Your condescending, contradictory bullshit isn't attractive to anyone except your frothing, basement-dwelling, virgin army.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

*As for my part, I don't find the present anus photo objectional or abnormal. My issues are (1) it's so hairy that the actual anus isn't very visible,

Body shaming!

*(2) It's a decidedly male-looking anus, so people are going to be tempted to put a shaved anus on there and call it "female" because this is what porn has conditioned them to think.

r/GenderCritical users on Wikipedia? https://i.imgur.com/Bvvfuto.gif

*The anus is neither male nor female... the anatomy is exactly the same, and some females have even hairier anuses than men.

Current Year 💪

*So I think if we had a slightly hairy anus, it would be both medically illustrative and gender-neutral.

Discriminatory against hairy anuses REEEEEEEEE 😡😡😡

The Crow 14:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

*I never said I found it strange. Firstly, I agree that a defecating anus is more vulgar than just an anus. I'm glad you can at least see that distinction.

Oddly arousing example. Thoughts /u/scatmunchies?

Do you mind if I post a picture of a gaping anus?

Of course not! Duh!!

Wikipedia banter never disappoints. 10/10 👌

All right, now who's the wise guy who decided to put "Anus, which uses P2P Caching..." Somebody expurgate that statement out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.152.179.197 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC). That’s my fucking favorite.

I have actually considered taking a photo of my own anus for the article (as far as I am aware, mine is pretty typical)

God, I love talk pages

Proto bussy posting!

I started laughing so hard reading that that I woke up my girlfriend and now she wants to have sex :(

Front hole or back?

This is /r/drama... I wouldn't expect any members to be dating much less a member of the opposite sex.

Shii left 4chan for this

Friendly reminder that Shii was banned from Something Awful for being a pedo.

Shii

that's a name i haven't heard in a long goddamn time - what ever happened to that dude?

Found this http://avery.morrow.name/

It does read like his writing.

Found this http://avery.morrow.name/

It does read like his writing.

Man. Internet idiots will argue about anything.

I don't think the old female anus was unsuitable; it was removed because it was unsourced. I'm not a fan of females, but cropped, that anus looks more useful than the male one we have now.

WOKE

I'm not a fan of females

NEET detected

WEEEOOOOOH white knight alert

How dare you accuse me of liking gussy.

While we're at it, why not put up an explicit picture of the anus expelling feces since this is its main function. That would surely be beyond valuable to the reader. And don't forget the "anal sex" page - there should be multiple pictures under anal sex: one of the anus before penetration, one with a penis penetrating the anus, and one of a gaping anus filled with semen. Of course, we should do this for both male and female anuses as to present a neutral POV.

I see no issue in this

This confuses me...surely wikipedia should be treated as a neutral frame of reference for what's universally considered normal? So many people getting in a tizzy saying "omg you can look at your own anus", but what if you have a multitude of external haemorrhoids? If your only frame of reference is your own haemorrhoid ridden sphincter then you are going to assume that everything is fine

Humanity was a mistake