually endorsed it while being the older man in the situation
Eh, the right still ditched his ass though. Being reviled by the left is generally a point of pride for right wing commentators (and vice versa) but even the right was just like "nope" and dropped him.
george takei
he's a double whammy minority though and other than being a disgusting old man with sexual harassment accusations circulating about him he's a good memer on the twatter.
He bleached his hair, and regardless of ideology and whatever harebrained garbage that went through his mind his bleached hair was absolutely unforgivable.
Excuse me? I didn't vote on your reply to my comment or anything. I didn't upvote it because I don't think it's a high-quality comment and I didn't downvote it because it's not off-topic exactly (y'now, what the downvote is for.) Someone else must have downvoted you, I should think. And if I had to guess why, it's because you took a joke way too seriously.
Excuse me? I didn't vote on your reply to my comment or anything. I didn't upvote it because I don't think it's a high-quality comment and I didn't downvote it because it's not off-topic exactly (y'now, what the downvote is for.) Someone else must have downvoted you, I should think. And if I had to guess why, it's because you took a joke way too seriously.
I literally cannot take this anymore. I have a gun in my mouth and have said goodbye to my loved ones. I am questioning every decision in my life that led me to this point in my career. I am broken, I have willed my personal finances and worldly possessions. Goodbye world. You deserve this book.
I get that you want markets and contracts to override democratic rights, but not everyone is a neoliberal ideologue like you. Libertarian dystopias don't produce genuine human freedom.
If it's "unprofitable because the manuscript he submitted was terrible and he's lost popularity since he got his advance" that's fine, if it's "unprofitable because a bunch of people threatened to boycott anyone who published him and the bean counters said it wasn't worth it" that's a chilling effect.
I have no idea what happened, however, and am just shitposting against the parent post's argument.
There's nothing "chilling" about people responding to their market base. You want free speech but you're too much of a pussy to accept it when it means people who aren't you voice their opinion. Now bend over and take it.
imagine being so butthurt you're still bitching about him long after his spotlight expired. this woman is just devoid of a life, she's also devoid of a personality it seems... i mean, just look at that pathetic bio she has up, "[insert quirky edited meme i saw on twitter here] haha im so unique and original!"
P.S. milo is a fag and his faggot book would flop because it too, would be devoid of meaning. the only people who would buy it are those retards on t_d and alt-soyboys
Which part of his post do you disagree with? You know you don't have to defend that woman just because she brought something funny to your attention, right? Her commentary was awful.
I consider /r/drama to be, at best, a superficial work of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues or free speech.
I work as an editor and this had me in absolute stitches. I've had to say some of these things (not too often though) to my writers but the takes the cake.
It's not free money. They see the shit writing, they tally the cost of editing, publishing, marketing, and figure it's not worth the investment because they won't even sell that many books. I'm sure a minor factor is their desire to not publish complete dog shit.
His cultural sell-by date has long passed, so if they publish, they will only get a lot of bad press, and there aren’t enough fans to purchase the book and make that headache acceptable. Instead they’ll just eat the loss on the initial advance.
I've never had to tell someone not to say cuck, but I was involved in a team where we had to tell someone it wasn't appropriate to tell college kids to do drugs and drop out of school to make room for better ones. Eek.
This is just a personal piss off, but I get quite cross because the majority of our collective posts are listicles. Some of mine are as well, but I prefer actual articles
I've had to yell at people for clearly including fake information and/or news. CLEARLY.
General amateur stuff that for whatever reason I have to repeat over and over and over again such as spelling, grammar, syntax, etc
Had someone once plagiarize a story TWICE.
Removed inappropriate comments, including one about a dick
Lots of comments saying that what they're writing is completely illogical and/or non sequitur
My favourite was when I told someone that their article was so poorly put together (grammar, spelling, sources, info, among others) that they should just scrap the entire article and write something else because it was so bad
This is from a few different places. I'm still in university and many of these pieces are from other students so I'm lighter on them, but goddamn we get some rough stuff.
Do you edit a college newspaper? If so, you seem to give more of a shit than most of the editors I had in uni. They were notorious for putting out stories without checking their edits with the writer first, which lead to some pretty egregiously bad and/or inaccurate copy getting printed.
I used to edit for my school newspaper, I currently edit for a school chapter of an online magazine, and then I do private/ freelance work for high school, university, and some beyond. I probably do care more about students' articles because it IS public writing and should be held to the same standards as others. I take my work and others' very seriously, especially since this is the line of work I'm in and where I want to be.
How do you feel about overcorrection? Like, there's this Canadian web-fiction writer who drives me absolutely nuts with his "They looked at my friend and I disparagingly", and I'm not even his editor or anything.
Exactly, but people tend to do it wrong in cases like "my friend and me went to /r/drama for some cheap entertainment", so apparently in Canada they brainwash children to always say "... and I", and then those children grow up and write insanely popular web-fiction and overcorrect.
Which annoys me more than it should because I'm OK with someone who speaks the way their illiterate brain naively thinks is proper, it's all right, I'm not a grammar prescriptivist, but when people go full retard on prescriptivism and do it wrong, that's not excusable. That's just wrong, man!
Please, if you're going to pretend that this editor wasn't politically biased as fuck, go ahead. but don't treat the rest of us as a bunch of idiots who might actually believe you.
This sub is basically just /r/neoliberal now. With a bit of SRS thrown in for good measure.
If you associate /r/drama with SRS of all places then you're a wingnut who can't handle life outside an echo chamber, just like all the bootyblasted losers on /r/negareddit who think this is a far-right community. Examine your life choices.
I think you're giving S&S too much credit. I wouldn't call any of the schlock they turn out from Tomi, or Ann Coulter, or Jeanine Garofolo an "academic piece." Only Milo fanboys would buy the book, and they by the book to read Milo saying over-the-top fairy shit.
Nobody had any illusions about this book - not Milo, not Simon and Schuster, who knew they'd be rolling in mayo-scented money even if Milo just wiped his GRIDS-ridden ass across a keyboard for a hundred fifty pages - nobody except a dipshit, world-weary English major who thought he could be catty to the world's biggest little bitch.
Why bother arguing here at this point? Let this liberal shithole become the same as all of the other liberal shitholes. It's pretty much there already.
Lol, the threads in "other discussions" are hilarious. One guy calls the Editor a Never Trump cuck despite the fact that the guy edited one of Trump's books.
I didn't consider that. Spending all day in your basement jerking off with one hand and spamming porn all over the internet with the other while getting paid. That's the neckbeard dream right there.
So if I understand this correctly, they paid him 80 grand to write a book and he writes something so shit they can't turn it into something publishable. He then gets to keep the money and the rights to the book, and he still wants to sue them for not publishing it?
cmon man dont be ghazi what are you doing this is colby klaus level
sjws had been trying to censor and smear him for years before that because he consistently made them look dumb, just like they used to post child porn to 8chan and then do "exposes" "discovering" it and trying to get it delisted
pretty sure i never implied anyone should give him money or buy his book, just that you shouldnt trust shrieking college students when they call him names
I just had a horrible vision. A saggy man with bleach blond hair and a disgusting flair to his nose like he is smelling the putrid vinegar odor emanating from his body.
351 comments
1 SwankDogsbody 2017-12-28
Literally "DELETE THIS".
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
That's a recurring theme there!
1 Michelanvalo 2017-12-28
Probably should delete the entire book, it's awful. And I've only read about 10 pages. Every criticism the editor left was completely valid.
1 Namenamenamenamena 2017-12-28
There weren't any comments after the first 10 pages?
1 Lawgustmarck 2017-12-28
It's almost like the seven stages of grief. The poor guy tries at the start and by the end of 267 pages is reduced to kinda giving it an effort but you know his heart isn't into it.
1 youcanteatbullets 2017-12-28
Which makes you wonder they would want a draft in the first place. Actual footage of his editor reading the draft
1 comebepc 2017-12-28
He should just delete himself
1 Harradar 2017-12-28
Looking at the notes, you have to wonder why they agreed to publish him in the first place (or why this particular editor was assigned). If they didn't want to publish someone calling people cucks, generally insulting people and going off on weird tangents about how everyone who hates him is a defective piece of shit, they contracted the wrong guy.
1 seshfan 2017-12-28
it's really incredible. I mean dnoush d'souza and rush limbaugh and ann coulter manage to publish dozens of books pandering to conservatives. you've got to be a real fuckup to write something so terrible conservatives won't even touch it.
1 pm_me_jumbo_jets 2017-12-28
Milo’s brand of
faggotrypolitics hates traditional conservatives as well. Don’t know if the word started there but ‘cuckservative’ was a name he used for them at one point.He markets himself to the alt-right, whether he identifies with them or not, and they are less numerous and more illiterate than the people who consume the sort of crap Coulter churns out.
1 nqtbty 2017-12-28
the cuccservative
1 Mr_Americas 2017-12-28
Anne’s books are well written and sourced believe it or not. She draws crazy conclusions but that’s not necessarily something an editor is correcting.
1 pasta4u 2017-12-28
her conclusions aren't actually crazy. they tend to be spot on.
1 Valdincan 2017-12-28
Don't try to educate these fucks, this is now one of the most SJW subs on this site.
1 dekonstruktr 2017-12-28
ESSJAYDUBBAYOOOS
1 Valdincan 2017-12-28
cuck
1 Tzcar 2017-12-28
Mods, as an sjw sub can we finally address the egregious kink shaming going on here?
1 pasta4u 2017-12-28
well i mean it makes sense , that dram is what sjw are all about
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2017-12-28
Lol
1 Namenamenamenamena 2017-12-28
Can't imagine needing this long to realize milo doesn't fit in with the conservative establishment.
1 fucknazimodzzz 2017-12-28
Probably has something to do that is coming from a gay Jew who talks about sucking black dick all the time
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
He is married to one
Not that being married to mayo would stop gay men from going after black dick
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-28
It's probably harder to convince neonazis to write an entire book for you than it is to get them to write your posts.
1 Elmepo 2017-12-28
They thought he'd just write a bland political memoir and they'd get some free and easy press and money. They underestimated Milos autism apparently.
1 GadolBoobies 2017-12-28
The editor in question spent the entire time praising Milo and flirting with him (he's also gay).
Milo just released all their text messages.
1 Zozbot 2017-12-28
zoz
1 Zozbot 2017-12-28
zle
1 Zozbot 2017-12-28
zozzle
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2017-12-28
NEPHEW
1 DontTrustRedditors 2017-12-28
Lmao, so what happened was basically 'liberal editors dislike conservatism'.
And reddit wonders why these people have such a huge persecution complex.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
Nope
1 Diaperologist 2017-12-28
I'm case anyone is interested, the editor is Mitchell Ivers, VP at Treshold Editions. He's definitely got conservative credentials.
1 cggreene2 2017-12-28
"""conservative"""
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2017-12-28
(((Cuckservative)))
1 AndroidHero23 2017-12-28
The book’s editor was Mitchell Ivers, who is no stranger to the world of conservative publishing, having edited manuscripts by President Donald Trump, Michelle Malkin, Ben Shapiro and more.
1 JohnTheOrc 2017-12-28
Edmund Burke is spinning in his grave
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2017-12-28
Do people who post "muh Burke" have any actual idea how the man would view things today?
1 JohnTheOrc 2017-12-28
He probably wouldn't be as big a fan of cock as Milo for one thing.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Calling all of feminism 'ugly sexless and have cats', is truly a shit argument. They also have red hair and find airconditioners to be sexist.
1 Michelanvalo 2017-12-28
Are you retarded?
What happened is that Milo wrote a shitty book and his conservative editor told him as such.
1 ay_what_up2 2017-12-28
once again you prove to be the biggest retard in drama
1 Deesing82 2017-12-28
try again
1 MG87 2017-12-28
I know you're little retarded there /u/DontTrustRedditors but Ivers is a staunch conservative
1 Strictlybutters 2017-12-28
Fam he edited 45s “book” or whatever Jew 45 hired to write it.
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Milo is done. You can make fun of basketball Americans, queers, and Izzlams but the second you defend pedos not even a bad bleach hairdo is going to save your ass.
Good riddance.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
The whole point was to be obnoxious. Good for him he got his sexual abuse story out of his system. Maybe 10yrs from now he'll have a positive political identity instead of being the teal life version of a pointless flamewar.
1 ConsoleWarCriminal 2017-12-28
That identity will be "Dead from GRIDS"
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
pretending_to_be_retarded.jpg
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
You missed the leaked memo's where Bannon dispatched milo into the public to be the thing the left hated? Okay.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
If true, that does surprisingly little to increase my respect for him.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
If ypu dont respect him that works for me
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
When did having a political stance replace moral standards?
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Um, huh? Idk what you mean in context, but generally i'd argue a complete political stance includes a judgement of morals, so one superscedes the other if you tryhard enough.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Yes, but there once was a time when a guy like Milo would have been shunned by his political allies because of his behavior alone. Now people are still making excuses for him, as if just being an asshole to piss people off wasn't enough to dislike the guy.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Yeah politics has gotten really fucked. Socisl media is fucked and 'the persinal is political' is fucked too.
1 stevemisor 2017-12-28
Milo was manufactured
Didn't a memo leak that said that Bannon and his friends more or less created his entire persona and the "flamboyant" style was only used as way to deflect criticism
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Perhaps. My bigger issue is with his audience, including the liberals who bought into the theatrics and volunteered to be extras in his comedies.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
You missed the leaked memo's where Bannon dispatched milo into the public to be the thing the left hated? Okay. Milo had a long histiry of political debate in the uk pre-trump. Not remarkable stuff, but a different enough presentation.
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-28
I mean so far the alt right has a lame duck president who sunk Obamacare repeal, signed a standard Republican tax cut in, had everyone from their wing of the Republican party kicked out of the White House, got caught with a pedophilia promoting spokesperson and managed to lose a senator in the reddest state in America. They're not exactly winning the culture war.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Tbh he also nailed net neutrality and got everyone to hate ajit pai instead of himself. I don't think you can get a publicly known pedo elected, but they got damn close. He's been depressingly competent at the job.
1 lascanto 2017-12-28
or
You can only have one
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-28
If the only piece of legislation you've managed to achieve for an entire term is exactly what the standard wing of the party who you don't like wants then it's not much good having the presidency is it?
1 im-a-koala 2017-12-28
His first term is literally only 1/4 over, though.
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-28
Can't pass major divisive legislation in an election year and they're going to lose the house.
1 im-a-koala 2017-12-28
Ok. Be sure to bet on it. You could pocket an easy 60% return on PredictIt.
1 lascanto 2017-12-28
Here’s still “doing” things. A lame duck is a president in the last years of his second term who doesn’t do anything. Not even try to do anything. Are you a fucking idiot or something?
1 Jrook 2017-12-28
Tbf I'm surprised trump hasn't appointed him secretary of state
1 GunOfSod 2017-12-28
Am I in /r/politics?
1 aolataoldotcom 2017-12-28
IRL Joker. Hilarious villain.
1 thisplaceisanonsense 2017-12-28
What's with all the sjw faggots in here?
1 Lawgustmarck 2017-12-28
Yep. He was an amusing little troll but the pedo thing ruined him.
1 Douggem 2017-12-28
He didn't do this - he talked about his own relationship as an underage boy with an older man and no one gave a fuck until a year later when it was quote mined to smear him.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Nah, you lie.
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
Were you an underage gay male? Then shut up about the experiences gay males go through in their teens.
I would have killed for a Daddy, rather than nearly killing myself.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Excuse me for believing in the law.
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
Excuse me for believing people should be able to have open discussions about gay sexuality without fear of persecution.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
You can do that! You just can't fuck underage boys. Sorry!
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
Which he didn't. He wanted to talk about how gay teens want to fuck older men, and how older men want to fuck teenage boys. Not that they should, just that the desire is there, and it can be helpful for the development of gay sexuality (try being a gay teen, especially when Milo was a gay teen, with no real role models or outlets for sexuality).
He was disowned for talking about a taboo topic straight people can't/don't/won't understand.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Plenty of people want to fuck older and younger people. It's not something exclusive to the gay community. Nobody ever said the desire wasn't there. If there were no desire for adults to take advantage of children to get a bit of pleasure, there wouldn't be laws against that sort of thing.
Why do you think adults should be able to manipulate vulnerable children while they're trying to sort out their sexuality?
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
I'm not advocating that. I'm advocating allowing people to talk about it without being publicly disowned.
1 Shalabadoo 2017-12-28
He was disowned for advocating for pedophilia
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-12-28
Excuse me but you're retarded
1 telandrias 2017-12-28
Faggotry is unfortunate to have it's name dragged through the mud by celebrity boy raping by Kevin spacey and George takei and Milo.
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
Should have finished the job
1 avz7 2017-12-28
Username checks out
1 Shalabadoo 2017-12-28
Lol
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Some 12 year olds like getting molested so naturally the left knows nothing about consent
1 trj820 2017-12-28
I mean, he seems to have enjoyed getting molested at age 13. Then again, given how he turned out, that doesn't really help his case.
1 comebepc 2017-12-28
Can I say this in court? My trial's tomorrow
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Yeah calling something as silly as "consent" stupid in the context of getting pounded as a teen by a gross old man is totally not gross at all and totally not the reason Milo fell off the face of the earth.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Conservative standards in currentYear settled somewhere between advocating sex with underage boys and bathing naked in pig's blood.
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Which is weird because conservatives love uncle toms as much as liberals love ex-mormons. The fact that Milo was gay and shat on left-wingers was basically the only reason he got the airtime he did. If he wasn't such a smug piece of shit they probably would have rallied around him, or at the very least not treated him like a leper in the aftermath.
1 Hemingwavy 2017-12-28
Well Milo was everything conservatives pretend to hate about homosexuality.
They liked he said it cool to call gay people faggots and then it turned out that a person who was shit enough to say that also did other shit things and they got a little turned off.
1 Redactor0 2017-12-28
So are you a catamite or a wannabe-catamite?
1 Red_Tannins 2017-12-28
This is /r/drama, so don't expect any real discussion. But Milo was abused as a child from a young age. Later in life he had unfortunate encounters that shaped his life. And a lot of gay men had a "coming of age" story that involved men that were older and more experienced.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
hes obnoxious but the pedo stuff was pretty weak
just hate him for being a huge self aggrandizing faggot
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
The pedo stuff was weak, but it was the final nail in the coffin. Even right-wingers were getting sick of his shit and it's no surprise that as soon as someone dug up that one little thing that could be used to shut him up he got dropped like a hot potato even by those circles.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
it was just american liberals venting, george takei is fine and he said the same exact shit except he actually endorsed it while being the older man in the situation
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Eh, the right still ditched his ass though. Being reviled by the left is generally a point of pride for right wing commentators (and vice versa) but even the right was just like "nope" and dropped him.
he's a double whammy minority though and other than being a disgusting old man with sexual harassment accusations circulating about him he's a good memer on the twatter.
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
We all know he doesn't meme his gay intern does
1 Red_Tannins 2017-12-28
but wasn't his issue was that he got diddled as a child. So the nail in the coffin was that he was sexually abused as a small child?
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-12-28
Such is the fate of all Uncle Toms
1 sup3r_hero 2017-12-28
I always thought, we love milo?
1 Joan_Wayne_Gacy 2017-12-28
Oh girl no.
He bleached his hair, and regardless of ideology and whatever harebrained garbage that went through his mind his bleached hair was absolutely unforgivable.
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-28
Don't forget fat.
1 Namenamenamenamena 2017-12-28
You'd think someone named Joan Wayne gacy would be down with immature edge
1 aolataoldotcom 2017-12-28
LOL
1 Pastelitomaracucho 2017-12-28
Seriousposter gtfo
1 disgruntled_chode 2017-12-28
Nice pull, OP. Some of these annotations need to be /u/snapshillbot quotes.
Particularly this one. And this one.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
I'm here to serve.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
That editor needs an editor lol. Otherwise yeah, great stuff.
1 Tragedi 2017-12-28
The editor's authority is severely diminished by their unprofessional tone and terrible grammar.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
Butthurt doesn't suit your pretty face, honey.
1 GunOfSod 2017-12-28
Hogswash pop psychology, have you ever seen the butthurt on a liberals face?
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
Haha, that downvote have shown me that you aren't butthurt at all, I apologize sincerely!
1 Tragedi 2017-12-28
Excuse me? I didn't vote on your reply to my comment or anything. I didn't upvote it because I don't think it's a high-quality comment and I didn't downvote it because it's not off-topic exactly (y'now, what the downvote is for.) Someone else must have downvoted you, I should think. And if I had to guess why, it's because you took a joke way too seriously.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
Oh. I should keep myself safe now then.
1 comebepc 2017-12-28
That's the spirit
1 baaaaby 2017-12-28
Excuse me? I didn't vote on your reply to my comment or anything. I didn't upvote it because I don't think it's a high-quality comment and I didn't downvote it because it's not off-topic exactly (y'now, what the downvote is for.) Someone else must have downvoted you, I should think. And if I had to guess why, it's because you took a joke way too seriously.
1 Tragedi 2017-12-28
wait what
1 Michelanvalo 2017-12-28
If that second one does't sum up the internet I don't know what else would.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-12-28
The first one is always wrong.
1 GadolBoobies 2017-12-28
Not using "delete ugh"?
Pffft.
1 [deleted] 2017-12-28
[removed]
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
On page 6, the editor pretty much hands MILO the playbook on how to write an effective pro-free speech book. Dude is worth his cash as an editor.
1 SnackBier 2017-12-28
Great editor for an establishment conservative. Not sure if it's a good fit for a bombastic narcissist.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
He's an ok fit. He doesn't rail against the self-aggrandizement. He rails against the self-aggrandizement without good solid backing.
From a practical perspective he is a good yin to milo's yang, forcibg a grounded base to build off.
1 SnackBier 2017-12-28
I somehow get the impression that the editor himself doesn't think that he's an ok fit.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
That is pretty funny, but it's not his writing style. I bet that's not in the real thing.
1 SnackBier 2017-12-28
ohfuck, you're right. Twitter fake news.
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Fun while it lasted :p real A208 connent is o. Page 97 for anyone that cares.
1 Elite_AI 2017-12-28
more of a joke than fake news
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
write your free speech this particular way please
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
You dont understand what free speech is, its ok.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
i bet you think its the first amendment and the government cant censor, not freedom from consequences, heres a gay xkcd comic etc etc
1 Uniquestusername99 2017-12-28
Since when does free speech (expression?) transcend a mutually agreed contract of business between two parties?
1 birdboy2000 2017-12-28
I get that you want markets and contracts to override democratic rights, but not everyone is a neoliberal ideologue like you. Libertarian dystopias don't produce genuine human freedom.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
I think this is not a freedom thing. We are talking about publishing a book, and the publisher saw the whole thing as unprofitable.
1 birdboy2000 2017-12-28
If it's "unprofitable because the manuscript he submitted was terrible and he's lost popularity since he got his advance" that's fine, if it's "unprofitable because a bunch of people threatened to boycott anyone who published him and the bean counters said it wasn't worth it" that's a chilling effect.
I have no idea what happened, however, and am just shitposting against the parent post's argument.
1 IssaPupper 2017-12-28
[serious posts]
[pretends he isn't seriousposting]
Just own up to it you pussy, fucking hell.
There's nothing "chilling" about people responding to their market base. You want free speech but you're too much of a pussy to accept it when it means people who aren't you voice their opinion. Now bend over and take it.
1 Jupiter178 2017-12-28
It's not free. He got paid an $80,000 advance.
1 pepperouchau 2017-12-28
I mean, if you want the book to sell, yeah
1 yetanothercfcgrunt 2017-12-28
LOL nobody is obligated to publish your inane ramblings. This isn't a free speech issue.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
lol the pure knee jerk and misinterpretation
1 MG87 2017-12-28
Never stop being retarded
1 LadyVetinari 2017-12-28
Right? Jesus that was dumb even for him
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
You really are a complete moron.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
i enjoy the reaction i can get out of you guys its so easy
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
Oh, you are just pretending to be a retard. My bad. Carry on.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
nope lol im right i just also know i can say literally anything and it makes some of you grind your teeth and seethe as though i raped your family
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
Taking a few moments to respond to one of your stupid comments = raping my family.
If this is how you really see the world, you really are pathetic.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
its not the response thats funny to me its the emotional feelings that drove you to reply
like you needed to reply but you have to force yourself to act as though you dont care (you do)
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
Nice projection. Is that why you are replying?
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
you addressed me apropos of nothing to have your little outburst lol wtf are you even talking about
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
Outburst? You sure have tickets on your ability to create emotional response in others. Did mummy not 💕 you enough?
1 shallowm 2017-12-28
This but with more added autism.
1 Pastelitomaracucho 2017-12-28
He confused your with you're. Imho that person must be dragged to the square and shot
1 Threctic 2017-12-28
Ouch
1 _narrows 2017-12-28
Tfw your editor gives you a much deeper dicking than your bf ever could
1 Elite_AI 2017-12-28
Just as I'd bothered to find it I scroll down.
1 FTFallen 2017-12-28
lol that twitter pic. Why are stereotypes always true?
1 missmurrr 2017-12-28
they also have to mention their pronouns in their twitter bio.
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-28
So, it. Got it
1 missmurrr 2017-12-28
yes, with a fake chinese last name that ironically means "beautiful", so mental case would apply as well.
1 nanonan 2017-12-28
Well if they weren't true they wouldn't be stereotypes.
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
That is hate talk
1 nanonan 2017-12-28
true
1 VPEKD 2017-12-28
imagine being so butthurt you're still bitching about him long after his spotlight expired. this woman is just devoid of a life, she's also devoid of a personality it seems... i mean, just look at that pathetic bio she has up, "[insert quirky edited meme i saw on twitter here] haha im so unique and original!"
P.S. milo is a fag and his faggot book would flop because it too, would be devoid of meaning. the only people who would buy it are those retards on t_d and alt-soyboys
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
Being butthurt harms your argument, you know.
1 Namenamenamenamena 2017-12-28
Which part of his post do you disagree with? You know you don't have to defend that woman just because she brought something funny to your attention, right? Her commentary was awful.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
I'm not defending the woman, I'm just poking fun at him a little.
1 You_Are_All_Absurd 2017-12-28
Technically, everything is devoid of meaning.
1 nanonan 2017-12-28
Not meaningful things.
1 Elite_AI 2017-12-28
That's tautological, and hence meaningless.
1 nanonan 2017-12-28
All observations are tautological, the meaning is self-explanatory.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-12-28
Meaningful things and most devoid of meaning
1 You_Are_All_Absurd 2017-12-28
Meaning doesn't actually exist, so things can't be meaningful.
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2017-12-28
This place is nothing but SRD2/SRS3 at this point. Few bother coming here but the left-wing circlejerk squad.
1 glmox 2017-12-28
nice meme
1 strathmeyer 2017-12-28
I consider /r/drama to be, at best, a superficial work of incendiary jokes with no coherent or sophisticated analysis of political issues or free speech.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
I disagree, seriousposters plague this land.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-12-28
Effortposters should be gassed like the vermin they are.
1 comebepc 2017-12-28
And mayos. Don't forget the mayos
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2017-12-28
I crave the day of the sandwich.
1 cleverseneca 2017-12-28
And /r/drama users! Splitters!
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-28
u/pizzashill on suicide watch
1 Greatpointbut 2017-12-28
I promise not to watch
1 Thot_Crusher 2017-12-28
Here's hoping
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-12-28
~suicide~ safety watch
1 WyrmSaint 2017-12-28
It's more fun when people care
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
It's most fun when there's a mixture and you have to figure out who's shitposting and who's seriousposting.
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
Literally kys
1 LadyVetinari 2017-12-28
That does not make the prior statement untrue
1 Threctic 2017-12-28
gasp
1 Chromebookbitches 2017-12-28
That pretty much sums up 90% of discourse on the internet today.
1 Talonek 2017-12-28
Is this pasta?
1 AlohaWarrior34 2017-12-28
It is now.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
duh
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
I work as an editor and this had me in absolute stitches. I've had to say some of these things (not too often though) to my writers but the takes the cake.
"NO. IT. HAS. NOT."
1 13213546846532186312 2017-12-28
Mate can you tell why they are canceling the book? I though they would just push the shit out and try to cash in. Instead they just gave him free $$
1 lickedTators 2017-12-28
It's not free money. They see the shit writing, they tally the cost of editing, publishing, marketing, and figure it's not worth the investment because they won't even sell that many books. I'm sure a minor factor is their desire to not publish complete dog shit.
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
Don't try to fix holes in a ship without a bottom.
1 Honk4Tits 2017-12-28
Its only implied hes a bottom.
1 _narrows 2017-12-28
His cultural sell-by date has long passed, so if they publish, they will only get a lot of bad press, and there aren’t enough fans to purchase the book and make that headache acceptable. Instead they’ll just eat the loss on the initial advance.
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
I work in journalism, but I'd have to assume this is too risky for the publisher. Too controversial and high chance of leaving bad press.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2017-12-28
(((They're))) worried that he'll purple-pill mayos who will then get the Shoah on the road.
Or maybe they just didn't think anyone would buy incoherent bullshit.
1 AlohaWarrior34 2017-12-28
Damn. This goy has exposed (((us))).
1 glmox 2017-12-28
so how many times have you had to tell an author to "leave 'cuck' out of it here?" round to the nearest hundred, please
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
I've never had to tell someone not to say cuck, but I was involved in a team where we had to tell someone it wasn't appropriate to tell college kids to do drugs and drop out of school to make room for better ones. Eek.
1 labiolingual_trill 2017-12-28
Any other stories of godawful writing and/or authors?
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
Told someone they couldn't plagiarize a recipe
"you're not allowed to call the readers names"
"capitalize the I's!!"
This is just a personal piss off, but I get quite cross because the majority of our collective posts are listicles. Some of mine are as well, but I prefer actual articles
I've had to yell at people for clearly including fake information and/or news. CLEARLY.
General amateur stuff that for whatever reason I have to repeat over and over and over again such as spelling, grammar, syntax, etc
Had someone once plagiarize a story TWICE.
Removed inappropriate comments, including one about a dick
Lots of comments saying that what they're writing is completely illogical and/or non sequitur
My favourite was when I told someone that their article was so poorly put together (grammar, spelling, sources, info, among others) that they should just scrap the entire article and write something else because it was so bad
This is from a few different places. I'm still in university and many of these pieces are from other students so I'm lighter on them, but goddamn we get some rough stuff.
1 labiolingual_trill 2017-12-28
Oh, so basically all the shit wrong with Milo's book.
1 disgruntled_chode 2017-12-28
Do you edit a college newspaper? If so, you seem to give more of a shit than most of the editors I had in uni. They were notorious for putting out stories without checking their edits with the writer first, which lead to some pretty egregiously bad and/or inaccurate copy getting printed.
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
I used to edit for my school newspaper, I currently edit for a school chapter of an online magazine, and then I do private/ freelance work for high school, university, and some beyond. I probably do care more about students' articles because it IS public writing and should be held to the same standards as others. I take my work and others' very seriously, especially since this is the line of work I'm in and where I want to be.
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
How do you feel about overcorrection? Like, there's this Canadian web-fiction writer who drives me absolutely nuts with his "They looked at my friend and I disparagingly", and I'm not even his editor or anything.
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
Overcorrection makes me sad. I fix it up and make a little note explaining why
1 Ennui2778 2017-12-28
Isn't it "my friend and me?"
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
Exactly, but people tend to do it wrong in cases like "my friend and me went to /r/drama for some cheap entertainment", so apparently in Canada they brainwash children to always say "... and I", and then those children grow up and write insanely popular web-fiction and overcorrect.
Which annoys me more than it should because I'm OK with someone who speaks the way their illiterate brain naively thinks is proper, it's all right, I'm not a grammar prescriptivist, but when people go full retard on prescriptivism and do it wrong, that's not excusable. That's just wrong, man!
1 geraldo42 2017-12-28
What is overcorrection?
1 zergling_Lester 2017-12-28
https://www.reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/7mnqcl/sothis_is_what_happened_with_milos_book/drvw43x/
1 Redactor0 2017-12-28
But then how are the Real Housewives going to be able to write a cookbook?
1 telandrias 2017-12-28
Oh look the editor for buzzfeeds "50 things men shouldn't own" article
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
Not really haha. I hate those articles a lot.
1 snallygaster 2017-12-28
I'd subscribe to ur blog
1 serialflamingo 2017-12-28
You sound like a total buzzkill.
1 screaming-succotash 2017-12-28
I am lmao
1 glmox 2017-12-28
idk seems like good advice to me
1 better_bot 2017-12-28
If a college kid read that and found it logical...I mean...
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2017-12-28
why Milo is talking about my ex-wife I will never know
1 _Sitty_Shoonerism_ 2017-12-28
who does this editor think ze is? That phrase would strengthen any point in all circumstances.
1 youcanteatbullets 2017-12-28
AWALT
1 Satafly 2017-12-28
lol
1 do0rkn0b 2017-12-28
literally who's.
1 the_black_panther_ 2017-12-28
I actually want to read the manuscript now
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
It's linked here. Look for it.
1 the_black_panther_ 2017-12-28
Thx
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-28
Trust me, you don't. It's garbage, like Milo
1 the_black_panther_ 2017-12-28
Since when do we care about quality lol. Drama is drama
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-28
Milo drama is [current year -1]
1 shallowm 2017-12-28
The court filing
The manuscript
1 t-r-s2 2017-12-28
I tried to read it with honest intentions and had to stop because it was so bad. And I enjoyed Milo's podcast during the campaign.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
After reading a bit, the editor doesn't get Milo's style at all.
1 Ennui2778 2017-12-28
Page twenty-something - Milo talks about the Democrats abandoning their blue-collar base. Editor responds "UMMM ACKSHUALLY, MUH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT."
Dude is entirely the wrong person for the job.
1 stevemisor 2017-12-28
Posting on the net or ranting in at speech is different from writing a book
Milo' usual antics look horrible in print and his editor is trying to turn the rants into an actual academic piece
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2017-12-28
Please, if you're going to pretend that this editor wasn't politically biased as fuck, go ahead. but don't treat the rest of us as a bunch of idiots who might actually believe you.
This sub is basically just /r/neoliberal now. With a bit of SRS thrown in for good measure.
1 stevemisor 2017-12-28
Drama is not "right wing" SRD
Go to cringe anarchy if you want a one sided cock suck fest
1 seshfan 2017-12-28
lmao of course he already posts there.
1 Ennui2778 2017-12-28
Down boy.
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
Go back to cringe anarchy retard
1 GuillotinesNOW 2017-12-28
YESSSSSSS THE LOLCOWS HAVE ARRIVED
1 snallygaster 2017-12-28
If you associate /r/drama with SRS of all places then you're a wingnut who can't handle life outside an echo chamber, just like all the bootyblasted losers on /r/negareddit who think this is a far-right community. Examine your life choices.
1 Ennui2778 2017-12-28
I think you're giving S&S too much credit. I wouldn't call any of the schlock they turn out from Tomi, or Ann Coulter, or Jeanine Garofolo an "academic piece." Only Milo fanboys would buy the book, and they by the book to read Milo saying over-the-top fairy shit.
Nobody had any illusions about this book - not Milo, not Simon and Schuster, who knew they'd be rolling in mayo-scented money even if Milo just wiped his GRIDS-ridden ass across a keyboard for a hundred fifty pages - nobody except a dipshit, world-weary English major who thought he could be catty to the world's biggest little bitch.
1 glmox 2017-12-28
dont think thats the problem here fam
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
You aren't paid to think here, just look pretty.
1 Black_d20 2017-12-28
Now if only you knew how to take your own advice. Or be pretty.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
My mother says I'm handsome.
1 Black_d20 2017-12-28
How you can make that out with her tongue buried in your pooper impresses me, to be quite honest.
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2017-12-28
Why bother arguing here at this point? Let this liberal shithole become the same as all of the other liberal shitholes. It's pretty much there already.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
Nah, its just a handful of retards who wander in from SRD.
1 MG87 2017-12-28
"retarded" is a writtimg style?
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
We like to think of you as differently abled.
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
I mean it's pretty hard to get aggressive retardation
1 FolkLoki 2017-12-28
"My writing isn't shit it's a style!"
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
If they expected Milo to write a serious cited book, thats on them.
1 FolkLoki 2017-12-28
Even with citations it'd still be a rambling, disjointed mess.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
They told him it was racist to say cab drivers need deodorant (mind you without mentioning race). Really?
1 A7thStone 2017-12-28
That's moronic even for a drama poster. He said telling a cabby curry isn't deodorant is racist.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
You have an opinion? That's adorable!
1 A7thStone 2017-12-28
Pretending to be detached and above it all doesn't work when you're stupid.
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
Let me serious post.
I think you are legitimately stupid and not worth engaging in banter with.
1 A7thStone 2017-12-28
I knOw yOu Are, buT wHat am I?
1 Chicup 2017-12-28
You are proving my point.
1 A7thStone 2017-12-28
YOu aRe ProvInG my poiNt.
1 FolkLoki 2017-12-28
"Curry smells bad and it's what those brown people from India eat. Please laugh at my jokes, I need an audience to validate me."
Editor called it an "irrelevant and superfluous ethnic joke." Sounds about right to me.
Rambling, disjointed mess.
1 comebepc 2017-12-28
I like this editor
1 IAmAN00bie 2017-12-28
Lol, the threads in "other discussions" are hilarious. One guy calls the Editor a Never Trump cuck despite the fact that the guy edited one of Trump's books.
1 xjapxn 2017-12-28
/u/Vidiotgamer why do you waste your time on those guys lol
1 VidiotGamer 2017-12-28
Honestly, I just like arguing on the internet.
1 xjapxn 2017-12-28
https://media.giphy.com/media/Hq4DYXhDkEvHW/200.gif
1 cheers_grills 2017-12-28
Now that I can respect.
1 Jrook 2017-12-28
/u/crowseldon are you fed thru a tube? How often do you choke on your own spit?
1 crowseldon 2017-12-28
/u/Jro
1 Poolb0y 2017-12-28
Why are you username tagging the person you're replying to? KiA isn't sending their best (but knowing them, you're close to it).
1 crowseldon 2017-12-28
I'm tagging me for the same of it since he decided to tag me from another sub instead of having the balls to post there.
1 Poolb0y 2017-12-28
Why not tag them in that thread, then?
1 crowseldon 2017-12-28
Because he was not going to go there. Here, he had a chance to reply among the coziness of upvotes.
He didn't. That speaks volumes.
1 im-a-koala 2017-12-28
VOLUMES.
1 crowseldon 2017-12-28
CIRCLEJERKZ!! trololol
1 Poolb0y 2017-12-28
I'm cozy right here
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2017-12-28
KiA is a safe space
1 crowseldon 2017-12-28
Says the guy who posts in this country and gets paid on the back by all in the sub. How superior must you feel, right? To all those other subs?
1 Bomb_adil 2017-12-28
So this is where the Brigade of Cucks came from.
1 IAmAN00bie 2017-12-28
me irl
1 Bomb_adil 2017-12-28
You irl
1 IAmAN00bie 2017-12-28
Not an argument
1 Pepperglue 2017-12-28
A pretty low bar, but it is good drama.
1 icefourthirtythree 2017-12-28
Are you telling me r/hottiesfortrump has been lying to me?
1 oshnyve 2017-12-28
i never realized it before but literally 3/4 of their posts are from one account wow
1 zsiwpoprod 2017-12-28
That's the case with a lot of porn subs actually. What a sad existence it must be to spend all your free time collecting porn to post on reddit.
1 PostNationalism 2017-12-28
i always assumed they get paid for porn traffic
1 zsiwpoprod 2017-12-28
I didn't consider that. Spending all day in your basement jerking off with one hand and spamming porn all over the internet with the other while getting paid. That's the neckbeard dream right there.
1 error404brain 2017-12-28
(The email of the editor to milo is pretty glorious)[https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSJCjkyUEAAW--N.jpg:large]
The last time someone gave back something this hard, it was the rommanoffs.
1 Lawgustmarck 2017-12-28
“Keep the money, just get out.”
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
take that milo
and by that i mean 80 grand
1 Time_to_Drink 2017-12-28
That is only going to to keep him in fake Gucci jackets, hair foils, and anal bleaching sessions for so long
1 KateUptonsCumback 2017-12-28
Lmao they literally paid him 80 grand to fuck off.
1 Gibbussyplz 2017-12-28
>tfw I will never shitpost hard enough to get paid to fuck off
1 DragonSlayerYomre 2017-12-28
You know it's bad when they let him keep the advance AND relinquish the rights
1 IvankaTrumpIsMyWaifu 2017-12-28
"Seriously, just get the fuck out"
1 rakkar16 2017-12-28
So if I understand this correctly, they paid him 80 grand to write a book and he writes something so shit they can't turn it into something publishable. He then gets to keep the money and the rights to the book, and he still wants to sue them for not publishing it?
1 DragonSlayerYomre 2017-12-28
Yes, you nailed it.
1 AlohaWarrior34 2017-12-28
Imagine still being retarded enough to sue.
1 felixjawesome 2017-12-28
What a faggot.
1 Lawgustmarck 2017-12-28
You missed the best part.
But for the lawsuit that annotated manuscript would most likely have never come to light. Milo literally shot his own dick.
1 snallygaster 2017-12-28
This is such a severe rejection that it made me feel like I was experiencing the rejection while I was reading it. Jeez.
1 ironicshitpostr 2017-12-28
I wish I failed so gloriously
1 Lawgustmarck 2017-12-28
https://mobile.twitter.com/sarahmei/status/946372862465556481/photo/1
Beauty section moved to after Nietsze. Fascinating. A book on philosophy, beauty, and black dick jokes. Who wouldn’t want to buy this?
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
lol why would you hire someone that hates you to edit your book
1 Redactor0 2017-12-28
Because you're a pedo and everyone hates you?
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
lol @ your feelings
1 MG87 2017-12-28
Who doesn't hate Milo at this point?
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
lol the only people that hate him got their info from ghazi
1 MG87 2017-12-28
Well he is a self admitted kid fucker. It's why he's fallen off the face of the Earth.
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
I though he admitted to being fucked as a boy or something
1 im-a-koala 2017-12-28
Yeah but he spun it as a positive experience.
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
cmon man dont be ghazi what are you doing this is colby klaus level
sjws had been trying to censor and smear him for years before that because he consistently made them look dumb, just like they used to post child porn to 8chan and then do "exposes" "discovering" it and trying to get it delisted
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
I may not hate the retarded but I won't buy books written by then either
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
pretty sure i never implied anyone should give him money or buy his book, just that you shouldnt trust shrieking college students when they call him names
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
You said the only people that hate him are members of a far left subreddit. That's not true at all
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
the only valid reactions to milo are "yeah ok whatever" or "i disagree and as such dont care"
if your reaction is rage or hate then youve been listening to ghazi because theyre the only ones that had a problem initially
hes just some big flamboyant fag that snarks and uses catty insults about black dicks, i thought hed be popular here if anything
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
Ur an idiot
1 captainpriapism 2017-12-28
lol youre one of those indistinguishable guys nvm
1 glmox 2017-12-28
this CUCKSERVATIVE just doesnt understand the contemporary intellectual landscape
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-12-28
Today's been my real dramahanukkah
1 RetroViruses 2017-12-28
OH MILO, YOU SCAMP
Not as bad as people are making it out to be, with the edits it would be readable, and other things are just Milo being Milo.
1 AnnoysTheGoys 2017-12-28
He's still not gonna fuck you
1 makes_people_cringe 2017-12-28
I just had a horrible vision. A saggy man with bleach blond hair and a disgusting flair to his nose like he is smelling the putrid vinegar odor emanating from his body.
1 Zeuter 2017-12-28
I'm not sure why, but the language Ruby tends to attract the clinically insane. What gives?
1 MayorOfPieTown 2017-12-28
Gotta love retards screeching autistically over Milo.
1 pvijay187 2017-12-28
We are clearly laughing at his expense retard
1 MayorOfPieTown 2017-12-28
Oh, my bad Le good sir.
tips fedora
1 TherapyFortheRapy 2017-12-28
ITT: SRDines circlejerking to non-existant drama...again. Pretty much the entire theme of the sub at this point.
1 Strictlybutters 2017-12-28
Did you reeeeeeallly think this comment was good enough to post twice?
1 Ennui2778 2017-12-28
Dude, you're spamming this in every thread. You know it's possible to be conservative without being ass-blasted every hour of the day.
1 it_ends_with_a_D 2017-12-28
Is it though?
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
There more downvotes in this thread than usual, it is true
1 markherrington5 2017-12-28
Comment A25... it's like he doesn't understand how quotes even work
1 ReBurnInator 2017-12-28
I feel like I could be a book editor. I mean I tell people their posts suck all day long for free on reddit. Just imagine getting paid for it.
1 kane4life4ever 2017-12-28
"You can't say ugly people are drawn to the left. Have you ever been to a trump rally" Holy fuck this is a gold mine. I demand u/neronah be modded.
1 Neronoah 2017-12-28
Why would you want me to be a mod? You monster.
1 kane4life4ever 2017-12-28
Even the wicked need mods.
1 joey_bosas_ankles 2017-12-28
If not here, then where? If not now, then when?
1 goosechaser 2017-12-28
A black dick joke declared for days to come is as good as none.
1 GayNotQueer 2017-12-28
I love how they refer to the presidents they dont like as numbers.
1 RainierRancor 2017-12-28
well she confirmed that Ugly People hate him
1 Awayfone 2017-12-28
White men are people now?
1 ben_gardners_boat 2017-12-28
All books go through this stage. What is OP’s point?
1 FapingWithYourChild 2017-12-28
I mena its a pretty good book.