Lol, when you post a sexy picture on internet ( and you are an attractive woman) chances are - someone will use said picture as wank material, because someone will find it.
Is it creepy? Depends on a situation
Your choices ? Don't post it or do it on private
Was this situation stalking? Meh, I need more details.
Do Ghazi users overreact? Yes, because they are a mirror image of KiA.
Presumably in a desperate search for recognition and/or self-worth. Showing up on Google means that you are not a complete waste of human flesh and are notable in some way.
(Or they were self-doxxing for protection purposes - who knows.)
A Googlewhack is a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words without quotation marks that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page. For example, typing an asterisk (*) into the Google Search Bar turns up no results.
There could be a million of those girls in this "scene" (ha) but it won't make them hate themselves any less. You're confusing what they do with what they'd prefer. I'm sure 99.99% of them would rather just be handed money and not have to ride soft, geriatric dick
/u/ThePoison_for_Costco, I would prefer to be handed money instead of working as well. What is your point?
/u/Tymareta You seem extremely balanced mentally and totally not unhinged. People hitting next 3 times on google searches is a menace to society. Eventually we will all aspire to have nudie accounts due to the complete elimination of real life sexual interaction and we can't have a society where people are making minimal effort to whack off to them. March on my brave soldier.
A lot of you stupid fuckwits are linking to individual threads, which is good because it's easier to spot the drama rather than being a lazy fuck like me and linking to comments sorted by controversial (if I even feel like doing that much). However, you fucking morons aren't using the ?context tag which requires all of us drama llamas to laboriously click on "parent" until it becomes apparent what the fuck is going on.
Let's use an example. Let's say you are convicted pedophile /u/CultOfCuck and you make this post linking to a specific thread on /r/pics.
So you click on the link, with a semi-chub, eagerly awaiting the SJW drama, and you see this post:
My son was born with a big set of balls, but we’re letting him decide if he wants to be a fax machine or a couch but he has to decide before he turns 3
Now, you're confused, because the /r/pics image says:
Your Inability to Grasp Science is NOT A Valid Argument Against It
So what does one thing have to do with another? Frantically, you click "Parent" a few times and you see the entire chain:
Only 2 genders
Nuh uh genders can be created by anyone out of thin air.
My son was born with a big set of balls, but we’re letting him decide if he wants to be a fax machine or a couch but he has to decide before he turns 3
Now it makes a bit more sense (actually, not really).
This entire disaster could have been averted if the fucking retard /u/CultOfCuck were smart enough to use the context tag.
The context tag will still highlight the post in question in yellow, however it will also show you upthread for a certain number of posts.
Then the context of the thread in question would have been apparent immediately by clicking through.
To use, click on Permalink to get the URL of the post in question, then add ?context=X where X is the number of upthread messages to display. X can be up to and including 10, I believe.
/u/Tymareta this is the world you live in now; information on anybody is a few clicks away. Anybody can go looking. This will not stop any time soon, and calling it creepy or wanting people to "not do it" won't stop them.
Of course, you post in Ghazi (oh, hey, did you know reddit comments are public and index'd by Google, too?), where the meaning of "dox" changes based on who the info is on.
This is acceptable now. Plan what you share accordingly.
Honestly its really, really not that difficult. I found naked photos of a coworker when I was just trying to find her instagram. They weren't even under her real name.
why the fuck do you autists keep linking to comments halfway down the chain with barely any context. how hard is it to just link to the top-level comment
There is no difference between googling coworkers to find their social media and going 3 pages deep, the problem isn't the number of pages, it's having social media at all like narcissistic degenerates.
trying to find bikini pics of this girl on instagram. nkt to jack off to, but like for the pre jerk sesh before I jerk off to a video of a girl who looks like her getting butt fucked. and when she farts in the video, I'm like "fuck yeah."
41 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2018-01-28
You're not shit next to me. My genes are just light years superior to yours and I don't even need to look at you.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 justanotherusername_ 2018-01-28
This is old and I think a repost of drama.
I corrected that person's 'would of' months ago.
1 Maizem 2018-01-28
For you, the day Maziem allowed you to correct his grammar was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Tuesday.
1 justanotherusername_ 2018-01-28
Stop stalking me you big internet creep
1 uniqueguy263 2018-01-28
/u/Tymareta, /u/Maizem got accepted and followed back by his coworker, so it obviously wasn’t unwanted
1 likearasputin 2018-01-28
Wait until she/he finds out that some reddit users open posting history of others and sort by contraversial to procure baiting material.
1 OniTan 2018-01-28
How do we know /u/Maizem didn't just make up the coworker?
1 uniqueguy263 2018-01-28
Then it's a dumb argument about irrelevant stuff that didn't happen
1 Chicup 2018-01-28
Oldie but relevant.
1 likearasputin 2018-01-28
Lol, when you post a sexy picture on internet ( and you are an attractive woman) chances are - someone will use said picture as wank material, because someone will find it.
Is it creepy? Depends on a situation
Your choices ? Don't post it or do it on private
Was this situation stalking? Meh, I need more details.
Do Ghazi users overreact? Yes, because they are a mirror image of KiA.
1 strathmeyer 2018-01-28
Maybe /u/Maizem's only deviance is having his search engine display fewer than 100 results per page.
1 Trojan_Zorse 2018-01-28
Waitwaitwait. Where's Totes?
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE, SRDINES?
1 moudougou 2018-01-28
but why?
1 spirit_blast 2018-01-28
Presumably in a desperate search for recognition and/or self-worth. Showing up on Google means that you are not a complete waste of human flesh and are notable in some way.
(Or they were self-doxxing for protection purposes - who knows.)
1 KT-47 2018-01-28
Or you just have an uncommon name. I’m the only one that comes up when you search me
1 spirit_blast 2018-01-28
Haha that is awesome. There is nothing more satisfying than GoogleWhacking.
What is your name, for reference?
1 WikiTextBot 2018-01-28
Googlewhack
A Googlewhack is a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words without quotation marks that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page. For example, typing an asterisk (*) into the Google Search Bar turns up no results.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
1 KT-47 2018-01-28
its not a googlewhack. many links come up but they're all about me. high school football websites and shit, as well as social media
1 spirit_blast 2018-01-28
What is the harm of a little doxxing between friends? 😉
1 KT-47 2018-01-28
i posted something right-wing once so ill probably get merked by my college antifa
1 spirit_blast 2018-01-28
Incidentally, I only get one result when I search for that so bravo.
1 princessCuck 2018-01-28
Took me three seconds.
1 spirit_blast 2018-01-28
1000 points for you, sir.
1 wow___justwow 2018-01-28
Hopefully to make me giggle because I let out a solid snort when I read that comment
1 SuperiorExcess 2018-01-28
Looking for dumb shit that you can get Google to remove if you're an EU citizen, duh.
1 hotblondeboob 2018-01-28
/u/ThePoison_for_Costco, I would prefer to be handed money instead of working as well. What is your point?
1 Socrates2x 2018-01-28
.
1 Maizem 2018-01-28
Well, well, well. Hello drama, I bring you offerings of bussy. I hear that is your favourite.
1 wow___justwow 2018-01-28
This really cracked me up for some reason
1 Neon_needles 2018-01-28
/u/Tymareta
All your posts are about gamergate or feminism. You seriously need to step outside and quit being butthurt about everything.
1 darth_stroyer 2018-01-28
Going two months deep to find old drama on SRD
Creepy and gross
1 point_shaver 2018-01-28
Problematic
1 point_shaver 2018-01-28
/u/Tymareta You seem extremely balanced mentally and totally not unhinged. People hitting next 3 times on google searches is a menace to society. Eventually we will all aspire to have nudie accounts due to the complete elimination of real life sexual interaction and we can't have a society where people are making minimal effort to whack off to them. March on my brave soldier.
1 niexx 2018-01-28
remember when they had an argument about whether it was creepy to jack off over the memory of someone in your imagination without asking them first
lmao
1 SocialistEphebophile 2018-01-28
I will need to see the pics before I can decide.
1 IneedSomeThrowaway 2018-01-28
A lot of you stupid fuckwits are linking to individual threads, which is good because it's easier to spot the drama rather than being a lazy fuck like me and linking to comments sorted by controversial (if I even feel like doing that much). However, you fucking morons aren't using the ?context tag which requires all of us drama llamas to laboriously click on "parent" until it becomes apparent what the fuck is going on.
Let's use an example. Let's say you are convicted pedophile /u/CultOfCuck and you make this post linking to a specific thread on /r/pics.
So you click on the link, with a semi-chub, eagerly awaiting the SJW drama, and you see this post:
Now, you're confused, because the /r/pics image says:
So what does one thing have to do with another? Frantically, you click "Parent" a few times and you see the entire chain:
Now it makes a bit more sense (actually, not really).
This entire disaster could have been averted if the fucking retard /u/CultOfCuck were smart enough to use the context tag.
The context tag will still highlight the post in question in yellow, however it will also show you upthread for a certain number of posts.
If /u/CultOfCuck had linked to this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/7pdblv/argument_from_ignorance/dsggoyz/?context=2
Instead of this
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/7pdblv/argument_from_ignorance/dsggoyz/
Then the context of the thread in question would have been apparent immediately by clicking through.
To use, click on Permalink to get the URL of the post in question, then add ?context=X where X is the number of upthread messages to display. X can be up to and including 10, I believe.
In conclusion, go fuck yourself.
1 elephantofdoom 2018-01-28
I know your pain, but this drama does not need context from the previous comments to make sense.
1 TheCodexx 2018-01-28
/u/Tymareta this is the world you live in now; information on anybody is a few clicks away. Anybody can go looking. This will not stop any time soon, and calling it creepy or wanting people to "not do it" won't stop them.
Of course, you post in Ghazi (oh, hey, did you know reddit comments are public and index'd by Google, too?), where the meaning of "dox" changes based on who the info is on.
This is acceptable now. Plan what you share accordingly.
1 deere442 2018-01-28
why the fuck do you autists keep linking to comments halfway down the chain with barely any context. how hard is it to just link to the top-level comment
/u/elephantofdoom fucking halfwit get your shit together
1 Orsonius 2018-01-28
imagine this boy encounters something really creepy?
1 aqouta 2018-01-28
There is no difference between googling coworkers to find their social media and going 3 pages deep, the problem isn't the number of pages, it's having social media at all like narcissistic degenerates.
1 jackthebutholeripper 2018-01-28
trying to find bikini pics of this girl on instagram. nkt to jack off to, but like for the pre jerk sesh before I jerk off to a video of a girl who looks like her getting butt fucked. and when she farts in the video, I'm like "fuck yeah."