Or accidentally nearly having sex with a close relative (idk maybe by being involved in some swinger shit or something).
If you put your mind to it, it turns out that there's quite a few situations that can be traumatizing without even a possibility of causing physical harm. But of course sex with a transperson can't be one of them because they are already very oppressed so expecting being responsible of them would be even more oppressive, so that's just not true, nobody can be traumatized by that thing. Not allowed!
Sending dickpics to women is absolutely unjustifiably demonized too. It's a picture, lady, it's not going to jump out of the screen and rape you, what's your problem even?
I hope you would agree that my fender bender is just as traumatic as vehicular homicide.
That's the whole problem, that you all over there have this attitude that being surprised by a vegeta is no big deal because no harm no foul etc etc.
But the same reasoning goes against a lot of things that we do recognize as oftentimes traumatic without being harmful. See this whole thread.
And then you say that a gay raped in his sleep is allowed to feel traumatized and a guy spooked by an unexpected gussy is not. With the only difference being that your personal life experiences tell you that you probably wouldn't be traumatized.
I mean, the OP is very clearly a troll, but you all should still take a long look in the mirror in my humble opinion.
Dude, dude, listen, what I'm saying is that "people ought not be freaked out by this", "on average people are not freaked out by this", and "you personally are not allowed to be freaked out by this" are three different statements that are very different along different dimensions too.
What kind of proportionality are you even talking about? What people on average find traumatic and how much? How do you get from that to what individual people might experience as traumatic?
Again what the fuck is the difference? I donât care to map somebodyâs acrophobia into an assertion that plane travel is actually traumatic. Even for them.
Donât be so quick to venerate the dysfunction of one guyâs reaction to whatâs considered reasonable. So youâre saying that one guy might be traumatized via an OCD reaction to mid-matched socks? One itty bitty guy should me where might have a singular solitary condition, your âsingle individualâ? They re-define the word, and map it unreasonably onto something benign? And Iâm supposed to solute you and get a boner because youâre playing the âevery individualâs reaction is their own and to be respectedâ game.
Nah.
I donât care to map somebodyâs acrophobia into an assertion that plane travel is actually traumatic. Even for them.
Nice. So if a person who is afraid to fly experiences a panic attack and passes out, that wasn't really traumatic, even for them.
Next in /u/whamo revelations: peanut butter isn't really allergenic, even for people who die from it.
OK, when there's a disagreement about definitions, we should take a step back and ask what are we going to use those definitions for. Like, supposedly Lincoln's favorite joke was, if we call a dog's tail a leg, how many legs does dog have?
The canonical answer that it's still four, because no matter what you call it, it's still a leg, is missing the point I think. The correct way to look at it is to ask, why are you asking? If because you're wondering how many dog boots you need for your dog (if it's a firefighter dog that wears boots or something), then yeah, no matter what you call its tail it doesn't need a boot. And if you're wondering how many appendages you can grab a dog by, then it makes sense to include the tail in the count, though calling it a leg specifically is still questionable.
Now, there's a person who was greatly distressed by some experience, to the point of still experiencing distress because of intrusive memories of that experience, including nightmares and shit, then why exactly do you want to know what the experience actually was? Why exactly do you care if they were almost hit by a car or saw a spooky tree?
I mean, there are legitimate reasons to care, maybe in some cases you might become pretty sure that they are lying about the extent of their trauma, but if you assume that they are not, then what exactly defining something as "not really trauma because it wouldn't traumatize most people" does for you, when dealing with that person in particular?
Another question is what the society-wide policy should be, we don't go cutting down all trees because of a handful of people who might be traumatized by them, because unfortunately for those people that would inflict much greater harm on everyone else, so they must learn to deal with that themselves.
Now, I'm not sure where being spooked by ftm vagina falls wrt to this, but it's not an obviously clear cut question, because I seriously suspect that there's going to be more gay dudes seriously spooked by it than ftm gay dudes. "But that is a minority so small that it can be ignored" is an argument that cuts both ways.
Long, incoherent desperately in need of cutting... and after all the gnashing and crit and condescending bs that I honestly just scanned without really bothering to read, youâre not sure whether ftm vagina is traumatic, not sure âwhere it falls wrt all this...â
Nice going
Wow. Brilliant. You donât know where to come down on the original question? Canât come up with a position?
Nah, you got it all wrong, I was pretty sure that ftm vagina is traumatic for someone if it traumatized them, but not sure if and how much we should do about preventing that as a society.
Yeah, I don't reflexively trust needlessly panicked triggered people's redefinition of words.
I don't have it all wrong. I'm absolutely sure that this idiot actually has no idea what trauma is. Want to see trauma? Watch Ken Burns' Vietnam War doc.
This doesn't qualify as trauma. Mild discomfort or shock and dismay, maybe. Personally I'd be like, wow hilarious, you're hot anyway, turn around let's fuck.
Trauma is seeing your kid killed in a car accident, not accidentally touching a trans peen.
You don't have a coherent definition of trauma and bounce all around the place because you mix apples, oranges, and a bunch of extra fruit varieties.
I already proposed one: it's when a person was greatly distressed by some experience, to the point of still experiencing distress because of intrusive memories of that experience, including nightmares and shit.
This is a definition based solely on the characteristics of that particular person: was distressed? Remained distressed afterwards? Yep, got trauma.
Instead you invent a bunch of criteria that examine everything except whether the person themselves was fucking traumatized.
Was the experience as bad as the 'nam? Well, what if it isn't, and what if some person had that experience but shrugged it off, would others become also not traumatized then?
Would that experience traumatize you personally? How the fuck does that even makes sense, all right, next time I'm distressed by someone you would not be and ask you to borrow your "mild discomfort", that's gonna help.
In above comments you also proposed to use the number of people who would be so traumatized as a criterion. Which is again retarded, that maybe one in a thousand people might die from peanut allergy doesn't mean that nobody dies from peanut allergy.
All because there's yet another angle, what would be the implications of you admitting that yeah, that guy was traumatized, what next, but of course with your scatterbrained approach you can't possibly disentangle that from factual questions and end up with rambling bunch of incoherent assertions.
Consult DSM-IV before you expect me to read another word. Got through the first line. There is an existing solid definition and you and your pussy saw buddies arenât re-writing it. I presented solid examples of what does constitute trauma which conform to the definition. Thatâs factual, and youâre outta bullets. Bye.
Symptoms include re-experiencing the trauma through nightmares, obsessive thoughts, and flashbacks (feeling as if you are actually in the traumatic situation again). There is an avoidance component as well, where the individual avoids situations, people, and/or objects which remind him or her about the traumatic event (e.g., a person experiencing PTSD after a serious car accident might avoid driving or being a passenger in a car). Finally, there is increased anxiety in general, possibly with a heightened startle response (e.g., very jumpy, startle easy by noises).
So basically what I wrote. Note the absence of "this should hurt them as bad as Vietnam vets to qualify", and "this should hurt them as bad as /u/whamo in a comparable situation to qualify", and "this should hurt most people as bad as them to qualify".
Someone who got really spooked by their child getting smashed by a car, or by turbulence in an airplane, or by an unexpected vagina, or by a tree branch scratching on the window, would qualify as long as they develop the symptoms. And if the symptoms don't persist for a month or more that qualifies as trauma but not a post-traumatic stress disorder.
Do you realize that I'd respect you a lot if you admit that you were wrong, and disrespect you if you make up some more ridiculous claims that contradict the DSM?
Very cute. Again reading the first line was enough that I knew you blew it, I did see the word Vietnam which I guarantee you know jackshit about.
Did you read the previous paragraph about death or severe personal injury?
âCriterion A (one required): The person was exposed to: death, threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, or actual or threatened sexual violence,â
Nice try.
First, I'm not sure why are we discussing the kinds of trauma that are a prerequisite for PTSD in particular at all. DSM is not and doesn't claim to be an authority on the meaning of the word "trauma". Again, not all traumatic events are severe enough to result in PTSD.
But OK, what do you think happens if a child comes to a psychiatrist and says that he has nightmares after this old guy exposed himself to him at a bus stop, does the psychiatrist tells him to stop being a pussy, he could just run away and so was never threatened by sexual violence?
The OPâs claim that he was traumatized by his discovery that his hookup was a trans guy simply does not satisfy the definition of âtraumaâ as clinically defined. Itâs a clinical term, and the word should not be refined by a panicked hookup participant or Reddit sophistry. I have demonstrated clearly the above and only the above.
Even if we go by the strict DSM definition, this shit would fall under it just like a PTSD after being exposed to an exhibitionist.
And similarly I'm pretty sure that it's not intended to be an exhaustive list. Or do you think that a girl with claustrophobia who got locked in a closet by bullies and has been peeing her bed every day since then would be told to stop being a pansy by the psychiatrist, that's not PTSD, DSM says so?
Anyway, DSM doesn't define "trauma", only the kinds of trauma that are sufficient for PTSD.
Even if not for all of the above, people aren't required to use technical terms when there's an established colloquial meaning.
But I guess it's all pointless because you are convinced that allowing someone to describe their condition as traumatic obliges you to suck their dick, and you only want to suck dicks of truly deserving people, like nam vets and the like.
That last line shows your true colors. Thatâs shitty and a true sign youâre outclassed.
You lost. Itâs not about me.
Itâs about this:
Dissociative. Summary of Changes in DSM 5. Criterion A: Definition of trauma âexposure to actual or threated death, serious injury, or sexual violenceâ.
It doesnât get any clearer than that.
I have no interest or obligation to âanswerâ your questions.
That last line shows your true colors. Thatâs shitty and a true sign youâre outclassed.
You lost. Itâs not about me.
No, it's definitely about you and why you refuse to respond to any of my four points refuting your point, and merely repeating it.
You really don't want to allow people to describe their experiences as "traumatic" for some retarded reason, like that makes your life worse in some way.
There's no way I can force you to engage with my points as long as you have this weird hang-up, that if you give them an inch the next thing is you finding yourself forced to suck a dick of someone who said that they were traumatized by something.
This sounds like you were traumatized by something, to be honest. I'm not going to speculate if that was your mother or father or a sibling, but you deffo come off as a victim of emotional and probably sexual abuse.
Keep it up, youâre making an idiot out of yourself.
Just read the definition. Not the Urban Dictionary version. Finding a trans guyâs junk is not death or potentially fatal injury.
I donât have anything else to say. Thatâs all I said at first and consistently since.. Itâs not trauma.
The patient doesnât diagnosis the disease. Redditoids donât write the DSM. And a colloquial misappropriation of a term is indefensible. Itâs an SAT word, and you flunked.
As for the rest about my personality and your hilarious speculations about it: you sound like a nut. Lottttttttaaaaa projection.
Just read the definition. Finding a trans guyâs junk is not death or potentially fatal injury.
Even if we go by the strict DSM definition, this shit would fall under it just like a PTSD after being exposed to an exhibitionist.
And similarly I'm pretty sure that it's not intended to be an exhaustive list. Or do you think that a girl with claustrophobia who got locked in a closet by bullies and has been peeing her bed every day since then would be told to stop being a pansy by the psychiatrist, that's not PTSD, DSM says so?
Anyway, DSM doesn't define "trauma", only the kinds of trauma that are sufficient for PTSD.
Even if not for all of the above, people aren't required to use technical terms when there's an established colloquial meaning.
Dude, it's OK. You don't have to suck the dick of anyone who claims to be traumatized.
I'd say being raped while unconscious is less traumatizing because you have no recollection of it, and if a guy is raped he doesn't even has to worry about being pregnant.
And since you're gauging trauma please tell everyone what are the appropriate things to be traumatized about
I'm not getting an answer because you're retarded.
Seriously how hard it is to see that how it could be traumatizing for a person to go to a strangers house(an unknown environment where he has no power) finding that he deceived you and could probably harm you if you don't oblige, like this could be a plot for a horror movie if you replace the genders(it would be regardless of the switch but retards like you would complain that it wasn't actually traumatic).
My opinion is that your drywall needs to be redecorated with chunks of exploding brain matter but I digress, have fun with molesting people in their sleep and grooming children
None of which I espoused. You just did it. Your disagreement with me (who asked you) about the more likely hilarious oops of finding yourself with a trans guy is comparable to rape and buttfucking 8 year olds, and that because we disagree I should be murdered.
Tell you what... run that by your shrink, see what they think.
Chain-escalating an argument by extrapolation and progressively more absurd false parallels is an old trick used by those who think theyâre smarter than they are,
Actually in my comment before this I just paraphrased op's situation, you can tell me how that wasn't traumatizing, but as I said keep grooming kids and putting roofies in people's drinks.
He was planning to fuck the guy anyways how does it matter if he doesn't have a dick. Not super knowledgeable about trans stuff but they still have buttholes right?
Im going to assume you are heterosexual male like most of us.
How would you feel if you met cute girl on Tinder and she promised you anal. You are going there to fuck girl in the ass but she turns out to be trans male to female? Asshole is still asshole?
Consider myself mostly heterosexual yes. As long as I don't have to perform oral, and she was feminine enough I had no idea until then, I'd absolutely be fine with it, possibly even be excited about it. But I still think that's a bigger bait and switch than the dude just missing something you weren't planning on using anyways.
Im going to assume you are heterosexual male like most of us.
How would you feel if you met cute girl on Tinder and she promised you anal. You are going there to fuck girl in the ass but she turns out to be trans male to female? Asshole is still asshole?
It was a dispute over whether or not some guy we dealt with on the phone was super fat or super skinny. I bet he was a fatty, turned out he was a toothpick.
I was walking down the street in some yoga pants today cause ya know I'm a slut. Then this old crusty fuck white man said to me "hey faggot you shouldn't be wearing that shit faggot". So I went over to where he was standing and got really close to him to the point where I could've kissed him. I then said "lol your mum gay" and dabbed on him. The man started to cry in pain and agony. "Ah no the gay gene!!! It's infecting me!" I laughed at him and said "lol that isn't the gay gene that's AIDS" then I kicked his dick and broke it in half. At this point cops were called and they detained me for questioning. After telling them everything they arrested the old white fuck and let me go.
I also fucked the entire police stationđđđđ
112 comments
1 starship_litterbox 2018-01-06
u/hapahapahapa Just fuck him right in the pussy, coward.
1 Zozbot 2018-01-06
zoz
1 Zozbot 2018-01-06
zle
1 Zozbot 2018-01-06
zozzle
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-01-06
/u/hapahapahapa has zozbot's blessing
1 CummyBot-1999 2018-01-06
And also has Ed's ping, so he needs to commit sudoku asap
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2018-01-06
/u/CummyBot-1999
Chop chop!! đ
1 shallowm 2018-01-06
What is it with hapas and retardation?
This is why we need communism.
1 uhuhuhu 2018-01-06
Hapas are 50% mayo, which is evidently enough to cause severe mental deficiencies.
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-01-06
More proof that the Mayocide should observe the One Drop Rule tbh.
1 ironicshitpostr 2018-01-06
This is why we need Islam, inshallah.
1 makes_people_cringe 2018-01-06
lmfao which one of you posted this
1 OniTan 2018-01-06
I'd like to see one where the faggot is catfishing a straight guy, but said straight guy turns out to be a tranny catfishing him.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2018-01-06
u/hapahapahapa don't be a transphobe
1 shallowm 2018-01-06
For some reason, this made me laugh, probably because I was thinking of the same advice being given in the context of dating instead of hook-ups.
1 pepperouchau 2018-01-06
Business meetings too!
1 gayhorny89 2018-01-06
That's my comment, haha. And yeah, I pretty much always used that rule on Grindr. No dick pic, no meet.
1 aonome 2018-01-06
Agreed, dicklets should he gassed tbh
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-01-06
How easy would it be for a really skinny, long haired guy on grindr? I'm trying to keep an open mind if this whole gussy thing doesn't work out.
1 grep_var_log 2018-01-06
How much can you fit in your bussy?
1 jaredschaffer27 2018-01-06
A little bit of toilet paper or a gentle slender Asian proctologist's finger.
1 IAintThatGuy 2018-01-06
/u/hapahapahapa I sincerely sympathize with your trauma. Too bad there's no "trans panic defense" anymore.
1 hexane360 2018-01-06
I need to make an even more asanine argument in court so people can trot it out online for 40 years to come
1 JohnTheOrc 2018-01-06
Lol. OPâs scared of a girl
1 a_normal_human 2018-01-06
well, to be fair, OP is a faggot
1 Mr_Americas 2018-01-06
K I N K S H A M E R
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
I hope the people saying it isn't traumatising also believe that raping a drunk person isn't traumatizing because they weren't even conscious.
Wouldn't you agree u/whamo, u/tojo940, u/MacroAlgalFagasaurus
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Or accidentally nearly having sex with a close relative (idk maybe by being involved in some swinger shit or something).
If you put your mind to it, it turns out that there's quite a few situations that can be traumatizing without even a possibility of causing physical harm. But of course sex with a transperson can't be one of them because they are already very oppressed so expecting being responsible of them would be even more oppressive, so that's just not true, nobody can be traumatized by that thing. Not allowed!
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
I'd say flashing and other non violent sexual misconduct or child grooming can also be ruled out not traumatizing, fucking children should get a grip
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Sending dickpics to women is absolutely unjustifiably demonized too. It's a picture, lady, it's not going to jump out of the screen and rape you, what's your problem even?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
What the hell has that got to do with it?
I hope you would agree that my fender bender is just as traumatic as vehicular homicide.
Jesus. Who taught these guys how to make a case.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
That's the whole problem, that you all over there have this attitude that being surprised by a vegeta is no big deal because no harm no foul etc etc.
But the same reasoning goes against a lot of things that we do recognize as oftentimes traumatic without being harmful. See this whole thread.
And then you say that a gay raped in his sleep is allowed to feel traumatized and a guy spooked by an unexpected gussy is not. With the only difference being that your personal life experiences tell you that you probably wouldn't be traumatized.
I mean, the OP is very clearly a troll, but you all should still take a long look in the mirror in my humble opinion.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Yeah we suck. If a guy turned out to be a trans guy Iâll run to my shrink. And weâre all pro rape. And you have no sense of proportionality...
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Dude, dude, listen, what I'm saying is that "people ought not be freaked out by this", "on average people are not freaked out by this", and "you personally are not allowed to be freaked out by this" are three different statements that are very different along different dimensions too.
What kind of proportionality are you even talking about? What people on average find traumatic and how much? How do you get from that to what individual people might experience as traumatic?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Again what the fuck is the difference? I donât care to map somebodyâs acrophobia into an assertion that plane travel is actually traumatic. Even for them.
Donât be so quick to venerate the dysfunction of one guyâs reaction to whatâs considered reasonable. So youâre saying that one guy might be traumatized via an OCD reaction to mid-matched socks? One itty bitty guy should me where might have a singular solitary condition, your âsingle individualâ? They re-define the word, and map it unreasonably onto something benign? And Iâm supposed to solute you and get a boner because youâre playing the âevery individualâs reaction is their own and to be respectedâ game. Nah.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Nice. So if a person who is afraid to fly experiences a panic attack and passes out, that wasn't really traumatic, even for them.
Next in /u/whamo revelations: peanut butter isn't really allergenic, even for people who die from it.
OK, when there's a disagreement about definitions, we should take a step back and ask what are we going to use those definitions for. Like, supposedly Lincoln's favorite joke was, if we call a dog's tail a leg, how many legs does dog have?
The canonical answer that it's still four, because no matter what you call it, it's still a leg, is missing the point I think. The correct way to look at it is to ask, why are you asking? If because you're wondering how many dog boots you need for your dog (if it's a firefighter dog that wears boots or something), then yeah, no matter what you call its tail it doesn't need a boot. And if you're wondering how many appendages you can grab a dog by, then it makes sense to include the tail in the count, though calling it a leg specifically is still questionable.
Now, there's a person who was greatly distressed by some experience, to the point of still experiencing distress because of intrusive memories of that experience, including nightmares and shit, then why exactly do you want to know what the experience actually was? Why exactly do you care if they were almost hit by a car or saw a spooky tree?
I mean, there are legitimate reasons to care, maybe in some cases you might become pretty sure that they are lying about the extent of their trauma, but if you assume that they are not, then what exactly defining something as "not really trauma because it wouldn't traumatize most people" does for you, when dealing with that person in particular?
Another question is what the society-wide policy should be, we don't go cutting down all trees because of a handful of people who might be traumatized by them, because unfortunately for those people that would inflict much greater harm on everyone else, so they must learn to deal with that themselves.
Now, I'm not sure where being spooked by ftm vagina falls wrt to this, but it's not an obviously clear cut question, because I seriously suspect that there's going to be more gay dudes seriously spooked by it than ftm gay dudes. "But that is a minority so small that it can be ignored" is an argument that cuts both ways.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Long, incoherent desperately in need of cutting... and after all the gnashing and crit and condescending bs that I honestly just scanned without really bothering to read, youâre not sure whether ftm vagina is traumatic, not sure âwhere it falls wrt all this...â
Nice going
Wow. Brilliant. You donât know where to come down on the original question? Canât come up with a position?
Then shut the fuck up about me until you can.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Black and white thinking is not a virtue.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Blurry incoherent thinking is not thinking at all.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
You said you didn't even read my comment, what could you know about my thinking?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
It was that obvious, even from a quick scan. Youâre not that trenchant.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Nah, you got it all wrong, I was pretty sure that ftm vagina is traumatic for someone if it traumatized them, but not sure if and how much we should do about preventing that as a society.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Yeah, I don't reflexively trust needlessly panicked triggered people's redefinition of words.
I don't have it all wrong. I'm absolutely sure that this idiot actually has no idea what trauma is. Want to see trauma? Watch Ken Burns' Vietnam War doc.
This doesn't qualify as trauma. Mild discomfort or shock and dismay, maybe. Personally I'd be like, wow hilarious, you're hot anyway, turn around let's fuck.
Trauma is seeing your kid killed in a car accident, not accidentally touching a trans peen.
C'mon already, this is pretty rudimentary.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
You don't have a coherent definition of trauma and bounce all around the place because you mix apples, oranges, and a bunch of extra fruit varieties.
I already proposed one: it's when a person was greatly distressed by some experience, to the point of still experiencing distress because of intrusive memories of that experience, including nightmares and shit.
This is a definition based solely on the characteristics of that particular person: was distressed? Remained distressed afterwards? Yep, got trauma.
Instead you invent a bunch of criteria that examine everything except whether the person themselves was fucking traumatized.
Was the experience as bad as the 'nam? Well, what if it isn't, and what if some person had that experience but shrugged it off, would others become also not traumatized then?
Would that experience traumatize you personally? How the fuck does that even makes sense, all right, next time I'm distressed by someone you would not be and ask you to borrow your "mild discomfort", that's gonna help.
In above comments you also proposed to use the number of people who would be so traumatized as a criterion. Which is again retarded, that maybe one in a thousand people might die from peanut allergy doesn't mean that nobody dies from peanut allergy.
All because there's yet another angle, what would be the implications of you admitting that yeah, that guy was traumatized, what next, but of course with your scatterbrained approach you can't possibly disentangle that from factual questions and end up with rambling bunch of incoherent assertions.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Consult DSM-IV before you expect me to read another word. Got through the first line. There is an existing solid definition and you and your pussy saw buddies arenât re-writing it. I presented solid examples of what does constitute trauma which conform to the definition. Thatâs factual, and youâre outta bullets. Bye.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
What do you mean exactly? If https://allpsych.com/disorders/anxiety/ptsd/ then it's not the same as "trauma", it's something that might or might no develop as a result of trauma, and the criteria for that are all about what the person experiences: https://allpsych.com/disorders/anxiety/ptsd/
So basically what I wrote. Note the absence of "this should hurt them as bad as Vietnam vets to qualify", and "this should hurt them as bad as /u/whamo in a comparable situation to qualify", and "this should hurt most people as bad as them to qualify".
Someone who got really spooked by their child getting smashed by a car, or by turbulence in an airplane, or by an unexpected vagina, or by a tree branch scratching on the window, would qualify as long as they develop the symptoms. And if the symptoms don't persist for a month or more that qualifies as trauma but not a post-traumatic stress disorder.
Do you realize that I'd respect you a lot if you admit that you were wrong, and disrespect you if you make up some more ridiculous claims that contradict the DSM?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Very cute. Again reading the first line was enough that I knew you blew it, I did see the word Vietnam which I guarantee you know jackshit about.
Did you read the previous paragraph about death or severe personal injury? âCriterion A (one required): The person was exposed to: death, threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, or actual or threatened sexual violence,â Nice try.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
First, I'm not sure why are we discussing the kinds of trauma that are a prerequisite for PTSD in particular at all. DSM is not and doesn't claim to be an authority on the meaning of the word "trauma". Again, not all traumatic events are severe enough to result in PTSD.
But OK, what do you think happens if a child comes to a psychiatrist and says that he has nightmares after this old guy exposed himself to him at a bus stop, does the psychiatrist tells him to stop being a pussy, he could just run away and so was never threatened by sexual violence?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
You simply will not let this go.
The OPâs claim that he was traumatized by his discovery that his hookup was a trans guy simply does not satisfy the definition of âtraumaâ as clinically defined. Itâs a clinical term, and the word should not be refined by a panicked hookup participant or Reddit sophistry. I have demonstrated clearly the above and only the above.
The end.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
You did not answer my question.
Even if we go by the strict DSM definition, this shit would fall under it just like a PTSD after being exposed to an exhibitionist.
And similarly I'm pretty sure that it's not intended to be an exhaustive list. Or do you think that a girl with claustrophobia who got locked in a closet by bullies and has been peeing her bed every day since then would be told to stop being a pansy by the psychiatrist, that's not PTSD, DSM says so?
Anyway, DSM doesn't define "trauma", only the kinds of trauma that are sufficient for PTSD.
Even if not for all of the above, people aren't required to use technical terms when there's an established colloquial meaning.
But I guess it's all pointless because you are convinced that allowing someone to describe their condition as traumatic obliges you to suck their dick, and you only want to suck dicks of truly deserving people, like nam vets and the like.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
That last line shows your true colors. Thatâs shitty and a true sign youâre outclassed.
You lost. Itâs not about me.
Itâs about this:
Dissociative. Summary of Changes in DSM 5. Criterion A: Definition of trauma âexposure to actual or threated death, serious injury, or sexual violenceâ.
It doesnât get any clearer than that.
I have no interest or obligation to âanswerâ your questions.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
No, it's definitely about you and why you refuse to respond to any of my four points refuting your point, and merely repeating it.
You really don't want to allow people to describe their experiences as "traumatic" for some retarded reason, like that makes your life worse in some way.
There's no way I can force you to engage with my points as long as you have this weird hang-up, that if you give them an inch the next thing is you finding yourself forced to suck a dick of someone who said that they were traumatized by something.
This sounds like you were traumatized by something, to be honest. I'm not going to speculate if that was your mother or father or a sibling, but you deffo come off as a victim of emotional and probably sexual abuse.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Keep it up, youâre making an idiot out of yourself.
Just read the definition. Not the Urban Dictionary version. Finding a trans guyâs junk is not death or potentially fatal injury.
I donât have anything else to say. Thatâs all I said at first and consistently since.. Itâs not trauma. The patient doesnât diagnosis the disease. Redditoids donât write the DSM. And a colloquial misappropriation of a term is indefensible. Itâs an SAT word, and you flunked.
As for the rest about my personality and your hilarious speculations about it: you sound like a nut. Lottttttttaaaaa projection.
1 zergling_Lester 2018-01-06
Even if we go by the strict DSM definition, this shit would fall under it just like a PTSD after being exposed to an exhibitionist.
And similarly I'm pretty sure that it's not intended to be an exhaustive list. Or do you think that a girl with claustrophobia who got locked in a closet by bullies and has been peeing her bed every day since then would be told to stop being a pansy by the psychiatrist, that's not PTSD, DSM says so?
Anyway, DSM doesn't define "trauma", only the kinds of trauma that are sufficient for PTSD.
Even if not for all of the above, people aren't required to use technical terms when there's an established colloquial meaning.
Dude, it's OK. You don't have to suck the dick of anyone who claims to be traumatized.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
You canât read, DSM 5 defines it.
1 whyameridumbs 2018-01-06
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
I'd say being raped while unconscious is less traumatizing because you have no recollection of it, and if a guy is raped he doesn't even has to worry about being pregnant.
And since you're gauging trauma please tell everyone what are the appropriate things to be traumatized about
1 whamo 2018-01-06
This is the most ridiculous conversation Iâve had this week. No. No longer interested. Said all I have to say.
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
Is flashing traumatizing?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Null set. Weâre done. Simply getting with a trans guy - even by surprise- is not traumatic in any way shape or form.
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
So flashing isn't?
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Youâre not getting an answer.
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
I'm not getting an answer because you're retarded.
Seriously how hard it is to see that how it could be traumatizing for a person to go to a strangers house(an unknown environment where he has no power) finding that he deceived you and could probably harm you if you don't oblige, like this could be a plot for a horror movie if you replace the genders(it would be regardless of the switch but retards like you would complain that it wasn't actually traumatic).
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Youâre not getting an answer because Iâve stated my opinion and youâre flailing with a non convergent counter-example that doesnât pertain.
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
My opinion is that your drywall needs to be redecorated with chunks of exploding brain matter but I digress, have fun with molesting people in their sleep and grooming children
1 whamo 2018-01-06
None of which I espoused. You just did it. Your disagreement with me (who asked you) about the more likely hilarious oops of finding yourself with a trans guy is comparable to rape and buttfucking 8 year olds, and that because we disagree I should be murdered.
Tell you what... run that by your shrink, see what they think.
1 Shiwanshu1 2018-01-06
Actually in my comment before this I just paraphrased op's situation, you can tell me how that wasn't traumatizing, but as I said keep grooming kids and putting roofies in people's drinks.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
Which I never have, and which arenât relevant. And youâre pretty lame if thatâs the best case you can make.
See ya!
1 xjapxn 2018-01-06
/u/Peemster99 has a point there
1 Systemsmodel 2018-01-06
Wasnât he attracted to all the feminine things about this person?
1 Delkseypoo 2018-01-06
He was planning to fuck the guy anyways how does it matter if he doesn't have a dick. Not super knowledgeable about trans stuff but they still have buttholes right?
1 Systemsmodel 2018-01-06
He was planning on fucking a real dude, not a med calmly created one, people are allowed to make that choice
1 ssg- 2018-01-06
Im going to assume you are heterosexual male like most of us.
How would you feel if you met cute girl on Tinder and she promised you anal. You are going there to fuck girl in the ass but she turns out to be trans male to female? Asshole is still asshole?
1 Delkseypoo 2018-01-06
Consider myself mostly heterosexual yes. As long as I don't have to perform oral, and she was feminine enough I had no idea until then, I'd absolutely be fine with it, possibly even be excited about it. But I still think that's a bigger bait and switch than the dude just missing something you weren't planning on using anyways.
1 Masterthrowaway9001 2018-01-06
F E M I N I N E P E N I S
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-01-06
A dude without a penis doesnât exist, you filthy degenerate
1 HasAnArchmageFetish 2018-01-06
Have you ever heard about androgen insensitivity syndrome?
1 Time_to_Drink 2018-01-06
Have you heard about our lord and saviour, Muhammad?
1 Delkseypoo 2018-01-06
Also that's a terrible assumption. Where have you been? Drama is mostly gay dudes and MTF trans now.
1 fsdgfhk 2018-01-06
Speak for yourself. Some of us are woke to the oppressive, violent, heteronormative propaganda of biological sex.
1 person594 2018-01-06
Um darling do you know what subreddit you're in?
1 wilsonspaulding 2018-01-06
A lots of these so-called âtopsâ are more interested in sucking dick than fucking ass.
1 shallowm 2018-01-06
Sounds pretty gay, tbh.
1 ssg- 2018-01-06
Im going to assume you are heterosexual male like most of us.
How would you feel if you met cute girl on Tinder and she promised you anal. You are going there to fuck girl in the ass but she turns out to be trans male to female? Asshole is still asshole?
1 quinotauri 2018-01-06
Since we're chatting - mayocide anyone?
1 Ultrashitpost 2018-01-06
I wouldn't call this a pussy tbh
1 Thhueros 2018-01-06
Once I lost a bet and had to watch a video of the surgery.
1 Ultrashitpost 2018-01-06
what was the bet?
1 Gil-Gandel 2018-01-06
"I bet I can say something that will make you barf."
1 Thhueros 2018-01-06
It was a dispute over whether or not some guy we dealt with on the phone was super fat or super skinny. I bet he was a fatty, turned out he was a toothpick.
1 shallowm 2018-01-06
The person he encountered was a trans man, not a trans woman, which means she was born with a gussy.
1 WereCarrot 2018-01-06
What in god's green fucking earth is that? Don't tell me that's an actual tranny puss, freshly spawned?
1 Ultrashitpost 2018-01-06
aye lad, it be that
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-01-06
Disgusting
1 r_juicyasians 2018-01-06
Help
1 GuillotinesNOW 2018-01-06
Ok, this has to be a/r/drama user's alt, lol.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-01-06
Is it gayer to fuck a MtF or a FtM?
Basically, I kind of wanted to bang the mute FtM assassin chick in John Wick 2 and I need to know if I can still take communion at church tomorrow.
1 Imgur_Lurker 2018-01-06
Ruby Rose?
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-01-06
Yes
1 stopspammingme 2018-01-06
Ruby Rose isn't even taking male hormones so she's basically a woman with short hair wearing man clothes
A dude banging her is really working hard to not get anywhere near actual bussy
1 POZLOADS0 2018-01-06
Banging a FtM tranny is like fucking a really ugly woman and it looks like a man so it's gay.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-01-06
There is nothing straighter than fucking ugly women.
1 POZLOADS0 2018-01-06
Is that what your father told you lul.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2018-01-06
Rude
1 CirqueDuFuder 2018-01-06
Anyone can fuck a hot woman. It takes a real straight guy to fuck ugly ones.
1 JumbledFun 2018-01-06
Guessing that's your alt?
1 RyuunDragon 2018-01-06
u/hapahapahapa how does it feel knowing even fucking r/askgaybros think you're being a overly fragile little snowflake
If you're not a troll, then you're the one with the pussy.
1 fsdgfhk 2018-01-06
tbf, I feel pretty traumatised just reading that thread.
1 fsdgfhk 2018-01-06
tbf, gussy is pretty scary. I hear some of them have teeth!
1 ahbslldud 2018-01-06
Why do trannies gotta be so rapey tho. How DARE this gay man not wanna fuck a pussy lmao
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-01-06
oh my god you miserable whores this isn't the lesson to take from this at all
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-01-06
I am fucking lollering here
1 do0rkn0b 2018-01-06
I don't see the problem, traps are gay.
1 queerjihad 2018-01-06
I was walking down the street in some yoga pants today cause ya know I'm a slut. Then this old crusty fuck white man said to me "hey faggot you shouldn't be wearing that shit faggot". So I went over to where he was standing and got really close to him to the point where I could've kissed him. I then said "lol your mum gay" and dabbed on him. The man started to cry in pain and agony. "Ah no the gay gene!!! It's infecting me!" I laughed at him and said "lol that isn't the gay gene that's AIDS" then I kicked his dick and broke it in half. At this point cops were called and they detained me for questioning. After telling them everything they arrested the old white fuck and let me go.
I also fucked the entire police stationđđđđ
Remember always dab on the haters.
1 whamo 2018-01-06
One manâs trauma is another manâs oops, hilarity, ok turn around letâs fuck. They canât both be right but Iâd go with the second.