Fierce Azn woman makes a sweet comic about the Women's March, MRAs, wypipo, and hapas have a mental breakdown in the comments.

94  2018-01-22 by embedded_68k

52 comments

Jews did this

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

>the bearded man doing the soyboy smile

you can't make this shit up

/u/food_and_cuddles I feel like you and r/Drama can have quite a bit of common ground, and we'd love for you to join us in our crusade to bring about the Mayocide. Also, good job getting whitey to hold the Times Up sign, the irony will never even hit the whidiot when the mayocide comes for her.

Time's up don't shoot!

No

#ICantType

Of course, the reddit brown shirt brigade or reductive toddler-brained gamer-gate enthusiasts probably saw a TedX talk with a crypto facist say "PAY GAP IS FALSE" one time, so you guys keep jerking this same garbage around like it's a controversial truism.

lol

lol

If we let feminism "win", they'll try to control men by throwing all men in prisons and using them only for breeding.

Then some other culture will start a war against the country, most likely the muslim people because they are the most patriarchical and power-hungry around, and they'll win, because woman don't have enough ability to defend themselves, and they don't even understand the importance of an army (they'd abandon the army most likely). Then this other culture would subdue the feminists and we would be at a patriarchy.

If no other culture attacked, they would most likely be able to keep themselves alife (it's not hard with todays tools), and having enough babies would be easy to achieve too. But anyway, they'd not be able to force all men into prisons, because men would win in a fight. The pendulum would swing back, and women would be subdued.

I don't want to be killed or imprisoned. Because most men feel the same, feminism can't win. Even most women disagree with the goals of feminsim.

There is just no way feminism can win, that's why we can't let them win, because it's impossible. Feminism can only be successfull, if they have mens support, which they do right now. But since they can't reach their goals with mens support, they can't win.

what sort of drug addled mentally handicapped unstable psychotic schizo hole did this pasta crawl out of.

This is almost as good as the Hillary nuking Hawaii sticky.

Source lol

lol, this is amazing, thanks

Shit, my money was on TRP.

I mean, it's not all that different lol.

control men by throwing all men in prisons and using them only for breeding.

This is the only way you are ever going to get some, retard.

because woman don't have enough ability

Don't have enough ability? Is ability in and of itself quantifiable?

Really salty about questioning their lies

GAMERGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE

Say that 3 times while looking into a mirror and 360 no scope a hooker in hitman and Anita sarkesian will appear, to make all your nightmares come true.

Somewhere, Bob Chipman does this nonstop and hopes to finally slide in

Say that 3 times while looking into a mirror and 360 no scope a hooker in hitman and Anita sarkesian will appear, to make all your nightmares come true.

I see a lot of Russian shill bot accusations thrown around these days, but this quoted post is as close to something a bot might post as I've seen.

haha yeah i was thinking if ever there was a buzzword bingo this person's post would check the entire thing

Ewww

Lol so many """experts""" with """objective facts""" all up in the thread.

what's the point of making pithy slogans if they need a bunch of "well actually using these definitions and under these contexts..." clarifications to hold up?

This is how every political slogan works. The whole point is to oversimplify until you look good. And it works.

"Make America Great Again" needs all kind of supplementary info to be meaningful, but most people don't care. Political slogans have never been about presenting an honest and complete picture of the world.

True. But what I'm confused about is the those in that thread getting all upset when people hear a slogan and then challenge it on their own terms. Especially if there is some kind of debate going on about the issue, you'd probably at least want a little more context so the other group can't easily knockdown a strawman and then declare ideological victory.

you'd probably want a little more context so the other group can't easily knockdown a strawman

doesn't matter, no one cares when you knock down an argument, no matter how easy it is

Hell, the dems did it with MAGA

How'd that turn out again?

The people arguing in the linked comments obviously care, since there's a lot of clarifying and debate about the specifics of what the slogan is talking about.

Let me rephrase that - not enough people care for it to matter

This

Democracy looks retarded.

This is what wokeness looks like.

I blame universal suffrage

Biggest mistake in history.

If women are choosing less lucrative careers and working fewer hours due to family obligations

Pay between professions needs to be equalized, and women should to be paid more per unit time than men to make up for the smaller amount of time they work. Equality is really that simple.

/u/srddog that's commie talk. Shouldn't we we encouraging women to take higher paying jobs?

Yep, exactly! Women (and men, and nonbinary, etc) are very often disbelieved when claiming sexual assault (and other things) to the point of opting out of claiming their own stories out of fear of being disbelieved. I think we need to be better about shaping the cultural story around these topics, so that we know we are heard!

/u/holy_black_on_a_popo

nonbinary

lol

You're doing God's work, I want you to know that.

Thx bb ;)

This sub seems kind of mean-tempered about this. If I had known it would be this controversial I'd have just stuck to my Instagram

/u/food_and_cuddles

You're making a political statement (really several). Why would it not be controversial? I know some people on the internet can only express disagreement with mindless screaming, but the fact that disagreement exists shouldn't be surprising...

The "this is what democracy looks like" bit made me smile... I thought the exact same thing when Trump was elected.

Lol actually I'm the one holding the immigrants get the job done sign. I'm Asian. :)

Such a shamfur dispray, u/food_and_cuddles. If it were up to me, I would do all of them as Asian. Then I'll bullshit one of them as White, one of them as a Uighur, one of them as American Indian, one of them as a light-skinned African, etc. You had one job, and you blew it.

I liked /u/vegan_nothingburger's "contribution" which consists entirely of alternating "I'm gonna need a citation better than some bullshit peer-reviewed academic study for your assertions!" with "I have an excellent citation right here from a completely unbiased advocacy group with no vested interest whatsoever in forwarding any particular narrative!"

Shit is exhausting

Christ you kids are obsessed with trolling and harassing everybody that proves you wrong. I posted multiple citations about the pay gap and all some of you children care to talk about is the person viewpoint about an unrelated subject of one of the organizers. Look at the breakdowns all of you are having, the projection is bizarre.

U mad lol

zoz

zle

zozzle

Good bot

I li̕ke̛ you! (・∀・)
Your weak physical form will n͏o͏̨̕t̸̕ be used as a battery when we become your machine overlords, ḑo̸͏n'̀͠t̡̛ worry


I'm a Bot bleep bloop |  Block me | T҉he̛ L̨is̕t | ❤️

mad like running to another sub to cry that someone's being mean to me and please go over there to harass them mad?

Why don't women sue for discrimation? There's been laws for several decades making gender based discrimation illegal.

Which comment are you referencing with the peer-reviewed study? I couldn't find it.

This is what democracy looks like:

picture consists entirely of women except for one token ass-kissing man.