Ancaps argue with socialists about the right to sell children into slavery. Bonus comparison between child slavery and NFL contracts

9  2018-02-28 by Deity_Of_Darkness

5 comments

Providing a Community Safe from TITrCJ's Sexual Advances Since October 2015.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp*, removeddit.com, archive.is*

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

ancaps

Unironically debating Meme ideologies lol

But if the example of what hath been done be the rule of what ought to be, history would have furnished our author with instances of this absolute fatherly power in its height and perfection, and he might have showed us in Peru people that begot children on purpose to fatten and eat them. The story is so remarkable, that I cannot but set it down in the author’s words: “In some provinces, says he, they were so liquorish after man’s flesh, that they would not have the patience to stay till the breath was out of the body, but would suck the blood as it ran from the wounds of the dying man; they had public shambles of man’s flesh, and their madness herein was to that degree, that they spared not their own children, which they had begot on strangers taken in war: for they made their captives their mistresses, and choicely nourished the children they lead by them, till about thirteen years old they butchered and eat them; and they served the mothers after the same fashion, when they grew past child-bearing, and ceased to bring them any more roasters.” Garcilasso de la Vega, Hist. des Yncas de Peru, 1. i. . 12.

-- cited by John Locke

He was trying to win an argument about absolute monarchy and the point of it is actually not that it's okay to eat your own children. Sometimes I worry that internet children may not fully understand all the nuances of these things.

Dumb monkeys argue with even dumber monkeys that want child slaves.

I think at this point Ancaps only say dumb shit like this because it is expected from them. (Not that Socialists are better)