What is it with conservatives always trying to dabble with intrigue & trickery (see Project Veritas and WaPo) and always coming out looking like even bigger mooks?
You could try reading the article fam. Colton originally wrote this question CNN was okay with, and then his dad came back with this giant manifesto he wanted him to read instead. The manifesto was too long and CNN was like "stick to your original shit."
Like this is all the article talks about. How is it possible to have reading comprehension THIS bad?
Ok, in one version, it's clear CNN is telling him to stick to X question that he submitted. The other version is CNN saying stick to the question. In one version, a person could say CNN was telling him what to ask. In the other version, CNN is telling him to stick to X question that he wanted to ask. I mean, unless the family's internet provider charges by the letter, there is no reason for someone to condense/edit a ~3 sentence email unless they want to change the meaning. Especially if that email is supposedly evidence of another's wrong doing. Super sketchy.
there is no reason for someone to condense/edit a ~3 sentence email unless they want to change the meaning. Especially if that email is supposedly evidence of another's wrong doing. Super sketchy.
Well let’s go over just CNN because there’s some really juicy stuff
In 2003 they covered a story about the upcoming expiration of the assaults weapons ban by demonstrating fully automatic weapons. After the expiration fully automatic weapons were still illegal. Then it all came tumbling down in 2016 after they openly started shilling for Hilary while giving Bernie practically no airtime. CNN also passed Hilary questions before a CNN-hosted debate in October 2016. Then Chris Cuomu stated that possessing the leaked emails was illegal, that statement being bother retarded and false. Then they ran multiple hours of coverage when the Trump dossier “The Piss Document” was released on Jan 10, 2017. The same dossier bought and paid for by the Hillary Campaign. Then CNN printed the false Scarramuchi story (June 26, 2017) after which 3 people resigned. November 6, 2017 CNN uses a cherry-picked quote to headline a story about Japanese automakers investing in America. Also closely followed after that they fucked up a story that falsely portrayed Trump as having had early access to Wikileaks information.
Going back to 2016 we have the deliberate misquoting of Sherelle Smith during the Milwaukee riots. I mean I’m not even going into heavy detail about the multiple changes to their online articles and them not printing retractions for those either. I could do this for any of the other news outlets but CNN is by far the worst offender. When you are a news outlet that isn’t afraid of blackmailing people to get apologies it’s time to take a look at how you operate your business.
So I'm supposed to the work for you, dude? Just admit you have no evidence and move on with your life. It's not like you had a chance of convincing me anyway.
Yeah those links to the actual sources is what I was trying to get you to look at. If you were any more intellectually impaired I’m afraid you wouldn’t be able to function daily. Do some reading, think for yourself and try to act like an independent/free-thinking person.
Yeah those links to the actual sources is what I was trying to get you to look at. If you were any more intellectually impaired I’m afraid you wouldn’t be able to function daily. Do some reading, think for yourself and try to act like an independent/free-thinking person.
Says guy who holds on to right-wing smearjob about CNN because they don't praise Daddy.
I am thinking for myself, BTW, but since I see right through your shilling, you "think" otherwise.
well they're all pretty much just dumbasses fucking up. there isn't so much as a Billo-style second take.
none of the listed incidents describe actual LIES (i.e. intentional falsehoods), unless Chris Cuomo KNEW it wasn't illegal to download illegally obtained documents when he said that live
I’m not any fucking friend of Trump’s. He’s a neocon hack, but what I do care about is an accurate and unbiased press. None of what can be said about the VAST majority of MSM outlets. So btfo, when you can’t defend it just stick a label on someone and try to write them off.
I’m not labeling you as a way to dismiss your argument. I’m labeling you as mentally deficient. I’m not a fucking republican and yet I’m accused of being a Republican shill for being angry at slanted/incorrect/reactionary journalism that dares to label itself as honest
Yeah, sure you are. Let's totally pretend that your shrill yelling at CNN (and not at, say, Fox News) is TOTALLY about "dishonest journalism".
FYI: Not buying your propaganda doesn't make any one "retarded", just as assuming so doesn't make you a medical doctor capable of making such a diagnosis.
anyone who gets angry at trump or trusts american media is below me and i make fun of them, nothing they say can ever affect me because its prob wrong like the other stuff they believe LOL
i just always found it weird like he could record whole uninterrupted sentences that are pretty incriminating but people would always claim he "edited" them somehow
like theres some way to justify saying the russia stuff was fake that doesnt actually mean it
All my STEM teachers were ex Korea vets and certified badasses. They could kill gooks 5 ways from Friday, and I'm sure that extends to modern 4chin kiddos too.
This was in the mid 1970s though... assume it hasn't changed much, we probably have hundreds of thousands of gulf war vets that could be recruited.
Really? You can't believe literal retards would believe that someone would hire tons of actors who might spill the beans rather than just do the shooting themselves?
Dunno, man — handing out edited versions of emails with people at a large media organization seems like some bullshit you’d get called out on pretty fast.
I only follow the patriarchal aspects of Islam. Not the aspects that make you a cuck e.g. Abstaining from womanising, penetrating a sweet trap virgin ass and lowering your gaze.
im not entirely sure about this whole shit tbh, there was a drill for that exact shooting scenario on the day it happened and everyone interviewed seems mad fake about it
126 comments
71 Matues49 2018-02-24
What is it with conservatives always trying to dabble with intrigue & trickery (see Project Veritas and WaPo) and always coming out looking like even bigger mooks?
46 parameciidae 2018-02-24
A lot of them just aren't very bright.
-2 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
how does that edit change anything?
3 parameciidae 2018-02-24
Wut? Oh, I see, you mean the edit the family made? Well, if it didn't change anything, why make the edit?
-1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
I have no idea.
What I wanna know is what does it change?
The meaning of the email is the same, with or without that part of the half-sentence, that they removed for whatever stupid reason.
5 ahbslldud 2018-02-24
It's the difference between
he needs to stick to what we wrote for him
and
he needs to stick with what he wrote for himself
ya dumbfuck
-1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
"That really was way too long."
this is the first sentence in both versions.
What else, besides Colton's own writing, could "it" refer to? What else could be "way too long"?
I read the first (the edited version) and the way I interpreted it is the same as I interpret the uncut version.
7 ahbslldud 2018-02-24
You could try reading the article fam. Colton originally wrote this question CNN was okay with, and then his dad came back with this giant manifesto he wanted him to read instead. The manifesto was too long and CNN was like "stick to your original shit."
Like this is all the article talks about. How is it possible to have reading comprehension THIS bad?
1 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2018-02-24
This is your brain on Daddies cummies
-1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
Yeah.
That's what the edited email says.
Same thing as what the unedited email says.
5 ahbslldud 2018-02-24
No, the unedited email specifies that Colton is being asked to stick with his own writing instead of CNNs. Like I said like two comments ago.
2 parameciidae 2018-02-24
Ok, in one version, it's clear CNN is telling him to stick to X question that he submitted. The other version is CNN saying stick to the question. In one version, a person could say CNN was telling him what to ask. In the other version, CNN is telling him to stick to X question that he wanted to ask. I mean, unless the family's internet provider charges by the letter, there is no reason for someone to condense/edit a ~3 sentence email unless they want to change the meaning. Especially if that email is supposedly evidence of another's wrong doing. Super sketchy.
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
Oh ok.
definitely
3 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
case in point
30 zergling_Lester 2018-02-24
They believe their own stuff about lying media and think that it's easy to do and won't backfire.
-1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
You know apart from the multiple times they’ve been shown to lie and push an agenda
2 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
I would love to see some evidence of that.
-1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
Well let’s go over just CNN because there’s some really juicy stuff In 2003 they covered a story about the upcoming expiration of the assaults weapons ban by demonstrating fully automatic weapons. After the expiration fully automatic weapons were still illegal. Then it all came tumbling down in 2016 after they openly started shilling for Hilary while giving Bernie practically no airtime. CNN also passed Hilary questions before a CNN-hosted debate in October 2016. Then Chris Cuomu stated that possessing the leaked emails was illegal, that statement being bother retarded and false. Then they ran multiple hours of coverage when the Trump dossier “The Piss Document” was released on Jan 10, 2017. The same dossier bought and paid for by the Hillary Campaign. Then CNN printed the false Scarramuchi story (June 26, 2017) after which 3 people resigned. November 6, 2017 CNN uses a cherry-picked quote to headline a story about Japanese automakers investing in America. Also closely followed after that they fucked up a story that falsely portrayed Trump as having had early access to Wikileaks information. Going back to 2016 we have the deliberate misquoting of Sherelle Smith during the Milwaukee riots. I mean I’m not even going into heavy detail about the multiple changes to their online articles and them not printing retractions for those either. I could do this for any of the other news outlets but CNN is by far the worst offender. When you are a news outlet that isn’t afraid of blackmailing people to get apologies it’s time to take a look at how you operate your business.
7 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
So you got nothing, 'cause I ain't seeing links.
2 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
Seriously just goggle list of CNN mistakes/scandals and retractions you lazy retard
4 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
So I'm supposed to the work for you, dude? Just admit you have no evidence and move on with your life. It's not like you had a chance of convincing me anyway.
2 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies#Allegations_of_bias
Looook at that, nice and simple. Formatted easily and with linked sources too. It only took me maybe 3 minutes of googling and some clicks.
3 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
wait, it took you 3 minutes to find the wikipedia page
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
Three minutes to browse through it and to check out some of the sources. Don’t be daft
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
you said that time was spent GOOGLING though
2 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
So, nothing. You lose, little boy.
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
Yeah those links to the actual sources is what I was trying to get you to look at. If you were any more intellectually impaired I’m afraid you wouldn’t be able to function daily. Do some reading, think for yourself and try to act like an independent/free-thinking person.
3 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
Says guy who holds on to right-wing smearjob about CNN because they don't praise Daddy.
I am thinking for myself, BTW, but since I see right through your shilling, you "think" otherwise.
Grow up.
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
honestly i’d just click the links at this point and explain why they don’t mean anything, but if it ain’t broke
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
I’d love you to actually try to explain it all away
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
well they're all pretty much just dumbasses fucking up. there isn't so much as a Billo-style second take.
none of the listed incidents describe actual LIES (i.e. intentional falsehoods), unless Chris Cuomo KNEW it wasn't illegal to download illegally obtained documents when he said that live
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
I’m not any fucking friend of Trump’s. He’s a neocon hack, but what I do care about is an accurate and unbiased press. None of what can be said about the VAST majority of MSM outlets. So btfo, when you can’t defend it just stick a label on someone and try to write them off.
1 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
Like what you're doing? And I don't think you have any problem with bias. You just have a problem with biases you don't hold.
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
I haven’t applied any label to you other than retard
1 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
So you do admit it then?
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
I’m not labeling you as a way to dismiss your argument. I’m labeling you as mentally deficient. I’m not a fucking republican and yet I’m accused of being a Republican shill for being angry at slanted/incorrect/reactionary journalism that dares to label itself as honest
1 AlohaWarrior34 2018-02-24
Yeah, sure you are. Let's totally pretend that your shrill yelling at CNN (and not at, say, Fox News) is TOTALLY about "dishonest journalism".
FYI: Not buying your propaganda doesn't make any one "retarded", just as assuming so doesn't make you a medical doctor capable of making such a diagnosis.
1 ModeratorAbuseSucks 2018-02-24
Dude fuck Fox, I can list just as many bullshit assumptions/half-truths/etc for them as well.
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
lol
2 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
hey, mistakes, scandals and retractions aren’t the same as LIES
1 doughboy011 2018-02-24
To be fair it was more Democrats get retarded and shit themselves whenever guns are mentioned so it is more ignorance than intentional malice.
19 Hemingwavy 2018-02-24
They're fundamentally honest people. Just kidding. They think given they'll swallow anything, other people are the same.
Apart from Alex Jones. That man speaks the truth.
15 PM_ME_FREE_FOOD 2018-02-24
It's because Conservatives are low IQ rural retards
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
the 30% low IQ welfare monstrosities in rural areas still vote liberals.
5 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
hookworms.php
1 doughboy011 2018-02-24
REEEEEE
10 nanonan 2018-02-24
Are you seriously not believing a school shooting survivor you heartless monster?
7 youcanteatbullets 2018-02-24
B E L I E V E T H E V I C T I M
2 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
THOSE TEENS' CLOUT ON GUN CONTROL IS INSANE
4 WinterTeaching 2018-02-24
Americans are idiots, why waste any effort to fool them?
-18 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
omg deceptive editing
34 allendrio 2018-02-24
nigga i just saw you doing damage control in /r/quityourbullshit sit down and take your spankings
5 cheeZetoastee 2018-02-24
You've got your panties in a bunch over this. Instead of dying on stupid hills, how about you suggest that Team Daddy try to lie less often?
0 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
he doesnt though, people are just butthurt
james o keefe has done more good for journalism with project veritas than cnn has ever done LOL
1 cheeZetoastee 2018-02-24
Imagine being this retarded
1 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
anyone who gets angry at trump or trusts american media is below me and i make fun of them, nothing they say can ever affect me because its prob wrong like the other stuff they believe LOL
2 cheeZetoastee 2018-02-24
Show me where the deep state touched you
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
srsly though, i think they tend to go more for the “out of context” strategy instead of literally shopping documents
1 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
i just always found it weird like he could record whole uninterrupted sentences that are pretty incriminating but people would always claim he "edited" them somehow
like theres some way to justify saying the russia stuff was fake that doesnt actually mean it
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
wait are you talking about james carveritas
50 respaaaaaj 2018-02-24
Does this make that kid and his dad crisis actors?
22 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
""THEY"" are REAL!!
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
how the 1970s successfully prevented school shootings
how Israel prevents school shootings
3 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
Very cool story!
2 Ardvarkeating101 2018-02-24
Bitch they didn't show up in 1970's
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
exactly.
because they knew the
roof koreansteachers and students were waiting for them.1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-02-24
Or it was a fake threat in the first place? Or it's just a bunch of text on a picture about something that never happened?
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
there is no such thing as a fake threat.
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-02-24
"I am secretly Hitler ready for round 2".
???
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
:O OMG I hope the FBI gets to you in time. Leave the Chosen People alone!
1 Terry_Samuel 2018-02-24
democrats using reverse psychology
0 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
how does that edit change anything?
46 nathan_barely 2018-02-24
kid faked the CNN email bc butthurt they wouldn't let him soapbox for arming teachers
32 bareballzthebitch 2018-02-24
The obvious answer for guns in schools is more guns.
17 Ardvarkeating101 2018-02-24
And prayers
6 Greatmambojambo 2018-02-24
The obvious solution is a super soaker with holy water
10 OniTan 2018-02-24
-1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-24
No one is suggesting arming the lib arts degenerates. But the STEM and gym teachers? Hell yeah!!
15 Sesek3 2018-02-24
Lol @ thinking some super skinny/fat nerd chem teacher is going to hold onto the gun any easier
0 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-24
All my STEM teachers were ex Korea vets and certified badasses. They could kill gooks 5 ways from Friday, and I'm sure that extends to modern 4chin kiddos too.
This was in the mid 1970s though... assume it hasn't changed much, we probably have hundreds of thousands of gulf war vets that could be recruited.
18 Sesek3 2018-02-24
I don't want some grandpa with ptsd to have a gun in a school lol
0 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-24
Okay kiddo that grandpa could likely kick your ass
10 uniqueguy263 2018-02-24
I don’t think you get the concept of PTSD, or why giving guns to people with PTSD is a bad idea
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-02-24
/ #RespectYourElders
4 444455555666666 2018-02-24
is this like a gimmick cringe account
1 OniTan 2018-02-24
Everyone on this subreddit is a gimmick cringe account.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-24
Well banning them didn't work. Sitting duck zones only get more people killed
1 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
IT'S WORKING IN ISRAEL
1 Ardvarkeating101 2018-02-24
It is????
Bullshit! They need to arm the teachers with AA guns to shoot down the incoming rockets!
0 ProgressiveFragility 2018-02-24
No, according to CNN he cut half a relative sentence of that e-mail. you should have read the article lol but #yolo
how does that edit change anything?
1 DannyLee90 2018-02-24
Because that part means that the kid is the one who came up with it, not CNN.
39 PussMonster_ 2018-02-24
I can't believe crisis actors is a mainstream, actually accepted conspiracy theory now
19 MegaSeedsInYourBum 2018-02-24
Really? You can't believe literal retards would believe that someone would hire tons of actors who might spill the beans rather than just do the shooting themselves?
-9 eva_unit_hung 2018-02-24
i bet (((you))) can't
15 Voltar134 2018-02-24
Eva fuck off you retard.
1 eva_unit_hung 2018-02-24
no u
4 Voltar134 2018-02-24
Seriously even ed could come up with a better comeback.
1 eva_unit_hung 2018-02-24
nobelium uranium
6 Voltar134 2018-02-24
AuTiSTiC
1 doughboy011 2018-02-24
MASTA PIECE 😘
19 scatmunchies 2018-02-24
Dunno, man — handing out edited versions of emails with people at a large media organization seems like some bullshit you’d get called out on pretty fast.
8 youcanteatbullets 2018-02-24
Only among people who actually listen to fake lying CNN. The only people that matter are daddys acolytes and they'll buy his bullshit.
8 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
IT’S
ALL
HAPPENING
3 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
/u/TheReasonTrumpWon
7 rhiehn 2018-02-24
Tbh you disappointed me with that title. I thought there was going to be Alex Jones.
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
there will be
there. will be.
6 SoberProfessionally 2018-02-24
American conservatives 🤣
3 SnapshillBot 2018-02-24
I only follow the patriarchal aspects of Islam. Not the aspects that make you a cuck e.g. Abstaining from womanising, penetrating a sweet trap virgin ass and lowering your gaze.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
2 ahbslldud 2018-02-24
I like that this dumbfuck tryna pull one over on a major news organization but he's so fucking stupid he can't even edit metadata.
2 kane4life4ever 2018-02-24
post bussy we must
1 [deleted] 2018-02-24
[deleted]
-14 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
lol believing cnn
31 Rith2 2018-02-24
🤔
8 automatic_cuck 2018-02-24
🐸👌
-13 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
i deliberately never installed emojis because theyre for fags LOL
posting squares at me and shit
18 Rith2 2018-02-24
👌
11 Ranilen 2018-02-24
🍆🍑
6 automatic_cuck 2018-02-24
💦💦💦😋
4 uniqueguy263 2018-02-24
Installed emojis? What r u even using
2 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
i assumed you had to because theyve always been squares
1 doughboy011 2018-02-24
Only us autists get the privilege to see them, normie 😎
1 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
are you saying im not autistic
please consider your words carefully
1 kjmiller7 2018-02-24
🍆💦🍆💦😘😘😘
1 doughboy011 2018-02-24
👈👁️👃👁️👂 👄
2 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
lol believing some kid
1 captainpriapism 2018-02-24
im not entirely sure about this whole shit tbh, there was a drill for that exact shooting scenario on the day it happened and everyone interviewed seems mad fake about it
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-24
🤔
🤔
🤔
🤔
🤔