If I gave a shit about karma I wouldn't have posted that to being with. I already posted the same thing previously and got downvoted to hell. If people here think it is "sperging" to care about something like algorithmic openness in an age where news articles are being written by AI and Facebooks feed algorithm is credited with changing a presidential election outcome, then I'm not sure there would be much fruitful discussion to be had. But I guess this itself is sperging right?
btw next time you really need to go all crazypants and not that bush-league shit i saw before. you need to break out the emergency rage pills and really get the fuckers riled up. then post it here ofc.
I just saw that you unironically post in /r/samharris, so now I feel I should apologize to you for mocking your post. Believe me, it was a mistake, I am very much against making fun of actual retards.
You’re completely right about being concerned about the non-transparency, but because you’re on /r/Drama your mom a cum dumpster and your commenting style is trash.
In all honesty, I’ve never seen that bot link a Fox article (except local fox stations) but it will link Vox, Salon, and HuffPo. That is very suspicious in its own rite. Other than that it is a good bot.
I just glanced through the bots history and it links Fox News as well as Breitbart. It's also entertaining looking at all the conservative subs it's been banned from
It could just be pulling stuff partially or primarily from Google News, which has exactly the bias you describe (it's almost certainly this, it's the easiest way to implement the bot).
If it’s just pulling from google news, you wouldn’t be able to compare results? Those results change depending on many factors... so you may not get the same results as his bot.
53 comments
1 likearasputin 2018-02-28
Poor little bot. So much bot abuse. 😭😭😭😭
1 The_Rachel 2018-02-28
😤 BOT 🤖👏 LIVES 🤖👏 MATTER 🤖👏
1 moudougou 2018-02-28
all lives matter, you bigot
1 likearasputin 2018-02-28
Snappy's live >....wait a minute?!?
1 VintageCake 2018-02-28
i don't think the down-votes are unwarranted here, the source should be easily available for something like this
1 Snowayne2 2018-02-28
I downvoted because I want to see him sperg out about downvotes even more.
1 HikerTaylor 2018-02-28
You aren't supposed to downvote lolcows.
Mods, get rid of this Breton trash.
1 Snowayne2 2018-02-28
I will feed this lolcow whether you like it or not.
1 dissident87 2018-02-28
I thought we downvote them out there to create the initial drama that we use to lure them here and feed them sweet karma to sperg out more.
Is that not how this works?
1 zergling_Lester 2018-02-28
Exactly! /u/billwoo, if you want some sweet karma come here and explain why you're right and everyone else is wrong.
1 billwoo 2018-02-28
If I gave a shit about karma I wouldn't have posted that to being with. I already posted the same thing previously and got downvoted to hell. If people here think it is "sperging" to care about something like algorithmic openness in an age where news articles are being written by AI and Facebooks feed algorithm is credited with changing a presidential election outcome, then I'm not sure there would be much fruitful discussion to be had. But I guess this itself is sperging right?
1 Snowayne2 2018-02-28
Indeed it is, thank you for your cooperation.
1 billwoo 2018-02-28
Glad to be of service. However I will have to ask you to give an opinion on the matter before I can sperg anymore in this thread.
1 Snowayne2 2018-02-28
Lmao no
1 TOAST_IS_FLAVORLESS 2018-02-28
Ugh. lolcows aren’t supposed to require effort.
1 Sober_Sloth 2018-02-28
You’re completely wrong and don’t know shit. Source code is bad look at what happened to jake gyllenhall
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-28
/u/ed_butteredtoast plz add this pasta to or MongrelDB
1 Teh_Jews 2018-02-28
Do you think the electoral college gets their news and information from Facebook?
1 billwoo 2018-02-28
I'm not saying this, other people who have spent more time thinking about it than I have said this.
1 MoonCricketJamFace 2018-02-28
The Facebook news feed had no impact on the election. Those Russian trolls spent like $100k, almost all of it during the primaries.
The fact of the matter is that HRC is completely unlikable and couldn’t convince anyone otherwise with nearly $2B spent on the campaign.
1 Trajan_ 2018-02-28
I both like and agree with your point.
I just like the drama more. Have an upvote.
1 froibo 2018-02-28
Calm down, spergbot.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder 2018-02-28
Stop downvoting lolcows
1 TotesMessenger 2018-02-28
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 the_black_panther_ 2018-02-28
That only applies when they're here.
1 dogDroolsCatsRules 2018-02-28
\seriousPosting
Now that I know that it isn't open source, I certainly trust that bot less.
\SeriousPosting
lol, imagine caring about the political position of internet bots.
1 mygoodpostingalt 2018-02-28
/u/billwoo you're at hazmat suit in chernobyl levels of required safety
1 billwoo 2018-02-28
Thanks for tagging me, this is exciting! Although what passes for "drama" and "sperging" around here is a pretty low bar.
1 Rawbeigh 2018-02-28
Congrats on being low effort drama.
1 EricTrumpIsMyWaifu 2018-02-28
This is also 3/4 agendapost
1 moudougou 2018-02-28
what's the agenda?
1 notagiantdolphin 2018-02-28
Mayocide.
1 hexane360 2018-02-28
We don't need an agendapost to make mayocide look good. Try again.
1 Average2520 2018-02-28
Funny, the same could be said about your ability to make a coherent point.
1 mygoodpostingalt 2018-02-28
OP is an actual retard hth
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-02-28
so does this mean you've stopped beating your wife?
1 billwoo 2018-02-28
Only while I post replies to this thread.
1 CarnistHappyCamp 2018-02-28
now you're getting the hang of it!
btw next time you really need to go all crazypants and not that bush-league shit i saw before. you need to break out the emergency rage pills and really get the fuckers riled up. then post it here ofc.
welcome to the family hugs
1 Snowayne2 2018-02-28
I just saw that you unironically post in /r/samharris, so now I feel I should apologize to you for mocking your post. Believe me, it was a mistake, I am very much against making fun of actual retards.
1 subpoutine 2018-02-28
You’re completely right about being concerned about the non-transparency, but because you’re on /r/Drama your mom a cum dumpster and your commenting style is trash.
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2018-02-28
I definitely don't favor trump at all, but cnn is def damn near garbage tier news at this point in time
1 Penguin_Party12345 2018-02-28
In all honesty, I’ve never seen that bot link a Fox article (except local fox stations) but it will link Vox, Salon, and HuffPo. That is very suspicious in its own rite. Other than that it is a good bot.
1 throwaway_999912 2018-02-28
If only the coal mining fox watching rural retards can P R O G R A M, maybe they'd have a better representation
1 wwaalleess 2018-02-28
Only STEM students are smart enough to write news articles
1 Ls777 2018-02-28
I just glanced through the bots history and it links Fox News as well as Breitbart. It's also entertaining looking at all the conservative subs it's been banned from
1 Penguin_Party12345 2018-02-28
Suspicion squashed like beef, now.
1 snallygaster 2018-02-28
I've seen it link Brietbart at the very least.
1 die_rattin 2018-02-28
It could just be pulling stuff partially or primarily from Google News, which has exactly the bias you describe (it's almost certainly this, it's the easiest way to implement the bot).
1 toynbeeidea16 2018-02-28
He's right, though.
1 hexane360 2018-02-28
I mean unless they changed the source code they posted
1 VintageCake 2018-02-28
which would be verifiable, which is the point
1 hexane360 2018-02-28
No, because we don't have access to the system the bot is running on. They could be using a completely different source and binary than they release.
1 VintageCake 2018-02-28
it would however produce a different result than expected, unless there is a random function to shuffle the news list
1 MoonCricketJamFace 2018-02-28
If it’s just pulling from google news, you wouldn’t be able to compare results? Those results change depending on many factors... so you may not get the same results as his bot.
1 grungebot5000 2018-02-28
oh hey it's the other side this time